How Maersk Is Navigating The Volatile Shipping Industry

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ค. 2024
  • Each year, about 90% of world trade is transported by ship. While commodities like oil and grain make up 40% of that cargo, large steel containers, filled with appliances, smartphones, and couches, make up the remainder. Maersk, the world's second largest container shipping company, transports about one in five of those containers.
    In addition to its fleet of over 670 vessels, the Danish-based carrier also runs one of the globe's largest port terminal businesses, with 64 terminals. Maersk logged record profits of $29.3 billion in 2022 due in part to pandemic-induced buying and higher freight rates.
    But the company is flagging "high uncertainty" for the year ahead as a shift in consumer spending habits has brought revenue in line with pre-pandemic levels. Today, like its rivals, Maersk faces a range of challenges including attacks on vessels in the Red Sea, a drought at the Panama Canal, and the threat of higher tariffs related to a potential Trump presidency.
    The company also chartered the vessel that crashed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge causing the structure to collapse and the Port of Baltimore to close.
    CNBC explores how Maersk’s business has evolved and how it is navigating the many challenges the shipping industry faces today.
    Chapters:
    0:00 Introduction
    2:44 Chapter 1: Global challenges
    5:38 Chapter 2: The early days
    8:43 Chapter 3: Pivoting to land
    Produced by: Shawn Baldwin
    Edited by: Nic Golden Henry
    Supervising Producer: Jeniece Pettitt
    Additional Reporting: Lori Ann LaRocco
    Animation: Christina Locopo
    Additional Footage: Getty Images, Maersk
    » Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
    » Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
    About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
    Want to make extra money outside of your day job? Take CNBC’s new online course How to Earn Passive Income Online to learn about common passive income streams. Register today and save 50% with discount code EARLYBIRD: cnb.cx/3Iwblnk
    Connect with CNBC News Online
    Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
    Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
    Follow CNBC on Threads: cnb.cx/threads
    Follow CNBC News on X: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
    #CNBC
    How Maersk Is Navigating The Volatile Shipping Industry

ความคิดเห็น • 172

  • @youtubetim3577
    @youtubetim3577 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +112

    These comments annoy me so bad, do people even listen or try to understand before commenting. Maersk chartered the ship meaning the other company owns ship, has crew on ship and hauling maersk cargo. In a trucking accident do you blame driver and trucking company or the people that own the boxes on the truck... my gosh, and the people saying ripping people off the shipping rates been so bad barely any profits last number of quarters, love how people expect every company to be a charity case except tech but perfectly fine having apple rip you off charging 1400 dollars for a phone that costs them 10 bucks.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I own an Android. ;-)

    • @nothisispatrick8001
      @nothisispatrick8001 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I guess most people don't care, people died in an accident and they want someone to blame and a "greedy" global company is perfect...

    • @laviefu0630
      @laviefu0630 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your righteous insight, couldn't agree more.

    • @dimosfakiris8914
      @dimosfakiris8914 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Completely agree with you on that. It's also mind blowing to me that when they have some surplus ships, they immediately call it a huge problem. But then when there's a need to scale up operations quickly (such as going around Africa) they say that's what helps them keep operating. Sounds like we're trying to run out of fuel as soon as the plane lands with the planning of these people. Surely a surplus of capacity should be preferred for that exact reason (something happens and there's an immediate need for ships). It's the exact same problem in the airline industry at the moment and it's absolutely mind blowing to me that all these years, no one thinks of any amount of redundancy/spike in demand/other issue and plans for it.

    • @xienjougao3131
      @xienjougao3131 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      agree! expensive price for that carrier with hidden charges and will go to just advertisement which all carriers do but they spend more.

  • @user-cv4od1qd4x
    @user-cv4od1qd4x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you very much for such a detailed review, now I know exactly what I need.

  • @catwbongos1416
    @catwbongos1416 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +169

    You guys have to be trolling right now by also releasing this video

    • @SuperPerfectMan
      @SuperPerfectMan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Why ?

    • @SlightlyOddFilms
      @SlightlyOddFilms 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@SuperPerfectManbruh, seriously?

    • @achalvyas90
      @achalvyas90 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Sounds like a sponsored gig, right??

