Mackinder's Heartland Theory (AP Human Geography)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Ever wonder how you could take over the world? This video has got you covered! In this video you will learn what the Heartland theory is and how you can use it to take over the world.
    Need help studying for APHG?! Check out this awesome resource created by Mr. Sinn! The Ultimate Review packet goes over every unit and concept that you need to know for AP Human Geography!
    AP Human Geography Ultimate Review Packet: www.ultimatereviewpacket.com/...
    Subscribe and hit the bell to see a new videos.
    Subscribe here ►goo.gl/7sNYbR
    #HumanGeo #WorldDomination #APHUG

ความคิดเห็น • 131

  • @dandrethomas8015
    @dandrethomas8015 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Love the beginning

    • @revinhatol
      @revinhatol 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Баетовду ким башкарса, Ак-Талаа районуна таасир этиши мүмкүн.
      Ак-Талаа районун башкарган адам Нарын облусуна таасир этиши мүмкүн.
      Нарын облусун башкарган адам Кыргызстанга таасир этиши мүмкүн.
      Кыргызстанды башкарган адам жүрөктөргө таасир этиши мүмкүн (Орто Азия).
      Жүрөктү башкарган адам Дүйнөлүк Аралга (Афроэуразия) таасир этиши мүмкүн.
      Дүйнөлүк аралды башкарган адам дүйнөгө (Жер) таасир этиши мүмкүн.
      Baetovdu kim başkarsa, Ak-Talaa rayonuna taasir etişi mümkün.
      Ak-Talaa rayonun başkargan adam Narın oblusuna taasir etişi mümkün.
      Narın oblusun başkargan adam Kırgızstanga taasir etişi mümkün.
      Kırgızstandı başkargan adam jüröktörgö taasir etişi mümkün (Orto Aziya).
      Jüröktü başkargan adam Düynölük Aralga (Afroeuraziya) taasir etişi mümkün.
      Düynölük araldı başkargan adam düynögö (Jer) taasir etişi mümkün.

  • @ralphbernhard1757
    @ralphbernhard1757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The Heartland Theory was perfectly valid.
    If pre-WW1 Germany/Austria-Hungary/Russia united with common goals, and convinced a few weaker nations (like the Ottoman Empire) to sign up, they could have swarmed all over the world starting with Persia/ME (incl. the Suez Canal), and there would have been little "naval powers" like GB or the USA could have done about it.
    It was *nukes in combination with very long range strategic bombers* (B-29) which made it obsolete in 1945.

    • @doraemon61377
      @doraemon61377 ปีที่แล้ว

      True. But at the same time, long range strategic bombers are not that long range. Long range means more fuel required and even with today modern technology, the vast expenses of Russia mean that it takes too long to reach into the interior.

    • @robertwilson214
      @robertwilson214 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Berlin- Baghdad railway.

  • @unstoppable_naari
    @unstoppable_naari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What an awesome explaination man❤️💎

  • @saidiyassine8135
    @saidiyassine8135 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Clear, and to the point. Thank you

  • @zenrouh4495
    @zenrouh4495 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I just found this old video, but it makes sense regarding Ukraine, The heartland needs to control east of Europe in order to avoid to be controlled.

    • @cscs9192
      @cscs9192 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      or to control the world... You can see it from both sides.

    • @Rishi123456789
      @Rishi123456789 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Mackinder's Heartland theory is obsolete now.

    • @MrNorma77
      @MrNorma77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Все таки есть думающие люди на западе, а то у меня сложилось впечатление что люди в основе своей элементарно географию не знают, не говоря уже о геополитике

  • @srijansrivastava69
    @srijansrivastava69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Awesome! Keep going! ❤️

  • @PaolaSanchez-kq3lx
    @PaolaSanchez-kq3lx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great job! Thank you!

  • @grantjones5894
    @grantjones5894 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Your thoughts intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  • @hardstylelife5749
    @hardstylelife5749 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really well explained, bravo!

  • @muskduh
    @muskduh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for all that you do

  • @supergamesvideos8450
    @supergamesvideos8450 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good and simple lecture,,,,thanks🥰

  • @brendakorir7827
    @brendakorir7827 ปีที่แล้ว

    Understood. Thank you!

  • @calebmeyerhoff
    @calebmeyerhoff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I will take over world now thank you

    • @huzeyfebulut9138
      @huzeyfebulut9138 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But if each of us will take over the world, who's going to the grocery

  • @ThePRCommander
    @ThePRCommander 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well explained, thank you. Subcribed.

