the solo thing sucks, but you gotta understand that zombies was always a co-op oriented game mode. I would go as far as to say that playing the game solo is the wrong way of playing it, kinda like how it was originally impossible to reach round 35 which is why the developers didn't bother trying to make it harder beyond that round. Sure you could play the game in "wrong" way and still have fun with it, but the true zombies expirience is with team-mates.
Zombies never forced you to play one way or the other though, aside from some Easter eggs mandating a 4 player team (which sucked) the game mode always allowed for multiple people or solo play. MWZ did not have this in mind, which in fairness is partly due to DMZ being the foundation and that wasn’t ‘made’ with solos in mind but you get my point. Solo players are a large community, stop excluding them!
@@DarkOps4 No offense dude but your comment defeats itself. The EE being 4 player only is more proof that the game mode was designed to be for co-op, and you literally just admitted that it wouldn't make sense for DMZ to be solo-able. I get your frustration (majority of the time i play solo too) but to still complain about it this late in the franchise just seems like a waste of time.
@@blauwbeer556 What I’m saying is that most people dislike those specific Easter eggs *because* they’re mandated for multiple people. Notice how every Easter egg doesn’t mandate this, only a select few. Origins doesn’t, and it’s THE map where having 4 people would matter the most. Ascension didn’t, hell if Im correct only Shangri-La absolutely mandated it in Bo1 and that was the origin of Easter Eggs. DMZ and MWZ are practically copy and paste in this regard of being “soloable” so I’ll concede for this mode, but only this mode.
@@DarkOps4 Origins was designed to be 4 player only, the reason why you can do it solo is the same reason why the tranzit EE is doable solo. In bo2 there's no hard-in code that prevents solo players from doing EEs but that doesn't mean they're supposed to be done solo. who honestly believes that treyarc devs thought that having solo players make and upgrade every staff in the *first step* is reasonable? exactly, it doesn't make any sense, it's clearly made to be done 4 player. It's the same shit with the tranzit EE, no one at treyarc honestly believed that having solo players throw EMPs at a certain angle, immediatly grab a max ammo and EMP the teleporters when teleporting is a reasonable EE step. As for your point of people hating multiple player EEs, i'd say it's moreso because the EE steps themselves usually don't need multiple players in the first place so it feels arbitrary. If the devs actually made steps that *REALLY* recuires co-op (for example, shooting the back of a boss to get a certain item. the boss will always face forward towards the nearest player so you need a second player to shoot him in the back.) then the amount of hate for it will dwarf in size. There's more to this topic but i can't be bothered to make a paragraph of text explaining why every EE til bo3 was co-op only.
cool intro bro
the solo thing sucks, but you gotta understand that zombies was always a co-op oriented game mode. I would go as far as to say that playing the game solo is the wrong way of playing it, kinda like how it was originally impossible to reach round 35 which is why the developers didn't bother trying to make it harder beyond that round. Sure you could play the game in "wrong" way and still have fun with it, but the true zombies expirience is with team-mates.
Zombies never forced you to play one way or the other though, aside from some Easter eggs mandating a 4 player team (which sucked) the game mode always allowed for multiple people or solo play. MWZ did not have this in mind, which in fairness is partly due to DMZ being the foundation and that wasn’t ‘made’ with solos in mind but you get my point. Solo players are a large community, stop excluding them!
@@DarkOps4 No offense dude but your comment defeats itself. The EE being 4 player only is more proof that the game mode was designed to be for co-op, and you literally just admitted that it wouldn't make sense for DMZ to be solo-able.
I get your frustration (majority of the time i play solo too) but to still complain about it this late in the franchise just seems like a waste of time.
@@blauwbeer556 What I’m saying is that most people dislike those specific Easter eggs *because* they’re mandated for multiple people. Notice how every Easter egg doesn’t mandate this, only a select few. Origins doesn’t, and it’s THE map where having 4 people would matter the most. Ascension didn’t, hell if Im correct only Shangri-La absolutely mandated it in Bo1 and that was the origin of Easter Eggs.
DMZ and MWZ are practically copy and paste in this regard of being “soloable” so I’ll concede for this mode, but only this mode.
@@DarkOps4 Origins was designed to be 4 player only, the reason why you can do it solo is the same reason why the tranzit EE is doable solo. In bo2 there's no hard-in code that prevents solo players from doing EEs but that doesn't mean they're supposed to be done solo. who honestly believes that treyarc devs thought that having solo players make and upgrade every staff in the *first step* is reasonable? exactly, it doesn't make any sense, it's clearly made to be done 4 player.
It's the same shit with the tranzit EE, no one at treyarc honestly believed that having solo players throw EMPs at a certain angle, immediatly grab a max ammo and EMP the teleporters when teleporting is a reasonable EE step.
As for your point of people hating multiple player EEs, i'd say it's moreso because the EE steps themselves usually don't need multiple players in the first place so it feels arbitrary. If the devs actually made steps that *REALLY* recuires co-op (for example, shooting the back of a boss to get a certain item. the boss will always face forward towards the nearest player so you need a second player to shoot him in the back.) then the amount of hate for it will dwarf in size.
There's more to this topic but i can't be bothered to make a paragraph of text explaining why every EE til bo3 was co-op only.