Aahhh -- this is SO SO helpful! I'm planning to take my tort law exam tonight, and I wasn't entirely sure if the but-for test and substantial-factor test were BOTH required to prove causation. Thank you so much for making this video! You're a lifesaver!
Here are some older videos, let me know whether you still have questions. My blog has a contact form. uslawessentials.com/blog th-cam.com/video/ama0epDkt6c/w-d-xo.html (mirror image rule) th-cam.com/video/ZG9cyqluC54/w-d-xo.html (UCC modification of mirror image part 1) th-cam.com/video/44HlgjyQSV8/w-d-xo.html (UCC modification of mirror image part 2)
Your criticism is improper, assuming that lifting weights is always properly performed under all circumstances (and that plaintiff could somehow prove that..)
I'm a first year struggling law student, thank you for your simple wording and heaps of examples It has helped me.
Thanks, Tammey! I also tutor law students. uslawessentials.com
Hi! How are you? Are you on your third year already?
Aahhh -- this is SO SO helpful! I'm planning to take my tort law exam tonight, and I wasn't entirely sure if the but-for test and substantial-factor test were BOTH required to prove causation. Thank you so much for making this video! You're a lifesaver!
Thanks for the short and simple explanation ! It helps me a lot
My head is spinning at the thought that the defendant ripped the tree up by the roots with that giant axe.
thank you so much sir ! been struggling to understand this for a long time, but your video makes it so easy to understand
Outstanding explanation of 2 in Causation. Thank you!!!
Thanks, Thomas. uslawessentials.com
Good info. Makes it a little clearer.
Thank you for this video❤️
Thank you so much, I love you for this!
bro you are saving my ass every day a decade later
Great video!
Thank you so much. So clear and understandable
Sure, thanks for watching. uslawessentials.com
Can you talk about a 3rd element that falls under causation (cause in fact)?
1) but for
2) substantial cause
3) alternative cause
Please check out a video on alternative liability:
uslawessentials.com/what-is-alternative-liability/
Thank you...
Sure! uslawessentials.com Let me know if you have any questions.
Question - in the last scenario, how would plaintiff be able to hold defendant liable if it doesn't pass the but for or substantial factor test?
If there is no causation there is no liability.
i love your channel. thank you so so so much
Thank you!
Thank you so much
No worries, Miryam. Any other topics interest you?
USLawEssentials battle of the forms 2-207
Here are some older videos, let me know whether you still have questions. My blog has a contact form. uslawessentials.com/blog
th-cam.com/video/ama0epDkt6c/w-d-xo.html (mirror image rule)
th-cam.com/video/ZG9cyqluC54/w-d-xo.html (UCC modification of mirror image part 1)
th-cam.com/video/44HlgjyQSV8/w-d-xo.html (UCC modification of mirror image part 2)
wow
You made this seem too easy
> "What are But For"
For pooping, silly.
(ps sorry for spoiling the tenor of this very informative video)
No worries, thanks for sharing.
if he hadn't taken the axe to the tree, the car would have been ok
The example is not proper, by lifting weights, properly performed under all circumstances, your back will become stronger and stronger.
Your criticism is improper, assuming that lifting weights is always properly performed under all circumstances (and that plaintiff could somehow prove that..)