Here's Why This Super Lightweight Concrete Slab Is The Future Of Architecture

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @MilciadesAndrion
    @MilciadesAndrion 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is digital engineering and the future of architecture. The use of 3D printing and digital technology is changing conventional design. Robots are a valuable tool and robotic fabrication is the current reality. I liked the video and subscribed to the channel.

  • @michaelgodown
    @michaelgodown 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    As a concrete and wood framing Carpenter it's kind of scary but interesting at the same time.

  • @beauripp1456
    @beauripp1456 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Being a builder, I love it! I have had that idea for some time now. your doing it right.

    • @qideus
      @qideus 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your research is very interesting! I wonder how I can engage younger students with an smaller part of the structural problems that you have mentioned. Do you have any activities that you could share? Thanks.

  • @Beton-Betonsky
    @Beton-Betonsky ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Здравствуйте!
    Испытайте пожалуйста на прочность при попадании в плиту из uhpc бетона авиационной против бункерной бомбы (gbu 28), какая толщина Вашего бетона не пропустит её насквозь???!!??? Обязательно чтобы бетон был армирован микро стальной фиброй. Благодарю. Я тоже делаю подобный бетон, но работаю один. У Вас возможностей побольше!) А вопрос сейчас актуален как никогда. Если результат будет, то этот бетон у Вас купят для укрытия богатые люди. Мира всем и добра!

  • @BD-hy8bl
    @BD-hy8bl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You have to design or find the way to be able to reuse all those 3D printed molds breaking them apart from the finished product with exhausting work is not the sustainable way we are aiming. Besides this issue great approach. Congrats.

  • @wellguesswhatIthink
    @wellguesswhatIthink 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There seems to be various definitions in the comments of what the professor's trying to say. I don't think this is to improve expensive, extravagant buildings but ALL buildings. Maybe that strange-looking surface is intended for more shock absorption with less materials

  • @avinashdas1013
    @avinashdas1013 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Becoz of you my atmosphere is full of airborne particles.

  • @theprodigalson4003
    @theprodigalson4003 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That’s pretty neat, always wanted to be an architect but then I realised I’m too dumb for that career

    • @Zoza15
      @Zoza15 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its not that you're *DUMB* but to lazy to actually learn about architecture..
      Nobody is dumb, it all depends on your dedication to learn about the topic and succeed, and that takes time.

  • @bobgeorge283
    @bobgeorge283 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    did you see that his workers are working with fiberglass and not wearing masks 1:36-1:38

    • @islandwoodfired
      @islandwoodfired 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the fiberglass is just loose fibers mixed into the concrete and then sprayed on...the mixture is too wet to have loose fibers floating around...

  • @DawFg-qb4ih
    @DawFg-qb4ih ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope work with you I have many ideas in my mind

  • @muhammadomerjaved3935
    @muhammadomerjaved3935 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to use this formwork for epoxy grouting.

  • @ab8jeh
    @ab8jeh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3d printing isn't the solution. Fine, find the principal stress curves in the slab and align material to it for efficiency, but it doesn't need such an elaborate manufacturing method. Fabrication and structural efficiency should be a compromise. Still, looks pretty I guess.

  • @nealholtz5938
    @nealholtz5938 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mr. Professor - if you would - please provide the names of a couple of companies that are selling the large scale 3D printers to make the forms. Also - is there a convention in the USA that displays these types of printers. I know that there are lots of companies making and selling smaller printers. The printer in your video is on a different scale. Thanks!

    • @xsrox420
      @xsrox420 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many of these printers are custom built. From my Knowledge, ETH Zurich, also has ABB robots moving from the ceiling to work on XXL projects. There are Build Cons regularly in several states where they show machines that can be customised to do this.

  • @actontreadway1168
    @actontreadway1168 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    well, it certainly isn't cheap now, but I imagine, with time, evolution and scale, this could be quite economical.

