PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED
please stop capping in your videos. How can you say you paid so we dont have to pay for it only to try with the link you posted and its asking for payment ? mtschewww
00:38 🔍 Turnitin, Originality, and gp0 are tools used for AI content detection. 01:18 💡 Originality was the best at detecting AI content compared to Turnitin and gp0. 04:44 🛡 Undetectable and Fasley were the best at bypassing AI content detection tools. 06:19 💬 Bypass AI was able to fool Turnitin but failed to pass Originality detection. 07:17 👀 Originality was the most effective tool at detecting AI-generated content despite bypass attempts.
Sounds interesting! If you’re experimenting with bypassing detection, you might want to try Winston AI too. It’s pretty accurate for spotting AI content.
Andy great video just a small note: It doesn't "know that you're AI". It predicts that there is an x% of being written by AI. It's not like plagiarism where you compare text to text. AI detection is just a prediction and nothing more.
If the use is acknowledged by a researcher, then maybe yes, but as the video focuses on how to avoid detection, the aim is clearly not to be open and honest. This is opposite of academic integrity.
Fair point! AI can be great for research, but for writing, that human touch is what makes it real. Hybrid Writer helps with that-human writers step in to bypass AI detectors and keep your content engaging. What’s your take on AI and human writing?
I wrote feedback to my student for submitting his dissertation, I tested my feedback in turnitin. It was detected 40% AI. I was really surprised as 90% of my writing was in first person form with my suggestions how to improve some aspects in the dissertation. Therefore I don’t trust Turnitin in detecting AI.
The likelihood of misclassification remains high for non-native English speakers/writers who use AI tools to improve fluency of their documents. That being said, wouldn't it be fun to have a tool that once applied to older texts would show how many of them were written by enslaved research assistants while signed by the big guns of the dept ? So, why is AI generated text such a scandal whereas assistants generated work has not been so for decades
I totally get it! Tools like Winston AI are getting sharper at detecting those AI humanizers. But have you tried Hybrid Writer? It’s different because it’s not just about tweaking words-actual human writers work on humanizing the content in a way that truly connects with readers and bypasses detection. Would love to hear your thoughts if you give it a go!
Originality is a scam, I'm not sure if you're promoting this tool or you have actually tested it. I copy text from books old papers long before Ai trend most of them were labeled as Ai generated content.
@@shaneegan7354 I know right. Like I don't understand how do we supposed to have a good writing if all the good words are flagged as ai? Do we have to use stupid words to make us look stupid for it to not be detectable as ai?
Originality states on their website that it is not suitable for testing academic works because it will often have false positives. I would assume since Turnitin is used by thousands of Universities they error on the side of it being human since 100% AI detection accuracy is basically impossible.
I dont mean to be a partypooper here Andy but i follow you because of your excellent content about the hard (and sometimes funny) truths about research and academia, and the occassional tips and tricks for productivity from a veteran researcher who saw the light. But of late most if not all the content is about flashy new AI tools. Having tried some of them, it's (a) overwhelming because there are SO MANY and i cant really make sense of whats good; (b) the generative AI's mostly feel unfit for research no matter how good they are today, simply because they do not seem up to the mark and more often than not are like an overconfident student likely to lack nuance. I get that a guys got to eat, and nothing against honest endorsements or even promotional content honestly, but id love to see some of your old content back as well - even the stories were hilarious. Maybe you do put them out but i only get notifs for the videos about the tools. Ps im a nobody here, so you can take this opinion with a grain of salt.
Hi Andy. Great content! But please do more content on PhD and postdoc research. especially on some supervisors who take all credit, e.g., there are many supervisors who take first author even if the majority work is done by the student etc etc
How good is originality of confirming that content is NOT AI when it is indeed human generated? One tool you showed in the past detected everything as AI.
I get your frustration. Some tools can be tricky like that. If you're up for it, check out Hybrid Writer-real human writers help tweak your content to make sure it feels 100% authentic and passes those AI detectors. Would love to hear how it compares for you!
