Bloomberg Opinion: Yellen Junks Economics to Block China Clean Tech

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 เม.ย. 2024
  • US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is wrapping up her China visit by repeating her warning about overcapacity, especially in sectors including EVs and lithium batteries. Bloomberg Opinion columnist David Fickling says that viewpoint is a "protectionist disaster" that could muddy the path to net-zero emissions.

ความคิดเห็น • 686

  • @isaackys
    @isaackys 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +656

    Only yesterday they were saying China was collapsing, now they were saying China is too powerful.

    • @haoyeleong541
      @haoyeleong541 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Monday, Wednesday, Friday = China collapsing
      Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday = China threat
      Sunday = Rest day

    • @drscopeify
      @drscopeify 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I did not hear Yellen say that China is collapsing. China is in transition as expected as their manufacturing has run out of customers and the construction-debt boom has run out of steam. China has deflation and domestic consumption is at decade lows and so has to transition. The west however will do what it takes to protect their own economies as China tries to compete this is not a surprise. The world has only so much supply and demand capacity, either China works together with the west on a fair and stable global economy or the sides compete and pull away leading to major shifts globally and a lot of pain a well, we will see how this plays out.

    • @nmew6926
      @nmew6926 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +124

      ​@@drscopeifyI remember Western propaganda in the early 1990s aimed at China: "Without (western) democracy there is no development".
      It was a total BS statement

    • @nmew6926
      @nmew6926 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      10 years later, Western propaganda came out with another BS statement: "Without democracy, there is no *SUSTAINABLE* development

    • @nmew6926
      @nmew6926 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another 10 years later, Western propaganda pull out another BS: "No country can develop and grow indefinitely.. It needs (western) democracy acting as a pressure value so that dissatisfied people may vent their anger.. blah.. blah.."

  • @jcteo1
    @jcteo1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +249

    The U.S. has an overcapacity for printing money.

    • @MegaTonyng
      @MegaTonyng 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      US has an over capacity for hypocrisy 😂😂😂

    • @lauriebarns9901
      @lauriebarns9901 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just look at the increase in M2 in China - no one is printing more currency than ccp.

    • @MegaTonyng
      @MegaTonyng 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@lauriebarns9901China's total debt ($47.5 trillion) is still markedly below that of the United States (close to $70 trillion)

    • @lauriebarns9901
      @lauriebarns9901 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MegaTonyng us debt is $32 trillion.

    • @chrislee5685
      @chrislee5685 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@lauriebarns9901 China not reserve currency duh. China debt it their own while US debt are push to world.

  • @willeisinga2089
    @willeisinga2089 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +246

    Thank China for Affordable Life. Affordable EV Cars. Affordable Solar. Affordable Batteries. Affordable Communication. Affordable Roads Rail Bridges Hospitals Schools. Clean Air Blue Sky Health Better Life. Thank You China ❤️

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Ok 50 cent army 😂

    • @tristanx3508
      @tristanx3508 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      @@JohnLee-db9zt
      It's okay, you don't have to work so hard for free keeps on typing the same cliche reply claiming other as 50 cent, at least they earn something. You? So brainwashed to the point of working for free.

    • @aaabbb-py5xd
      @aaabbb-py5xd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @JohnLee-db9zt Fifty? Lol yeah baby, cuz I'm gonna party like it's your birthday, and icing on cake the cake will be "Snuffed is your disSeNt". Btw, like the overwhelming majority of Chinese people, I'd say here and free of charge: "Godspeed to the Chinese Communist Party". That and I drink your diSsiDenT tears because your problems were created by yourself. And your detox is not anybody else's problem.

    • @lauriebarns9901
      @lauriebarns9901 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree with what you say, But ccp is most corrupt form of government. Clearly Xi can use corruption to get rid of opponents, because they are all guilty. What has become the worst sin, is trying to improve the lives of Chinese citizens.

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@JohnLee-db9zt stick to your apple and samsung phones...

  • @nulnoh219
    @nulnoh219 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +172

    Complain about China being polluting.
    China makes cheap solar panels and EV cars.
    USA still mad.

    • @esphilee
      @esphilee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      And wind mill farm.

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yet China burns more fossil fuel than any other country on earth.

    • @n3g774
      @n3g774 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Environmental protection is just an excuse to prevent others from developing. When they found that China could not be stopped through environmental protection, they abandoned it without hesitation.

    • @mariajiao4855
      @mariajiao4855 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They just hate the Chinese, regardless of what they do. Racists pretend not to be racists.

    • @adamoliver4094
      @adamoliver4094 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China still uses more coal than all the other countries in the world combined.

