The Dark Truth: Why Ships Are Avoiding Singapore's Port

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 150

  • @worldknowmore
    @worldknowmore  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Will Singapore overcome this shipping crisis? Let us know in the comments below!
    If you enjoyed this video, do like, subscribe and buy us a coffee: bmc.link/worldknowmore
    Check out the next video on the mega project that could end Singapore's maritime dominance th-cam.com/video/HO1r9hUn8Kk/w-d-xo.html

    • @verypleasantguy
      @verypleasantguy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      From its humbly beginning, Singapore has become more and more arrogant
      They seem to think too much of themselves, as if the whole world depends on Singapore alone

    • @lucern543
      @lucern543 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@verypleasantguy Said by the very pleasant guy

    • @KKohl
      @KKohl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A distorted video with sensational words created to earn revenues from advertisements n sponsorships. Lol

  • @wmchan44
    @wmchan44 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    The current abnormal situations in the Singapore port are caused by wars, both shooting wars and trade wars, and are temporary.
    Eventually they will stop and situation will be stabilized.
    Ships by-passing Singapore now will ease the congestions and allow faster clearance for the rest.
    No need to panic as there are no fundamental physical changes that will justify the construction of the Thailand Kra Canal by-pass.

    • @philmu1983
      @philmu1983 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are wrong, perhaps you are not dealing with international trade. I'm already headache with delays from overseas imports that missed ETA schedule and has to bear empty warehouse costs and labour costs. These shall pass on to you as price increase. Although these maybe a few months but when near the end of the year when lot's of festive season where demand for goods also increase, it will continue to pressure all manufacturers as well as the whole chain to end consumers. Hope the government can provide more vouchers for us otherwise you and me shall see another round of inflation, not a sudden spike but gradually over the course of at least 6 months and more

    • @wmchan44
      @wmchan44 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@philmu1983
      You are stating the effects of the shipping disruption which is the results of the trade war (USA/China) and the shooting wars (Middle East and Europe).
      This disruption to shipping schedules need to be untangled and eventually will be normaized by clearing any backlocks.
      There is no magic wand solution to solve this problem and building any bypass will take years to achieve.
      Price increase is inevitable and apply not only to Singapore alone.
      Handing out more helicopter money to Singaporeans is never a good solution.

  • @Buttercookies0
    @Buttercookies0 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    You have missed a very impt point. Bec US is increasing tariff rate on more goods and China is rushing to get more goods out before the deadline. Everyone is rushing to beat the deadline. Thus, the overwhelming demand on shipping. But it will just be a temporary congestion.

    • @worldknowmore
      @worldknowmore  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Hi there, thank you for the comment. We actually covered this point from 04:23 onwards. Cheers!

    • @btgan3838
      @btgan3838 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Why would ships from China heading to North America pass through Singapore??

    • @thanhtong2281
      @thanhtong2281 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@btgan3838- 2 more questions to ask -
      1. How many vessels were cancelled for these routes?
      2. How many vessels are currently docked at US ports(particularly Long Beach/Los Angeles)

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@btgan3838 Because some people are very directionally challenged lol.

  • @lohti6399
    @lohti6399 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Singapore is high in security. Many choose Singapore as a port because of this. That is vital.

    • @ViolentCabbage-ym7ko
      @ViolentCabbage-ym7ko 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      To some extent, yes but ports generally do not need high level security as it would mean additional cost unless the region is at war like in the Middle East.

    • @lohti6399
      @lohti6399 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko Take a look at pirate activities outside Straits of Malacca.
      Without Singapore Maritime security, there will be a lot of unsafe activities.
      So company felt safe docking their goods at the port here.

    • @utubegeronimo7628
      @utubegeronimo7628 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Gradually no more. Thailand would be the natural focus henceforth if the Kra Canal falls through making shipping routes shorter and less expensive.
      Is joining China and becoming part of a Greater China alongside HK, Macau and Taiwan the considered viable option?

    • @zulamy3472
      @zulamy3472 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's literally a choke point

  • @kiantan1072
    @kiantan1072 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Singapore has reopened the old ports to accommodate surge.

