Star Citizen is a neverending prototype in development. As long as the goalposts keep getting moved, this game will always be in this state. They bring in potential new players with marketing for the final stage of the prototype which will never exist.
I got a shill saying it will take 8-10 years to finish all of the unfinished concept ships, and theres no intention to add them until the systems that allow their functionality to exist. Which means even if it had miracle development from here on out, you are still looking at 15 years MINIMUM just for ASSETS.
imagine being a reactionist writer, who falls in love with a game to the point of spending a ton of money on it, is BANNED on the spectrum because he can't stop talking shit and since then, he makes almost daily videos trying to talk bad about a game on the which he is CONCIERGE, but keep throwing money on it, telling people to use his code. What a funny guy.
good job... some one needs to criticize CIG ... I appreciate your effort ... your channel would be a lot more successful if you were a shill like 99% of SC creators. Thank you !!!
How is this critique? It is his opinion without going into depth as to why he doesn't like something. Ps. I got my shill Check in the mail today, some free ships, and chocolate donuts! Thx CIG
Constructive criticism is always good, Altough I really don't think this guy does a good job at that. He is worn out, I can fully understand that! Therefor I would advise him strongly to play something else and maybe come back in a few years. This means his channel can grow with good content instead of this ever whining shit show. There are also alot of other SC content-creators that give out constructive criticism and still enjoy what is given. The community is torn and many only believe in black or white (there is always the good or the bad), nothing in between. I'm also a SQ42/SC backer myself, I hop in "the verse" from time to time (sometimes I play more, then other times) and I'm fully aware of what CIG is doing (and also what is not been develivered). I'm a worried myself? Nope, absolutely not (not even from backing this project in 2014), because every other fucking game company out there proves that time after time, by making a shit show themselves in one way or another. There are litterly almost no new games that really have the "wow factor" or get me personally interested for more then 2-3 hours for 60+ dollars for a so called AAA-title.
@@taskforce876 some people have an ability to see the end of the road in this project, it may still take like a decade for the project to fizzle out but more and more people will join our ranks in the mean time
@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n I dont really get the "our ranks" part. I think this is the primary thing that is wrong with this community. We have the knights and the haters and those who stand in between. The thing is, CIG can make or break the gaming community and I understand that more and more people loose their trust in CIG (or this project), because setbacks and not delivering promises in an open and (semi) transparent project is killing, also the management and putting the wrong people in charge of gameplay elements is setting CIG in the wrong. This shit happens, CIG is also learning from their mistakes, they need to fall before they can rise stronger, ofc all of this is "our funds" but that is what we choose to do, also we signed up for that and is something that is explained in detail with every "purchase" (or call it whatever you want). There is no-one (not even CIG) that can predict the future or know exactly where the project ends up. Only time will tell.
Starfield better than, SC? That should tell you enough that he's just angry at SC. If you bought the base game of Star citizen and didn't spend anything else i think you would be hard pushed to get that kind of value from any other game. I've got my money back so many times over. Sure its full of bugs, some game breaking, but I've paid £50 for 2042 when that came out and that was a disaster. SC I've got more much value out of it Every patch is free, no subscription, and if you want to spend more you can, but that's on you if you do. I've asked this guy before what he wants and he's replied, " i just want the game they promised" If you look at the original pledge of this game and they stayed with it, we wouldn't have planets, the stuff on them, the list is quite long. He's complained about the graphics look like dog shit. It looks amazing and the ships do too. You can't compare, Starfield to SC. SC and it's tech is light-years Infront. This guy and the amount of time he spends playing it is just clouded by his bitter and negative outlook on it. He also complained about the new MFDs which are a huge improvement over what we have now. He's not mentioned the de cluttering of the screen in the new patch, what you can choose to have on your screen., loads of quality of life improvements. SC is far from complete and at times so frustrating that I've got so angry with it. But when that time comes, i leave it and come back at a later date. Everyone is entitled to Thier opinion, it's not based on fact, it's not right or wrong, but like i said, if you get the game i think you would be hard pushed to get more value out of a game. I've been playing it on and off for over 8 years, some longer. It's been frustrating and amazing at the same time, but what a ride.
@@Master_Ki_Adi_Mundi Didn't Microsoft buy Bethesda for 7 billion dollars in 2021? Didn't Starfield come out in 2023? Seems like they had the money to make a better game with at least a couple of miracles.
I love how you point out the ovious, and still, after 14 years and over HALF A BILLION in funding there are still people who defend the current state of the game with "it's an alpha" "they develop new technologies" etc. there are several players on the forum in every critical post who will try to gaslight you and make you appear as a uninformed ignorant loser by using dismissive and condescending language. The cope is real.
Lol, NMS and Starfield? Really? Do you hate your audience or something? The only thing I would suggest and is somewhat similiar but working is Elite: Dangerous.
Fr, when I heard Starfield as an alternative his credibility plummeted for me. NMS and ED are both really good recommendations, both have different game-loops.