Hi, I'm the creator of StealthWriter, I want to point something out, although all some of the tools claim to bypass all AI detectors, you need to also take into account the quality of the text generated from these tools, there are many tools that claim to provide undetectable content but the output is just gibberish unreadable content. It would be a good idea to create an unbiased video comparing these tools in readability also and not only the undetectability scores. This is what we focused on the most when we created StealthWriter.
@@mahermansour1131is it still working in bypassing Turnitin in? And. How about the grammar improvements I read some comments in other videos they highlighted the grammar quality
Unfortunately, there is no option available for us students who are studying in Africa. You see, most of African countries don't have access that can allow you pay online anywhere in the world even if you are capable of paying. So is there anyway for us students with a very limited access to bypass ai detection?
If writing using AI tools is considered wrong or taboo then the same logic of thinking should also apply when using AI to detect AI-assisted writing. Based on this, using AI to detect AI is very wrong, in addition to creating many possibilities of wrong accusations and causing anxiety that should not exist.
I believe in the power of AI as a research tool … but that’s all it is. A tool. I’m all for a hybrid writing strategy between AI and us mere mortals, But, I do believe we should be the dominant partner.
No way I ran undetectable ai through copyleaks and it classifies it as ai if you cant even get it through copyleaks then undetectable ai has screwed you. Other than that it's ability to detect actual ai content is actually up there with other apps
I have a 4000 word extended essay all of it is ai even though I changed a lot. Which one do. you think I should buy? I looked at some and they were really bad, like added slang terms into my research paper.
OMG! So there's AI services to convert AI generated content and make it NOT look AI to University AI detectors! OMG. My head is reeling at this........
As a university professor, I'm extremely frustrated that so many students use AI to do all of their work, rather than actually learn to think and write on their own. The universities I teach for use Turnitin, which as you proved is not very good. Have you found a good tool that detects AI-generated content that has been run through a bypass tool?
PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED.
How can we identify that which source/AI tool was used to generate the content identified as AI-generated either in Turnit-in or Originality or any other tool for this? If you may have a video on it, it would be helpful.
I don't know about source but it just identifies the ai and even if it gives a source it just cites it from an article that doesn't even relate to what you got
I have problem with all these tools that you have mentioned because I have tested many of them with original text and they all generated an AR detection of 20 or 30% I have written those texts way before AI ever existed so I'm not sure how I made it through but apparently I'm 30% or 40% are this is very weird and it's harming and harmful to us PhD students people who works in Academia there is something wrong with this we creating something purely original and an AI stupid tool is selling the word that no it's AI generated this is frustrating to me I don't know what to do at this point I am literally just basing myself to whether I should send my text or not I'm placing some stupid words just to make sure that my professor doesn't think that I'm using stupid AI this is became a fear for writers for people in Academia there's something wrong with these tools
There's a significant difference between generating content from an AI tool, and testing this; and passing your own human work through an AI tool to be reworded. Detection is more interested in the first usage of AI; and not so much in the second usage, as this is what spell-checkers and Grammarly do anyway.
I recently sent a manuscript that I fully wrote to a journal owned by Elsevier. Turnitin detected my preprint copy on a preprint server and the managing editor asked if I could take it off the preprint server (Elsevier owns SSRN). I told him no. Turnitin is ridiculous. Be aware: if you have copies on a preprint server, some managing editors are wankers about this.
At the risk of sounding old fashioned I feel that one should write in their own words and avoid AI tools to prevent a loss of creative writing skills and avoid becoming a lazy brain in the long run
As AI gets better and learns to write identical to humans then AI detection will flag all things as AI. These AI detectors only look at how well it's written. If it's good it's considered AI. If it's highly flawed it's human. So basically everyone is trying to hold onto crap instead of embracing the future. Which makes zero sense.The reason why we can detect AI writing is because it's already better.
I used Undetectable AI to remove AI-generated content from my master’s thesis, but unfortunately, when I checked it in Turnitin, it still flagged the document as 100% AI-generated. Could you please help me resolve this issue and remove any remaining AI detection?