  • @patriciapaul218
    @patriciapaul218 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU SO MUCH IT HELPED A LOT

  • @sami2612
    @sami2612 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot
    It's so informative

  • @rema4750
    @rema4750 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for making this video 🧿🙏🏼‼🧿🙏🏼‼

  • @ashishdwivedi4272
    @ashishdwivedi4272 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Mr Sinn

  • @sacchin8535
    @sacchin8535 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb lecture!

  • @kuamrrishabh
    @kuamrrishabh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, really well explained. One question about a statement which you made at the end about Rimland that it can out maneuver heartland from the oceans.
    How could Rimland do it when the basic definition of heartland says that it has no access to oceans?

  • @tracyjefferson2398
    @tracyjefferson2398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks! Nice Intro!

  • @mizrov8180
    @mizrov8180 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks!

  • @deborahverdier9900
    @deborahverdier9900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Merci beaucoup, c'est très clair

  • @fastinoclement3312
    @fastinoclement3312 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great thank you

  • @ABHISHEK-xm5mt
    @ABHISHEK-xm5mt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good explanation 👌

  • @radiojockey5049
    @radiojockey5049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just subscribed 👍

  • @g4zindagi933
    @g4zindagi933 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Grt lecture.
    Can u plz discuss its relevance in contemporary world?

    • @redcoltken
      @redcoltken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lookup peter zeihan

    • @FanOfYiruma
      @FanOfYiruma 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look at one belt one road initiative!

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super interesting lecture dear sir.🗻🌍

  • @SachinLKO1
    @SachinLKO1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @MrNorma77
    @MrNorma77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Маккиндер не успел дописать 4 часть: Все кто пытается силой войти в Хардленд - получает жестко по еб@лу!

    • @andyboxish4436
      @andyboxish4436 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣

    • @vanezz
      @vanezz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ahahaha true

    • @MrMarat0407
      @MrMarat0407 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂смешной малый

    • @TriBandah
      @TriBandah หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂

  • @nasimaakter6722
    @nasimaakter6722 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there anyone who purchased the guided notes.i m unable to download it.plz help

  • @abhirajsingh8310
    @abhirajsingh8310 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanation!!

  • @acyutad
    @acyutad 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video and I'll support you by liking your video from now on! Love froom indonesia

    • @MrSinn
      @MrSinn  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you so much for the support! I am glad I could help!

  • @akshay3143
    @akshay3143 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Heartland Theory makes a good observation of the power balance across the world. However, the Heartland, though self-sustaining split up into a number of republics.

    • @doraemon61377
      @doraemon61377 ปีที่แล้ว

      True but Russia is still a heartland power.

  • @michelletorres781
    @michelletorres781 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Next video request . Zbigniew Brzezinski Geopolitical theory and thinkers

  • @Tiarzwigeo
    @Tiarzwigeo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best one

  • @akashchaubey5746
    @akashchaubey5746 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice❤️

  • @TheRealSyncRow
    @TheRealSyncRow 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Power check? Mackinder was the first vibe check

  • @andraslibal
    @andraslibal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    1914 was the time for a Russian-German alliance. In fact 1878 was already a golden opportunity missed. Germany needed a space to expand and Russia needed the German technology and development. How the Rimland machinations succeeded in bleeding them both out in futile wars fought in the interest of the Rimland 🙄 is beyond me 🤷‍♂

  • @jackmiller4708
    @jackmiller4708 ปีที่แล้ว

    What lesson would this be

  • @ChockPoint
    @ChockPoint 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Teori heartland cocok untuk negara kontinental....untuk negara kepulauan dan super power menggunakan teori AT Mahan....

  • @sumaiaafroze9376
    @sumaiaafroze9376 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you add line by line bellow the video, it will be helpful.

  • @malihatabassum5654
    @malihatabassum5654 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is the note?

  • @Charliecomet82
    @Charliecomet82 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I read once that Mackinder's theory only made sense if you were looking at a Mercator Projection map of the world.

    • @cdmcmxcvi1249
      @cdmcmxcvi1249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t think it does. Because if you look at the eastern flank of the Heartland, its nearest point of enemy land access and contention is China. China and Russia will remain amicable so long as they are authoritarian. But aside from that, an airborne invasion of Yakutia and Chukotka is untenable. In terms of “backing yourself against a wall”, Russia is the country best situated to do so. They have everything in front of them. It is a fortress.

  • @pfpf6450
    @pfpf6450 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Something i don't understand about this theory is that the russian empire and the USSR had control of the heartland yet they were not controlling the world island were they? Dosent it make the theory unvalid?

