Australia is acquiring 29 new-build AH-64E Apaches as part of the Army's Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter Replacement Project (Land 4501 Phase 1) to replace its existing 22 Airbus Helicopters Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopters. These in concert with the new Blackhawks means the Army has a functional air wing again.
It’s actually 6 Hunter class frigates and 8 SSN submarines, 3 SSN will be Virginia class SSN with an option to buy 2 more then Australia will build their own under the AUKUS arrangement and that will be 8 SSNs. Australian at the end of the year, will announce the contractor to supply an additional 11 light frigates/ corvettes
Thanks good summary. Australia has huge area of operations. Good recce, rapid mobility and significant strike capacity at range are needed as well as very capable ASW point and area air defence. More destroyers, P8s, Tritons, Ghost Bats long range strike aircraft clearly fit such requirements. There needs to be more focus on missiles. Area and point air defence (SAMs) for defence and long range missiles (ATACMs cruise missiles), glide bombs and artillery (eg. Ceasar) for the offence. Additionally, rear basing, dispersal and logistics, including munitions needs beefing up. The nuclear submarines unless armed with cruise missiles are a waste of money. Cruise missile capability would likely be better served through lower cost capabilities like Rapid Dragon.
Not in full swing though, we still operate our 59 M1A1 AIM Abrams tanks, not all 100 M1A2 Sep V3 variants have arrived in Australia yet, we ordered them years ago and only just started having them land in country 2-3 months ago with released photographs by Defence.
@beaverdam1199 where did you get 100 from, we're only getting 75. We are getting frames for them that we will use as breacher vehicles and such, but that's not the same.
While the Australian Defence Force (ADF) may appear to be a robust and technologically advanced military force, a closer examination reveals several areas where its capacity may be overstated. Let's highlight these limitations: 1. Limited Personnel for Comprehensive Defense Needs: Despite a relatively large budget against tax earnings, the ADF’s manpower is relatively modest for a country with such a vast landmass, extensive coastline, and large exclusive economic zone (EEZ) to patrol. With 57,346 full-time personnel and 32,049 reservists, the ADF lacks the personnel depth to sustain prolonged, large-scale operations or defend against simultaneous threats across multiple fronts. Many modern military actions require rapid deployments, continuous rotations, and enduring support, which the current personnel levels struggle to fulfil without high operational strain. As such, the northern sector of Australia is vulnerable to attack. 2. Reliance on Allies, Especially the United States: Australia's defence strategy relies heavily on partnerships, notably with the United States, for force projection and deterrence against regional threats. This reliance exposes Australia to strategic vulnerabilities, as it means that in high-stakes conflicts-especially those in which the U.S. is not directly involved-the ADF could face severe constraints. This dependency on foreign alliances also leaves Australia vulnerable to shifts in foreign policy by allies, potentially compromising national security if support is withdrawn. 3. Logistical and Supply Chain Challenges: Although Australia is attempting progress in military procurement and Indigenous defence manufacturing, it remains dependent on international suppliers for critical systems, parts, and advanced technologies. In a high-intensity conflict, supply chains could be disrupted, leading to equipment shortages, maintenance challenges, and gaps in operational readiness. As a result, the ADF may be slower to mobilise or sustain missions compared to larger, self-sufficient militaries in Asia. A critical element is fuel reserves. 4. Geographical and Strategic Constraints: Australia's geographical isolation presents advantages and limitations. While the distance from potential threats can act as a deterrent, it also complicates rapid deployment and support for allied missions. In contrast to some regional militaries that can mobilise forces quickly within their zones of interest, the ADF faces long transit times for naval and air assets, limiting its ability to respond swiftly in crises, especially in the wider Indo-Pacific. The lack of true blue water aircraft carriers limits force projection. 5. Aging Equipment and Expensive Upgrades: Many of the ADF’s core assets are nearing the end of their service life or require costly upgrades to remain effective. For instance, the Collins-class submarines, although capable, are becoming outdated and will require significant investments to ensure their continued viability until replacements are ready. (30 years +) Similarly, modernising other assets to keep pace with rapid technological advancements in the region represents an ongoing and expensive challenge, especially as other nations continue to invest in advanced and more numerous equipment. 6. Budgetary Sustainability: Although Australia’s defence budget is considerable for a country of its size, defence spending is capped at around 2.04% of GDP, which may limit its ability to expand or modernise the ADF substantially in the long term. With defence costs-especially for cutting-edge technology and advanced platforms-increasing each year, maintaining the current operational readiness and capability level may strain national finances, potentially diverting funds from other critical areas. In summary, while the ADF is undoubtedly a capable and professional force, it operates under significant constraints that could limit its effectiveness in high-stakes or protracted regional conflicts. Its reliance on allies, logistical and personnel limitations, aging equipment, and budgetary constraints highlight Australia's challenges in maintaining a fully independent military capable of responding to all potential threats on its own terms. Australia was once considered fitted for but not with.