  • @charleshong5610
    @charleshong5610 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    2B completed in the 2040s, Tuas Port will be the largest automated container terminal in the world, with an annual handling capacity of 65 million TEUs.2027,phase 1 operational.

    • @ares8887
      @ares8887 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tuas already started since Sept 2022 and achieved 1M TEU by Mar 2023, and continues to ramp up progressively!

  • @PahatRout
    @PahatRout 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Well, if PSA were to adapt Yangshan terminal in Shanghai, larger than Singapore, they claim that with full automation, they need only 120 staff! with productivity of 47 TEU per hour per quay crane! Not only knowing this for a fact but they are doing it, would China support the Thais proposed rail-linked KRA project? Maybe, if Thailand under write the whole project!!

  • @EthanChua-v3p
    @EthanChua-v3p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Probably because, it is too crowded and there’s really not enough port space that it is smarter to go to another port than wait for a week to just dock?

  • @EvelynHo-y3v
    @EvelynHo-y3v 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Using Thailand road to transport goods as an alternative route😂? Try going to Thailand for tour....n experience the congested roads there....u will cry 😭wasting most of your tour timing on road, than having fun time in actual tour spot....

    • @shaf3006
      @shaf3006 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Build Hway direct

    • @jasxteo
      @jasxteo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Agree. The pp manning the port will be slow. Thais work culture is very chill and relaxed.

    • @ernestkj
      @ernestkj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@shaf3006imagine unloading to trains/trucks then to the other side to loading to another ship.. plus crossing ports x 2.. with Thai style of chill chill. The ship that passes by Singapore has sailed passed by the time the containers are on the train or truck

  • @rahalwijesekera493
    @rahalwijesekera493 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Other routes must be developed. Overland routes across Eurasia, other ports in Malaysia and Indonesia are options.

    • @utubegeronimo7628
      @utubegeronimo7628 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Other than the only
      option of becoming part of a Greater China, Singapore in reality has to rely on itself and not others for its economic progress. Singaporeans cannot tell themselves that they can depend on Malaysian or Indonesian ports.

  • @Trueye-sl2mr
    @Trueye-sl2mr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Malaysia, Indonesia, etc have been developing large ports and trade volumes for these nations have also increased. These factors permanently reduce the need for a transit port like Singapore

    • @ishaks8152
      @ishaks8152 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Cheaper and equal efficiency at times better.

    • @gl1363
      @gl1363 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@ishaks8152 that's the biggest joke I heard this year

    • @kaiserlow652
      @kaiserlow652 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ishaks8152Er.....

    • @wf645
      @wf645 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@ishaks8152 Cheaper, maybe ? But that does not include the bribes at adds to the cost. Efficiency ??? Biggest JOKE !!! In short, NOT Cheaper and definitely NOT Efficient !

    • @mrj475
      @mrj475 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Jealous,Singapore are doomed

  • @cac1504
    @cac1504 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Tuas Feng Shui may not be good for shipping. But Singapore is too greedy to turn Tanjung Pagar port into expensive condo and landed property (extension of Sentosa Cove?).

    • @wjj7488
      @wjj7488 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      If you know Google, search how huge Tuas port is and much bigger than Tanjung Pagar . This mammoth port has been going for a number of years.

    • @windydragon6522
      @windydragon6522 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@wjj7488
      He’s talking about fengshui.

  • @hillarygleen1793
    @hillarygleen1793 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When oil prices heading north and shipping companies can’t afford to waste money from one country to another country travelling thousands of miles to berth for two weeks waiting for loading and unloading. China must avoid incurring higher rates so must look for opportunities to cut cost related to shipping routes.

  • @teoteo-pb1uc
    @teoteo-pb1uc หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good title but I doubt your researchers are in the shipping industry to know really what is going on. One belt One Road is the one that is fking SG port. It has nothing to do with goods getting stuck. Already massive investments and construction developments are underway for Thai and Malaysia port. One Belt One Road does not have SG in consideration. If SG has this port weakened, can expect crazy downturn for economy forever.

  • @paulr1125
    @paulr1125 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the problem is the shipping industry itself , and the fact that countries do not protect ships as they should .

  • @barryshaw5660
    @barryshaw5660 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Singapore’s port issues are just beginning and the future there are going to become less relevant. The ASEAN countries have issues with them. And many other countries have issues with them also, including the big dog in the neighborhood.

