She said "I think that if you are anyone to be blunt that's not a white male you potentially feel that implicit bias" isn't what she said implicit bias twords white males?
So, is there no such thing as implicit bias agaisnt white males? I saw a lot of diveristy in this video talking about how others need to do better, the only thing I didn't see was any example of implicit bias agaisnt white males, does it just not exist? I would even go as far as to say this video had implicit bias agaisnt white conservatives. During this video, 4:54, there was a drawing of white conservatives marching behind the bias monster with what was clearly meant to be a MAGA hat, one lady is carrying a confederate flag, and there are Confederate statues near them. During this picture, the narrator says that the IAT shows how "groups of people will act on average, and that is worrisome." This is a clear stereotype and showing implicit bias agaisnt white conservatives, this is meant to paint the majority of conservatives and Trump supporters as racist. This video is clearly politicized, and it doesn't surprise me since it comes from such a far left univeristy, tu.
Mark Garza as someone who has experienced it in my work environment from my supervisors, I would have to disagree. Multiple times I was yelled at by my manager in front of customers because of my “white privilege.” She assumed I had never had a job and that my life had been nothing but easy due to my skin color. Without knowing anything about me. Her implicit bias quickly turned very apparent and hostile during every shift that she was my manager. Her supervisor said simply “when you work for her, stay away from her” that was all. I’m not saying racism doesn’t occur toward only black Americans, brown Americans, Im saying racism is a two way street, and anyone who says otherwise is close minded, racist, and uneducated.
@Mark Garza Are you suggesting white people are better than other races? If you say they have ALWAYS had the upper hand, you are, inarguably, claiming that they are superior to all other races. Of course your statement is false...they have NOT...by any stretch of the imagination...always had the upper hand. More white people have been enslaved in the history of humanity than ANY other race of people. They have been persecuted and murdered at nearly the same rate as the people of modern China. The difference? White people buckled down, bettered themselves and overcame all of their historic problems ON THEIR OWN...if they seem to have the "upper hand" in western society...ITS BECAUSE THEY BUILT that society...the greatest society mankind has ever known...belittling them and punishing them for their accomplishments won't bring any other group up...that isn't how whites built the west...and it won't do anything good for the groups too lazy to build themselves up instead of trying to tear others down.
@Christiano Delgado when you or any other self serving leftist can be honest about the following FACTS...maybe the thinking adults in the world will start paying attention to you... FACT...U.S. legal code considers the lives of non whites as being more valuable than whites...punishment for killing a white is less than killing anyone else...BY LAW FACT...An unarmed white person is significantly more likely to be killed by cops than an an unarmed black person...more than twice as likely in fact. FACT...not one instance of institutional racism against blacks can be found in America...it does not exist...feel free to cite examples that your educated, thinking superiors can knock down for you.
At 2:11 maybe the friend knows for a fact that this young woman is good at math or science? Maybe the friend knows she gets all A's? Implicit bias works both ways : you could just assume that everything is about your ethnicity when it really isn't.
I took the IAT test and I had a self reflection moment. The test does work if you do as it says and don't think to hard simply press the keys as quickly as you can come up with your answer.
I've taken a few of them and I feel like these tests actually lead you to show certain bias. I would be interested to see how the results change if the "negative" feature was associated with the positive words first.
Implicit bias testing when concerning race or discrimination is very controversial. Meta studies have shown that those tests are not scientifically verifiable ( you take the test 3 times you get 3 different results), full of false positives, does not predict behavior and can't be trained out of. Many psychologist state that they do not even know what it is testing. Even the founders claims that the tests are made for aggregates can be considered unfounded because of the inconsistency of them at the individual level. Do your own research if you do not believe this.
Just watched this as part of CE course. I want to address the last stronghold of implicit bias left unaddressed and perfectly depicted in your video. When recounting how bias was addressed by holding blind auditions for orchestras, those holding auditions were in suits from chins on down and the chosen female was revealed in a tank top with clearly drawn breasts and armpit holes halfway down her rib cage.
That’s African American Vernacular English. I’m sure you didn’t grow up around African Americans but like many people, you’re imitating their vernacular to sound more interesting, fun, cool.
I saw this during an audition on tv when the New York Philharmonic set up the audition where they only heard the player. I never forgot that because there were instances of IRB when I auditioned.
@@jwc160 that's like saying we should consider a female employee's likelihood of falsely accusing the company of mysogynyn. It's quite ignorant and it stops black people from wanting to report racism when it happens. Don't assume that the average black person will falsely accuse a company of racism if they get fired, it's not true.
@@AkTheProducer There's evidence that people who present themselves as victims are more likely to cheat, lie and steal, this is the paradox inherent in extending good faith to people who claim oppression, since it opens the door to grifters, which damages the credibility of actual victims.
The Asian girl said her friend was biased because she believed, based on her friend saying: "you are good at math you are good at science." This might not have been based on an unconscious bias but based on her friend's observations that she was better at math and science than she was. This might show the Asian student's bias rather than the bias she attributed to her friend.
They only showed a snippet of her interview, this kind of thing has been shown to happen across the board to people of Asian descent, stop looking for some ridiculous counterargument as if it proves anything real.
@@watching99134 It does prove something real. The creators of the video did not take into account any assumptions or biases that they have. The fact that their video shows only White biases calls into question their own anti-White bias. We can't assume that the incident that watching99134 refers to is not further evidence of the video creators' biases.
I noticed she didn’t mention whether she actually was good at math. Her mannerisms indicated a personality of some precision, there are a lot of ways people evaluate one another-implicit bias is nonsense.
if you're trying to school me on #implicitbias without even knowing my thoughts, you are also implicitly biasly challenged. LOL!! My actions and good character matter more than whatever you think is in my head.
Its always good to not judge based on culture, race or anything like that. But its important to note that implicit bias, if its real, is being positive to people you can relate to and negative to people you cannot relate to. Its not just people juding black people negatively as this video suggest. Its weird to only focus on white vd black, but if you do.. black people would probably do the same for white people.
It’s been my experience that the unconscious bias comes from black people toward white more than the other way around. Here’s a famous example: Oprah refused to have a white flight attendant tend to her and would only allow the black FA to be near her. This was reported in the media and celebrated….
This is true for all cultures. They all have biases, its human nature, and that is how it should be explained but since it is only white culture that holds themselves accountable for these actions it seems like we only hear about white biases and it comes across as though they are the only ones guilty of it
When a group of guys in tech were asked why there were so few minorities and woman, they said because in the beginning it was just friends of nerds who knew other nerds and was just people they felt they had more in common with and were comfortable around. It wasn’t because they were implicitly bias.
