FSXPlay vs GSPro Gameplay - HD 1080p
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
- FSXPlay: Front 9 @ Pebble Beach
GSPro: Back 9 @ Pebble Beach
My Simulator Setup and Equipment:
hfhgolf.com/my...
Recommended Products
Enclosures:
hfhgolf.com/en...
Projectors/Mounts
hfhgolf.com/pr...
Golf Simulator Gaming Computers
hfhgolf.com/co...
Impact Screens:
hfhgolf.com/im...
Hitting Mats:
hfhgolf.com/hi...
GC3 Launch Monitor:
hfhgolf.com/la...
Accessories
hfhgolf.com/ac...
![[LIVE] MCHOICE & MINT AWARDS 2024 at TRUE ICON HALL, ICONSIAM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wMewUeT5nbY/mqdefault.jpg)
Liked your video man. I did GSpro for roughly 3 years and switched to fsx play earlier this year so ive plsyed both quite a lot. My take is that fsx play is a ton more realistic when considering POV of ball flight. In GSpro you're seeing the ball it's like 10 feet in front of you all the time and the ball flight takes off from that stationary ball on the screen. So the virtual ball flight takes off from that ball on screen not your real ball and where it hits on the screen. That diminishes a bunch of realism. It's especially evident when you hit to the right or to the left of the on screen ball. Then the virtual ball flight isn't even remotely close to the real ball flight. In fsx play you're not seeing a stationary ball on the screen you feel as though the digital ball is at your feet. In play The digital ball flight literally takes off from where your real ball hits the screen (if you have your room config set properly which is easy). So in fsx play if I'm punching out around a tree or something I'm just hitting my bell to the left of the tree and the ball goes left or right of it. If im wanting to cut a corner off a fairway I'm just hitting the real ball over the trees on the screen. I'm not having to go to the computer and using my arrow keys to aim to the left of the right of the tree like in GSpro. This adds a level of realism that GSpro doesn't come close to. In fsx play the real ball flight perfectly transforms into the digital ball flight. My 2 cents. If you still have access to both software you should do a video on this.
Thanks for the suggestion. I will fire up FSX play and check it out (I haven’t played it in a while). I think I agree with your main point though! Stay tuned!!
Thanks for the video. Just got a BLP last week and started with FSXPlay. Even coming from TGC2019 and SkyTrak, I didn't care for the graphics or gameplay of FSXPlay.
Felt the same way with GSPro versus FSXPlay. GSPro has better graphics, is priced right, more courses without having to put out a bunch of $$$ like FSXPlay charges, etc...
So GSPro for me.
Totally agree, there isn’t anything else close to it in my opinion!
Was gameplay in 4K for the graphics quality? Wasn't sure if the TH-cam video title for HD 1080p is related to the TH-cam quality or the gameplay quality.
4k for gameplay, but not for the TH-cam video. I would like to get all the videos to 4k just a challenge managing the data and upload times. Both softwares are 4k capable.
On putting how hard is it to “aim” 1st on the software/pc so you can just put straight every time?
I recommend changing the aim on the computer so you can putt straight when there is a lot of break, otherwise I aim like a normal put.
GS Pro is much better. I still think Foresight is missing a market by not simply offering a virtual range for free or $100/yr. I often dont have time to play and just want to hit some balls and work on my game
There is definitely a bigger financial commitment to use FSX
The grass looks absolutely terrible on FSXPlay. I don’t understand why it’s so hard to create good graphics. They could have just used Unreal engine. It’s has amazing grass texture and looks real.
Agreed, I play on GSPro, just feels real!
People honestly complaining about graphics now on simulators lmao
Go outside and play then🤣
I’m playing the software that identifies my yardage and overall gameplay then worrying about graphics tbh
Practice and recreation are two different things. Why not optimize?
Moore Anthony Wilson Mary Lewis Patricia