  • @mulyadinaiborhu7275
    @mulyadinaiborhu7275 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It's interesting to see Malaysia Government view on the Kra Canal. I don't believe Thailand will go ahead with that canal because it probably can cause disintegration in southern Thailand.

    • @PahatRout
      @PahatRout 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If it is a rail link, we can guarantee it is a write-off. Just look at the Mexican rail link trying to offer an alternate to the Panama Canal which could handle only containerships up to 13,600 TEU capacity. It seems the containerships prefer to use the US continental rail link from California to Chicago. Just to save 2-day of sailing time, the ultra-large containerships would have to wait for days to have their boxes transfer to the ships on the other end. With say 20,000 TEUs flowing from each end, it could take more than 2 days plus, with say 5-day wait, the amortized cost would easily cost us$ 0.75 million. it is mission impossible.

    • @marktan8074
      @marktan8074 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@PahatRout Would a rail link make sense, I wonder...? Imagine a container ship having to unload its goods over on the western seaboard. Then it takes *a few* trains to load up all the containers unloaded from the ships, embark on a few hour's journey over to the eastern seaboard and then reloaded once again by a different ship. Imagine the container arrangement plans would be totally different. All that benefits from these arrangements would be the businesses created for this purpose.

    • @PahatRout
      @PahatRout 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marktan8074 , Did I tell differently?

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PahatRout Besides the ridiculousness of the loading and unloading, I actually went on Google maps and measured the distances needed to travel for the ships using the proposed canal route. Unless the route is to Vietnam, their is NO distance saved, it was all a hoax. Why that happens is because of the Vietnam land mass cutting across a direct route to China, so even if ships cut across Thailand, they still have to go around Vietnam while Singapore is at an angle to they have a straighter shot even though it takes longer to get there. In the end, distances end up the same.

  • @harryniedecken5321
    @harryniedecken5321 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    As an American, I don't see a problem in any of this. We need to reduce the trade deficit as much as possible

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And America has a trade deficit OWED to Singapore. If you want to be deficit neutral, then you are going to have to sell cheaply to them.

    • @harryniedecken5321
      @harryniedecken5321 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @danielc2701 Or not buy from them. Why isn't Singapore buying more stuff such as agricultural products and fuel from the US? Don't you like being an independent country vs part of China?

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harryniedecken5321 That increases the trade deficit you owe to them.

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harryniedecken5321 Cheaper to get from Brazil and Vietnam. US is more for higher end products like aircraft and engines. And you (you being the US) have a trade surplus with Singapore, yet you don't see them kicking up a fuss do you? And in what universe does a country win a war to end up as part of the loser? Win a war against the Commies first before swaggering, child.
      And by the way, I also figured out another goof of yours. No goods to the US from China will pass by Singapore. The US is to the EAST of China. Singapore is to the WEST of China. If you are shipping to the US from China through Singapore.... YOU'RE GOING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. lol. Maybe you can start trying to get to Mexico by driving North? lol

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harryniedecken5321 You guys freed yourselves from your Russian overlords yet?
      You can't owe others but others owing you is fine huh? Double standards much?

  • @sandeepkumar-rx6jv
    @sandeepkumar-rx6jv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sri Vijayapuram Port(port Blair) can be used for solveing congestion problem at Srivijaya Singapora port.

  • @winsee4551
    @winsee4551 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best if you can inform your nation shipping lines to avoid Singapore for the time being so as to ease the workload and to give other shipping lines a chance to experience our good maritime services.

  • @ReynoldTay-u6v
    @ReynoldTay-u6v 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Honest oppinion. Singapore has reached a saturation point whereby they cannot grow significantly anymore. Not because of people, but because of no natural resources and land scarcity. Also their advanced infratructure had been caught up by Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia. Everyone has MRT, trains etc. Everyone has awesome ports. My oppinion is Singapore camt grow much more. If Singaporeans want to be rich and do more, they shouls start looking outside their country.

    • @onexoxtoo
      @onexoxtoo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's all in Singapore plan to grow something else other than port.