  • @morgenknas
    @morgenknas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +355

    The only thing the US can produce cheaply is the US dollar. Maybe that has got something to do with all this?

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Hugely subsidised Chinese products and CCP policy of exporting out of their economic problems

    • @MickZorro
      @MickZorro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      That's true, very funny, and also sad, all at the same time!

    • @spaceballs72
      @spaceballs72 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Andy-P you are so brainwashed that you think that being productive and producing more stuff is a bad thing.

    • @RickBlaine
      @RickBlaine 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      @@Andy-P But didn't China's economy collapse back in 2002, 2003, 2004 2005 2006 etc. Keep up with the story, you can't have if both ways!

    • @DC-qn4wz
      @DC-qn4wz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🤣🤣🤣

  • @pabloc.282
    @pabloc.282 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +299

    This is so messed up. The US can monopolize the AI GPU production, but China can't do the same with their strenghts?

    • @marktrinidad7650
      @marktrinidad7650 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean that should be right. America can only do these things because we are America. We are an exception, a global phenomenon the world looks with jealousy.

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China can put a import ban on American tech then. Save US export bans

    • @Hierarchy_Of_Power
      @Hierarchy_Of_Power 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

      Hypocrisy is their birth right.

    • @laughoutloud3404
      @laughoutloud3404 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WHITE IS RIGHT

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China is not our friend and never played on even playing field. It steals our IPs to get competitive advantage. So yeah we don’t need to play on the same playing field as China. Stop being a China apologist. You reek of 50 cent Chinese army.

  • @ghtwghtw7197
    @ghtwghtw7197 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +323

    america: we are losing. stop making us look so incompetent.

    • @tiktoktrending2635
      @tiktoktrending2635 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Boycott China 🤮

    • @aramtime7368
      @aramtime7368 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      china : we are better then everyone. No one can stop us.

    • @drscopeify
      @drscopeify 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is a very mistaken statement becasue you make the USA look like an innocent player, like a weak player, when it is the USA that created the world economy we all live in, everyone in China, every single Chinese person is living in a world economy order that the USA created. And the office that Yellen leads over destroyed the British Empire, the most powerful Empire in history weas destroyed by the entity that Yellen leads. As such your comment is ignorant and blind. You are not doing Chinese propaganda very well my friend.

    • @bradleyp3655
      @bradleyp3655 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      That is not hard. Privatization and corporate capture of government does not work. That is why China is thriving and the Western nations are economically and politically collapsing. They don't allow one major problem with capitalism. Lobbying.

    • @hehe-mq2bk
      @hehe-mq2bk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@bradleyp3655 i am actually disturbed lobbying exists. It is directly AGAINST the interest of the people!

  • @ximinghu9456
    @ximinghu9456 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +197

    If you cannot win through fair competition, you could still beat your competitors through smearing!😏

    • @aramtime7368
      @aramtime7368 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stealing US tech is fair? Go back to eat your rat then LOL

    • @petergreen5337
      @petergreen5337 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Exactly

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      50 cent Chinese army😂

    • @wowyzaoy
      @wowyzaoy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ouch!

    • @lauriebarns9901
      @lauriebarns9901 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can you even argue that anyone is smearing? You have zero access to reality.

  • @matt3935
    @matt3935 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +161

    Ah America just looks worse and worse.

    • @drscopeify
      @drscopeify 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ah yes, China's 50 cent army. The funny thing is that China is the one in deflation and has hit the peak of a construction-debt system that has run out of steam.

  • @danwelterweight4137
    @danwelterweight4137 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    What a bunch of nonsense.
    Percentage of Chinese cars in the American market is 0%
    Percentage of American cars in the Chinese market is like 25%.
    As a matter of fact American car makers make more money in China than they do in the United States
    Percentage of Chinese cars in Europe is 8%
    Percentage of European cars in the Chinese market is 20%
    Same thing, European car makers can't make money in Europe.
    The only place where they make money is in China.
    If anyone should be complaining about over capacity is China to Europe and the United States.
    Furthermore, what exactly do they want the Chinese government to do tell their auto industry to stop manufacturing cars.
    I thought the free market involved the government allowing the private sector to have the freedom to make it's own decisions.
    Government interference in the pivate industry is not capitalism.
    You guys who are champions of the free market want the Chinese to implement state control over their own industries and make them cut production.
    What kind of nonsense is that.
    What happened to letting the market take care of itself?

  • @kelel6656
    @kelel6656 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Imagine being on a loosing team and the coach telling the opposing coach to stop scoring so many goals because it's not good for the loosing team. 😂😂😂

    • @david50665
      @david50665 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      then have the audacity to say it is not only good for the loosing team but good for the winning team as well to ensure everyone knows they r doing so out of pure goodness!