That's where this video fell apart for me when they started speaking about the study of white = positive and black = negative and not even mentioning or considering that people tend to stick with what is familiar. Your comment describes this well in my opinion.
@Leigh Michelle So what! Birds of a feather stick together. Ever walk into a school cafeteria? Blacks sit with the blacks, Asians with Asians, Latino with Latinos, etc…even though it’s an integrated school, people still self segregate. It is government overreach to try and regulate such things. People can’t be forced onto each other, they will cross the isle out of mutual benefit, shared Intrest’s or needs. It shouldn’t be forced.
They need to start doing Blind interviews where you speak into a box that changes the sound of your voice so it is unidentifiable to any particular racial group, where they can't see you, and where they don't know your name. And until that blind interview is completed, and after they decide you're good enough for the job, you should not have to reveal your race or name. I know it sounds unrealistic, but the truth of the matter is as long as you have a name that can link you to you to a particular ethnic group or they can see that you belong to one, or they think they can tell by the tone of your voice, your chances will always be less. And that is real.
Meaning so the prospective employer can’t tell who he is actually hiring. That’s absurd. People are evaluated by how they present, and interview of a candidate is worthless if the employer can’t tell how he would act on the job. This is more obsessing about identity that is wildly overwrought.
I mean, we don’t exactly have context, we just know that her friend said she was good at math and science. Given that they were friends she could actually be good at math and science and her friend knows.
4:50 *shows a picture of white people marching under a confederate flag* "It still indicates how groups of people will act on average, and that is worrisome." Why is it worrisome? Specifically... why is it worrisome that white rural folk would act in their own best interest? I would really like to know why they think that is 'worrisome,' when every group does that. Do they think that modern white Americans are somehow more dangerous than everyone else? That we are somehow more capable and organized, and thus can do more damage to people and society if we so choose? That sounds like a bias stereotype to me, one that smacks of a white supremacist mindset. This is exactly why I left the left. Pseudo science... the left has embraced pseudo science. And I'm not going to be part of any movement that promotes this half baked phrenology.
It shows a dreadful level of conscious bias by the creator of this video. Clue: The world isn't America. Most people would not understand the concept of people being behind the Confederate flag, for example.
What are these internal bias's based on? Where do they come from? Does it come from experiences and knowledge accumulated throughout ones life? Is it the mind forcing a determination/judgement using the only available data?
They come from every interaction you've ever had with anything. Whether that be a woman calling you ugly or you seeing a black person being incarcerated on the news.
It comes from media, taking to others as well as personal experience. In many cases individuals of one group might show bias against people of another group despite never having met people of the other group personally. They have no personal experience with said people, so they base their opinions on what they've heard or seen coming from others and media.
@@AkTheProducer also the media will show one "black person being incarcerated on the news" but not show black college graduates at college graduation. Or show them working jobs in the fields of engineering or medicine.
@@jhonklan3794 yes they have, but yet at the school district I work in it was thought to be reasonable to use the IAT as some kind of D.E.I (diversity, equity, and inclusion) training. SMDH
I think a schema is basically referring to how implicit bias is often used to convey why people have "prejudices". I would highly recommend the video Im about to link then coming back to this one to see what you think. Then, if you're interested in going further down the rabbit hole look up divergent evolution and secular creationism. I have literally had my worldview turned upside down in the last few years, slowly at first, then these ideologies that seemed so distant years ago all of the sudden seemed so clearly justifiable in the context of historical conquest. If you want further information on implicit vs explicit reasoning I can share a video that far better illustrates why civilizations that have come before us have failed when denying how big of a role implicit traits play in determining characteristics of a person. We all agree that dogs have different characteristics but we're told in humans that the variances between our species, aka subspecies are somehow different to that of dogs. Its all so obvious that some dogs are more dangerous than others and ignoring implicit bias is like saying Ive pet a Chihuahua so I somehow now have the explicit knowledge that I can pet a pit bull, and why stop there? A wolf is still a dog so now I should pet that! You can see how dangerous it is to completely ignore implicit bias. Implicit traits outside my European gene pool are likely vastly different than those of African decent, even if we shared common ancestors thousands of years ago. It's not that Im saying one is better than the other, it's admitting that they evolved differently with completely different environmental and cultural pressures. This is the only way to explain the differences in IQ which even the most liberal studies show no matter what environmental factors come about, IQ is already determined to be about the same as your birth parents 60-70% of the time. The twin experiments are the best example of this fact. th-cam.com/video/9cls-nGTjoE/w-d-xo.html
If there is such a thing as an unconscious mind- something we're not aware of in ourselves but believe we can observe it others therefore, I too must have an unconscious mind exerting influence on my behaviours and attitudes.... hmmmmm........I think I can see yours at work even though I can't see my own but as we're both of the same species I must have one too..... hmmm...
You might not be able to see your brain processes but you can still make educated guesses on them by looking at the input and output. When you get an input of a resume from people of different races and output a different response, yes, we can’t see the internal processes but we can assume there was some unconscious difference in the way both were treated (Got a Psych exam coming up)
Did you notice the implicit anti-white bias spread throughout the video? How good was the study concerning the musician auditions? Were there control groups? Has there ever been any study that compares a specific judge's evaluation of a specific musician both seen and unseen? What was the rate of growth of the percentage of females in orchestras before the study? Was it the same, less than, or greater than the rate after the general change in audition conditions? Were there any controls in the study that took into account the increasing role in society of women in general? What were the implicit biases held by Blacks in the study? Were there any anti-White biases held by Blacks? Were there Anti-Asian biases, perhaps, given that 85% of Asian assaults in San Francisco were committed by Blacks. If there were Black biases noted in the study, do you justify them? If so, then shouldn't Whites or Asians be justified in their anti-Black biases?
Implicit bias isn't ABOUT race... you can be implicitly biased about race, for sure, but you also have bias toward other factors. Age, gender, sexual orientation, religion, culture, political affiliation, pet choice, hair colour... almost anything can create an implicit bias. And it's not just about people - dog breed is an example of this outside humans.
Is it not possible that the girl just thinks that the Asian girl is good at math? The question I would ask is does the Asian girl get good grades in math? Does the work seem to come easily to her?
The video is about how to overcome implicit bias and stereotypes, and I am watching it as part of the NJ CE Fair Housing requirement. The narrator just got finished saying that women used to hold relatively small number of seats in orchestra until orchestras starting holding blind auditions. When auditions were done behind a curtain, the number of women doubled. Cool, right? But then why is the woman auditioning for an orchestra in a skimpy tank top and winking at the men as they smirk at her? Why are they stereotyping women in a video about how to overcome stereotypes? I seriously have better things to do with my time than post this. Like finish my CE or go sell a house or play outside in the spring weather. But really? What is this teaching our culture about women? What is it saying to our girls? There is nothing wrong with wearing skimpy clothes. There is nothing wrong with winking. There is nothing wrong with women expressing sexuality. But there is something wrong with showing a scantily dressed, winking woman as an example of how NOT to stereotype. Jeez.... We can do better. McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin can do better. Do better.