    • @dirtymike3329
      @dirtymike3329 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      @@SuperPerfectMan A Maersk ship destroyed a major bridge in Baltimore recently

    • @beaniemac
      @beaniemac 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I was thinking the same thing. That key bridge accident is going to cost them billions

  • @user-xh8wi3ce1i
    @user-xh8wi3ce1i 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very informative thanks

  • @jitansharora779
    @jitansharora779 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Awesome Story. This should be a detailed 30-45 minutes documentary

  • @momen78699
    @momen78699 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Good video keep it up

  • @michaelpatosa
    @michaelpatosa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing!

  • @rolandalfonso6954
    @rolandalfonso6954 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This was great. Taught me so much...

  • @OwenAlekos-mh7yw
    @OwenAlekos-mh7yw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is Maersk actually Samsung?
    Dpworld stands for danish port world?

  • @zikolojii
    @zikolojii 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Perfect timing

  • @PeterParker-cv2tb
    @PeterParker-cv2tb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    10:31 you overlooked the purchase of Martin Bencher !

  • @philippesails4973
    @philippesails4973 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How bad is it that right after the SHanghai index is shown as doubling, the speaker says it is multiplied by 4!

  • @anotherelvis
    @anotherelvis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Maersk also raised the stock dividend, so they don't reinvest all the excess profits.

  • @KenGray
    @KenGray 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    When NBC a story on shipping ocean going container ships, it always sounds like a commercial for Maersk for some reason. I would love to see what their advertising budget is like for nbc.

  • @Shipspotting_Vietnam
    @Shipspotting_Vietnam 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video!

  • @ferdinandflora6713
    @ferdinandflora6713 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good job maersk.

  • @brianpambana8115
    @brianpambana8115 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    1,5 tonnes of goods are shipped by each person each year

  • @mattygaga2013
    @mattygaga2013 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    9:22 the ship that is blurred out is NYK LINE and is the NYK LYRA. Not sure why CNBC blurred it out.

  • @Davethreshold
    @Davethreshold 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All fine and well but tell them to check ALL of their ship engines and ships. It was an engine failure that caused the bridge disaster in Baltimore. Further, that same ship/engine flunked its inspection showing the same problem about 1-2 years ago.

    • @SimonTmte
      @SimonTmte 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is a not so interesting theory, you know there'd be some conspiracy theories, some has to do with spase lasers and aliens

  • @laveshraj4300
    @laveshraj4300 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    QRyde Public transportation software is a comprehensive digital solution designed to streamline and enhance the efficiency of public transit systems. This software typically includes a range of features tailored to meet the diverse needs of both passengers and transit operators.

  • @prinnyexplodes
    @prinnyexplodes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    CNBC got to collect that Maersk dollars. "Make my image better !! "

    • @Jon.Morimoto
      @Jon.Morimoto 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      CNBC should do a Boeing infomercial next!

  • @trepan4944
    @trepan4944 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    CNBC.....the fuq are you guys doing?😂😂😂

    • @dirtymike3329
      @dirtymike3329 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They are not navigating well through these choppy waters

    • @marksmith6632
      @marksmith6632 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They knew we'd click on it😂

  • @go-ek7sg
    @go-ek7sg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    9:22 Why is the company name on the ship blurred out?

    • @rinoohhighskilled7236
      @rinoohhighskilled7236 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its their competitor Evergreen ;)

    • @mattygaga2013
      @mattygaga2013 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's the NYK LINE and the ship I believe is the NYK LYRA. A Japanese based shipping company.

    • @mattygaga2013
      @mattygaga2013 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@rinoohhighskilled7236nope, it's NYK LINE and the ship is the NYK LYRA I believe.

  • @CaptRR
    @CaptRR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    They could start by not navigating into bridges.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @doodskie999
    @doodskie999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Ah Maersk, making a bridge from ocean to ocean
    Well sometimes destroying it 😂

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @EcomCarl
    @EcomCarl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maersk's strategic diversification into air freight and last-mile delivery is a smart move in navigating the unpredictable waters of global trade. This holistic approach not only mitigates risks but also enhances their ability to adapt to rapidly changing market dynamics. 🚢

  • @SlightlyOddFilms
    @SlightlyOddFilms 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    They are navigating through key supports to avoid collapse

    • @MR-04
      @MR-04 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Just because you don't like the company for no apparent reason doesn't mean a ship they chartered (Borrowed/Lent) to another company is their responsibility. Like when you rent a car then that vehicle is YOUR responsibility and NOT theirs!