@@YunusAli-xs1wk what does it implies? I am not against him but I am saying that those softwares don’t give you a quality content after running your write up
this test would be complete with your human layer of assessment how rubbish the result was in each case. It's easy to bypass AI if you suddenly make stupid mistakes, for example humanizing often changes narrative to first person which is easy but unacceptable. Detectors simply think it's a daft person and too bad for AI.
If an average publishing professors' work product were run through credible AI detection, the jig would be up. Makes sense they would pick the worst one for their up and coming students, lol
Phrasely AI writes far better content. Undetectable AI writes unintelligibly. For context, a Senior Year, University paper about Behavioral Pharmacology was used.
Hey! I totally feel you on that. AI-generated content can miss the mark sometimes. If you’re looking for something more authentic, check out Hybrid Writer. Our human writers know how to create engaging content that passes AI detectors. Would love your feedback if you try it!
This is a scam. Undetectable AI doesn't do the job and this guy should know. Probably, he just gets paid from these companies to make his dubious reviews.
Is it intentional irony that this video’s description appears to have been AI generated? I have got to the point where if the first sentence of any article begins with, “In this age of…”, “In today’s rapidly advancing…”, or ends with, “… in today’s business environment”, “… in the technology environment we now live in”, or similar, I move on. These are classic AI cliched article introductions. I don’t object to using AI as a writing aid, but I’m not going to waste my time reading an article when no effort has been put into writing an interesting introduction.
It doesn't look legit as you did not show the entire originality AI score, instead you typed a number in excel leading to suspicion. Moreover, you have referral codes below in description. SOMETHING FISHY!!
Great.Humanizing Ai content doesn’t help. Also human written content doesn’t rank on google. The most important is *** value***. If you are humanizing poor ai content...waste of time.Google cares about value only.
You'll be SHOCKED by the 12 FREE AI tools that are about to TRANSFORM academic research in 2024: th-cam.com/video/qB4HGMvrhwE/w-d-xo.html
PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED
please stop capping in your videos. How can you say you paid so we dont have to pay for it only to try with the link you posted and its asking for payment ? mtschewww
I tried those methods, but honestly, Winston AI is the only one that gives me solid results. The others were kinda hit or miss.
00:38 🔍 Turnitin, Originality, and gp0 are tools used for AI content detection.
01:18 💡 Originality was the best at detecting AI content compared to Turnitin and gp0.
04:44 🛡 Undetectable and Fasley were the best at bypassing AI content detection tools.
06:19 💬 Bypass AI was able to fool Turnitin but failed to pass Originality detection.
07:17 👀 Originality was the most effective tool at detecting AI-generated content despite bypass attempts.
Originality also has a lot of false positives, probably not that relevant.
For your next test use 4 papers: 1) AI generated, 2) human generated, 3) AI generated/AI rewritten, and 4) AI generated/human rewritten.
Ypu can check out the Undetectable AI for human-generated content.
What is the best website to humanize?
Sounds interesting! If you’re experimenting with bypassing detection, you might want to try Winston AI too. It’s pretty accurate for spotting AI content.
just put a whole phrase from my head in there and came up with 0% human. I must be a bot. I think it's all about the money and just wasted £15 poooof
Andy great video just a small note: It doesn't "know that you're AI". It predicts that there is an x% of being written by AI. It's not like plagiarism where you compare text to text. AI detection is just a prediction and nothing more.
Wonder what's wrong with using AI for academic writing. the goal of a research paper is to find something new, not to write something new.
I love this response ❤😂
If the use is acknowledged by a researcher, then maybe yes, but as the video focuses on how to avoid detection, the aim is clearly not to be open and honest. This is opposite of academic integrity.
Because human beings shouldn't outsource their minds to technology.
Academics get so offended that some machine can write the same bullshit as them with their 8 years PHD.
Fair point! AI can be great for research, but for writing, that human touch is what makes it real. Hybrid Writer helps with that-human writers step in to bypass AI detectors and keep your content engaging. What’s your take on AI and human writing?