A person’s mannerisms and the way others react are so complicated and the science so uncertain regarding the psychological reasons why a person acts or reacts the he does , this notion of implicit bias is another attempt to exaggerate discrimination in society for ulterior motives. The only bias I saw during this video was quite explicit - the anti white prejudice in the image of the parade of stereotypes in a line carrying the Rebel Flag. There’s nothing wrong with the Confederate flag, it’s an historical artifact and obsessing over it indicates intolerance rather anything it represents. It shows how the people making this video have some soul exploration to do, certainly before they can presume to lecture others about subconscious thoughts. There are a lot of ways people evaluate one another-implicit bias is nonsense.
It feels so bad when you are scared being around people who discriminate. Implicit bias must be taking serious into our society. If you feel that you feel that you are more important than others that is implicit bias
Implicit bias: When you noticed the thumbnail to the video you're watching has "Texas" written on it and automatically assume that the content won't inform you because of the deep rooted implicit biases that were sown into your head as a child. I wouldn't have realized it without this video's help. Thank you ❤️
When I first read the thumbnail to this video I automatically assumed that the content would be uninforming because of my deep rooted implicit biases about Texans being uneducated. I was wrong and put in my place. I agree that stereotypes are everywhere.
Implicit bias exists among white males too. If one is young, tall, handsome, educated and intelligent, they don't get affected much as others who aren't.
If you are being forced to watch this video for school or work. Please comment with the name of school or employer so we can publicly name and shame them.
Implicit bias seems to affect marginalized groups more negatively than non-marginalized groups, but it does exist toward the majority, too, since it is inevitable and subconscious. It can have a negative effect on someone from a majority group, of course, but I gather from this video that it is less common than its negative effect on someone from a minority group.
I disagree with much of this video. In what world do doctors recommend less pain medication for black people? Honestly alot of this stuff, like saying implicit bias is deep rooted and that prejudice is ingrained in us just keeps the race problem going.
I work in healthcare. One week after my mother's knee replacement surgery, the doctor decided she didn't pain medication any more because she needed to be weened off before she could become addicted. It's standard for narcotic pain medication to not be discontinued for nearly a month, doesn't always last that long, but that's near the standard. The doctor wanted to take my mother's pain medication before she could even go to the bathroom under her own power. This is a real issue. Ask some of your friends who are people of color what their experience has been. It may reinforce your position, but it also may change. All the best.
check out "how does implicit bias affect health care?" from the channel "Institute for healthcare improvement" they discuss and explain with actual stats
@@RollerBear123 I would highly recommend the video Im about to link then coming back to this one to see what you think. Then, if you're interested in going further down the rabbit hole look up divergent evolution and secular creationism. I have literally had my worldview turned upside down in the last few years, slowly at first, then these ideologies that seemed so distant years ago all of the sudden seemed so clearly justifiable in the context of historical conquest. If you want further information on implicit vs explicit reasoning I can share a video that far better illustrates why civilizations that have come before us have failed when denying how big of a role implicit traits and bias's play in determining characteristics of a person, largely irrespective of environmental factors. We all agree that dogs have different characteristics but we're told in humans that the variances between our species, aka subspecies are somehow magically different to that of dogs. Only by the content of their character should you judge someone, sure, but denying any implicit/genetic differences gives people this idea that they should have forced equality of outcome rather than true equality which is the equality of opportunity. Its all so obvious that some dogs are more dangerous than others and ignoring implicit bias is like saying Ive pet a Chihuahua so I somehow now have the explicit knowledge that I can pet a pit bull, and why stop there? A wolf is still a dog so now I should pet that! You can see how dangerous it is to completely ignore implicit bias, and in fact, from a young age we are taught the opposite. We know this to be true because people who are the least "prejudice" towards any race/nation, no matter how bad they actually are, will always be the ones who don't actually have to live alongside the group. This is wrong, they're anthropomorphizing the negro, in the same way people who never spend time with the dangerous breeds of dogs are the ones who refuse to admit that those dogs, the same ones they've never cared to have as a Pet or be around, they're the ones who ironically stick up for and say it deserves the same petting that the little friendly doggies get. "How could you not pet that dog?!" Give me a break, its denial of reality and I don't deny that race exists. The moment when Charles Darwin's theory gets good is when he speaks of divergent evolution, yet that's the moment we're told not to look any farther because Darwin puts "his own" racial prejudice into the scientific field that he literally invented. Such a reach considering the man was not racist at all, just pointing out what he saw. Any professor that was still talking about divergent evolution in the 70's had to have armed guards around them. Imagine an idea being so powerful that people want you killed for sharing it. The true terrible ideas of society are never met with violence, they're met with mockery. If these arguments Im exposing you to you were so bad that they can immediately be labeled as such, they would be easy to debunk and be available to everyone to show them for what they really are; a bad idea. Just like dogs, the magic scientists may try calling us one species, but in reality there are many breeds, with just as many external differences as cognitive differences, just like all animals. Denying this will cause a repeat of history, when you look back on history and think its so easy to see where they went wrong, just remember, embracing explicit knowledge to argue against implicit bias is literally what has caused the collapse of hundreds of nations before us. Implicit traits outside my European gene pool are likely vastly different than those of African decent, even if we shared common ancestors thousands of years ago. It's not that Im saying one is better than the other, it's admitting that they evolved differently with completely different environmental and cultural pressures, and their own implicit bias's and should've remained separated. We are the only nation in history where the supposed oppressed group, instead of fighting for independence, fought for desegregation. First equality of opportunity, but that wasn't enough, now we've been trying to force equality of outcome for the last 50 years and the black community is worse in nearly every way than they were in the 60's. They were just coming out of curfews and now look what they've done to themselves with the help of those guilty whites that parade the black people around like their newest toy.These changes in "the human race", though slower than dogs who were artificially selected, are still present and are the only way to account for why black people are on average 20% less successful than the citizens of the nation they inhabit. This is why we should've realized they will never be happy unless they have more than us, and even then they will still find ways to be the victim because everyone has allowed them to claim this who didn't actually have to deal with them. Black people should be thanking Americans, not the other way around. Built this country.... give me a break th-cam.com/video/9cls-nGTjoE/w-d-xo.html
This video is so full of crap. Anecdotal evidence that only proves that people have experienced... something. Maybe that girl is good at math.Or her friend wasn't good at math and she was just better at it. She clearly believes that "all Asians are good at math" stereotype to some degree since she's the one who said it out loud. Maybe that Latino Lieutenant was treated like a poor leader because he was a poor leader. He doesn't even know why they treated him like that. Maybe people learn from their experiences and apply that knowledge to later encounters. You wouldn't go sticking your hand in a fire because it might not burn you the same way that other one did, and you wouldn't grab a fire extinguisher every time you saw a fire on a grill. If you're offended by someones experiences with someone who belongs to your "identity group" then I'm sure you can fix them by telling them how terrible they are and how much better you are than them
I think that what the video fails to address is the actual nuance associated with the term "bias". Fact is there is more honestly a bias that is misplaced (like say a prejudice) which is effectively an unmerited perspective towards a person and even a group of people and a well placed bias (like say w/ good judgment) which is effectively based on a historically merited perspective towards a person and even a group of people. It would be ludicrous for a bully to beat someone up on a playground repeatedly and then decry that there is an "implied bias" for some unmerited reason. No the merited reason is that he has a history of unprincipled, malicious, selfish and violent behavior. That if "labeled something else" (ie a bias) then fails to address whatever the real problem is. In this scenario the victim remains a potential victim and the perpetrator remains unbridled and unrehabilitated if left to social constructs like "implied bias".
