Review of All Australian Defence Force Equipment / Quantity of All Equipment

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 88

  • @ArmyEncyclopedia
    @ArmyEncyclopedia  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    ► More Military videos on: th-cam.com/users/QUASAREntertainmentvideos

    • @PRIMAL_HUNTER1988
      @PRIMAL_HUNTER1988 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      were is the emu platoon were is the kangaroo brigade

  • @alexanderleach3365
    @alexanderleach3365 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Marvelous work and tribute to Land Down Under.

  • @robertbroadbent216
    @robertbroadbent216 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    You forgot about our fighting kangaroos and drop bears?

    • @DansModelBench
      @DansModelBench 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Drop bears fall under the paratroopers and are listed as troops. Kangaroos work in Transport.

  • @MrTallpoppy58
    @MrTallpoppy58 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Australia is acquiring 29 new-build AH-64E Apaches as part of the Army's Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter Replacement Project (Land 4501 Phase 1) to replace its existing 22 Airbus Helicopters Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopters. These in concert with the new Blackhawks means the Army has a functional air wing again.

  • @jimgraham6722
    @jimgraham6722 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thanks good summary. Australia has huge area of operations.
    Good recce, rapid mobility and significant strike capacity at range are needed as well as very capable ASW point and area air defence.
    More destroyers, P8s, Tritons, Ghost Bats long range strike aircraft clearly fit such requirements.
    There needs to be more focus on missiles. Area and point air defence (SAMs) for defence and long range missiles (ATACMs cruise missiles), glide bombs and artillery (eg. Ceasar) for the offence.
    Additionally, rear basing, dispersal and logistics, including munitions needs beefing up.
    The nuclear submarines unless armed with cruise missiles are a waste of money. Cruise missile capability would likely be better served through lower cost capabilities like Rapid Dragon.

  • @Nathan-ot9eu
    @Nathan-ot9eu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You forget about the Local Train Stations. at any given station one could lose Durrys, loose change and maybe your life better stay strapped.

  • @mattattard-yk7bk
    @mattattard-yk7bk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It’s actually 6 Hunter class frigates and 8 SSN submarines, 3 SSN will be Virginia class SSN with an option to buy 2 more then Australia will build their own under the AUKUS arrangement and that will be 8 SSNs. Australian at the end of the year, will announce the contractor to supply an additional 11 light frigates/ corvettes

  • @dbarro6723
    @dbarro6723 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    No tigers scrapped
    Apaches on order. And you forgot the redback tank

  • @grahamjohnbarr
    @grahamjohnbarr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Everything the Australian Army uses is 20 years out of date & mostly refurbished.

    • @A_localguy
      @A_localguy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It still has good army

    • @grahamjohnbarr
      @grahamjohnbarr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@A_localguy I'm not disputing that fact. We were very effective in Vietnam & other conflicts despite our outdated equipment. I guess we had to be.

    • @cplbruiser8267
      @cplbruiser8267 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is total bullshit

    • @grahamjohnbarr
      @grahamjohnbarr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cplbruiser8267 One example. The Raven Radio. They were refurbished Radios from Sweden when they replaced it with a new Radio. Australia brought them cheap & passed them off as brand-new latest gear. I used the Raven in the 80's. The SLR was old & Australia altered it for Australian standards. It wasn't as good as the original. Shall I keep going?

    • @bugattichiron8784
      @bugattichiron8784 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is it so ????

  • @kwf05
    @kwf05 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Please do Jordan 🇯🇴

  • @rubenacevedo2484
    @rubenacevedo2484 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Some people assume that every country in the world has more modern equipment than Australia. I don't think that's the case.

  • @alexpitt6989
    @alexpitt6989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you

  • @andynoya4106
    @andynoya4106 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Next Indonesia ... thanks

  • @gonzalovalenzuela1054
    @gonzalovalenzuela1054 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Please do chilean armed forces ❤

  • @cpt.yaniscr7
    @cpt.yaniscr7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Plase do nord korea or republic of Moldova or japan

    • @robandcheryls
      @robandcheryls 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Search the ones they’ve done as well.