I hope you are correct about there being only 3 Hunters ordered ?? There were originally 9 ordered but they are fat, underguned, problematic and hugely over budget and behind schedule. We need 3 more (updated) Hobarts and a dozen corvettes, i.e. Navantia Tasman Class.
Just as long as we don't waste any more money on the Anzacs we're retiring, my father served onboard HMAS Hobart from 1990-1997 as a surface weapons officer, HMAS Hobart was a DDG builtin the 60s which served till the early 2000s, most of the Anzacs are 20 ish years old and are already being retired and phased out
Australia needs to have 12 Combat Brigades (6 Mechan., 2 Armored, 2 Cavalry and 2 Light). With 75 000 Personal (72 000 X 12). Army Equip. is 150 M1- A2 MB Tanks, 450 Boxer + 700 Red Back IFV, 1500 Bushrangers, 9500 Other Vehicles, 700 105 mm Guns, 150 155 mm Sp. / Guns, 1400 Morters 81 mm, 75 NASAM - 1, 150 Stigers - 1 (SAM), 75 Hawk - 1 ( SAM), 450 Helicopters. Plus 25 000 Reserve Personal. Plus 25 000 Air-Force Personal. With 72 F -33 A, 36 F/A - 18 F, 18 F/A -18 E, 36 A- 10 , 36 B 21, 36 C-130J, 12 C -27, 12 C-5C. Plus 25 000 Navy Personal . With 9 Hobart Class Destroyers, 9 Hunter Class Frigates, 9 Loss Angles Destroyers, 9 Arafura Class Corvettes, 18 Patrol Boats, 9 Mine Hunters, 9 Amphibian Landinging Ships, 36 LC -M, 18 LC -L, 3 Supply /Oilers, 9 Supply Ships, 3 LSD, 3 LSH, 3 Training Ships, 1 AirCraft Carriers, 9 Loss Angeles Sumbarines and 6 SNN Sumbarines. Plus 2 Missile Brigades (36 NASAM -1 and, 18 Anti ship Launches). Also 18 Ammunition Sites and 9 Oil Sites. Plus 150 Anti - Ship Missiles 3000 km /D. Then Australia will become a Super Power.
@@Official_gray_sprunki I'm not disputing that fact. We were very effective in Vietnam & other conflicts despite our outdated equipment. I guess we had to be.
@@cplbruiser8267 One example. The Raven Radio. They were refurbished Radios from Sweden when they replaced it with a new Radio. Australia brought them cheap & passed them off as brand-new latest gear. I used the Raven in the 80's. The SLR was old & Australia altered it for Australian standards. It wasn't as good as the original. Shall I keep going?
We never procure enough equipment for anything above niche or training. There is no depth in platforms, consumables or manpower. The is no stomach politically to have a force that could genuinely and reasonably protect Australia.
With the coming of the Armed Drones as used in Ukraine, Australia needs to take a serious look at these small armed drones. Training the Soldier could be a problem as these armed drones cost between $3000 to $20000. Losing a drone is a large expense. American Soldiers are being made to pay for any they damage. I hope the Australian Army doesn’t make a Soldier fill out an L&D report & have to pay. There are small drones, I have one costing under $100 that could be used for initial training. Getting the Soldier used to the Controller & using Video to fly the drone. Once the soldier is proficient in flying these small drones they then could move up to the Armed Drones. Start small first. I have seen the really tiny resonance drones & talked to the Soldiers who fly them. They tell me that the training does take some time & they are not cheap $6000, I believe. It’s just an idea.