Hiring managers want to get the best candidate in the shortest amount of time. I have a hard time believing they would throw out a resume of an equally qualified minority, without a reason. I.e., typos, unprofessionalism, etc. I would like to know their basis for "equally qualified." Education, experience, extra-curricular...it all plays in. Two people with same education doesn't equal same qualifications if one person has experience or better grades than the other.
There have been numerous studies done on this over hundreds of years. Even the military has equal opportunity offices on every base because people are literally in an environment that strips them to nothing and gives us equal opportunities and experience, but minorities and women are still unevenly picked for jobs and opportunities within the military, despite literally having the same qualifications. Same uniform, pay, and everything. A majority of our pilots are hand-selected white males, despite many women and minorities having equal or greater qualifications to do such a job and the military is well-aware of this issue and holds regular diversity meetings. Is it really still unbelievable that marginalized groups face discrimination even after the hundreds of years of scholarly, scientific, anthropologic, and government-funded surveys, work and school rules, state, local, and government laws, ongoing HR training, military briefings and movements? Everyone's lying? That isn't even logical more than it is clearly your denial based in implicit bias. This video displays multiple studies verifying similar evidence over millions of subjects, but it's still "hard to believe" that despite Rosa Parks' death in the 21st century, all discrimination has simply vanished.
This is propaganda designed to remove discrimination. Discrimination is very important in identifying who is and is not allowed into your house. To identify what is good or bad food. Who to have children with. What restaurant is good. This anti-bias training basically owers the bar. It forces the majority to become obedient to a loud and angry minority.
So happy I pulled my kids of school. Btw I’m Mexican American and this makes me feel very uncomfortable. I don’t want to treat or want to be treated differently because of my skin color or back ground. This whole idea is “racist”. Stop the hateful indoctrination!
From the University of Texas...enough said. Spewing its own brand of bias and indoctrination! Being a native Texan...I'm appalled by this video and to learn that this was shown in a high school a few years back in my children's school district.
It's surreal that they openly admitted that blacks are discriminated against but had the lighter skinned black woman speaking. She almost looks mixed. You would think that they know about biases between lighter skinned and darker skinned ppl. Well after all the system does has to keep it going.
Presupposed in dogma about bias is what those biases might be: when people tout “systems of oppression” THEIR capricious, biased, and oppressive ideas of who is privileged of who oppressed are the ONLY deciding factor, and are considered to be unassailable. There is no impartial, evidence based discussion of what individuals are objectively “oppressed” or “privileged”. Who gets to decide who is oppressed and by how much? (Answer: that highly subjective determination is in the hands of people with an axe to grind) What’s the formula for this woke calculus? How do we know when there is no more oppression? Is such a thing even feasible? There is no turning back from officially elevating collectivist blood feud above individual rights and liberties in our civilization.
She said "I think that if you are anyone to be blunt that's not a white male you potentially feel that implicit bias" isn't what she said implicit bias twords white males?
NO .
It's not "implicit" bias, but it is bias. To assume that white men don't experience bias is very narrow minded.
@@HeatherPilonieta this video is about implicit bias though , hence concentrating on implicit bias
Certainly yes
obviously yes. But logic doesn't apply well in the field.
So, is there no such thing as implicit bias agaisnt white males? I saw a lot of diveristy in this video talking about how others need to do better, the only thing I didn't see was any example of implicit bias agaisnt white males, does it just not exist? I would even go as far as to say this video had implicit bias agaisnt white conservatives. During this video, 4:54, there was a drawing of white conservatives marching behind the bias monster with what was clearly meant to be a MAGA hat, one lady is carrying a confederate flag, and there are Confederate statues near them. During this picture, the narrator says that the IAT shows how "groups of people will act on average, and that is worrisome." This is a clear stereotype and showing implicit bias agaisnt white conservatives, this is meant to paint the majority of conservatives and Trump supporters as racist. This video is clearly politicized, and it doesn't surprise me since it comes from such a far left univeristy, tu.
Mark Garza as someone who has experienced it in my work environment from my supervisors, I would have to disagree. Multiple times I was yelled at by my manager in front of customers because of my “white privilege.” She assumed I had never had a job and that my life had been nothing but easy due to my skin color. Without knowing anything about me. Her implicit bias quickly turned very apparent and hostile during every shift that she was my manager. Her supervisor said simply “when you work for her, stay away from her” that was all. I’m not saying racism doesn’t occur toward only black Americans, brown Americans, Im saying racism is a two way street, and anyone who says otherwise is close minded, racist, and uneducated.
It's clearly extremely liberal, good points though.
@Mark Garza So you're saying white people are superior in every conceivable way? Ok...doesn't sound like you're biased at all.
@Mark Garza Are you suggesting white people are better than other races? If you say they have ALWAYS had the upper hand, you are, inarguably, claiming that they are superior to all other races. Of course your statement is false...they have NOT...by any stretch of the imagination...always had the upper hand. More white people have been enslaved in the history of humanity than ANY other race of people. They have been persecuted and murdered at nearly the same rate as the people of modern China. The difference? White people buckled down, bettered themselves and overcame all of their historic problems ON THEIR OWN...if they seem to have the "upper hand" in western society...ITS BECAUSE THEY BUILT that society...the greatest society mankind has ever known...belittling them and punishing them for their accomplishments won't bring any other group up...that isn't how whites built the west...and it won't do anything good for the groups too lazy to build themselves up instead of trying to tear others down.
@Christiano Delgado when you or any other self serving leftist can be honest about the following FACTS...maybe the thinking adults in the world will start paying attention to you...