    • @efemitchellamrohore4156
      @efemitchellamrohore4156 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @VL-inquisitor
    @VL-inquisitor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    When it comes to advancing the Global Warming agenda, a student is complaining that the best student is doing too good. He also lobbies other students to boycott the best student.

    • @checkoutmyyoutubepage
      @checkoutmyyoutubepage 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who says the planet was built for the car?

    • @jjsamuelgunn1136
      @jjsamuelgunn1136 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      America is basically telling China to stop studying so hard because the academic grades they are scoring are 'too high'. Otherwise we will stop ban you from getting places in colleges and universities. Wait a minute... that's exactly what they are doing in the American education system.

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yet China burns more fossil fuel than any other country on earth.

  • @spvlinn9009
    @spvlinn9009 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +221

    We buy zero EV from china and BYD makes it clear that they are not interested in selling their product to us. Then why concern for what?

    • @Hierarchy_Of_Power
      @Hierarchy_Of_Power 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Americans are jealous and scared of others buying Chinese cars.

    • @drscopeify
      @drscopeify 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They do want to sell cars in the USA 10000% of course. Look at Germany and Japan, China wants to join in as well and be a major car manufacturer for the USA but it will be required to make the cars in the USA however what percent of parts, batteries are made in China that is the question. We will see how this develops.

    • @soowo5942
      @soowo5942 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Don't know.

    • @F3CKTHEZIOS
      @F3CKTHEZIOS 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      BYD building factory in Mexico and can enter USA with low tax.

    • @ddwitdaysl
      @ddwitdaysl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      byd's pricing in Europe (£20,000 €23,326) is becoming very competitive

  • @James-mc5hc
    @James-mc5hc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    Capacity is dictated by demand. No demand factories closes down. BS.

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed. Non Chinese manufacturers will close down

    • @kamsunleong6648
      @kamsunleong6648 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@Andy-P
      Be competitive then.

    • @privacyhelp
      @privacyhelp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Andy-P Instead of wasting on war, the US could use it for incentives and subsidies to domestic industries.

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kamsunleong6648 Agreed. Do what China does - subsidies and tariffs

    • @Jamie-nt3eh
      @Jamie-nt3eh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      you can create demand by setting attractive prices

  • @praveenspike
    @praveenspike 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

    America should take this as an advantage, importing cheap goods for its people. When the nation is already in a situation were its own govt spending is far more higher than its own tax revenue that it needs to borrow more to sustain.

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If the CCP were not targeting high value products then yes

    • @markosmataasii2000
      @markosmataasii2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Andy-P Lol. And you're complaining on the country for having a vision to grow? Now innovation is bad these days? Well typical westoids don't understand economics. If your war freak US is spending much in infrastructure & education than instigating wars and producing bombs these days, just maybe your Yellen is not in CHINA begging. Gets?

    • @superchargerone
      @superchargerone 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Andy-P lol what does that even mean? so you are saying they should only produce undies and socks while usa makes iphones? lol are you ok mate? you dont make sense. hope you were not dropped repeatedly on your head as a kid.

    • @kamsunleong6648
      @kamsunleong6648 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@Andy-P
      EVs are not exactly high value products.

    • @Andromeda365
      @Andromeda365 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@Andy-P so china shouldn't move up the value chain and stick to selling t-shirts and toys.

  • @kaimingraymondchoi9909
    @kaimingraymondchoi9909 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Yellen’s message to China and indeed to the world:-
    Although American’s unemployment is much lower than China, China has to cut its production capacity and increase unemployment further to keep Americans fully employed. All men are equal, but Americans are more equal than the others.
    Although China’s production of cheap and reliable green energy products are definitely beneficial for the planet, it is against US interest and hence should be stopped.
    Some three four years ago, the Commercial Department of United States started ordering American importers to cut their orders to China causing significant drop in export. To Yellen this is level game play.
    In spite of the fact that the aforesaid is one of the key reasons for “over capacity” in China, the Chinese government should always be blamed.
    The one and only over capacity industry in the world is the US military industry. In order to sustain the over capacity of this industry, US government has continuously provoke conflicts everywhere in the world in the last 30 years.

    • @alanssshh
      @alanssshh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      well said

  • @hansolo8225
    @hansolo8225 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Translation: The United States high volume manufacturing is not competitive with China. So we cry like a toddler that it’s not fair!!!!

  • @alainmcin
    @alainmcin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    When she says the world, she means the US

  • @wallacekatini3424
    @wallacekatini3424 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    Yellens yelling abd squealing CANNOT hinder China's powerful and unstoppable growth!😂😂😂
    Now the US has resorted to YELLING?😂😂

    • @jogana6909
      @jogana6909 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Efficient production does not mean overcapacity.
      Trade protection will only make US companies lazier and fatter.

