Terraforming Mars Gameplay Runthrough

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2016
  • Help Rahdo Run: / rahdo ❤️ Code of conduct: conduct.rahdo.com 🙂 And now...
    A video outlining gameplay for the boardgame Terraforming Mars.
    For more game info, boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/1...
    Part I: Gameplay Runthrough
    • Terraforming Mars Game...
    • (static cam) Terraform... (Static)
    Part II: Extended Gameplay
    • Terraforming Mars Exte...
    • (static cam) Terraform... (Static)
    Part III: Final Thoughts
    • Terraforming Mars | Ra...
    ---------------------
    Hey Everybody! Today Paulo Runs Through "Rahdo's Goofs"
    If you find Goofs I didn’t notice Please leave Timestamps :)
    Thank You
    1:20 Those are player cubes, they aren't supposed to be used there, he should be using the other 3 types of cubes that represent quantity of resources
    1:41 When playing the Standard game with the not Beginner Corporation cards like Ecoline, you start with 1 Production of everything PLUS what the Corporation card says, so in this case Richard should start with a Production of Plants of 3, not 2
    2:37 Jen should start with 4 Heat production (1+3)
    10:12 In a 2P game you only score the 5 points for the one that Wins the Award, second place gets nothing
    14:43 Not instead... when you place a Tile on the Board if there's anything printed on that space you receive that thing... in this case Richard should have received the Titanium that was printed on the space and would also increase the Titanium production due to the power of the project he played.
    Also, that tile should be flipped and placed with the other side up so that Richard could put one of his ownership cubes on the tile stating that he owns that space
    21:05 Forgot to Pay the 1 Mega Credit to be able to Search for Life

ความคิดเห็น • 76

  • @brandondwaite
    @brandondwaite 7 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    I know you don't really like this game, but I want you to know how much I appreciate you filming a run-through for it anyway. Others have done them already, but yours are the ones I really lean on when I am making and purchasing decision. Thanks for pushing through so that we can get a better idea of whether this game will work for us.

    • @boardgamefangirl
      @boardgamefangirl 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      DITTO Squared! Richard's run-throughs really are detailed and super helpful and have definitely influenced my purchase decisions.

    • @DavidKlausa
      @DavidKlausa 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just curious, why don't they like the game? I felt it was sorta inelegant, with too much going on and no clear logical strategy, which I find frustrating, but I've only played it once.

  • @sevatatarenkov7246
    @sevatatarenkov7246 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hi. I am pretty sure that you can play Search for Life as long as Oxygen is below 6%. However, once you play it, you can use it every generation, even when the oxygen level is higher than 6%. It talks about it on page 6 of the instruction manual, about how the requirement needs to be met when you play the card not when you use it later. Regardless, thank you for the tutorial, it was super helpful for getting started with the game.

  • @Qui86
    @Qui86 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sounds like this guy is having a blast!

  • @MnMcoo
    @MnMcoo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now I finally understand how to play the game - thank you!

  • @Eriadel
    @Eriadel 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've just got this game today. A lot of fun and options. I simply love it even in the basic mode.

  • @vanchaser
    @vanchaser 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    At 10:12 - In a 2 player (only) game there is no second place. There is only 5 points for first place for awards.

    • @Krste198
      @Krste198 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The 2nd player will get victory points for that even if he doesn't own the reward?

  • @Toytoonsreviews
    @Toytoonsreviews 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Rahdo, You have the best run through tutorial for this game by far. We had a hard time figuring out the game until we found your vids. Now we watch your vids for reference for our new games all the time. We just watched Roll Player, Near and Far and many others that we recently purchased, all of them are very easy to follow and entertaining to watch. Keep up the great work!

  • @Jackanapes7
    @Jackanapes7 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    When playing the standard game where everyone starts with a production of 1 across the board, EcoLine would still increase your plant production by 2, so you should have started at 3.

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yup, that error was noted in the video and the video show notes. i'll still maintain that the way the rules are written though that my interpretation was correct (but that's just the rules being too vague) :)

    • @Femaiden
      @Femaiden 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the way i read it...it looks like its just a flat “2” not a “+2” . I look at the operative words. It says “you start with 2 plant production” not “you start with +2 plant production “
      granted, this gives them a smaller headstart if people use the standard “+1” to all production method over starting with nothing.
      but it just feels like that was the way they intended it. because the alternate start where you start with nothing was not the original way, that’s for the “corporate era” expansion, so it feels like the “spirit” was for ecoline to start with exactly 2 while everyone else starts with 1

  • @PaulSmith-zs5je
    @PaulSmith-zs5je 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My wife and I played this game for the first time last night and there was very little "Take that" and found a number of opponent actions help the opposition. Found it well balance with different strategies. I had little Mega Credits and high heat and mining. She beat me by 10 VP in the end as she had the money to purchase the awards and milestones.

  • @DanGalarzaCyber
    @DanGalarzaCyber 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting, so there *is* set collection, which is what I watched this video for: to find out what Tags were. Thanks for your help.