    • @matttaylor2627
      @matttaylor2627 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      pf pf yes Russia dominates the heartland by pure luck (due to their geographical position). However, Mackinder also said that there were two main reasons why Russia wouldn’t be able to control the world despite controlling the heartland. This is because of the 14 countries which neighbour Russia which could invade them at any time (especially after the break up of the USSR in 1991). Also because Russia lacks a warm sea port. This means that although Russia have a vast amount of resources found in the heartland, they cannot export these resources in the winter as the sea freezes. This means that other countries could out produce Russia in the winter months and therefore, wasn’t reliant on Russia. This is why Russia doesn’t dominate the world, especially now that the heartland is dominated by 15-17 countries after the split of the USSR. Any help ?

    • @plintfain122
      @plintfain122 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@matttaylor2627 it is helpful thank you (i just saw your answer) ! Therefore for USSR back in the days they would have needed to conquer / dominate Iran ( or Pakistan ?) in order to have access to a warm sea and achieve world domination?

    • @tomasroma2333
      @tomasroma2333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      matt taylor That may be true for Russia but it doesn’t explain why the USSR didn’t come to dominate. They controlled eastern Europe and still fell apart.

    • @ziborgbe
      @ziborgbe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tomasroma2333 because they weren't able to build an attractive state. They lacked an efficiency during peace time.

    • @PeterDivine
      @PeterDivine 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@matttaylor2627 Seems to me that Heartland theory is _ipso facto_ defunct if this whole 'today the Heartland, tomorrow THE WORLD!!!' thought process can be shut down the instant you realize the Heartland gives you an abundance of resources and almost no capacity for naval trade some 70-80% of the year or whatever. Was Mackinder really such a hack he couldn't even consider what a country's geographical latitude would do to resource production and transport?
      I'm inclined to say yes, given how ridiculously oversimplified this all seems, even IF you only consider the geographical perspective and not how the world has changed since the 1910's.

  • @demlinnalo2030
    @demlinnalo2030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @WahidKhan-mr4gx
    @WahidKhan-mr4gx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please add subtitles for the people of Rimland.

  • @TronUse999
    @TronUse999 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok this theory supposed to explain humans geopolitic relationships through every human time periods so my question is how this theory explain the crusades for example? Since it been initiated by sea powers
    Note: I love history as well geography

  • @agnes7801
    @agnes7801 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    LOVING THE INTRO

    • @bumheo64
      @bumheo64 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agnes he coppy from other people intro

  • @saturnentertainment9821
    @saturnentertainment9821 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you believe in a revival of geopolitics in world politics. Why and why not

  • @rema4750
    @rema4750 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    now that I think of it. libya.

  • @adeela3895
    @adeela3895 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    U helped me more than my book.. thank you

  • @just.play1ng
    @just.play1ng 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video should be called: how to understand the wolrd in few minutes

  • @NEdumpling
    @NEdumpling 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    the logic is confusing. Russia already had the heartland and yet it did not prevail, obviously there is some caveat to the heartland theory. Instead of investigating what the caveats are, mackinder decided that the next country that commands the heartland, which supposedly Germany was the best candidate, will simply be able to do what russia couldnt?

    • @Rishi123456789
      @Rishi123456789 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The Heartland theory is obsolete now. Sea-based powers (like Britain, for example) are superior to land-based powers (like Russia, for example). That's why Britain was the world's sole superpower from 1815 to 1945, then Britain's successor the United States of America became a superpower from 1945 to today with the United States of America being the world's sole superpower from 1991 to today. So in one form or another, Anglo global hegemony has existed for 207 years.

  • @mikelake1306
    @mikelake1306 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Continued to evolve his theory" or "kept moving the goalposts"? Tomato, to-mah-to. The fragility of Mackinder's theory is underlined by the number of times he had to redefine even its most basic terms to salvage his idee fixe.

  • @antotyrrell2012
    @antotyrrell2012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the heartland going to come under Ruso/Chinese rule.
    Are we seeing the balance of power transferring from the Atlantic to the Pacific?

  • @geoeconomics5629
    @geoeconomics5629 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    An existential threat to the USA UK is GermanyRussia strategic partnership

    • @TronUse999
      @TronUse999 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you look to history Germany was part of greater frankia that consisted of France Germany and Austria union but never Russia, Russia historically considered it self third Roman Empire so they want to reclaim all of eastern Roman lands and also unite all Slavic countries, so there actually 2 threats to Anglo dominance on the world not one !!!