    • @SlightlyOddFilms
      @SlightlyOddFilms 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MR-04 it was a joke

  • @AndrewLaFon
    @AndrewLaFon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    they navigate the volatile shipping industry by hitting bridges

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @tubby_1278
    @tubby_1278 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Those ships are like cities and imagine working on em.

    • @catatonicbug7522
      @catatonicbug7522 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are surprisingly simple. Only a handful of people onboard each one.

  • @alessandrobogoni
    @alessandrobogoni 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Old economy international trade always grow countries production. Long way run.

  • @JaneTesla-rx7kc
    @JaneTesla-rx7kc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Probably should figure out how to navigate harbors without smashing into bridges.....

    • @henriknielsen1662
      @henriknielsen1662 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @JaneTesla-rx7kc: The ship that ran into the antique bridge isn't owned by Maersk

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @JohnDoe19754
    @JohnDoe19754 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Maersk PR Team - Everyone's hating on us right now, we need something subtle to hide our 20$ billion profits.
    CNBC - How about we put the word 'VOLATILE' in title and make you seem like the victim here ?

  • @_Vancelvany_
    @_Vancelvany_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    This freight ship lines are a huge factor on why our consumer goods are going up.
    Maersk & others have increased the freight prices which is then passed on to us to maintain their OR...
    What we're about to see is a shift in logistics, especially in NA, with the likes of Maersk doing M&A's and then investments in Mexico that is becoming the battleground for end-to-end logistics.
    Honestly, the only takeaway here is until North American logistics stabilizes post-shift away from China and leverages fully the USMCA in trade, Maersk & the likes will continue to make bank & eat up all the smaller companies in every facet of the supply chain LOL

    • @youtubetim3577
      @youtubetim3577 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you dumb? Go look at shipping profits in 2023 and this year so far its been barely profitable, most aren't even paying out dividends of any sort atm cause so bad, last year I made almost 15,000 dollars in dividends and this year will not even be 1,000. Try looking at a balance sheet of profits before you talk trash

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      "This freight ship lines are a huge factor on why our consumer goods are going up."
      A 40' container can hold 10,000 laptops. It costs US$ 3,000 to ship from China to US west coast. That equates to 30 cents per laptop. It used to cost only 10 cents per laptop computer, so yes, the price of your MacBook has gone up 20 cents due to these evil, greedy container shipping companies. Your claim that shipping is a 'huge factor' is simply false. The reality is that a very large part of the price of many goods is due to advertising and marketing. A huge proportion. For known brands, it's probably over 30% of the price you pay that goes to advertisers. But without advertising and marketing, you probably wouldn't buy the product in the first place.

    • @youtubetim3577
      @youtubetim3577 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @pjacobsen1000 yep rates haven't went up sense the 90s basically, yet people crying a river. Reminds me of gas people crying a river when up 10 cents a gallon in 10 years and same time pay 10 bucks a day for Starbucks coffee, hilarious how things needed to survive go up price people freak out while same time let apple charge them 1400 for a new phone that costs them 50 bucks to make and need a upgrade every year... fact is they think companies for living essentials should be a charity case to them and not profitable while same time fine that apple and these other places rip them off.. people screwed up

  • @nagasako7
    @nagasako7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    By not paying any fines for destroying a US Bridge and Hwy...

    • @jebbo-c1l
      @jebbo-c1l 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      didnt their engines fail? if the bridge was built with proper protections perhaps it could have been avoided

    • @alooga555
      @alooga555 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jebbo-c1l Cargo ships were so much smaller back in the late 70s.

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Not their ship. Not their crew.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bzdtemp Right. It would be like if an Amazon vehicle crashed into a busload of kids and then blaming everyone who's delivery was on that vehicle.

    • @davidellis279
      @davidellis279 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jebbo-c1lThat bridge would have to have been made substantially better to stand an impact like that,ship’s DONT have brakes,they have an anchor but no brakes and if the engines fail for any reason then things like hitting the bridge is always on the cards or another vessel.

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how? by making shipping industry volatile

  • @TheOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    @TheOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    You guys didn't think to get any comment from Maersk regarding the bridge collapse in Baltimore?

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Why would they, it is just a footnote in what the video is about. Besides Maersk has commented on the accident, had it been their ship then it would have impacted them more directly.

  • @Dukaamoses
    @Dukaamoses 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Making money is not the same as keeping it there is a reason why investments aren't well taught in schools, the examples you gave are well stationed, the market crisis gave me my first millions, people shy away from hard times, I embrace them.. well at least my advisor does lol.