In my hangar, glitched through floor, got crime stat, game did not even start again after that.... Crap! Useless repeating game loops, unlogical tecs, expensive, promises, promises and nothing ready.
@briananderson4032 no it hasn't, it's still broken as fuck, and the tutorial is so fucked it'll make the 3.24 live drop look perfect. Because if the tutorial is broken, those aspects will be broken for every quest.
I can understand complaining, as I complain also, but Bethesda fanboi gem, he is nothing but some big mouth tool on line. Gem is the same guy that loves the Todd man, and raves about how good starfield is. I think someone at cig upset him and he has an all out assault on Star citizen. Look at it this way, Bethesda built starfield and it is released game that out right sucks. Yes, I did put about 45 hours in to starfield, to be able to have a fair opinion. My opinion of starfield is the same as 65% of the reviews, starfield sucks. Star citizen definitely has its draw backs and a lot of complaints but Gem, it’s not a released game. Gem go back to blowing Todd and post more garbage about how great starfield is.
This is his shtick.He posts videos hating on everything he can possibly find and complaining nonstop, but simultaneously begging you to use his referral code for the game.
Star Citizen is a neverending prototype in development. As long as the goalposts keep getting moved, this game will always be in this state. They bring in potential new players with marketing for the final stage of the prototype which will never exist.
I blew $2k on this tech demo. My own fault, I fell for the hype. I haven’t touched it after I completed the hornet Mk2 quest line.
Skill issue 🤌
Skill issue 🤌
True
Not a single second wasted. Straight to the point. Thank you. xD
I got a shill saying it will take 8-10 years to finish all of the unfinished concept ships, and theres no intention to add them until the systems that allow their functionality to exist.
Which means even if it had miracle development from here on out, you are still looking at 15 years MINIMUM just for ASSETS.
imagine being a reactionist writer, who falls in love with a game to the point of spending a ton of money on it, is BANNED on the spectrum because he can't stop talking shit and since then, he makes almost daily videos trying to talk bad about a game on the which he is CONCIERGE, but keep throwing money on it, telling people to use his code. What a funny guy.
good job... some one needs to criticize CIG ... I appreciate your effort ... your channel would be a lot more successful if you were a shill like 99% of SC creators. Thank you !!!
How is this critique? It is his opinion without going into depth as to why he doesn't like something.
Ps. I got my shill Check in the mail today, some free ships, and chocolate donuts! Thx CIG
Constructive criticism is always good, Altough I really don't think this guy does a good job at that.
He is worn out, I can fully understand that! Therefor I would advise him strongly to play something else and maybe come back in a few years. This means his channel can grow with good content instead of this ever whining shit show. There are also alot of other SC content-creators that give out constructive criticism and still enjoy what is given.
The community is torn and many only believe in black or white (there is always the good or the bad), nothing in between. I'm also a SQ42/SC backer myself, I hop in "the verse" from time to time (sometimes I play more, then other times) and I'm fully aware of what CIG is doing (and also what is not been develivered). I'm a worried myself? Nope, absolutely not (not even from backing this project in 2014), because every other fucking game company out there proves that time after time, by making a shit show themselves in one way or another. There are litterly almost no new games that really have the "wow factor" or get me personally interested for more then 2-3 hours for 60+ dollars for a so called AAA-title.
@@taskforce876 some people have an ability to see the end of the road in this project, it may still take like a decade for the project to fizzle out but more and more people will join our ranks in the mean time
@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n Our ranks? Why not move on instead of wasting time on a game you don't like?
@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n I dont really get the "our ranks" part. I think this is the primary thing that is wrong with this community. We have the knights and the haters and those who stand in between. The thing is, CIG can make or break the gaming community and I understand that more and more people loose their trust in CIG (or this project), because setbacks and not delivering promises in an open and (semi) transparent project is killing, also the management and putting the wrong people in charge of gameplay elements is setting CIG in the wrong. This shit happens, CIG is also learning from their mistakes, they need to fall before they can rise stronger, ofc all of this is "our funds" but that is what we choose to do, also we signed up for that and is something that is explained in detail with every "purchase" (or call it whatever you want). There is no-one (not even CIG) that can predict the future or know exactly where the project ends up. Only time will tell.
Starfield better than, SC? That should tell you enough that he's just angry at SC.
If you bought the base game of Star citizen and didn't spend anything else i think you would be hard pushed to get that kind of value from any other game.
I've got my money back so many times over.
Sure its full of bugs, some game breaking, but I've paid £50 for 2042 when that came out and that was a disaster. SC I've got more much value out of it
Every patch is free, no subscription, and if you want to spend more you can, but that's on you if you do.
I've asked this guy before what he wants and he's replied, " i just want the game they promised"
If you look at the original pledge of this game and they stayed with it, we wouldn't have planets, the stuff on them, the list is quite long.
He's complained about the graphics look like dog shit. It looks amazing and the ships do too. You can't compare, Starfield to SC. SC and it's tech is light-years Infront.