  • @carlianedossantos2266
    @carlianedossantos2266 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Qatar pls

  • @Runnistr8
    @Runnistr8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Need to upgrade the Air Force and navy more the army is fine

  • @MrJohnnybe123
    @MrJohnnybe123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The truth is most gunners will not even see the enemy and be taken out by artillery and the like..

  • @neerajoshi5473
    @neerajoshi5473 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Please do Japan 🇯🇵 next 🫡

  • @TheReviewLab000
    @TheReviewLab000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had to mute it that bloody sound

  • @Buddy89538
    @Buddy89538 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the ADF but It’s taken 20+ years for the Australian government to begin to modernise the ADF. Budget cuts, new governments have all contributed to the lack of foresight to plan. Lucky tech enhancements and large private investment by private companies has seen a surge in manufacturing in the last 10 years. If it wasn’t for the AUKUS agreement we wouldn’t have nuclear Subs. The F35s took a long time to develop and we now have almost a full fleet (still awaiting arrival of the last few) but even they’re now due for upgrades. The Offshore patrol vessels are plagued with setbacks and that was a failed project because our original Armidale class boats were a failure and undertasked to conduct border protection. Our Army still uses Vietnam era ASLAVS because the LAND 400 projects are still ongoing and new land vehicles are being pushed out slowly. The MRH90 helicopter was a failed project and now we don’t have any capability until new Blackhawks come online. The Army and Navy are using civilian companies and leasing helicopters and vessels just to conduct training and keep personnel qualified, The Navy has decommissioned numerous ships in the last few months due to the age of their vessels and on top of that, dwindling numbers of personnel have seen a shift to recruitment and retention because no one wants to work for the ADF anymore. Employment numbers are the lowest they’ve ever been. I’ve never seen a lower point of the ADF until now. Our forefathers would be turning in their graves and I hold high concerns for our future to deal with conflicts if we don’t have the equipment, money and most importantly the personnel.

  • @ClevelandSteamer99
    @ClevelandSteamer99 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The best is the youth Australia has.

  • @wadymshvydkoy4729
    @wadymshvydkoy4729 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Qatar pleas

  • @darul_kutninew3489
    @darul_kutninew3489 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Indonesia militery please😊

  • @joeyvill
    @joeyvill 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What good is a tank if you can't transport it overseas. We need naval superiority and an aircraft carrier. Otherwise we are left with a local malitia and nothing else.

  • @Rubina-cl2ze
    @Rubina-cl2ze 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Please Do Pakistan 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰

  • @andyt654
    @andyt654 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    😅 all this planned. We know will blow out of budget and come full of problems like everything else we have had like our subs, our vehicles that we forgot had no spare tyre, and the government will cut and slash. We need all that and more

    • @garryjones2609
      @garryjones2609 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where is the government going to get the personal to use this equipment.

    • @dropbear6740
      @dropbear6740 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garryjones2609 They will start recruiting at the next LGBTQ Mardi gras

    • @Brimfarm
      @Brimfarm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garryjones2609they’ll conscript you when the need arises 😂

  • @David-Daff1
    @David-Daff1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Brooooooooo Malaysia

  • @99bevo
    @99bevo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mostly outdated equipment when you compare it to other countries in the world .
    Not a lot there to defend us is there ..
    So where's our land based surface to air missile capability & our missile/Drone defence systems.
    No good put it on this list if it's planned
    74 f35 fighter jet is about 1/2 of the numbers we need .
    But having fighter jets with no missiles to fire won't do us any good anyway & Australia don't manufacture any
    We have a limited amount of missiles to arm our fighters in storage.
    NOW RERUN THE VIDEO WITH THE NUMBERS THAT ARE ACTIVE OR ACTUALLY IN SERVICE NOT WHATS PLANNED OR ORDERED
    &
    STOP TRYING TO FOOL THE PUBLIC

    • @cplbruiser8267
      @cplbruiser8267 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stop talking crap

    • @99bevo
      @99bevo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cplbruiser8267
      Never mind matey we will get the equipment we need 20 years after we need it ..thats if we survive that long perhaps... don't fuck with us China we're getting a nuclear submarine in 20 years lol 😂

  • @robertklimczak5630
    @robertklimczak5630 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Panstwo wysoa/ kontynent w sumie taka slaba dywizja. Miedzy ciezka i lekka dywizja . Z powodu jednego batalionu czolgow.. Stawiaja na obrone przez marynarke wojenna i obrone lotnicza.