What good is a tank if you can't transport it overseas. We need naval superiority and an aircraft carrier. Otherwise we are left with a local malitia and nothing else.
I love the ADF but It’s taken 20+ years for the Australian government to begin to modernise the ADF. Budget cuts, new governments have all contributed to the lack of foresight to plan. Lucky tech enhancements and large private investment by private companies has seen a surge in manufacturing in the last 10 years. If it wasn’t for the AUKUS agreement we wouldn’t have nuclear Subs. The F35s took a long time to develop and we now have almost a full fleet (still awaiting arrival of the last few) but even they’re now due for upgrades. The Offshore patrol vessels are plagued with setbacks and that was a failed project because our original Armidale class boats were a failure and undertasked to conduct border protection. Our Army still uses Vietnam era ASLAVS because the LAND 400 projects are still ongoing and new land vehicles are being pushed out slowly. The MRH90 helicopter was a failed project and now we don’t have any capability until new Blackhawks come online. The Army and Navy are using civilian companies and leasing helicopters and vessels just to conduct training and keep personnel qualified, The Navy has decommissioned numerous ships in the last few months due to the age of their vessels and on top of that, dwindling numbers of personnel have seen a shift to recruitment and retention because no one wants to work for the ADF anymore. Employment numbers are the lowest they’ve ever been. I’ve never seen a lower point of the ADF until now. Our forefathers would be turning in their graves and I hold high concerns for our future to deal with conflicts if we don’t have the equipment, money and most importantly the personnel.
The Australians army fought bravely in Malaysia during the Japanese Occupation and also the Indonesia Confrontation. The British army in Singapore were useless and surrender meekly. The British employ the Indians Punjabs and Gurkhas to do the fighting and expand the British Empire. But their poorly trained army in Asia was soon massacars and capture by the Japanese.
😅 all this planned. We know will blow out of budget and come full of problems like everything else we have had like our subs, our vehicles that we forgot had no spare tyre, and the government will cut and slash. We need all that and more
Panstwo wysoa/ kontynent w sumie taka slaba dywizja. Miedzy ciezka i lekka dywizja . Z powodu jednego batalionu czolgow.. Stawiaja na obrone przez marynarke wojenna i obrone lotnicza.
Mostly outdated equipment when you compare it to other countries in the world . Not a lot there to defend us is there .. So where's our land based surface to air missile capability & our missile/Drone defence systems. No good put it on this list if it's planned 74 f35 fighter jet is about 1/2 of the numbers we need . But having fighter jets with no missiles to fire won't do us any good anyway & Australia don't manufacture any We have a limited amount of missiles to arm our fighters in storage. NOW RERUN THE VIDEO WITH THE NUMBERS THAT ARE ACTIVE OR ACTUALLY IN SERVICE NOT WHATS PLANNED OR ORDERED & STOP TRYING TO FOOL THE PUBLIC
@@cplbruiser8267 Never mind matey we will get the equipment we need 20 years after we need it ..thats if we survive that long perhaps... don't fuck with us China we're getting a nuclear submarine in 20 years lol 😂
I love the ADF but you’re 100 percent right. It’s taken 20+ years for the Australian government to begin to modernise the ADF. Budget cuts, new governments have all contributed to the lack of foresight to plan. Lucky tech enhancements and large private investment by private companies has seen a surge in manufacturing in the last 10 years. If it wasn’t for the AUKUS agreement we wouldn’t have nuclear Subs. The F35s took a long time to develop and we now have almost a full fleet (still awaiting arrival of the last few) but even they’re now due for upgrades. The Offshore patrol vessels are plagued with setbacks and that was a failed project because our original Armidale class boats were a failure and undertasked to conduct border protection. Our Army still uses Vietnam era ASLAVS because the LAND 400 projects are still ongoing and new land vehicles are being pushed out slowly. On top of this dwindling numbers of personnel have seen a shift to recruitment and retention because no one wants to work for the ADF anymore. Employment numbers are the lowest they’ve ever been.