    • @geoeconomics5629
      @geoeconomics5629 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TronUse999
      An EXISTENTIAL threat
      to the UK was United Europe
      An EXISTENTIAL threat to the USA UK
      since 1904 is GermanyRussia strategic partnership

  • @jellylofranco5284
    @jellylofranco5284 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    put some caption next time

  • @sami2612
    @sami2612 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does he look a lot like Sheldon😲😲??

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    super one sunflower🏝🗻🐷🚮

  • @Lahesou6891
    @Lahesou6891 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They don't explain that in the medias on Ukraine crisis, they should, gives a better understanding on what's actually going on.

  • @lorenagarfias7017
    @lorenagarfias7017 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh I would like to be better at english 😭

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🌻🌼🌈✍️🎓

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌻🌈

  • @trmon8890
    @trmon8890 ปีที่แล้ว

    Look at China's string of pearls policy

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    All right z theory
    peace now
    🗻🌏🌍🌍🏝🌋🏞🏞🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷

  • @hellosiri1483
    @hellosiri1483 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My friend is so cheap he shared all of your notes for free :( like 56student got your notes for free

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🌼🌻🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🏝️🥬🌸👌🌈🌾🥀🌼🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬

  • @revinhatol
    @revinhatol 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Баетовду ким башкарса, Ак-Талаа районуна таасир этиши мүмкүн.
    Ак-Талаа районун башкарган адам Нарын облусуна таасир этиши мүмкүн.
    Нарын облусун башкарган адам Кыргызстанга таасир этиши мүмкүн.
    Кыргызстанды башкарган адам жүрөктөргө таасир этиши мүмкүн (Орто Азия).
    Жүрөктү башкарган адам Дүйнөлүк Аралга (Афроэуразия) таасир этиши мүмкүн.
    Дүйнөлүк аралды башкарган адам дүйнөгө (Жер) таасир этиши мүмкүн.
    Baetovdu kim başkarsa, Ak-Talaa rayonuna taasir etişi mümkün.
    Ak-Talaa rayonun başkargan adam Narın oblusuna taasir etişi mümkün.
    Narın oblusun başkargan adam Kırgızstanga taasir etişi mümkün.
    Kırgızstandı başkargan adam jüröktörgö taasir etişi mümkün (Orto Aziya).
    Jüröktü başkargan adam Düynölük Aralga (Afroeuraziya) taasir etişi mümkün.
    Düynölük araldı başkargan adam düynögö (Jer) taasir etişi mümkün.

  • @donone1493
    @donone1493 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That's why the US bis panicking about Russia and chine because they are in the heartland

  • @gabrielniklasschildt5612
    @gabrielniklasschildt5612 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo this is like a straight up copy video of strategy stuff's channel...

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🌈👌

  • @geoeconomics5629
    @geoeconomics5629 ปีที่แล้ว

    For America the chief geopolitical prize is Russia

  • @indigocolossus
    @indigocolossus ปีที่แล้ว

    Soon, the next “rim lands” will be cis-lunar space.

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    super all there🗻🏝🏝🐷🚮

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Time coming zero
    🗻🏝🌋🏕🐷🐷🐷🚮

  • @miniaturejayhawk8702
    @miniaturejayhawk8702 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Now i want to take over Russia !!! 😈

  • @PeterDivine
    @PeterDivine 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Feh. Sounds like a crock.

  • @antotyrrell2012
    @antotyrrell2012 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wouldn't it be just dandy if Brics could get Ukraine

  • @runelokas-zm1bs
    @runelokas-zm1bs ปีที่แล้ว

    NUKES made this theory obsolete.

  • @magestic90
    @magestic90 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Far too eurocentric for my taste.

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    all three super🗻🏝🐷🐷🐷🐷🚮

  • @c0nstantin86
    @c0nstantin86 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mackinder "let's be mean to orthodox christians and Russias"
    *"HEY WORLD, DO YOU KNOW THAT TO DEFEAT THE RUSSIANS IS TO BECOME THE MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE??"*

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    super great three.
    Gro.
    the one most part living peace of U.N.
    where is the security council of U.N.🏝🗻🌏🏞🏔

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    super one gentle.
    maledominated human geo.🗻🏝🌏🏞🏔

  • @brendakorir7827
    @brendakorir7827 ปีที่แล้ว

    Understood. Thank you!

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🎓✍️🥬🥦🌈👌

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🌈🥬✍️🍎👌

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 ปีที่แล้ว

    🦚🌈🥦✍️🥬🌻🌼