    • @KASISAMADIA
      @KASISAMADIA 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Psa has done so 25 years ago by investing in ports along the international maritime route.

    • @utubegeronimo7628
      @utubegeronimo7628 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      By becoming part of a Greater China can Singapore further advance its economy.

    • @DySun
      @DySun 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In 2020, the total number of foreign born residents in Singapore was standing at 2,523,648, almost half of SG's total population. And this is not even including foreign born citizens who have obtained Singaporean citizenship.
      This is likely an attempt by the Govt to lower labor costs to remain attractive to foreign investors and to increase consumption to revitalize the economy.

    • @onexoxtoo
      @onexoxtoo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DySun Yes, look at those insolent faces like Amy Khor, Lee Bee Wah....

  • @leemuihock6018
    @leemuihock6018 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    TH-cam Admin, pls ask the uploader of this channel to verify his facts with practising professionals before posting his comments. Thanks.

  • @lirenzeng592
    @lirenzeng592 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    These are temporary problems

  • @johntan9151
    @johntan9151 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It is a supply and demand factor problem which is inevitable because the burgeoning world trade will have to pass through the Straits of Malacca. The idea of building a canal at the Isthmus of Kra in Thailand is an idea floated in the 1970's. Project studies then showed that the idea was not economical and I would imagine that it would be even more costly now, given inflation and the costs of building such a project. There likely is no saving of time in transit via the Isthmus of Kra as opposed to using Singapore as a transit point.

  • @chandrasegar9466
    @chandrasegar9466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    LOL..COME ON ..ITS JUS SHORT DELAY...COMPROMISE FOR THE SECURITY. N SERVICE .

  • @edreeves6440
    @edreeves6440 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Sorry I watched this nonsense right to the end.

  • @nar5956
    @nar5956 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Such a misleading content. Should flag this video

  • @weejph
    @weejph 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A global situation. If it affects Singapore, it also affects other ports. Yet Singapore is singled out. Typical example of bias reporting. Boycott this kind of reporting.

  • @DySun
    @DySun 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In 2020, the total number of foreign-born residents in Singapore was standing at 2,523,648, almost half of SG's total population. And this is not even including foreign-born citizens who have obtained Singaporean citizenship.
    This is likely an attempt by the Govt to lower labor costs to remain attractive to foreign investors and to increase consumption to revitalize the economy.

  • @sunichong7260
    @sunichong7260 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good opportunity for Thailand's I kra land bridge project. N also for Mia's other ports as an alternative route. However, are the median ports n infrastructure geared to take advantage of this?😮😮

  • @moonslashh
    @moonslashh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Time.will.tell. Review this after 10 years…

  • @two02ful
    @two02ful 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Firstly we don’t have a leader that have the knowledge nor idea to develop Singapore. 2nd nepotism and cronyism are rampage causing low productivity, and corruption lthat caused the public . 3rd becoming USA largest ammo depot outside of USA and naval and airbase is frightening away China investors which is the up and coming super power of the world replacing USA. Because of all this negative factors. China relentlessly is in the look out for an alternative shipping route avoiding the straits of malacca that usa can blockage its ships passing thru the straits. China finally found Kyaukphyu Port belonging to Myanmar with a 100 years lease. If this is completed atleast 50% of China merchant shipping to north, west and south China can now discharge its cargo at Kyaukphyu Port avoiding passing thru the straits of malacca. We know it’s not possible for Singapore to do away all the key negative factors that are the cause of our economy and living standard in sharp decline.

    • @maxjek2374
      @maxjek2374 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @two02ful But there's a long running insurgency in Myanmar which might explode into a civil war.

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@maxjek2374 The joke is that his port is actually now in the hands of the rebels.

  • @AngieleowHoon
    @AngieleowHoon 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You go wild at sea or ocean? The blood of youth. After going wild you settle down and become homly. A home becomes your goal and destiny. God bless Singapore.

  • @two02ful
    @two02ful 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please tell Singaporean the true and stop lying! With Kyaukphyu Port coming up stream singapore guarantee will be affected! 50% of the merchant ship will not have to pass thru the straits of malacca! Only east bound ship still continue to use the straits. I have relocated my company to Thailand to cut down the ridiculously high overhead that saddle the company’s profit. 3 Singaporean now settle in Thailand to manage the business. Overhead cost reduce by 50% and I have visited Kyaukphyu area. Kra canal will definitely be build but not now maybe 10 years later where the tech is cheaper. Also because China had Kyaukphyu Port so the urgency is no longer that urgent.