I wrote feedback to my student for submitting his dissertation, I tested my feedback in turnitin. It was detected 40% AI. I was really surprised as 90% of my writing was in first person form with my suggestions how to improve some aspects in the dissertation. Therefore I don’t trust Turnitin in detecting AI.
shocked
The likelihood of misclassification remains high for non-native English speakers/writers who use AI tools to improve fluency of their documents. That being said, wouldn't it be fun to have a tool that once applied to older texts would show how many of them were written by enslaved research assistants while signed by the big guns of the dept ? So, why is AI generated text such a scandal whereas assistants generated work has not been so for decades
yep, nailed it with this one
"provides assistants, secretaries, interns, etc with valuable work experience" - Some old dude who gave a lecture at my previous workplace
I tried using AI humanizers/bypassers, but Winston AI can detect those tools effectively. Better stick to genuine methods!
How bout Undetectable AI sir?
I already subscribed here and It says my txt is always 99.9% human like
I totally get it! Tools like Winston AI are getting sharper at detecting those AI humanizers. But have you tried Hybrid Writer? It’s different because it’s not just about tweaking words-actual human writers work on humanizing the content in a way that truly connects with readers and bypasses detection. Would love to hear your thoughts if you give it a go!
Have you written your original work amd then these tools detect it as AI? Personally I experience that every day
I'm missing one test: priming Claude by training it to write in your own style via analysing your old texts.
i tried it originality ai was able to detect it
Bro, you dropping bombs. Thank you.
Originality is a scam, I'm not sure if you're promoting this tool or you have actually tested it. I copy text from books old papers long before Ai trend most of them were labeled as Ai generated content.
Absolutely. My own original writing from 10 years ago are flagged as 88% AI.
I agree with you, all of my paper always flagged as ai even i use the best ai humanizer called Undetectable AI
@@shaneegan7354had the exact same experience. Pasted my Masters thesis from 2017 before any LLM existed for this matter. It flagged it as 80% AI
@@shaneegan7354 I know right. Like I don't understand how do we supposed to have a good writing if all the good words are flagged as ai? Do we have to use stupid words to make us look stupid for it to not be detectable as ai?
absolutely ....👌
Originality states on their website that it is not suitable for testing academic works because it will often have false positives. I would assume since Turnitin is used by thousands of Universities they error on the side of it being human since 100% AI detection accuracy is basically impossible.
I dont mean to be a partypooper here Andy but i follow you because of your excellent content about the hard (and sometimes funny) truths about research and academia, and the occassional tips and tricks for productivity from a veteran researcher who saw the light. But of late most if not all the content is about flashy new AI tools. Having tried some of them, it's (a) overwhelming because there are SO MANY and i cant really make sense of whats good; (b) the generative AI's mostly feel unfit for research no matter how good they are today, simply because they do not seem up to the mark and more often than not are like an overconfident student likely to lack nuance.
I get that a guys got to eat, and nothing against honest endorsements or even promotional content honestly, but id love to see some of your old content back as well - even the stories were hilarious. Maybe you do put them out but i only get notifs for the videos about the tools. Ps im a nobody here, so you can take this opinion with a grain of salt.
Hi Andy. Great content! But please do more content on PhD and postdoc research. especially on some supervisors who take all credit, e.g., there are many supervisors who take first author even if the majority work is done by the student etc etc
How good is originality of confirming that content is NOT AI when it is indeed human generated? One tool you showed in the past detected everything as AI.
I wish I could like this twice, hat off for the dedication
Hi Andy, can you make a video comparing DSc & PhD there seems to be very little or vague info on this on the internet
Hi Andy, the turnitin that you are using is the normal turnitin or the turnitin AI? if im not mistaken, turnitin has turnitin ai version.
How is originality at confirming that NOT AI is NOT AI? The last time you did a tool like this it detected everything as AI including my pre AI paper.
I get your frustration. Some tools can be tricky like that. If you're up for it, check out Hybrid Writer-real human writers help tweak your content to make sure it feels 100% authentic and passes those AI detectors. Would love to hear how it compares for you!