This guy and the amount of time he spends playing it is just clouded by his bitter and negative outlook on it.
He also complained about the new MFDs which are a huge improvement over what we have now.
He's not mentioned the de cluttering of the screen in the new patch, what you can choose to have on your screen., loads of quality of life improvements.
SC is far from complete and at times so frustrating that I've got so angry with it. But when that time comes, i leave it and come back at a later date.
Everyone is entitled to Thier opinion, it's not based on fact, it's not right or wrong, but like i said, if you get the game i think you would be hard pushed to get more value out of a game.
I've been playing it on and off for over 8 years, some longer. It's been frustrating and amazing at the same time, but what a ride.
Gem is just a paid fanboi for Todd and Bethesda. Nothing but a mouth. He is definitely angry at cig.
People tend to judge what SC *wants to be* vs. what other games *are.*
Are you one licker?
Sadly, one of the few places on the internet where we can talk freely about this game.
Did you really just say Starfield is a better game? Welp, thanks for showing why I don't need to see the rest of this video.
Sure give starfield the money this sh*t has and you'll see miracles
@@Master_Ki_Adi_Mundi Didn't Microsoft buy Bethesda for 7 billion dollars in 2021? Didn't Starfield come out in 2023? Seems like they had the money to make a better game with at least a couple of miracles.
I love how you point out the ovious, and still, after 14 years and over HALF A BILLION in funding there are still people who defend the current state of the game with "it's an alpha" "they develop new technologies" etc. there are several players on the forum in every critical post who will try to gaslight you and make you appear as a uninformed ignorant loser by using dismissive and condescending language.
The cope is real.
Lol, NMS and Starfield? Really? Do you hate your audience or something? The only thing I would suggest and is somewhat similiar but working is Elite: Dangerous.
Fr, when I heard Starfield as an alternative his credibility plummeted for me. NMS and ED are both really good recommendations, both have different game-loops.
😂 damn you mad asf LOL
But yeah this patch is trash, hope 4.0 comes out sooner rather than later but knowing CIG it will probably be mid April
I know nothing about trading/ Investing and I'm keen on getting started . What are some strategies to get started with ?
As a beginner, it's essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable.
I'm guided by a widely known crypto consultant
Mrs Joanna Walker
This is correct, Joanna Walker strategy has normalized winning trades for me also and it's a huge milestone for me looking back to how it all started.
Joanna is considered a key Crypto Strategist with one of the best copy Trading portfolio and also very active in the cryptocurrency space.
700m went and gone for what?
In my hangar, glitched through floor, got crime stat, game did not even start again after that.... Crap! Useless repeating game loops, unlogical tecs, expensive, promises, promises and nothing ready.
3.24.2 drop is going to be a disaster. The tutorial hasn't worked once in 3.24.2, which is always a bad sign.
3.24.2 is still in the ptu, where it has been for way to long.
@briananderson4032 no it hasn't, it's still broken as fuck, and the tutorial is so fucked it'll make the 3.24 live drop look perfect. Because if the tutorial is broken, those aspects will be broken for every quest.
Says a lot about your channel when the most-liked comment is by an investment scammer bot.
Really fitting too.
Thanks for the videos 👍
Less quantum fuel... Now thats a real QOL update we wanted!
Caves are horrible and I don't know ANYONE that enjoys them
I can understand complaining, as I complain also, but Bethesda fanboi gem, he is nothing but some big mouth tool on line. Gem is the same guy that loves the Todd man, and raves about how good starfield is. I think someone at cig upset him and he has an all out assault on Star citizen. Look at it this way, Bethesda built starfield and it is released game that out right sucks. Yes, I did put about 45 hours in to starfield, to be able to have a fair opinion. My opinion of starfield is the same as 65% of the reviews, starfield sucks. Star citizen definitely has its draw backs and a lot of complaints but Gem, it’s not a released game. Gem go back to blowing Todd and post more garbage about how great starfield is.
Jesus Saves....
I had a conversation with a fellow gamer about SC and warned him to stay away, the game is garbage.
things that are cool ... fun... yeah like all the loadingscreens and map restrictions in starfield....
Maybe they'll add fuel coins to the store to help you save time
stability and bux fixes...
suuuuuuuuuuRRREEEEEEEEEEEE (ocky voice)
and i have well over 200h in NMS but its a totally different game
I've watched the last 20 of your videos and you haven't said one genuinely good thing about star cit6
He literally bitches about CIG in every video for views from everyone who isnt happy with the game... He is a shill just in another way lol
This is his shtick.He posts videos hating on everything he can possibly find and complaining nonstop, but simultaneously begging you to use his referral code for the game.
@@XShadowAngel He just does it 4 views
This crap ain't even worth 45 anymore
one week now since 3.24.2 went live. I still can not play the game! mouse can not ineract with manual, inventory, mobi glass. just not playable!
you think starfield is better than star citizen? lmfao