I am beyond distraught with CHAT GPT being used for TH-cam narration. Obvious as and totally annoying. When I am installed as Emperor offenders will be tracked down and face the same fate as scammers, pesky use of file footage . Any non-fiction av will also require authentication info. If this lax authentication was applied to university
► More Military videos on: th-cam.com/users/QUASAREntertainmentvideos
were is the emu platoon were is the kangaroo brigade
Australia is acquiring 29 new-build AH-64E Apaches as part of the Army's Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter Replacement Project (Land 4501 Phase 1) to replace its existing 22 Airbus Helicopters Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopters. These in concert with the new Blackhawks means the Army has a functional air wing again.
Marvelous work and tribute to Land Down Under.
We have 3 eras of Australian army truck's a blitz and 2 accos one 4x4 and 6x6 and recently got a Mack 6x6
Love Australia from America 🇺🇸❤🇦🇺
It’s actually 6 Hunter class frigates and 8 SSN submarines, 3 SSN will be Virginia class SSN with an option to buy 2 more then Australia will build their own under the AUKUS arrangement and that will be 8 SSNs. Australian at the end of the year, will announce the contractor to supply an additional 11 light frigates/ corvettes
Thanks good summary. Australia has huge area of operations.
Good recce, rapid mobility and significant strike capacity at range are needed as well as very capable ASW point and area air defence.
More destroyers, P8s, Tritons, Ghost Bats long range strike aircraft clearly fit such requirements.
There needs to be more focus on missiles. Area and point air defence (SAMs) for defence and long range missiles (ATACMs cruise missiles), glide bombs and artillery (eg. Ceasar) for the offence.
Additionally, rear basing, dispersal and logistics, including munitions needs beefing up.
The nuclear submarines unless armed with cruise missiles are a waste of money. Cruise missile capability would likely be better served through lower cost capabilities like Rapid Dragon.
You forgot about our fighting kangaroos and drop bears?
Drop bears fall under the paratroopers and are listed as troops. Kangaroos work in Transport.
Having inherited Western science, Australia's military is truly well-developed
We actually use M1A2 Abrams SEP 3
Not in full swing though, we still operate our 59 M1A1 AIM Abrams tanks, not all 100 M1A2 Sep V3 variants have arrived in Australia yet, we ordered them years ago and only just started having them land in country 2-3 months ago with released photographs by Defence.
@beaverdam1199 where did you get 100 from, we're only getting 75. We are getting frames for them that we will use as breacher vehicles and such, but that's not the same.
@@andrewsmall6834 I thought it was 100 no? Because we currently have seventy M1A1 tanks
@@beaverdam1199 74 new tanks
Some people assume that every country in the world has more modern equipment than Australia. I don't think that's the case.
No tigers scrapped
Apaches on order. And you forgot the redback tank
Did u watch the end of the video?
Redback ain't a tank.
You forget about the Local Train Stations. at any given station one could lose Durrys, loose change and maybe your life better stay strapped.
Including boxers but not M1A2s?
Thank you
While the Australian Defence Force (ADF) may appear to be a robust and technologically advanced military force, a closer examination reveals several areas where its capacity may be overstated. Let's highlight these limitations:
1. Limited Personnel for Comprehensive Defense Needs: Despite a relatively large budget against tax earnings, the ADF’s manpower is relatively modest for a country with such a vast landmass, extensive coastline, and large exclusive economic zone (EEZ) to patrol. With 57,346 full-time personnel and 32,049 reservists, the ADF lacks the personnel depth to sustain prolonged, large-scale operations or defend against simultaneous threats across multiple fronts. Many modern military actions require rapid deployments, continuous rotations, and enduring support, which the current personnel levels struggle to fulfil without high operational strain. As such, the northern sector of Australia is vulnerable to attack.
2. Reliance on Allies, Especially the United States: Australia's defence strategy relies heavily on partnerships, notably with the United States, for force projection and deterrence against regional threats. This reliance exposes Australia to strategic vulnerabilities, as it means that in high-stakes conflicts-especially those in which the U.S. is not directly involved-the ADF could face severe constraints. This dependency on foreign alliances also leaves Australia vulnerable to shifts in foreign policy by allies, potentially compromising national security if support is withdrawn.