Andy, can we use a conversational tone instead of an educational one in any research paper?
Great tutorial! This is exactly what I needed to get started.
Hi, I'm the creator of StealthWriter, I want to point something out, although all some of the tools claim to bypass all AI detectors, you need to also take into account the quality of the text generated from these tools, there are many tools that claim to provide undetectable content but the output is just gibberish unreadable content. It would be a good idea to create an unbiased video comparing these tools in readability also and not only the undetectability scores. This is what we focused on the most when we created StealthWriter.
Stealthwriter didn't work for me
@mutintam3986 What detector you tried? We have many users no one complains.
@@mahermansour1131is it still working in bypassing Turnitin in? And. How about the grammar improvements I read some comments in other videos they highlighted the grammar quality
@@NeilSam-d6b yes its working fine you can check the free version, paid version is much better also.
@@mahermansour1131 thank you very much for your prompt reply! Going to try it for sure and hope won’t be caught
Unfortunately, there is no option available for us students who are studying in Africa. You see, most of African countries don't have access that can allow you pay online anywhere in the world even if you are capable of paying. So is there anyway for us students with a very limited access to bypass ai detection?
Hahaha nobody cares about Africa 😂😂😂
Do it old school and instead of copy and paste just rewrite the ai sentence with your own words
Also quillbot is free but ai detection is always updating and adapting to new methods best way is do it yourself with ai for resarch
@@messagedeleted4307 Indeed, they only care about natural resources we have because without it, they know their throat will dry instantaneously!!
@@atogthe1st Since I don't have much time, I guess this is the only option available to me that can get me out this mess right now.
If writing using AI tools is considered wrong or taboo then the same logic of thinking should also apply when using AI to detect AI-assisted writing. Based on this, using AI to detect AI is very wrong, in addition to creating many possibilities of wrong accusations and causing anxiety that should not exist.
Thanks for this video. Love watching your videos!
best transition ever
I believe in the power of AI as a research tool … but that’s all it is. A tool. I’m all for a hybrid writing strategy between AI and us mere mortals, But, I do believe we should be the dominant partner.
This was super helpful, thanks! Subscribed for more.
I am using this Undetectable AI for a while now and this really bypass some ai detectors, just make sure to tweak its setting to bypass ai detectors
No way I ran undetectable ai through copyleaks and it classifies it as ai if you cant even get it through copyleaks then undetectable ai has screwed you. Other than that it's ability to detect actual ai content is actually up there with other apps
Wow! so undetectable ai done bypassing those ai detectors so well.
How did Bro get access to Turnitin?
Originality is not intended for academic writing as they clarify this on their website.
Good insight. Wondering Ouriginality assumes by default the submitted content is AI generated?
What model originality did you use? Turbo or lite?
You write with ChatGPT, edit it, and then use a humaniser only on the parts that the detector complains about.
I have a 4000 word extended essay all of it is ai even though I changed a lot. Which one do. you think I should buy? I looked at some and they were really bad, like added slang terms into my research paper.
Thank you so much for explaining details
OMG! So there's AI services to convert AI generated content and make it NOT look AI to University AI detectors! OMG. My head is reeling at this........
Have Neri Oxman, Claudine Gay, Francesca Gino heard of these services? OMG.
As a university professor, I'm extremely frustrated that so many students use AI to do all of their work, rather than actually learn to think and write on their own. The universities I teach for use Turnitin, which as you proved is not very good. Have you found a good tool that detects AI-generated content that has been run through a bypass tool?
I’ve been struggling with this for weeks, and this video finally cleared things up. Thank you!
You can send them to me. I write essays at affordable prices, depending on the type of work.
@@clintonlamar6530how much
PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED.
Phrasly is the best. Even thr easy version is able to destroy originality’s Turbo 3
Hi Andy, Standard 2.0 comes out with a human result while Turbo comes out with AI generated. Got any solution to help out?
Sir, I am not shocked, but pretty interesting. 😀
How can we identify that which source/AI tool was used to generate the content identified as AI-generated either in Turnit-in or Originality or any other tool for this? If you may have a video on it, it would be helpful.