FACT...U.S. legal code considers the lives of non whites as being more valuable than whites...punishment for killing a white is less than killing anyone else...BY LAW
FACT...An unarmed white person is significantly more likely to be killed by cops than an an unarmed black person...more than twice as likely in fact.
FACT...not one instance of institutional racism against blacks can be found in America...it does not exist...feel free to cite examples that your educated, thinking superiors can knock down for you.
At 2:11 maybe the friend knows for a fact that this young woman is good at math or science? Maybe the friend knows she gets all A's? Implicit bias works both ways : you could just assume that everything is about your ethnicity when it really isn't.
no
I took the IAT test and I had a self reflection moment. The test does work if you do as it says and don't think to hard simply press the keys as quickly as you can come up with your answer.
I've taken a few of them and I feel like these tests actually lead you to show certain bias. I would be interested to see how the results change if the "negative" feature was associated with the positive words first.
The test has absolutely nothing to do with bias. It's literally a memory game and has no real standing. It should not be considered a study.
Implicit bias testing when concerning race or discrimination is very controversial. Meta studies have shown that those tests are not scientifically verifiable ( you take the test 3 times you get 3 different results), full of false positives, does not predict behavior and can't be trained out of. Many psychologist state that they do not even know what it is testing. Even the founders claims that the tests are made for aggregates can be considered unfounded because of the inconsistency of them at the individual level. Do your own research if you do not believe this.
Just watched this as part of CE course. I want to address the last stronghold of implicit bias left unaddressed and perfectly depicted in your video. When recounting how bias was addressed by holding blind auditions for orchestras, those holding auditions were in suits from chins on down and the chosen female was revealed in a tank top with clearly drawn breasts and armpit holes halfway down her rib cage.
I agree with your observation! The illustrator must have had implicit bias against women. Intersting!
Well the example of orchestra auditions was talking from a real-world example, it was in fact male judges discriminating against female applicants.
They did away with blind auditions in most of the professional Orchestras because meritocracy was evidently racist.
Dude flexed about his "good voice" lmao
LMFAOO
That’s African American Vernacular English. I’m sure you didn’t grow up around African Americans but like many people, you’re imitating their vernacular to sound more interesting, fun, cool.
@@aem870 They always copy from us smh.
@@aem870 LMFAO
@@maryamadahir1199 said in english xD
I saw this during an audition on tv when the New York Philharmonic set up the audition where they only heard the player. I never forgot that because there were instances of IRB when I auditioned.
did anyone notice the ice cream cone on the window at 5:57 turn into a construction worker
3:39 So I can't feel implicit bias?
"We can do better.... I have HOPE" Sam Alix
knowing who you are without getting offended by others opinions is a basis for keeping a good attitude and staying positive.
Regarding hiring/promotion, I would like to know of those equally qualified, was there an equal ratio of contenders?
@@jwc160 that is a perspective that I never thought of. I've never been in the hiring seat, so I haven't had to consider that.
@@jwc160 that's like saying we should consider a female employee's likelihood of falsely accusing the company of mysogynyn. It's quite ignorant and it stops black people from wanting to report racism when it happens. Don't assume that the average black person will falsely accuse a company of racism if they get fired, it's not true.
@@AkTheProducer There's evidence that people who present themselves as victims are more likely to cheat, lie and steal, this is the paradox inherent in extending good faith to people who claim oppression, since it opens the door to grifters, which damages the credibility of actual victims.
Why would this matter?
0:45
1:30
1:58
2:23
4:56
5:25
5:36
5:50
6:22
7:35
what
did anyone else have to watch this for school? cuz this for my history class🥲🥲
me. for my philosophy class.
me. for my clinical education class.
yeah lmao for my ethnic studies
Yea Social Sciences and it is entirely ridiculous... -_-
Mines is for ethnic studys
Great explanation
The Asian girl said her friend was biased because she believed, based on her friend saying: "you are good at math you are good at science." This might not have been based on an unconscious bias but based on her friend's observations that she was better at math and science than she was. This might show the Asian student's bias rather than the bias she attributed to her friend.
Oh man! What a hardship to have in life. To be thought of being good at math and science when you’re not. That’s horrible!
They only showed a snippet of her interview, this kind of thing has been shown to happen across the board to people of Asian descent, stop looking for some ridiculous counterargument as if it proves anything real.
@@watching99134 It does prove something real. The creators of the video did not take into account any assumptions or biases that they have. The fact that their video shows only White biases calls into question their own anti-White bias. We can't assume that the incident that watching99134 refers to is not further evidence of the video creators' biases.
I noticed she didn’t mention whether she actually was good at math. Her mannerisms indicated a personality of some precision, there are a lot of ways people evaluate one another-implicit bias is nonsense.
if you're trying to school me on #implicitbias without even knowing my thoughts, you are also implicitly biasly challenged. LOL!! My actions and good character matter more than whatever you think is in my head.
Its always good to not judge based on culture, race or anything like that. But its important to note that implicit bias, if its real, is being positive to people you can relate to and negative to people you cannot relate to. Its not just people juding black people negatively as this video suggest. Its weird to only focus on white vd black, but if you do.. black people would probably do the same for white people.
It’s been my experience that the unconscious bias comes from black people toward white more than the other way around.
Here’s a famous example: Oprah refused to have a white flight attendant tend to her and would only allow the black FA to be near her. This was reported in the media and celebrated….
Nooo
This is true for all cultures. They all have biases, its human nature, and that is how it should be explained but since it is only white culture that holds themselves accountable for these actions it seems like we only hear about white biases and it comes across as though they are the only ones guilty of it
Had to watch this for school, its going to show up on my feed now😭
rs
When a group of guys in tech were asked why there were so few minorities and woman, they said because in the beginning it was just friends of nerds who knew other nerds and was just people they felt they had more in common with and were comfortable around. It wasn’t because they were implicitly bias.
That's where this video fell apart for me when they started speaking about the study of white = positive and black = negative and not even mentioning or considering that people tend to stick with what is familiar. Your comment describes this well in my opinion.
@Leigh Michelle So what! Birds of a feather stick together. Ever walk into a school cafeteria? Blacks sit with the blacks, Asians with Asians, Latino with Latinos, etc…even though it’s an integrated school, people still self segregate. It is government overreach to try and regulate such things. People can’t be forced onto each other, they will cross the isle out of mutual benefit, shared Intrest’s or needs. It shouldn’t be forced.
@@Emmanuel-ow3ix They address specifically how some people prefer their own in the video.
Literally how implicit bias works. You described why people think it's harmless or preference.
I practice non-judging behaviors or at least reflect if i felt like i made an assumption about another based on their race.