  • @jackhsiehhautecouture
    @jackhsiehhautecouture 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But the dip?

  • @edcastle2345
    @edcastle2345 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Yes, corporate overlords we will do as you command.😂

  • @advancedbodydesign
    @advancedbodydesign 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Q? Why does Maersk get to Privatize Profits but Socialize LOSES?? Same for Insurance Provider....
    I'm not given same treatment when I'm at fault in an auto accident 🙃

  • @williamlloyd3769
    @williamlloyd3769 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maersk is just growing up and down the supply chain so as to keep more of their customers cash spend. Makes sense.

  • @amazon4716
    @amazon4716 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Because of Trum p free trade with Mexico
    Our jobs went to Mexic o
    Cargo drivers
    Port jobs.
    Etc.
    Smh.

  • @MrGoalie2012
    @MrGoalie2012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sooooooo buy MAERSK stock?

  • @Zdawd
    @Zdawd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How will they deal with less than record breaking profits??? What a catastrophe!

  • @craumm
    @craumm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "1.5 tonnes of goods are shipped by ship per person each year" WOW! I never ordered so much stuff from Amazon!

    • @ricke3939
      @ricke3939 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This figure also includes (in fact the majority is) commodities such as oil, fuels, ores, gas, and grain as well as cars, trucks, and other vehicles. Finished goods (which is what is mainly transported in containers) only make up about 20% of all shipping.

  • @tuckergraham846
    @tuckergraham846 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Idu ..a co like maersk can easily afford a defense system with some missiles

  • @randyrrandelson6444
    @randyrrandelson6444 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems like Maersk is creating volatility in the shipping industry.
    Sounds like they have enough bucks rebuild a huge bridge…. or their insurance carrier.

  • @keturunankusuma4213
    @keturunankusuma4213 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    8:02

  • @user-ww7uq9sf8w
    @user-ww7uq9sf8w 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why is there no talk about them paying to rebuild the bridge and take care of the familys that lost a family member?

    • @ndirangugichuki6260
      @ndirangugichuki6260 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      In the video they clearly say that the ship that hit the bridge was chartered by Maersk, it does not belong to them.

    • @carlmller4769
      @carlmller4769 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why dpnt you pay for it?

  • @howard6433
    @howard6433 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    So Maersk leased the ship that took down the Key Bridge in Baltimore, effectively shutting down one of the largest ports in the world....that is how it's navigating the shipping industry?

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't be silly.
      Maersk didn't steer the ship, their people were not on it or anything.
      You conspiracy nonsense is the equivalent of you being responsible for an Uber you called crashing on the way to pick you up.

    • @erikk77
      @erikk77 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's not one of the largest ports in the world. Nothing like Hong Kong, Shanghai, or Singapore.

    • @youtubetim3577
      @youtubetim3577 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another stupid comment, they chartered the ship meaning the ship and its employees are transporting there cargo, do you go after the trucking company or the people that have cargo on the truck in a trucking accident, tool.

    • @henriknielsen1662
      @henriknielsen1662 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @howard6433: Baltimore, like any other US port, is insignificant in a global perspective. The really big container vessels bypass US ports because they are too shallow and their cranes are too small to service them

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It doesn't matter who owns the ship. The shipping company's insurance must cover the damage.

  • @SeeLasSee
    @SeeLasSee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s such a waste of fuel and hardship on people to raise shipping prices.

  • @user-cw1fx2bw1e
    @user-cw1fx2bw1e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Because ships weren't using synthetic fuel.

  • @RichardKing-sx6xc
    @RichardKing-sx6xc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Long on $AMKBY... 😎👌

  • @douglasthompson2740
    @douglasthompson2740 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Always can depend on the cartel's drugs that they ship on a regular basis by the containerload. Then their help in money laundering is a profitable sideline as well. Oh yeah as they rip off the world in shipping fees! I am shedding crocodile tears for poor Maersk.

  • @Alpharizzchad
    @Alpharizzchad 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    By not playing for the bridge they knocked down and killed 6 people 😢

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It was not their ship. It was chartered. Knowledge is power my friend. Sometimes it pays to be better informed.

