Quantification || Logic || Quantifiers || Predicate Logic|| Philosophy || Solved Exercise||

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ค. 2024
  • Quantification Proving Validity: • Quantification || Prov...
    Quantification Proving Invalidity:

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @Soniarshpreet_27
    @Soniarshpreet_27 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please upload rest exercises as soon as possible ma'am

  • @priyanshibhatt9146
    @priyanshibhatt9146 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for uploading😄

  • @RimjhimYadav-dv4in
    @RimjhimYadav-dv4in 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thankyou ma'am❤

  • @Kripa_Agarwalla
    @Kripa_Agarwalla หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will the subject the predicate be interchanged agar ‘only’ sentence ke beech aa raha hai?

  • @praanhbhakshi9810
    @praanhbhakshi9810 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i have a doubt, in the exercises question 3 why is it an I preposition and not A because in the above two there is no certain quantity explaining them to be universals question 2 and 3 are almost the same the only difference is that 3rd one doesn't have negation and still you considered the 2nd as E . then why did we use I preposition instead of A because in the 3rd question it is just plainly given that, reporters are present and in 2nd it is given as sparrows are not mammals then why cant we use O preposition in 2nd. because in semantics both question 2 and 3 are almost the same. then why is 2nd E and not O

    • @darshan_stanzin
      @darshan_stanzin  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Such statements can be doubtful, we can determine the meaning by examining the context in which it is used. In Q:3 (It is not possible for ALL the reporters to be present) and Q4:(If you use O: Some sparrows are not mammals, it means that some are mammals which is FALSE)

  • @Kripa_Agarwalla
    @Kripa_Agarwalla หลายเดือนก่อน

    The sentence which starts with ‘none but’, usme subject aur predicate ki jagah interchange hoti hai?

    • @darshan_stanzin
      @darshan_stanzin  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes

    • @Kripa_Agarwalla
      @Kripa_Agarwalla หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@darshan_stanzin can you please symbolise this sentence using quantifiers- all fencers are not exuberant

    • @darshan_stanzin
      @darshan_stanzin  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kripa_Agarwalla It’s ( O ) proposition

    • @Kripa_Agarwalla
      @Kripa_Agarwalla หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@darshan_stanzin Indians are rarely punctual. What about this?

    • @Kripa_Agarwalla
      @Kripa_Agarwalla หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@darshan_stanzin If either Socrates was happily married or else he wasn’t, then Socrates was a great philosopher. Therefore, Socrates was a great philosopher. (H,G)
      Symbolise please ma’am