  • @Faiaz999
    @Faiaz999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is Bangladesh army equipment 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩

  • @warenbalicog5535
    @warenbalicog5535 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Philippines please....❤❤❤❤

  • @Nathan-ry3yu
    @Nathan-ry3yu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Not much. Looks outdated with most stuff

    • @gregorywildie37
      @gregorywildie37 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Judging a book by its cover, number one tactical error.

    • @roamingbarber3100
      @roamingbarber3100 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Say that to the new nuclear subs and b2 spirits we just got 😂

    • @cmondevils
      @cmondevils 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@roamingbarber3100that wont be ready for 20+ years 😃

    • @SmacsSimRacing
      @SmacsSimRacing 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Our fighting doctrine needs to be considered if you want to pass judgement the fact we haven't been invaded by a landing force speaks volumes

    • @Buddy89538
      @Buddy89538 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I love the ADF but you’re 100 percent right. It’s taken 20+ years for the Australian government to begin to modernise the ADF. Budget cuts, new governments have all contributed to the lack of foresight to plan. Lucky tech enhancements and large private investment by private companies has seen a surge in manufacturing in the last 10 years. If it wasn’t for the AUKUS agreement we wouldn’t have nuclear Subs. The F35s took a long time to develop and we now have almost a full fleet (still awaiting arrival of the last few) but even they’re now due for upgrades. The Offshore patrol vessels are plagued with setbacks and that was a failed project because our original Armidale class boats were a failure and undertasked to conduct border protection. Our Army still uses Vietnam era ASLAVS because the LAND 400 projects are still ongoing and new land vehicles are being pushed out slowly. On top of this dwindling numbers of personnel have seen a shift to recruitment and retention because no one wants to work for the ADF anymore. Employment numbers are the lowest they’ve ever been.

  • @nateyinternational
    @nateyinternational หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rethink your voiceover and presentation design.

  • @anasdidil2144
    @anasdidil2144 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦

  • @honahwikeepa2115
    @honahwikeepa2115 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Useless in Ukrainian mud.

    • @thecount2130
      @thecount2130 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We are not coming to ukraine , what the fukk for ???

    • @garryjones2609
      @garryjones2609 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thecount2130 Australia is sending equipment to Ukraine. If not for Australians to use, why are we sending it then.

    • @dropbear6740
      @dropbear6740 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garryjones2609 Because our Woke Government want to be in with the cool kids

  • @Rosy_y_Misha
    @Rosy_y_Misha 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Please do libya

  • @georgedimakopoulos3581
    @georgedimakopoulos3581 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Australia needs to have 12 Combat Brigades (6 Mechan., 2 Armored, 2 Cavalry and 2 Light). With 75 000 Personal (72 000 X 12). Army Equip. is 150 M1- A2 MB Tanks, 450 Boxer + 700 Red Back IFV, 1500 Bushrangers, 9500 Other Vehicles, 700 105 mm Guns, 150 155 mm Sp. / Guns, 1400 Morters 81 mm, 75 NASAM - 1, 150 Stigers - 1 (SAM), 75 Hawk - 1 ( SAM), 450 Helicopters. Plus 25 000 Reserve Personal.
    Plus 25 000 Air-Force Personal. With 72
    F -33 A, 36 F/A - 18 F, 18 F/A -18 E, 36 A- 10 , 36 B 21, 36 C-130J, 12 C -27, 12 C-5C. Plus 25 000 Navy Personal . With 9 Hobart Class Destroyers, 9 Hunter Class Frigates, 9 Loss Angles Destroyers, 9 Arafura Class Corvettes, 18 Patrol Boats, 9 Mine Hunters, 9 Amphibian Landinging Ships, 36 LC -M, 18 LC -L, 3 Supply /Oilers, 9 Supply Ships, 3 LSD, 3 LSH, 3 Training Ships, 1 AirCraft Carriers, 9 Loss Angeles Sumbarines and 6 SNN Sumbarines. Plus 2 Missile Brigades (36 NASAM -1 and, 18 Anti ship Launches). Also 18 Ammunition Sites and 9 Oil Sites. Plus 150 Anti - Ship Missiles 3000 km /D.
    Then Australia will become a Super Power.