3. Logistical and Supply Chain Challenges: Although Australia is attempting progress in military procurement and Indigenous defence manufacturing, it remains dependent on international suppliers for critical systems, parts, and advanced technologies. In a high-intensity conflict, supply chains could be disrupted, leading to equipment shortages, maintenance challenges, and gaps in operational readiness. As a result, the ADF may be slower to mobilise or sustain missions compared to larger, self-sufficient militaries in Asia. A critical element is fuel reserves.
4. Geographical and Strategic Constraints: Australia's geographical isolation presents advantages and limitations. While the distance from potential threats can act as a deterrent, it also complicates rapid deployment and support for allied missions. In contrast to some regional militaries that can mobilise forces quickly within their zones of interest, the ADF faces long transit times for naval and air assets, limiting its ability to respond swiftly in crises, especially in the wider Indo-Pacific. The lack of true blue water aircraft carriers limits force projection.
5. Aging Equipment and Expensive Upgrades: Many of the ADF’s core assets are nearing the end of their service life or require costly upgrades to remain effective. For instance, the Collins-class submarines, although capable, are becoming outdated and will require significant investments to ensure their continued viability until replacements are ready. (30 years +) Similarly, modernising other assets to keep pace with rapid technological advancements in the region represents an ongoing and expensive challenge, especially as other nations continue to invest in advanced and more numerous equipment.
6. Budgetary Sustainability: Although Australia’s defence budget is considerable for a country of its size, defence spending is capped at around 2.04% of GDP, which may limit its ability to expand or modernise the ADF substantially in the long term. With defence costs-especially for cutting-edge technology and advanced platforms-increasing each year, maintaining the current operational readiness and capability level may strain national finances, potentially diverting funds from other critical areas.
In summary, while the ADF is undoubtedly a capable and professional force, it operates under significant constraints that could limit its effectiveness in high-stakes or protracted regional conflicts. Its reliance on allies, logistical and personnel limitations, aging equipment, and budgetary constraints highlight Australia's challenges in maintaining a fully independent military capable of responding to all potential threats on its own terms. Australia was once considered fitted for but not with.
I hope you are correct about there being only 3 Hunters ordered ?? There were originally 9 ordered but they are fat, underguned, problematic and hugely over budget and behind schedule. We need 3 more (updated) Hobarts and a dozen corvettes, i.e. Navantia Tasman Class.
Just as long as we don't waste any more money on the Anzacs we're retiring, my father served onboard HMAS Hobart from 1990-1997 as a surface weapons officer, HMAS Hobart was a DDG builtin the 60s which served till the early 2000s, most of the Anzacs are 20 ish years old and are already being retired and phased out
Plase do nord korea or republic of Moldova or japan
Search the ones they’ve done as well.
Should really diversify their procurement of military hardware
Please do Jordan 🇯🇴
OMAN pleas
Please do libya
Y sont où les sous marins?
Please do chilean armed forces ❤
Please do Morocco
Australia needs to have 12 Combat Brigades (6 Mechan., 2 Armored, 2 Cavalry and 2 Light). With 75 000 Personal (72 000 X 12). Army Equip. is 150 M1- A2 MB Tanks, 450 Boxer + 700 Red Back IFV, 1500 Bushrangers, 9500 Other Vehicles, 700 105 mm Guns, 150 155 mm Sp. / Guns, 1400 Morters 81 mm, 75 NASAM - 1, 150 Stigers - 1 (SAM), 75 Hawk - 1 ( SAM), 450 Helicopters. Plus 25 000 Reserve Personal.