  • @xxalgorinxx
    @xxalgorinxx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    epic fast review, i need this game after this!!! tks a lot!!!!

  • @IainMabbott
    @IainMabbott 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "Regolith is a fancy science word for dirt." :)

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      SCIENCE!

  • @stvaf
    @stvaf 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Woah, your time when playing this awesome Terraforming Mars is the same as mine..!
    Thanks for playthrough-ing this awesome game, Rahdo!

    • @eusebiou-say-bee-oh326
      @eusebiou-say-bee-oh326 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ... playing through ? Around the world, English is already an amalgam of a language. It will only becomes more difficult to learn, for those who are learning, if we keep on making new rules for its use (...not being offensive, so please don't be offended 👍)

  • @ludwigvanbeethoven61
    @ludwigvanbeethoven61 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This will game will be legendary in 2032+

  • @JJ_TheGreat
    @JJ_TheGreat 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just played this game for the first time at my game night. My issues with the game so far have to do with the end of game scoring. I had no idea while playing - for example, how plants and cities on the Mars map would be scored. I played with the corporation which helped me become efficient at heating up the planet, and the cards I received were more focused on improving my heat production than anything else. I also did not understand what microbes were and how to use them on the cards until 2/3 of the way through the game. As a result, I was able to get quick, easy points from each time I raised the temperature, but because I was not able to get cards which allowed me to build cities or gardens, I neglected getting anything on the map. Yes, I know that I could have spent 25 to build a city, but that is a lot of money to put something for which you do not know how it could help you - that is, not knowing how many points it would give you. I will have to give the game another try, now that I know what I need to focus on to score even at the end.
    In comparison, I am a Terra Mystica fan. In that game, you know exactly how you can get bonus points during the game - as well as at the end of the game. Analogously, my not knowing how points are scored at the end of the game in Terraforming Mars, would be like if I did not know how points would be distributed from the cult tracks ("Hmm... So if I can get to 5 on this one, maybe I'll end up with 5 more points") or from the final area scoring - if, for example, I were to just continue to expand my one town and make it as big as possible instead of using shipping to go elsewhere - and expand your foothold elsewhere around the map for final area scoring.

  • @namrevo84
    @namrevo84 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "slowly but surely... terraform the planet mars" Nice one ;-)

  • @josephsapiano6170
    @josephsapiano6170 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is there any player interaction apart from negatively effecting other players with card actions?? Sounds like pretty multi-player playing kind of solitaire to me...

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      there are lots of attack cards, you compete to beat players in several different metrics, you try to steal land from them on the board itself. it's one of the more "interactive" euro style games to come out in the last few years

  • @nezukoshop
    @nezukoshop 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, why being late, rahdo? I've already played this game 7 times since I bought. I have no regret buying this, the strategic rating @ BGG is high enough at 14th. :D

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      arranging co-host is tough. i actually filmed the runthrough over a month ago

  • @ronhatch9175
    @ronhatch9175 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does the "Sell patents" project have an icon with an X for the cash you receive? There must be some circumstance under which it gives you more than 1, right?

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      as an action, you can discard as many cards from your hand as you like and get $1 for each

  • @rolandoorozco599
    @rolandoorozco599 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great stuff as always. Curious...how long does it take you to learn a game so you're comfortable enough to do these awesome runthroughs?

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      one or two plays. in rare cases, no plays (see food chain magnate runthrough)

  • @vognarov
    @vognarov 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just love your channel. There is simply no better way to learn new game on your own. English isnt even my mother tongue but it doesnt matter because your camera movement, explanations and thought process is so perfectly executed in every video, thank you and please keep going! :)

  • @veerchasm1
    @veerchasm1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a better version of Concordia with an endgame that makes thematic sense

  • @cjanquart
    @cjanquart 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hell-E-on or he-Lee-on?
    SpaceBucks or MegaCredits? Who cares...it's a great game!

  • @stormquiver
    @stormquiver 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    think you missed placing the generation marker on the board.

    • @DeathTheTeen
      @DeathTheTeen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Generation marker for multiplayer games is useless. It's only there to track how many generations your game took. Don't know why they added it in the general setup. It only has a purpose in solo and drafting variants.

  • @robbmh87
    @robbmh87 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where in rulebook does it state to use money for your resources instead of your player markers?

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      sorry, what moment (timestamp) are you referring to in the video?