  • @johnkeenan5637
    @johnkeenan5637 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the clicking music is really annoying,. sounds like the speaker connection is bad

  • @protonneutron9046
    @protonneutron9046 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    30 years late. Thin shell concrete using basalt reinforcing is decades old and is stronger than what they are doing here.

    • @SK-fd8kw
      @SK-fd8kw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Could you provide a link or additional info about this? Very interested

  • @wyleong4326
    @wyleong4326 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible that the form work be made by sonic means?

  • @TsetsiStoyanova
    @TsetsiStoyanova 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Music is annoying

  • @R.E.A.L.I.T.Y
    @R.E.A.L.I.T.Y ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool research. But its not "cheaper and more efficient". That is one costly and complex method to produce a ceiling.

  • @nstl440
    @nstl440 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Future challenges? Why then adding glassfiber to the mix? Giving extra hard to recycle junk to future generations.
    Find a solution without fibers. Make a robot rebar bender and add that.

  • @hindustani8940
    @hindustani8940 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm looking for concrete slab preparation in factory and direct installation at site at a cheaper price along easy to transport

    • @fenqing08
      @fenqing08 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      check out a Norwegian company Polybo.no

  • @EbrahimHasan
    @EbrahimHasan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's no shortage of gimmicks in the construction industry

  • @alterego157
    @alterego157 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Congratulations, you turned cheap and simple into expensive and complicated. For some marginal benefits. Vanity is fun I get it, but reducing the amount of concrete in the slab and improving it's thermal, hydrophobic, structural and other properties can be done far more effectively with new aggregates that can be produced from recycled materials. And stays simple and cheap which ensures wide adoption.

  • @MarinusMakesStuff
    @MarinusMakesStuff 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    A very nice solution for a problem that does not exist. This is decadent design, not design for public housing. Get over yourself, don't try to sell this idea as if it's going to revolutionize the future where we need to build more and faster than ever before. That's just misleading.

    • @lotmyle5465
      @lotmyle5465 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The design and application featured may be decadent depending on interpretation, but the potential application of this technique is completely functional, useful, and valid. The fact of most new techniques and technologies first originating in the projects of the wealthy or exhaustively artistic has a practical cause - they are the only ones wealthy enough or dedicated enough to pour resources and effort into a pipe-dream others have yet to see merit in. Such single-minded drive and excess does not invalidate the value of the end product.
      Expand beyond your eco-socio based class view of the world and look at the engineering potentials. If you are unable to see them - you might not be qualified to continue commenting.

    • @cdsnider9496
      @cdsnider9496 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I couldn't agree more. The shell of a structure is a small fraction of the overall cost of the building. Just watching them make that one piece you can clearly see that this is not at all a cheap process.

    • @lawlerzwtf
      @lawlerzwtf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Lot not only is this more difficult to do because you have to make ultra custom engineered solutions just for a slab, it is also much slower to manufacture and takes longer to install. It may be space efficient, but it is not time and cost efficient at all.

    • @grandtourtgt9181
      @grandtourtgt9181 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lawlerzwtf technology will evolve man

    • @coreywong
      @coreywong 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      1. It is a problem that exits, that because of labour and accuracy issue, we are building with a thick slab because optimizing the load like Gothic architecture is economically impossible today. But the conventional concrete construction not only comprise of major co2 emission for global warming, but it's useless
      2, this method can be made into robotic fabricated formwork which is cheap fast and efficient, look at Odico from Denmark. 3 you and public in general need to engage more and try to understand the environment you are living in, to improve your life. Not to make assumptions and protect status quo for no reason.

  • @jasonwowhero8147
    @jasonwowhero8147 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First

  • @dripmeister5555
    @dripmeister5555 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    oof

  • @AutoNomades
    @AutoNomades 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Robotic made concrete house" : "Sustainable" ??!🤔🤑😅 Who will Really benefit from that? You ? Concrete lobby and 3d printers owners ? 🥱 So "connected" to electronic that you are totally disconected from basic humans needs..