  • @Ayo22210
    @Ayo22210 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why not make them hydrogen powered ships instead of methanol

    • @henriknielsen1662
      @henriknielsen1662 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Ayo22210: it will come later. Hydrogen technology isn't ready for this yet

  • @Deshbhakt-hx9du
    @Deshbhakt-hx9du 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤😂😂🎉🎉🎉😂😂❤❤😂🎉🎉🎉😂😂❤❤😂🎉🎉

  • @rok0sbasili5k
    @rok0sbasili5k 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Trump living in CNBC's head rent free 😂

  • @asianhobbitshaving3050
    @asianhobbitshaving3050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Is Maersk responsible for completely destroying the Francis Scott Key Bridge? If so, are they going to compensate the US government for the ineptitude of its maintenance staff, and the reconstruction?

    • @Tola5657
      @Tola5657 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No there not it the ship owner

    • @Tola5657
      @Tola5657 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @SimonTmte why should this one be different from all other you think so that will happen 🤔

  • @walli6388
    @walli6388 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hapag-Lloyd❤

    • @jebbo-c1l
      @jebbo-c1l 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      lol why do you love a shipping conglomerate

    • @walli6388
      @walli6388 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jebbo-c1l Because it's an institution here

    • @PopeyedGoose
      @PopeyedGoose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also, they pay some of the best dividends on their stocks.
      Last year Mærsk B stock paid a dividend of $600 per stock and Hapag-Lloyd paid $55.
      This year's its down a bit but Mærsk paid $80 per stock and upcoming in May Hapag-Lloyd is giving $35 per share. After I got my Mærsk divided last month, I sold all of my Mærsk stock and bought 400 more stocks of Hapag-Lloyd. Sitting on 484 stocks of Hapag-Lloyd now, waiting for the dividends then I will sell all the stocks and buy Mærsk again to hold onto for a couple years.
      That's why I love the shipping industry.

  • @MohamedHassan-nq5pd
    @MohamedHassan-nq5pd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    MSK is just trying get rid of the forwarders.

  • @panama-canada
    @panama-canada 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Vertical integration.

  • @user-tg2iq5wd6i
    @user-tg2iq5wd6i 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Save your $ buy American 😊

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly, the crap that is produced in the USA for twice the price.

  • @CosmeAlvarenga-ep5yi
    @CosmeAlvarenga-ep5yi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ategyrtWow interesting, I'm going to practice this s

  • @dlight9849
    @dlight9849 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My job is processing (data entry) of Sea Waybills all day long. Out of all the carriers listed here, Maersk has the *WORST* Waybills. *HATE MAERSK* 🤬

  • @gumroller9617
    @gumroller9617 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    not one interesting picture, all is stock footage. Containers, container ship, container terminals all the time... Low budget films a lot on CNBC.

  • @SilasDogopiaDogopia
    @SilasDogopiaDogopia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Silas dogopia

  • @SilasDogopiaDogopia
    @SilasDogopiaDogopia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bosku

  • @amazon4716
    @amazon4716 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    😂 that true. Trum. p family
    I guess they didn't give them a good deal like
    M e x ic o and Indi @ 😅
    I am still paying for the wall ( Mex)
    I am still funding Russi @ (indi)
    The two nation T r u m . P wanted people to invest in 😅 (Mex and indi)
    😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂

  • @powerofshah3
    @powerofshah3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Msdnc can't make a small documentry without trashing trump somehow lol

    • @RealAnthonyJones
      @RealAnthonyJones 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      His policy of being anti China is expensive for you. Facts don’t care about your feelings.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you make a comment, you should at least know who made the report you just looked at. Who is msdnc, please?

  • @moneeb343
    @moneeb343 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "They're buying up air freight, they're buying up terminals, they're buying up trucking companies"
    "The Sherman Act also makes it illegal to monopolize, conspire to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize a market for products or services. An unlawful monopoly exists when one firm has market power for a product or service, and it has obtained or maintained that market power, not through competition on the merits, but because the firm has suppressed competition by engaging in anticompetitive conduct"

    • @walli6388
      @walli6388 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They still don't have a monopoly

    • @ankurito3746
      @ankurito3746 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      they're not even the 2nd biggest shipping container company in the world, how can they have a monopoloy?

    • @dylanslagh851
      @dylanslagh851 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      most idiotic comment award

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Explain how 20% of a market = monopoly.
      Maersk is a very big company, but they are nowhere near being a monopoly or having market control.