  • @lewynomg4943
    @lewynomg4943 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We never procure enough equipment for anything above niche or training. There is no depth in platforms, consumables or manpower. The is no stomach politically to have a force that could genuinely and reasonably protect Australia.

  • @FlyingAnA330
    @FlyingAnA330 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The army uses out of date crap, airforce used the most modern aircraft the US is using,
    Navy uses newish ships and subs but will get newer ones

  • @samuelstanton486
    @samuelstanton486 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We actually use M1A2 Abrams SEP 3

    • @beaverdam1199
      @beaverdam1199 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not in full swing though, we still operate our 59 M1A1 AIM Abrams tanks, not all 100 M1A2 Sep V3 variants have arrived in Australia yet, we ordered them years ago and only just started having them land in country 2-3 months ago with released photographs by Defence.

    • @andrewsmall6834
      @andrewsmall6834 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@beaverdam1199 where did you get 100 from, we're only getting 75. We are getting frames for them that we will use as breacher vehicles and such, but that's not the same.

    • @beaverdam1199
      @beaverdam1199 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@andrewsmall6834 I thought it was 100 no? Because we currently have seventy M1A1 tanks

  • @MrTallpoppy58
    @MrTallpoppy58 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I hope you are correct about there being only 3 Hunters ordered ?? There were originally 9 ordered but they are fat, underguned, problematic and hugely over budget and behind schedule. We need 3 more (updated) Hobarts and a dozen corvettes, i.e. Navantia Tasman Class.

    • @beaverdam1199
      @beaverdam1199 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Just as long as we don't waste any more money on the Anzacs we're retiring, my father served onboard HMAS Hobart from 1990-1997 as a surface weapons officer, HMAS Hobart was a DDG builtin the 60s which served till the early 2000s, most of the Anzacs are 20 ish years old and are already being retired and phased out

  • @wadymshvydkoy4729
    @wadymshvydkoy4729 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    OMAN pleas

  • @PM-do2yu
    @PM-do2yu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am beyond distraught with CHAT GPT being used for TH-cam narration. Obvious as and totally annoying.
    When I am installed as Emperor offenders will be tracked down and face the same fate as scammers, pesky use of file footage .
    Any non-fiction av will also require authentication info.
    If this lax authentication was applied to university

    • @ArmyEncyclopedia
      @ArmyEncyclopedia  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is not chargpt.

    • @PM-do2yu
      @PM-do2yu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ArmyEncyclopediaThe minor mispronunciations and odd cadence would suggest otherwise.

  • @michaelleong2582Quartermaster
    @michaelleong2582Quartermaster 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Australians army fought bravely in Malaysia during the Japanese Occupation and also the Indonesia Confrontation. The British army in Singapore were useless and surrender meekly. The British employ the Indians Punjabs and Gurkhas to do the fighting and expand the British Empire. But their poorly trained army in Asia was soon massacars and capture by the Japanese.

  • @louayeelalamitalbi6672
    @louayeelalamitalbi6672 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please do Morocco

  • @Michal-mr3lq
    @Michal-mr3lq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @Paul-fp4ux
    @Paul-fp4ux 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Y sont où les sous marins?

  • @JulioMarcal-u7c
    @JulioMarcal-u7c 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Qatar pls