They need to start doing Blind interviews where you speak into a box that changes the sound of your voice so it is unidentifiable to any particular racial group, where they can't see you, and where they don't know your name. And until that blind interview is completed, and after they decide you're good enough for the job, you should not have to reveal your race or name. I know it sounds unrealistic, but the truth of the matter is as long as you have a name that can link you to you to a particular ethnic group or they can see that you belong to one, or they think they can tell by the tone of your voice, your chances will always be less. And that is real.
Meaning so the prospective employer can’t tell who he is actually hiring. That’s absurd. People are evaluated by how they present, and interview of a candidate is worthless if the employer can’t tell how he would act on the job. This is more obsessing about identity that is wildly overwrought.
Having Implicit bias + Conscious awareness and suppression of them.
Both are important.
I mean if she really is good at science or math is it still a stereotype? (2:06)
yes
I mean, we don’t exactly have context, we just know that her friend said she was good at math and science. Given that they were friends she could actually be good at math and science and her friend knows.
It could mean she has that stereotype about her own people.
No
What did u use to create
0:58 those owls didn't have to be so savage 🦉
Implicit bias is something we all have, I feel it’s hard to remove it but as a first step we could try to identify them and try to challenge it.
Bias and stereotypes that Asian students are good at math and science is supported by facts and statistics
4:50 *shows a picture of white people marching under a confederate flag*
"It still indicates how groups of people will act on average, and that is worrisome."
Why is it worrisome? Specifically... why is it worrisome that white rural folk would act in their own best interest? I would really like to know why they think that is 'worrisome,' when every group does that. Do they think that modern white Americans are somehow more dangerous than everyone else? That we are somehow more capable and organized, and thus can do more damage to people and society if we so choose? That sounds like a bias stereotype to me, one that smacks of a white supremacist mindset.
This is exactly why I left the left. Pseudo science... the left has embraced pseudo science. And I'm not going to be part of any movement that promotes this half baked phrenology.
It shows a dreadful level of conscious bias by the creator of this video. Clue: The world isn't America. Most people would not understand the concept of people being behind the Confederate flag, for example.
What are these internal bias's based on? Where do they come from? Does it come from experiences and knowledge accumulated throughout ones life? Is it the mind forcing a determination/judgement using the only available data?
They come from every interaction you've ever had with anything. Whether that be a woman calling you ugly or you seeing a black person being incarcerated on the news.
The IAT is not psychometrically valid. The creators has since denounced the test as meaning anything.
It comes from media, taking to others as well as personal experience. In many cases individuals of one group might show bias against people of another group despite never having met people of the other group personally. They have no personal experience with said people, so they base their opinions on what they've heard or seen coming from others and media.
@@AkTheProducer also the media will show one "black person being incarcerated on the news" but not show black college graduates at college graduation. Or show them working jobs in the fields of engineering or medicine.
@@jhonklan3794 yes they have, but yet at the school district I work in it was thought to be reasonable to use the IAT as some kind of D.E.I (diversity, equity, and inclusion) training. SMDH
Please can someone explain what the difference between schemas and concepts are? Also categorie sounds also pretty similar to schema. I am confused.
I think a schema is basically referring to how implicit bias is often used to convey why people have "prejudices". I would highly recommend the video Im about to link then coming back to this one to see what you think.
Then, if you're interested in going further down the rabbit hole look up divergent evolution and secular creationism. I have literally had my worldview turned upside down in the last few years, slowly at first, then these ideologies that seemed so distant years ago all of the sudden seemed so clearly justifiable in the context of historical conquest.
If you want further information on implicit vs explicit reasoning I can share a video that far better illustrates why civilizations that have come before us have failed when denying how big of a role implicit traits play in determining characteristics of a person. We all agree that dogs have different characteristics but we're told in humans that the variances between our species, aka subspecies are somehow different to that of dogs. Its all so obvious that some dogs are more dangerous than others and ignoring implicit bias is like saying Ive pet a Chihuahua so I somehow now have the explicit knowledge that I can pet a pit bull, and why stop there? A wolf is still a dog so now I should pet that! You can see how dangerous it is to completely ignore implicit bias.
Implicit traits outside my European gene pool are likely vastly different than those of African decent, even if we shared common ancestors thousands of years ago. It's not that Im saying one is better than the other, it's admitting that they evolved differently with completely different environmental and cultural pressures. This is the only way to explain the differences in IQ which even the most liberal studies show no matter what environmental factors come about, IQ is already determined to be about the same as your birth parents 60-70% of the time. The twin experiments are the best example of this fact. th-cam.com/video/9cls-nGTjoE/w-d-xo.html
If there is such a thing as an unconscious mind- something we're not aware of in ourselves but believe we can observe it others therefore, I too must have an unconscious mind exerting influence on my behaviours and attitudes.... hmmmmm........I think I can see yours at work even though I can't see my own but as we're both of the same species I must have one too..... hmmm...
You might not be able to see your brain processes but you can still make educated guesses on them by looking at the input and output. When you get an input of a resume from people of different races and output a different response, yes, we can’t see the internal processes but we can assume there was some unconscious difference in the way both were treated (Got a Psych exam coming up)
Think about this, you will never be able to hold your brain and look at it, but you can do that for other people's.
What about the bias of the parade with a confederate flag along with a person w an American flag shirt? So if you are patriotic, you are also racist?
Did you notice the implicit anti-white bias spread throughout the video?
How good was the study concerning the musician auditions?
Were there control groups? Has there ever been any study that compares a specific judge's evaluation of a specific musician both seen and unseen? What was the rate of growth of the percentage of females in orchestras before the study? Was it the same, less than, or greater than the rate after the general change in audition conditions? Were there any controls in the study that took into account the increasing role in society of women in general?
What were the implicit biases held by Blacks in the study? Were there any anti-White biases held by Blacks? Were there Anti-Asian biases, perhaps, given that 85% of Asian assaults in San Francisco were committed by Blacks.
If there were Black biases noted in the study, do you justify them? If so, then shouldn't Whites or Asians be justified in their anti-Black biases?
Implicit bias isn't ABOUT race... you can be implicitly biased about race, for sure, but you also have bias toward other factors. Age, gender, sexual orientation, religion, culture, political affiliation, pet choice, hair colour... almost anything can create an implicit bias. And it's not just about people - dog breed is an example of this outside humans.
What is the proof offered on the resumes?
I don’t it to be a requirement or want or feel it is possible for a government institution teaching how to be a decent human.
this video is doing more harm than good. its' confusing stereotype with implicit bias.
Is it not possible that the girl just thinks that the Asian girl is good at math? The question I would ask is does the Asian girl get good grades in math? Does the work seem to come easily to her?
The video is about how to overcome implicit bias and stereotypes, and I am watching it as part of the NJ CE Fair Housing requirement.