I don't know about source but it just identifies the ai and even if it gives a source it just cites it from an article that doesn't even relate to what you got
Hix is funny. It completely changes the context with its grammatical errors, adding context changing words.
You can send them to me. I write essays at affordable prices, depending on the type of work.
If i put a piece of work into Originality AI does it mean it is now in the big web and Turnitin can now flag it as someone else's work?
Thank you!
Now we have humbot, please make video comparing these for us sir❤❤❤
What about AI based tools like Grammarly or Reverso used by the most non native English speakers? Will they be detected as AI generated texts? Thanks
Good question. I would like to know the answer too.
Yes grammarly will make your text appear as ai written which is quite stupid if your just changing grammatical errors
Undetectable AI makes interactions feel more human.
Thanks a lot, which scan level of originality? Standard 2.0 or Turbo 3.0?
I've tried both, standard 2.0 shows it as human written while turbo shows it as ai written. hope someone can help if there is a solution out there
Awesome stuff
How do you get turn it in access?
Exclusive to teachers
I have problem with all these tools that you have mentioned because I have tested many of them with original text and they all generated an AR detection of 20 or 30% I have written those texts way before AI ever existed so I'm not sure how I made it through but apparently I'm 30% or 40% are this is very weird and it's harming and harmful to us PhD students people who works in Academia there is something wrong with this we creating something purely original and an AI stupid tool is selling the word that no it's AI generated this is frustrating to me I don't know what to do at this point I am literally just basing myself to whether I should send my text or not I'm placing some stupid words just to make sure that my professor doesn't think that I'm using stupid AI this is became a fear for writers for people in Academia there's something wrong with these tools
Are this still working? Or did something change in turnit in and the others?
Was the originality ai detection on their standard 2.0 or 3.0?
There's a significant difference between generating content from an AI tool, and testing this; and passing your own human work through an AI tool to be reworded. Detection is more interested in the first usage of AI; and not so much in the second usage, as this is what spell-checkers and Grammarly do anyway.
Heavy paraphrasing has always worked on originality for me
great video, try Conch AI too :P
not sure about undetectable anymore. I had humanised a text and ran it through turnitin and it stated It was made by ai.
Which tool you used?
what tool did u use? i have a list of humanizing tools like stealthwriter, bypass, undetectable ai. idk which one to use
I recently sent a manuscript that I fully wrote to a journal owned by Elsevier. Turnitin detected my preprint copy on a preprint server and the managing editor asked if I could take it off the preprint server (Elsevier owns SSRN). I told him no. Turnitin is ridiculous. Be aware: if you have copies on a preprint server, some managing editors are wankers about this.
Does anyone know if these techniques work on older versions?
You can send them to me. I write essays at affordable prices, depending on the type of work.
At the risk of sounding old fashioned I feel that one should write in their own words and avoid AI tools to prevent a loss of creative writing skills and avoid becoming a lazy brain in the long run
Unfortunately, there is no way to prove your innocence. AI detectors fail on content written in the 90's.
Nah don't work like that I literally pulled a story that doesn't even exist and tools still classify it as ai even though I made it up
Have you written anything that is entirely original and see what the detection is?
Advise, well noted. Thanks a bunch Andy.
what about for photos?
Even more cooked
@@dawn78145 I figured it out
As AI gets better and learns to write identical to humans then AI detection will flag all things as AI. These AI detectors only look at how well it's written. If it's good it's considered AI. If it's highly flawed it's human. So basically everyone is trying to hold onto crap instead of embracing the future. Which makes zero sense.The reason why we can detect AI writing is because it's already better.
I used Undetectable AI to remove AI-generated content from my master’s thesis, but unfortunately, when I checked it in Turnitin, it still flagged the document as 100% AI-generated.
Could you please help me resolve this issue and remove any remaining AI detection?