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol Yes the ships will sail to Myanmar, grow legs, walk across the country then go back in the water on the other side, right? lol. Most ship traffic IS east bound, very few stop in that part of the region.

    • @two02ful
      @two02ful หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ if you have a some brain left in your head should tell you if less ship supposedly to discharge cargo in Singapore now need not mean less business. no wonder this bunch of fools is running Singapore to the ground

  • @vvvv5287
    @vvvv5287 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Inflation already happens months ago. More to come .

  • @Elsang-Ngnb9iv
    @Elsang-Ngnb9iv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s that much shipments in the world’s to ships?!

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. Shipping is the biggest method to move cargo. One container ship carries about 20,000 TEUs, which is the equivalent to 20,000 container trailers. In short, one ship can replace 20,000 trailer trucks.

  • @elielee7364
    @elielee7364 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    All ships should avoid Singapore which house a major US military base. Start investing in the land bridge/canal south of Thailand.

    • @BeachBoi1000
      @BeachBoi1000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I think there is a video about this bridge/canal. It is not a worthwhile investment because of many factors.

    • @lucern543
      @lucern543 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Have you experienced the road traffic in Thailand before?

    • @jackielee4599
      @jackielee4599 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Still with your land bridge Thai PM could not get any investors interested with the US$ 28 billion land bridge.

    • @sjv9147s
      @sjv9147s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unless it's a throughput canal across the Kra, it's not going to make a serious dent to Singapore's port biz. Then again, such a massive infrastructure to do so, who's going to risk underwriting it?

    • @sjv9147s
      @sjv9147s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @thulomanchay You're preaching to the choir. It's exactly why I'd written "throughput canal".

  • @caialan9491
    @caialan9491 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2040 please work faster.

  • @macjastic
    @macjastic 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know just the thing to solve it, Land Expansion, build more ports.

  • @phillipng252
    @phillipng252 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It is no longer to your advantage.Malaysia can overtake Singapore.The forced shifting to TUAS region, has an underwater cable and shallow water than Brani. HaHaHaHa .

    • @jackielee4599
      @jackielee4599 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Overtake Singapore wait long long $1 sing- 3.5 ringgit 😂😂😂

  • @ishaks8152
    @ishaks8152 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's not rosy all the time hiccups do happen and can be disastrous.❤

  • @wjj7488
    @wjj7488 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Malaysia ports are jammed up now .

  • @user-hv9xz1zu4t
    @user-hv9xz1zu4t 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Extremely expensive port charges compared to all other ports .

    • @wjj7488
      @wjj7488 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ports are not just loading and unloading . Otherwise cheaper Malaysia ports would be 10x bigger.

  • @kornhead8
    @kornhead8 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is BS 🥸

  • @pongbravo5822
    @pongbravo5822 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    useless and no value at all it will be double handling and lot of costs for labour transpost delay damages in 2 sides 90 km road.

  • @williamzabiski7653
    @williamzabiski7653 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Ccp is proposing a canal accross thailand bypassing good friend singapore.

    • @EvelynHo-y3v
      @EvelynHo-y3v 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In tat case CCP is not Singapore friend....CCP is frienemy...tis not how u treat ur friends by backstabbing them....distasteful 🤮

    • @leealex24
      @leealex24 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It will be Malaysia not Thailand. Thailand not even close. Port Klang is 11th/12th busiest in the world.

    • @marktan8074
      @marktan8074 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Not an issue. S'pore is China's #1 investor and yet they can commit such an act. So likewise they shouldn't be protesting either when S'pore does things for its own benefits but which may harm China. After all, self interest comes first as according to China.

    • @marktan8074
      @marktan8074 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@leealex24 Actually, Malaysia protested to Thailand recently on this issue.

    • @onexoxtoo
      @onexoxtoo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marktan8074 What ground?

  • @phillipng252
    @phillipng252 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why do you worry.They have scholars who went on to become CEO , excellant on paper .