  • @Femaiden
    @Femaiden 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    just gonna say, on your first turn you went into that whole explanation about jovian and space cards and explained the strategy with the mining right and why you wanted to put it on a titanium space.
    i was wondering why you put it on the “1 titanium” spot instead of the water space with 2 titaniums on it.
    i’m assuming that you thought you couldn’t do that because it is water.
    I believe you can, because if you look at the board, you will notice that there are a total of 12 ocean spaces but there are only 9 ocean tiles, in addition, there are exactly 3 of those special tiles such as mining rights and the sinkhole that could “potentially “ be placed on ocean tiles,
    this is why they put 12 ocean spaces on the board, it is to facilitate the fact the you HAVE to place all 9 ocean tiles to complete the game, while still allowing for those 3 special tiles to still be placed on the ocean spots.
    I also interpret it such that those blue spaces, technically don’t have any water on them at the start; they merely mark the spots where water will pool when we start melting icecaps and causing weather phenomena. it could be like...earth’s government “zoning” and they only approved certain projects to be allowed to be put there.
    just like that “city” hex, the city isn’t there yet, but the space is preplanned for the eventual city to be placed there, so nothing else can be put there

    • @deuce1062
      @deuce1062 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      you cannot play Mining Rights on an ocean-reserved space. you can only play ocean tiles there UNLESS a card specifically says it breaks those rules (3 cards do - mohole, protected valley, and mangrove). thus 12 spaces = nine required oceans plus the three special exceptions (of which mining rights is not one).

  • @LoveDragonDon
    @LoveDragonDon 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    For beginners level, 10 cards that starts out are FREE actually.

  • @BoardgameswithNiramas
    @BoardgameswithNiramas 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best game of 2016 imo! And the carebear aspect... I guess you could just remove those few card that are a bit mean? Now as a 2 player game I dunno, just played it with 3,4,5 players and it is just simply awsome as such!

  • @KuddlyKisses
    @KuddlyKisses 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aw, I thought this was going to be cooperative -_- Terraforming Mars would have been a perfect theme.

  • @Femaiden
    @Femaiden 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    also, i dunno why so many people dislike this game...i think it’s really smart and fun and i can’t understand why it got passed over by Mensa selects....and then Mensa selects games like Ghoooosts!(which i think is a stupidly dumb game) and Fluxx(which i do like, i just don’t understand why Mensa picked it) instead...

  • @aarondovauo1471
    @aarondovauo1471 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool idea, not for us as we already have a healthy dose of "take that" in a fair number of our games.

  • @terencerocckid5052
    @terencerocckid5052 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Use alot of big air mattress to suck the gas out of mars atmosphere and put oxygen making factors at the poles while also planting plants or algae.😂😂😂

  • @jerryf196
    @jerryf196 ปีที่แล้ว

    This game or origin first builders?

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  ปีที่แล้ว

      origins for us, but i think that's a pretty minority opinion! :)

    • @jerryf196
      @jerryf196 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rahdo thanks. Actually watching this video you did on origins: th-cam.com/video/7hng5y_Bmqg/w-d-xo.html

  • @GameUp5406
    @GameUp5406 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WHY U NO FINISH THOUGHT!!!!!!

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sorry, not sure i understand

  • @Mat23
    @Mat23 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You talk so fast at times dude... it was a bit hard to follow. But thanks for the run through eitherway. :)

  • @adamheeley285
    @adamheeley285 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The components look really cheap. It would probably sell more if they made them higher quality. The cards look like they were made on printer paper.

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      well they've already repeatedly sold out :)

  • @sirrichiofawesome9617
    @sirrichiofawesome9617 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didn't you say you wasn't going to review this because it was too cut-throat?

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i had said that i was hesitant to get the game in the first place becuase i was worried that it would be too cutthoat, but in the end, my voters *really* wanted to see it, and I did want to try it because I was confident it was going to be well designed, and I hoped it wouldn't be "too spicy" for us, but it turned out it was...

    • @sirrichiofawesome9617
      @sirrichiofawesome9617 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      *****
      I'm sorry it wasn't a game which would work for you and Jen, but I really appreciate you gave it a try and made a runthrough.
      You give the best reviews since you show how the game is played and don't just give your opinions and description of the rules. I rely on you for 95% of the games I am interested in and my wife will only watch you.
      I think Terraforming Mars will work for us, since the attack cards seem more setbacks than outright destruction, I need to see what my wife thinks before making my final decision
      Thanks again for the runthrough!

  • @houndofzoltan
    @houndofzoltan ปีที่แล้ว

    Jen's a bit quiet...

  • @SteveKelem
    @SteveKelem 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Camera-work is too unsteady to watch without getting nauseous! Waving cards around in front of the camera is also disturbing, and we can't pause and read the cards. I ended up listening and glancing at the screen occasionally.

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      there's static cam versions of all my vids (check the shownotes)

    • @ludwigvanbeethoven61
      @ludwigvanbeethoven61 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's fine.

  • @truce11
    @truce11 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Badly need update in art quality. Looks bland but I want to like it

  • @AUGOM0919
    @AUGOM0919 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    i got more confused.. pffftt..

  • @iammurphy
    @iammurphy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't think Jen exists

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      oops, typo... faq.rahdo.com #1 :)

  • @hiimsho3683
    @hiimsho3683 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought it was a fps game...

  • @jdrmdrla
    @jdrmdrla 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is he cute? Lol

  • @azell2913
    @azell2913 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    is jen real?

    • @rahdo
      @rahdo  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      faq.rahdo.com #1

  • @amorbavian
    @amorbavian 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy's just talks without punctuation