The narrator just got finished saying that women used to hold relatively small number of seats in orchestra until orchestras starting holding blind auditions. When auditions were done behind a curtain, the number of women doubled.
Cool, right?
But then why is the woman auditioning for an orchestra in a skimpy tank top and winking at the men as they smirk at her?
Why are they stereotyping women in a video about how to overcome stereotypes?
I seriously have better things to do with my time than post this.
Like finish my CE or go sell a house or play outside in the spring weather.
But really? What is this teaching our culture about women? What is it saying to our girls?
There is nothing wrong with wearing skimpy clothes.
There is nothing wrong with winking.
There is nothing wrong with women expressing sexuality.
But there is something wrong with showing a scantily dressed, winking woman as an example of how NOT to stereotype.
Jeez....
We can do better.
McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin can do better.
Do better.
bias?
A person’s mannerisms and the way others react are so complicated and the science so uncertain regarding the psychological reasons why a person acts or reacts the he does , this notion of implicit bias is another attempt to exaggerate discrimination in society for ulterior motives. The only bias I saw during this video was quite explicit - the anti white prejudice in the image of the parade of stereotypes in a line carrying the Rebel Flag. There’s nothing wrong with the Confederate flag, it’s an historical artifact and obsessing over it indicates intolerance rather anything it represents. It shows how the people making this video have some soul exploration to do, certainly before they can presume to lecture others about subconscious thoughts.
There are a lot of ways people evaluate one another-implicit bias is nonsense.
3:10
This whole video is a bias lol
How
True bro
Being able to listen to other peoples views. Everyone is different.
0:56 the book is bias to dick moby
The guy who said he has a good voice is cute-👀
Thank you! I am using a portion of this clip to share with a group of leaders next week
So how did it go?
KING KEG lol
It's a stubborn social phenomenon in the West. Who knows how many generations can shake it up?
It feels so bad when you are scared being around people who discriminate. Implicit bias must be taking serious into our society. If you feel that you feel that you are more important than others that is implicit bias
Implicit bias:
When you noticed the thumbnail to the video you're watching has "Texas" written on it and automatically assume that the content won't inform you because of the deep rooted implicit biases that were sown into your head as a child.
I wouldn't have realized it without this video's help. Thank you ❤️
This is well explained. There is a lot of implicit bias especially when it comes to racial segregation.
When I first read the thumbnail to this video I automatically assumed that the content would be uninforming because of my deep rooted implicit biases about Texans being uneducated.
I was wrong and put in my place.
I agree that stereotypes are everywhere.
Implicit bias exists among white males too. If one is young, tall, handsome, educated and intelligent, they don't get affected much as others who aren't.
The screen grab is presumptuous and biased from the jump 🤣💀
If you are being forced to watch this video for school or work.
Please comment with the name of school or employer so we can publicly name and shame them.
Really well done! Thanks for sharing outside your university.
Implicit bias seems to affect marginalized groups more negatively than non-marginalized groups, but it does exist toward the majority, too, since it is inevitable and subconscious. It can have a negative effect on someone from a majority group, of course, but I gather from this video that it is less common than its negative effect on someone from a minority group.
I'm bias against blissful ignorance
Hi, do I have permission to use this for our company?
Let me in
I disagree with much of this video. In what world do doctors recommend less pain medication for black people? Honestly alot of this stuff, like saying implicit bias is deep rooted and that prejudice is ingrained in us just keeps the race problem going.
FiringallCylinders this is actually supported by data. check out john oliver’s segment on medical bias here on youtube.
I work in healthcare. One week after my mother's knee replacement surgery, the doctor decided she didn't pain medication any more because she needed to be weened off before she could become addicted. It's standard for narcotic pain medication to not be discontinued for nearly a month, doesn't always last that long, but that's near the standard. The doctor wanted to take my mother's pain medication before she could even go to the bathroom under her own power. This is a real issue. Ask some of your friends who are people of color what their experience has been. It may reinforce your position, but it also may change. All the best.
I’m guessing you’re not black. Just because you haven’t experienced it doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen
check out "how does implicit bias affect health care?" from the channel "Institute for healthcare improvement" they discuss and explain with actual stats
@@RollerBear123 I would highly recommend the video Im about to link then coming back to this one to see what you think.
Then, if you're interested in going further down the rabbit hole look up divergent evolution and secular creationism. I have literally had my worldview turned upside down in the last few years, slowly at first, then these ideologies that seemed so distant years ago all of the sudden seemed so clearly justifiable in the context of historical conquest.
If you want further information on implicit vs explicit reasoning I can share a video that far better illustrates why civilizations that have come before us have failed when denying how big of a role implicit traits and bias's play in determining characteristics of a person, largely irrespective of environmental factors.
We all agree that dogs have different characteristics but we're told in humans that the variances between our species, aka subspecies are somehow magically different to that of dogs. Only by the content of their character should you judge someone, sure, but denying any implicit/genetic differences gives people this idea that they should have forced equality of outcome rather than true equality which is the equality of opportunity.
Its all so obvious that some dogs are more dangerous than others and ignoring implicit bias is like saying Ive pet a Chihuahua so I somehow now have the explicit knowledge that I can pet a pit bull, and why stop there? A wolf is still a dog so now I should pet that! You can see how dangerous it is to completely ignore implicit bias, and in fact, from a young age we are taught the opposite. We know this to be true because people who are the least "prejudice" towards any race/nation, no matter how bad they actually are, will always be the ones who don't actually have to live alongside the group. This is wrong, they're anthropomorphizing the negro, in the same way people who never spend time with the dangerous breeds of dogs are the ones who refuse to admit that those dogs, the same ones they've never cared to have as a Pet or be around, they're the ones who ironically stick up for and say it deserves the same petting that the little friendly doggies get. "How could you not pet that dog?!" Give me a break, its denial of reality and I don't deny that race exists. The moment when Charles Darwin's theory gets good is when he speaks of divergent evolution, yet that's the moment we're told not to look any farther because Darwin puts "his own" racial prejudice into the scientific field that he literally invented. Such a reach considering the man was not racist at all, just pointing out what he saw. Any professor that was still talking about divergent evolution in the 70's had to have armed guards around them. Imagine an idea being so powerful that people want you killed for sharing it. The true terrible ideas of society are never met with violence, they're met with mockery. If these arguments Im exposing you to you were so bad that they can immediately be labeled as such, they would be easy to debunk and be available to everyone to show them for what they really are; a bad idea.
Just like dogs, the magic scientists may try calling us one species, but in reality there are many breeds, with just as many external differences as cognitive differences, just like all animals. Denying this will cause a repeat of history, when you look back on history and think its so easy to see where they went wrong, just remember, embracing explicit knowledge to argue against implicit bias is literally what has caused the collapse of hundreds of nations before us.
