Stephen Batchelor on Shantideva

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @DMarie-eg5tq
    @DMarie-eg5tq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love Shantideva! Just learned of him. This talk was great. Entertaining and inspiring.
    P.s. there is a Shantideva app! It will deliver a quote to you each day, or you can read the whole thing there.

  • @danielpincus221
    @danielpincus221 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Shantideva reaches down deep into you, and squeezes.

    • @danielpincus221
      @danielpincus221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's because he seems to have squeezed himself quite hard, over and over. I get the impression that all of his examples of loathsome behavior had been his own. You don't come by that knowledge of debased human potential casually. The picture he paints of the bodhisattva is a very fussy, prickly, harsh, selfish person who turns over a new leaf -- over and over and over to reach the straight and narrow of boundless selflessness. He seems to open inordinately preoccupied with himself. But, his achievement is staggering. He would have made one heck of a prison chaplain.

  • @ROYMITCH73
    @ROYMITCH73 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for posting this wonderful talk.

  • @devasadhvi
    @devasadhvi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for posting!

  • @MrCanigou
    @MrCanigou 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for sharing this inspiring talk

  • @hilarystewart366
    @hilarystewart366 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful. Thank you.

  • @Guedingen
    @Guedingen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Many thanks. Stephen can be sometimes infuriating in his inconsistencies but this is a gem.

    • @chrisnamaste3572
      @chrisnamaste3572 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Guedingen What are the inconsistencies?

    • @wotiluv
      @wotiluv 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Guedingen inconsistencies? Such as?

  • @JuneAllen-Art
    @JuneAllen-Art 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    love this talk

  • @spiritualanarchist8162
    @spiritualanarchist8162 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant words to bring Christianity nearer to Buddhism...;-)

    • @gwinocour
      @gwinocour 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Baudrillard may have said that they're reversible:-/

  • @stevebarber8501
    @stevebarber8501 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful. Thank you.

  • @chrisnamaste3572
    @chrisnamaste3572 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Dali Lama's favorite verse is at 21:00 minute mark.

  • @MrCanigou
    @MrCanigou 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Inspired talk by St. Batchelor whom I should be careful of not becoming excessively attached to. However could someone please recommend a good translation of the Bodhicaryavatara he regularly quotes in this talk ?

    • @bodhisatyanam1734
      @bodhisatyanam1734 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Edition Stephen Batchelor
      Dalai Lama Hamburg 2014 english
      www.dalailama-hamburg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/texte/bca-english-batchelor-ltwa.pdf
      or
      www.tibethouse.jp/about/buddhism/text/pdfs/Bodhisattvas_way_English.pdf
      Edition Alex Berzin
      studybuddhism.com/en/tibetan-buddhism/original-texts/sutra-texts/engaging-in-bodhisattva-behavior
      Edition A+V Wallace - Drepung -
      www.drepunggomangusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/shantideva-bodhicaryavatara-wallace.pdf
      Edition Geshe Tenzin Zopa
      www.tenzinzopa.com/Ebooks/Cttb_Book_Final_Complete.pdf
      Padmakara revised edition 2011
      promienie.net/images/dharma/books/shantideva_way-of-bodhisattva.pdf
      @ your choice
      not to leave out: vimeo.com/173000154; ref to Chapter 9, Wisdom
      www.amazon.com/Wisdom-Chapter-Miphams-Commentary-Bodhisattva/dp/1611804167
      --- hope this helps

    • @chrisnamaste3572
      @chrisnamaste3572 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Patrick Leclercq if St Batchelor relays a more accurate semblance of truth then why should we not become attached until there is a better alternative? I have seen far too many people in the West (and East) attached to gurus (even of the Buddhist variety) who lacked significant truth or substance.

    • @gustavosanthiago
      @gustavosanthiago 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's a good translation published by Shambhala Publications! Their website has all the info.

  • @Shadow-di7mw
    @Shadow-di7mw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shanti dev same as buddha were not historical people, hard to describe in English but closest way is that they are archetypes of consciousness

  • @mattbard7612
    @mattbard7612 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    who owns love ? come on fellas....listen freely

  • @12345678987654321537
    @12345678987654321537 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beware! antecedence of delusion can creates further delusion and more disolution down the road. Until, and only until one has the understanding of the original Buddha's perspective of existence. That's the only then.!