Plus 25 000 Air-Force Personal. With 72
F -33 A, 36 F/A - 18 F, 18 F/A -18 E, 36 A- 10 , 36 B 21, 36 C-130J, 12 C -27, 12 C-5C. Plus 25 000 Navy Personal . With 9 Hobart Class Destroyers, 9 Hunter Class Frigates, 9 Loss Angles Destroyers, 9 Arafura Class Corvettes, 18 Patrol Boats, 9 Mine Hunters, 9 Amphibian Landinging Ships, 36 LC -M, 18 LC -L, 3 Supply /Oilers, 9 Supply Ships, 3 LSD, 3 LSH, 3 Training Ships, 1 AirCraft Carriers, 9 Loss Angeles Sumbarines and 6 SNN Sumbarines. Plus 2 Missile Brigades (36 NASAM -1 and, 18 Anti ship Launches). Also 18 Ammunition Sites and 9 Oil Sites. Plus 150 Anti - Ship Missiles 3000 km /D.
Then Australia will become a Super Power.
Next Indonesia ... thanks
Everything the Australian Army uses is 20 years out of date & mostly refurbished.
It still has good army
@@Official_gray_sprunki I'm not disputing that fact. We were very effective in Vietnam & other conflicts despite our outdated equipment. I guess we had to be.
That is total bullshit
@@cplbruiser8267 One example. The Raven Radio. They were refurbished Radios from Sweden when they replaced it with a new Radio. Australia brought them cheap & passed them off as brand-new latest gear. I used the Raven in the 80's. The SLR was old & Australia altered it for Australian standards. It wasn't as good as the original. Shall I keep going?
Is it so ????
We never procure enough equipment for anything above niche or training. There is no depth in platforms, consumables or manpower. The is no stomach politically to have a force that could genuinely and reasonably protect Australia.
Please do Japan 🇯🇵 next 🫡
The truth is most gunners will not even see the enemy and be taken out by artillery and the like..
and ?
With the coming of the Armed Drones as used in Ukraine, Australia needs to take a serious look at these small armed drones. Training the Soldier could be a problem as these armed drones cost between $3000 to $20000. Losing a drone is a large expense. American Soldiers are being made to pay for any they damage. I hope the Australian Army doesn’t make a Soldier fill out an L&D report & have to pay.
There are small drones, I have one costing under $100 that could be used for initial training. Getting the Soldier used to the Controller & using Video to fly the drone. Once the soldier is proficient in flying these small drones they then could move up to the Armed Drones. Start small first.
I have seen the really tiny resonance drones & talked to the Soldiers who fly them. They tell me that the training does take some time & they are not cheap $6000, I believe.
It’s just an idea.
Qatar pls
Indonesia militery please😊
What good is a tank if you can't transport it overseas. We need naval superiority and an aircraft carrier. Otherwise we are left with a local malitia and nothing else.
I love the ADF but It’s taken 20+ years for the Australian government to begin to modernise the ADF. Budget cuts, new governments have all contributed to the lack of foresight to plan. Lucky tech enhancements and large private investment by private companies has seen a surge in manufacturing in the last 10 years. If it wasn’t for the AUKUS agreement we wouldn’t have nuclear Subs. The F35s took a long time to develop and we now have almost a full fleet (still awaiting arrival of the last few) but even they’re now due for upgrades. The Offshore patrol vessels are plagued with setbacks and that was a failed project because our original Armidale class boats were a failure and undertasked to conduct border protection. Our Army still uses Vietnam era ASLAVS because the LAND 400 projects are still ongoing and new land vehicles are being pushed out slowly. The MRH90 helicopter was a failed project and now we don’t have any capability until new Blackhawks come online. The Army and Navy are using civilian companies and leasing helicopters and vessels just to conduct training and keep personnel qualified, The Navy has decommissioned numerous ships in the last few months due to the age of their vessels and on top of that, dwindling numbers of personnel have seen a shift to recruitment and retention because no one wants to work for the ADF anymore. Employment numbers are the lowest they’ve ever been. I’ve never seen a lower point of the ADF until now. Our forefathers would be turning in their graves and I hold high concerns for our future to deal with conflicts if we don’t have the equipment, money and most importantly the personnel.
The Australians army fought bravely in Malaysia during the Japanese Occupation and also the Indonesia Confrontation. The British army in Singapore were useless and surrender meekly. The British employ the Indians Punjabs and Gurkhas to do the fighting and expand the British Empire. But their poorly trained army in Asia was soon massacars and capture by the Japanese.