Implicit traits outside my European gene pool are likely vastly different than those of African decent, even if we shared common ancestors thousands of years ago. It's not that Im saying one is better than the other, it's admitting that they evolved differently with completely different environmental and cultural pressures, and their own implicit bias's and should've remained separated. We are the only nation in history where the supposed oppressed group, instead of fighting for independence, fought for desegregation. First equality of opportunity, but that wasn't enough, now we've been trying to force equality of outcome for the last 50 years and the black community is worse in nearly every way than they were in the 60's.
They were just coming out of curfews and now look what they've done to themselves with the help of those guilty whites that parade the black people around like their newest toy.These changes in "the human race", though slower than dogs who were artificially selected, are still present and are the only way to account for why black people are on average 20% less successful than the citizens of the nation they inhabit. This is why we should've realized they will never be happy unless they have more than us, and even then they will still find ways to be the victim because everyone has allowed them to claim this who didn't actually have to deal with them. Black people should be thanking Americans, not the other way around. Built this country.... give me a break th-cam.com/video/9cls-nGTjoE/w-d-xo.html
This video is so full of crap. Anecdotal evidence that only proves that people have experienced... something. Maybe that girl is good at math.Or her friend wasn't good at math and she was just better at it. She clearly believes that "all Asians are good at math" stereotype to some degree since she's the one who said it out loud. Maybe that Latino Lieutenant was treated like a poor leader because he was a poor leader. He doesn't even know why they treated him like that. Maybe people learn from their experiences and apply that knowledge to later encounters. You wouldn't go sticking your hand in a fire because it might not burn you the same way that other one did, and you wouldn't grab a fire extinguisher every time you saw a fire on a grill. If you're offended by someones experiences with someone who belongs to your "identity group" then I'm sure you can fix them by telling them how terrible they are and how much better you are than them
Horrible, being offended even for compliments 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
I think that what the video fails to address is the actual nuance associated with the term "bias".
Fact is there is more honestly a bias that is misplaced (like say a prejudice) which is effectively an unmerited perspective towards a person and even a group of people and a well placed bias (like say w/ good judgment) which is effectively based on a historically merited perspective towards a person and even a group of people.
It would be ludicrous for a bully to beat someone up on a playground repeatedly and then decry that there is an "implied bias" for some unmerited reason. No the merited reason is that he has a history of unprincipled, malicious, selfish and violent behavior. That if "labeled something else" (ie a bias) then fails to address whatever the real problem is. In this scenario the victim remains a potential victim and the perpetrator remains unbridled and unrehabilitated if left to social constructs like "implied bias".
great video!
couldve been better if the ailen was wearing pants
Give that ailen some damn PANTS
Hiring managers want to get the best candidate in the shortest amount of time. I have a hard time believing they would throw out a resume of an equally qualified minority, without a reason. I.e., typos, unprofessionalism, etc. I would like to know their basis for "equally qualified." Education, experience, extra-curricular...it all plays in. Two people with same education doesn't equal same qualifications if one person has experience or better grades than the other.
There have been numerous studies done on this over hundreds of years. Even the military has equal opportunity offices on every base because people are literally in an environment that strips them to nothing and gives us equal opportunities and experience, but minorities and women are still unevenly picked for jobs and opportunities within the military, despite literally having the same qualifications. Same uniform, pay, and everything.
A majority of our pilots are hand-selected white males, despite many women and minorities having equal or greater qualifications to do such a job and the military is well-aware of this issue and holds regular diversity meetings.
Is it really still unbelievable that marginalized groups face discrimination even after the hundreds of years of scholarly, scientific, anthropologic, and government-funded surveys, work and school rules, state, local, and government laws, ongoing HR training, military briefings and movements? Everyone's lying? That isn't even logical more than it is clearly your denial based in implicit bias.
This video displays multiple studies verifying similar evidence over millions of subjects, but it's still "hard to believe" that despite Rosa Parks' death in the 21st century, all discrimination has simply vanished.
"Buy-a-seees" lol.
LOL. Brainwashing in full force from our educated betters.
It is not even conscious so why do you care!
did you even bother to watch the video
@@ladyvmgx yes
This was a great explanation 💗💯
Good video
It’ll be better if that ailen was wearing some nice tight pants
Bullshit. That's all you need to know about implicit bias.
This is propaganda designed to remove discrimination. Discrimination is very important in identifying who is and is not allowed into your house. To identify what is good or bad food. Who to have children with. What restaurant is good.
This anti-bias training basically owers the bar. It forces the majority to become obedient to a loud and angry minority.
This is a racist video. What a shame.
bias
Ax that person? That’s violent!
So happy I pulled my kids of school. Btw I’m Mexican American and this makes me feel very uncomfortable. I don’t want to treat or want to be treated differently because of my skin color or back ground. This whole idea is “racist”. Stop the hateful indoctrination!
whos in pshe whilst watching this lmao
Thank God this is not a problem that needs solving... but you knew this already.
You do realize that this entire video is biased, right?
From the University of Texas...enough said. Spewing its own brand of bias and indoctrination! Being a native Texan...I'm appalled by this video and to learn that this was shown in a high school a few years back in my children's school district.
Om shanti k good day
This whole video is biased
STRAIGHT UP BLACK SUPREMACISTS RHETORIC
"hhwhite" 😆
ell gee bee tee quew
This reeks of confirmation bias and of course ignoring important aspects of bias and shit
Take that ailen’s shirt away and give him pants instead he’ll look better in pants and that shirt turned him bad so pants to make him good
Racism but with extra steps
Implicit bias exists if your brain is a completely non-functional mess.
You people are complete fucking idiots.
If you can stop keep blacking out the video, that'll be great
It's surreal that they openly admitted that blacks are discriminated against but had the lighter skinned black woman speaking. She almost looks mixed. You would think that they know about biases between lighter skinned and darker skinned ppl. Well after all the system does has to keep it going.
Just a bunch of bs.
Thank you for your negative comment! I needed on find one on this video for a homework assignment
Presupposed in dogma about bias is what those biases might be: when people tout “systems of oppression” THEIR capricious, biased, and oppressive ideas of who is privileged of who oppressed are the ONLY deciding factor, and are considered to be unassailable. There is no impartial, evidence based discussion of what individuals are objectively “oppressed” or “privileged”. Who gets to decide who is oppressed and by how much? (Answer: that highly subjective determination is in the hands of people with an axe to grind) What’s the formula for this woke calculus? How do we know when there is no more oppression? Is such a thing even feasible? There is no turning back from officially elevating collectivist blood feud above individual rights and liberties in our civilization.
great video!