Slope Deflection Method - Frame with Support Settlement Example

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ก.ย. 2024
  • In this question we solve a basic frame's reactions and SFD/BMD using the slope deflection method. Single support settlement.
    Link to Slope Deflection Introduction: • Slope Deflection Metho...
    Link to Slope Deflection Modified Equation Method: • How to Use Modified Sl...
    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.afmatheng.com/ !!!
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Now try to solve it on your OWN! Don't just "understand"... PRACTICE!!
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    AF MATH AND ENGINEERING - Students Helping Students!
    Join our Community! =)
    -------------------------------------
    Follow us on Twitter at / afmatheng
    Follow us on Facebook at www.facebook.c...
    #math #civilengineering #engineering #education #edchat #lrnchat #blendchat #mlearning #elearning #ipadchat #pblchat #passiondriven #blendedlearning #ccchat #ccss #commoncore #competencyed #curriculum #deeperlearning #digln #earlyed #edapp #eddata #edleaders #edpolicy #edtech #education #elearning #highschool #leadership #middleschool #literacy #engchat #mathchat #scichat #stem #highered #calculus

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @notSavant
    @notSavant 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In a beam problem I had with singularity functions, one of the compatibility equations was that the Moment of a support is zero... does that mean the sum of the moments is zero or that there's no moment in the reaction??

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey man, thanks for your questions. It depends on what kind of support you're talking about. If the support in question resists rotation, there will be a moment developed at that support, assuming some load is acting on the beam. However, if you have a support that doesn't resist rotation, e.g. pin or roller connection, the sum of moments at that support must equal zero.

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just a hint: It helps to think about it in terms of restraint against rotation or movement. If a support prevents a member or whatever it's attached to from moving, the support itself must be resisting that movement and that internal force will be developed there.

  • @ednaacosta9490
    @ednaacosta9490 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    When to use the modified slope deflection equation?

  • @notSavant
    @notSavant 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shouldn't it be wL^2/8 for the FEMcd? From the tables I have, wL^2/12 is when there are moments on both sides like both ends are fixed ie.

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      wL^2/8 is the equation for the maximum moment of a simply supported beam at midspan. wL^2/12 is the formula for a beam in which both ends have fixed supports, and is the value of the moment at the supports. Hope that helps!

    • @billyjanssen5823
      @billyjanssen5823 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AFMathandEngineering wl^2/8 is FEM_cd where joint C is fixed and joint D is a pin or roller. Also if Joint D is a pin or roller, there is no fixed end moment so FEM_cd would not equal -FEM_dc.

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@billyjanssen5823 reread his post, I was clarifying to him why we don't use wl^2/8. It doesn't matter if there isn't any fixed end moment in the actual beam, assuming the ends are fixed and finding the moment is a technique used in a number of structural analysis techniques.

    • @wilsonteh1467
      @wilsonteh1467 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AFMathandEngineering so when im finding FEM for any question, i just have to assume both ends are fixed eventhough there is a roller support in the question?

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wilsonteh1467 Yes

  • @niruda638
    @niruda638 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    If the Frame is sway but the question say "Neglect the axial deformation " then how to solve the problem (Can I consider as non-sway Frame ?)

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It sounds like they want you to ignore p-delta (second order) effects on the frame with that note. Does the question say sway? If it states sway I dont think you can assume non sway.

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Or perhaps they're referring to slenderness of the members (buckling) that you can ignore. Sorry I'd need to see the question!

  • @zikas-dev
    @zikas-dev 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2020