  • @BrandyHeng007
    @BrandyHeng007 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Singapore port is Americanised .

    • @Buttercookies0
      @Buttercookies0 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Strange description for a non-living thing.

    • @danielc2701
      @danielc2701 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, no, no, cranes from Hyundai, Singapore port is Koreanized! lol.

  • @TheresaYipLF54
    @TheresaYipLF54 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fake news

  • @alvinseah5423
    @alvinseah5423 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its cos the previous and very experienced Transport Minister, S Iswaran, was forced to step down after being charged for corruption. He was replaced by a younger and less experienced man, Chee HT.

    • @choonhockong8215
      @choonhockong8215 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Iswaran is not indispensable. Singapore has a pool of younger visionary leaders. Test them out like every 5 years rotation of young 4G leaders to head another ministry.

    • @choonhockong8215
      @choonhockong8215 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nonsense, Iswaran was forced to step down. Our CPIB officials are trusted professionals and will report on facts.

  • @michaeltham9914
    @michaeltham9914 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🇸🇬👍👍👍

  • @TheAdventureFun100
    @TheAdventureFun100 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Lots of Bullshit 😂

  • @lawrencewong6184
    @lawrencewong6184 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    USA is declining in importance. As the largest debtor nation in the world, vs the largest Real Economy and creditor in the world, China is dumping the US.

  • @kevina2907
    @kevina2907 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rubbish

  • @khooahok4589
    @khooahok4589 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Singapore economy will slowdown

  • @tippchiam6822
    @tippchiam6822 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Expensive!!!

  • @weesowhow9156
    @weesowhow9156 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Please don't make up story which did not happen.

  • @anasqai
    @anasqai 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There looks like will become a Situation of: "working for which country?" Then Trade is Important to Function As What It Means, To Just Remind That Shops Exist As A Place That "Anyone can passby to buy something". We are Not Many People: 4.5m Egypt, 4m Japan, 2m Saw People, 755k Secret society, (?) North Korean heard as "The Giver of License", we must maintain the workforce of Jobscope if imagine Catering To Buy, they are True Military Hidden Motives we should just look like living life to what it's meant to be.

  • @爾文奧利施
    @爾文奧利施 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No worries we have India with us.

  • @Shipspotting_Vietnam
    @Shipspotting_Vietnam 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @RohanJ-z9m
    @RohanJ-z9m 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Welcome to Vizhinjam Port, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. Having a natural draft of 24 metres which can accomodate world's largest motherships and very close to International shipping route( Just 10 nautical miles or 18.5 kilometres).We are welcoming the largest shipping companies in the world to Vizhinjam port from July 2024🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @geralddorasamy-gt6yn
    @geralddorasamy-gt6yn 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good Times ar over...

  • @selvaraja1487
    @selvaraja1487 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hahahahhaa lots of China cargo been transit from Singapore port even transhipment change company name made in Singapore Malaysia Indonesia....... Hahahahaha pitty Singapore port

  • @whateverwhateverdoevilgoog4132
    @whateverwhateverdoevilgoog4132 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    in order to keep its monopoly in shipping, Singapore can play very dirty! For example, they overbid China at a ridiculous HIGH price for the 2nd stage of construction of the Gwadar Port in Pakistan, and then sitting on it for 5-6 years, doing NOTHING! Because they do NOT want to see the port completion, and post competition with Malacca strait which is their biggest money maker. Finally, Pakistan was forced to break the contract, and rebid, then China won, and then finished the port, but Singapore caused a lot of damage anyway. and Pakistan had to pay a huge fine to Singapore unfair practice. So I consider what happening now is a belated revenge from the God to Singapore!.

    • @linhwang6651
      @linhwang6651 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Problems lied on Parkistan which did not have huge amount of money to develop first the infrastructures and to sort out the problems in the development until China was willing to step in! In a poor country with terrorist activities, it is not simply a port construction!

    • @utubegeronimo7628
      @utubegeronimo7628 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We dwell in the ever changing world and the Kra Canal is incidental. The Thais do not plan it deliberately but even centuries ago, it was already on the agenda.
      The Kra eventually will impact on Singapore but not on other Asean countries.