Constitutional Law: 1st Amendment Free Speech (Pt. 3.3) - Obscenity under Miller v. California

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
  • 📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
    Law school prep: studicata.com/...
    Bar exam prep: studicata.com/...
    🤝 CONNECT WITH YOUR INSTRUCTOR
    Michael's Instagram: / studicataguy
    ❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
    Community: studicata.com/...
    Testimonials: studicata.com/...
    Submit a review: shoutout.studi...
    📱 TECH
    iOS app: studicata.com/ios
    Android app: studicata.com/...
    📣 ABOUT
    Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
    Email: info@studicata.com
    Learn more: studicata.com
    🎬 VIDEO INFO
    Constitutional Law: 1st Amendment Free Speech (Pt. 3.3) - Obscenity under Miller v. California
    Primary sources of law for this video:
    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)
    Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
    Jenkins v. Georgia, 418 U.S. 153 (1974)
    Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968)
    Ward v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 767 (1977)
    Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 (1987)
    Learn more: studicata.com

ความคิดเห็น • 10

  • @juliemarie2490
    @juliemarie2490 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I literally love this guy.

  • @zima627
    @zima627 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hearing Mike talk about porn on a Monday, who knew my day would end this way

  • @forrestfireart866
    @forrestfireart866 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the logic behind the statements around 16:00?

  • @jonathanlindsey7623
    @jonathanlindsey7623 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ... Not to mention the leggings showing camel toe when the honorable elders wearing the same store bought clothes in your society still don't accept skinny jeans, leggings, or tiktok leggings.

  • @DonnyBrook762
    @DonnyBrook762 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because law is in a constant of evolution, wouldn't the definition of obscenity evolve too?

    • @kenlandon6130
      @kenlandon6130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes

    • @kenlandon6130
      @kenlandon6130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's tied to local standards of "morality" so what is obscene in one area may not be in another and what is obscene in one time may not be in another

    • @SpartanLawyer
      @SpartanLawyer ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, but you’d have to use the current test and definition on a law exam. The Miller test is the current one.