The best is the youth Australia has.
Need to upgrade the Air Force and navy more the army is fine
The army uses out of date crap, airforce used the most modern aircraft the US is using,
Navy uses newish ships and subs but will get newer ones
Qatar pleas
Had to mute it that bloody sound
😅 all this planned. We know will blow out of budget and come full of problems like everything else we have had like our subs, our vehicles that we forgot had no spare tyre, and the government will cut and slash. We need all that and more
Where is the government going to get the personal to use this equipment.
@@garryjones2609 They will start recruiting at the next LGBTQ Mardi gras
@@garryjones2609they’ll conscript you when the need arises 😂
Please Do Pakistan 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
Panstwo wysoa/ kontynent w sumie taka slaba dywizja. Miedzy ciezka i lekka dywizja . Z powodu jednego batalionu czolgow.. Stawiaja na obrone przez marynarke wojenna i obrone lotnicza.
Brooooooooo Malaysia
Philippines please....❤❤❤❤
Mostly outdated equipment when you compare it to other countries in the world .
Not a lot there to defend us is there ..
So where's our land based surface to air missile capability & our missile/Drone defence systems.
No good put it on this list if it's planned
74 f35 fighter jet is about 1/2 of the numbers we need .
But having fighter jets with no missiles to fire won't do us any good anyway & Australia don't manufacture any
We have a limited amount of missiles to arm our fighters in storage.
NOW RERUN THE VIDEO WITH THE NUMBERS THAT ARE ACTIVE OR ACTUALLY IN SERVICE NOT WHATS PLANNED OR ORDERED
&
STOP TRYING TO FOOL THE PUBLIC
Stop talking crap
@@cplbruiser8267
Never mind matey we will get the equipment we need 20 years after we need it ..thats if we survive that long perhaps... don't fuck with us China we're getting a nuclear submarine in 20 years lol 😂
Saf sa mindanao and sabah
👍👍👍👍👍👍
Pang ojt
Not much. Looks outdated with most stuff
Judging a book by its cover, number one tactical error.
Say that to the new nuclear subs and b2 spirits we just got 😂
@@roamingbarber3100that wont be ready for 20+ years 😃
Our fighting doctrine needs to be considered if you want to pass judgement the fact we haven't been invaded by a landing force speaks volumes
I love the ADF but you’re 100 percent right. It’s taken 20+ years for the Australian government to begin to modernise the ADF. Budget cuts, new governments have all contributed to the lack of foresight to plan. Lucky tech enhancements and large private investment by private companies has seen a surge in manufacturing in the last 10 years. If it wasn’t for the AUKUS agreement we wouldn’t have nuclear Subs. The F35s took a long time to develop and we now have almost a full fleet (still awaiting arrival of the last few) but even they’re now due for upgrades. The Offshore patrol vessels are plagued with setbacks and that was a failed project because our original Armidale class boats were a failure and undertasked to conduct border protection. Our Army still uses Vietnam era ASLAVS because the LAND 400 projects are still ongoing and new land vehicles are being pushed out slowly. On top of this dwindling numbers of personnel have seen a shift to recruitment and retention because no one wants to work for the ADF anymore. Employment numbers are the lowest they’ve ever been.
I am beyond distraught with CHAT GPT being used for TH-cam narration. Obvious as and totally annoying.
When I am installed as Emperor offenders will be tracked down and face the same fate as scammers, pesky use of file footage .
Any non-fiction av will also require authentication info.
If this lax authentication was applied to university
This is not chargpt.
@@ArmyEncyclopediaThe minor mispronunciations and odd cadence would suggest otherwise.
The Abrams have been sent to Ukraine,
Multiple errors
yes lets tell china what everything we got....
Where is Bangladesh army equipment 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦
Rethink your voiceover and presentation design.
Useless in Ukrainian mud.
We are not coming to ukraine , what the fukk for ???
@@thecount2130 Australia is sending equipment to Ukraine. If not for Australians to use, why are we sending it then.
@@garryjones2609 Because our Woke Government want to be in with the cool kids
Qatar pls