    • @JanBruunAndersen
      @JanBruunAndersen 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know that it might come as a surprise to you, but this Sherman Act has no legal consequences outside USA, despite all your wet dreams. It is of no consequence in Denmark 🇩🇰 where Mærsk is headquartered.
      At it's worst, it could negatively impact a US subsidiary which mostly exists to provide auxiliary transport capacity for the US military.

  • @PedalToTheMetal61888
    @PedalToTheMetal61888 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    .... WHILE TICKER/SYMBOL- AMKAF JUST SIT THERE IDLE LIKE ZIM DANA SHIPPING HANJIN AND NUMEROUS OTHERS I DON''T CARE TO MENTION WHERES MY $$$ $$$ $$$ ...

  • @fitshamer
    @fitshamer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe they should invest in their shops with all their profits. If the ship in Baltimore had been maintained properly it probably wouldn't have crashed

    • @dlight9849
      @dlight9849 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Maersk doesn't own that ship. They were chartering that ship. Just like if you rent a limo - would you blame the passenger for the driver's behaviour or mechanic's work?

    • @fitshamer
      @fitshamer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dlight9849 I would expect a shipping company with the means would do their due diligence to make sure their cargo is secured on a ship that doesn't have major mechanical problems. Maersk makes money by getting stuff from A to B. If the ship hits the bridge, then no point B.
      Not sure why you say blame would go to the passenger. That's not really how this works. It's more like this:
      If your Uber breaks down on the side of the road, do you blame the driver or the platform? Even if the driver didn't maintain their car, Uber is still responsible for getting me to my location and compensating me for my time. Therefore it's in Uber's best interest to hire drivers with well maintained cars.
      The video says Maersk made $billions in profit, all I'm saying is they should spend some of that cheddar on making sure the vessels they employ are up to the job.

    • @gerhardma4297
      @gerhardma4297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Knowledge is power my friend. Unfortunately, you have neither of the one nor the other. Sometimes it pays to be better informed before you make a fool of yourself here.

    • @fitshamer
      @fitshamer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gerhardma4297 yes, the life and death consequences of TH-cam comments! So very serious! 😮

  • @alexandreablalock7997
    @alexandreablalock7997 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm early 😊

  • @user-ru6uq7dy3p
    @user-ru6uq7dy3p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HI good morning
    Indian Ocean
    C TARDE MARK
    EC. CE AB BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT LOW
    INDIAN OCEAN ASIA BUSINESS
    C. C. SEE YOU

  • @amazon4716
    @amazon4716 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    T r u m p
    Lead us to inflation
    Higher taxes on other nations
    Lead us to pay more.
    Smh.

  • @orangejjay
    @orangejjay 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice to see CNBC doing their best to help Maersk and their propaganda machine. 😂

  • @Shuoshihua8
    @Shuoshihua8 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A pirate company

  • @thomasbrown6970
    @thomasbrown6970 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video is already out dated.

  • @BOOSTED98GT
    @BOOSTED98GT 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    TDS. 😂

  • @PulseNews-gu9fe
    @PulseNews-gu9fe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Imagine yourself. The probability that we see the world as it is is zero.
    the world you perceive is just a screen behind which it is convenient to live. The real world or the truth is so complex that evolution itself has tried to make sure that we never find out what lies behind the partition.

  • @MohammedAli-mt9kd
    @MohammedAli-mt9kd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    America is over.

  • @pxd291
    @pxd291 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maersk is just HORRIBLE

  • @TheChiefEng
    @TheChiefEng 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's incredible that so many people are so hopelessly ignorant when it comes to understanding what it means to charter a ship.
    When you charter a ship, it's the equivalent to hire a FedEx airplane to transport your shipment. That's what a charter is.
    Maersk charter a ship to sail with their cargo. The ship is not owned by Maersk, the crew is not Maersk etc. Maersk has nothing to do with the chartered ship other than telling them where the ship needs to sail.
    However, the ignorance displayed by so many people and especially in America seems to suggest that education in America is pretty poor.
    Maersk grew a lot when they bought up among other things American shipping and harbor facilities when they could not manage to operate their companies with a profit so now, Maersk are in the position where they pretty much own stakes in the entire shipping process from containers, trucks, ships, harbor facilities etc. However, they also always check for options to find the best way to earn more and sometimes that includes renting space on ships, trains, trucks and airplanes owned by other companies.
    Maersk are not unique in that respect. All major shipping companies do that. If you are not flexible, you will get hurt financially.

  • @SilasDogopiaDogopia
    @SilasDogopiaDogopia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Silas dogopia