Netus ai bypasses all ai detectors, including turnitin
What are of them is free?
every tool here is paid, and the author links to those tool are all affiliate links
Well, I am using the Undetectable AI now for about 5 months and I never get detected by this
Your software "humanize" failed with CopyLeaks. I tried 2x to rewrite it with your software and each time it came back 100% AI.
You can send them to me. I write essays at affordable prices, depending on the type of work.
Fake. Don't fall for that. Yes, it can give low AI detection but the content you will get will not fit for a purpose. It gives you wrong content.
Yes sir..
Guys, this guy is a lecturer who works in a university
@@YunusAli-xs1wk what does it implies? I am not against him but I am saying that those softwares don’t give you a quality content after running your write up
this test would be complete with your human layer of assessment how rubbish the result was in each case. It's easy to bypass AI if you suddenly make stupid mistakes, for example humanizing often changes narrative to first person which is easy but unacceptable. Detectors simply think it's a daft person and too bad for AI.
I need because i have so much work to do
If an average publishing professors' work product were run through credible AI detection, the jig would be up. Makes sense they would pick the worst one for their up and coming students, lol
i dont allow my students to do writing at home anymore because of stuff like this. All writing must be done by hand in the classroom.
Can you do one with Turnitin?
You can send them to me. I write essays at affordable prices, depending on the type of work.
is phrasly free or do u have to pay?
Free but you get a 300 word limit
crazy that you test tools that are long proven to be inaccurate.
Phrasely AI writes far better content. Undetectable AI writes unintelligibly. For context, a Senior Year, University paper about Behavioral Pharmacology was used.
Tried undetectable. Wow was it bad. Like worse than the days of WordAI. These humanizers make the content passable, but completely unreadable.
Hey! I totally feel you on that. AI-generated content can miss the mark sometimes. If you’re looking for something more authentic, check out Hybrid Writer. Our human writers know how to create engaging content that passes AI detectors.
Would love your feedback if you try it!
Undetectable is a complete waste of time and money as they reduce the content to a tiny fraction. For 1000s words, you get like 20 or similar ratios.
You can send them to me. I write essays at affordable prices, depending on the type of work.
This is a scam. Undetectable AI doesn't do the job and this guy should know. Probably, he just gets paid from these companies to make his dubious reviews.
You saved my ass
what did you use?
If Google detects also so bad, then it's irrelevant what we publish 😂
Whether I'm finished or not i dont care
these didnt work and i got a bad turnit in score
You can send them to me. I write essays at affordable prices, depending on the type of work.
Is it intentional irony that this video’s description appears to have been AI generated?
I have got to the point where if the first sentence of any article begins with, “In this age of…”, “In today’s rapidly advancing…”, or ends with, “… in today’s business environment”, “… in the technology environment we now live in”, or similar, I move on.
These are classic AI cliched article introductions. I don’t object to using AI as a writing aid, but I’m not going to waste my time reading an article when no effort has been put into writing an interesting introduction.
Undetectable AI couldn't pass Originality AI Turbo 3.0 :((
I tried Undetectable AI and it bypass the Originality ai, maybe try tweaking to make your content undetected. :))
Dont use Phrasely its BS. I couldn't even get a 1900 word to humanise. Its a scam.
You can send them to me. I write essays at affordable prices, depending on the type of work.
Lmao 😭 I was wondering why it took a century to scan the words
undetectable ai does not bypass turnitin as of today
You can send them to me. I write essays at affordable prices, depending on the type of work.
Yep it's gone now
@@dawn78145 What do you guys use now? I need something to bypass it
ai bros have to trick you into looking at their drek lmao
yeah this is totes the future
It doesn't look legit as you did not show the entire originality AI score, instead you typed a number in excel leading to suspicion. Moreover, you have referral codes below in description. SOMETHING FISHY!!
yes, I also thought it
VIP
originality is still bull shit , even my own paraphrased text is dected as a.i .... what this lol ...
Great.Humanizing Ai content doesn’t help. Also human written content doesn’t rank on google. The most important is *** value***. If you are humanizing poor ai content...waste of time.Google cares about value only.
You should start an AI channel. That’s pretty much all you talk about these days.