    • @alystero8838
      @alystero8838 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@jogana6909not just lazier and fatter, it'll also become a huge tax burden to tax payers.

    • @markosmataasii2000
      @markosmataasii2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@jogana6909 It's not fatter but becoming zombies. Imagine the majority of these US companies have much profits coming from overseas selling their overpriced useless products & services are now struggling to find new markets because as I said their products & services are awful & not competitive.

  • @Yarhnam
    @Yarhnam 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    It's clean tech ,come on US !!! It is beneficial for developing countries while US is over building military bases around the world and dont complain ???

  • @sfoster18sf
    @sfoster18sf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    What a predicament. Love the free market when it works for us. Not when it works against us. How do you regulate this? Tariffs, but what are the repercussions?

    • @choonhockong8215
      @choonhockong8215 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Spot on

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed. China been doing it for years

    • @david50665
      @david50665 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it is actually working if USA just let the free market run its course it will improve standard of livings of both USA and China but instead they want to play tribal politics. So it is not working against USA it's just they want to make sure China cannot be a tech leader in any sector even if it is bad economics....Lose lose strategy...

  • @ielee1765
    @ielee1765 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    China is nearly 4 times the size of USA, what is she talking, stating the obvious. China goods are afordable to all and not more than 10 times more because the China GDP per capita is 10 times less hence cost of living is lower, raw materials are lower, cheaper fuel, etc. this is the reason why China is very competitive. If American don't want the cheap Chinese EV & other made in China goods they can always choose others. Think about the hundreds of poorer countries, stop creating these false security risk narrative because China help the poorer countries to progress & developed. The USA are welcome to do the same help the poorer countries, such as reduce carbon foot print, built infrastrutures, ports, & power plants, etc. Don't try to stop or slowdown China.

    • @F3CKTHEZIOS
      @F3CKTHEZIOS 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      you're right. thanks to china, only because of them people in poor or developing countries get to enjoy smart technology from smartphone to home appliances / solar all the other tech things which are great quality at reasonable price. if rest of the world was dependent on western product half of planet would still be lacking basic tech cause of their expensive price. not only they help with such things but also help underdeveloped countries with infrastructure from bridges to ports / power plants / railways everything.

    • @wensun8133
      @wensun8133 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Shortly after Yellen's defamation of "overcapacity", a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs quoted Mao Zedong as saying that China was "lifted" into the United Nations by developing countries, and has always been a close partner of developing countries.

    • @randot6675
      @randot6675 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The US is only interested in extracting value from smaller countries. Why build railways or hospitals for a colony that you want to keep poor after all? They'd be selling things at higher prices once they develop, and oh wouldn't that be awful for poor sad America?

    • @randot6675
      @randot6675 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      To China(and India), most of the smaller countries in Asia are seen as trade partners, and have been for millennia before the Renaissance brought the Europeans to Eastern shores directly for the first time ever, allowing them to finally circumvent those pesky middlemen from the middle east etc. Thus, after a four or five centuries of colonisation, the US, being late to the party, does not have the aforementioned diplomatic relationships that eastern superpowers has with small Asian countries. Therefore, to the US, countries like the Philippines, Indonesia etc are not trade partners, but rather vassal states. And they dare decry whatever perceived slights observed on this side of the globe whenever any so called "developing country" tries to "rise above their stations", as if their double standards absolve them of their own hypocrisy, considering how the CIA's efforts alone may have contributed to the greatest amounts of political stagnations in recent history just to keep the US at the top of the food chain a little bit longer after ww2

    • @lalatubby4836
      @lalatubby4836 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@randot6675 nicely put 👍

  • @medialcanthus9681
    @medialcanthus9681 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +147

    Don't stop China from making money. They have to feed 1.4 billion people.

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They could increase domestic consumption so Chinese consumer more of what they make

    • @medialcanthus9681
      @medialcanthus9681 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      @@Andy-P how to change a culture ? Chinese are savers. Also how to change a culture of hard work?

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@medialcanthus9681 how indeed?

    • @markosmataasii2000
      @markosmataasii2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      ​@@Andy-P FYI, majority produced by CHINA is consumed by CHINA. One prime example is the EVs, CHINA's CAR including EV market is so large which is far larger than even US+Japan+India combined. You think majority of Chinese EVs products are sold outside CHINA. FYI, only less than 10% of produced by these CHINESE companies are sold outside. Another prime example, is what these Yellen is yapping about renewable energy. The biggest market for renewables is CHINA. Majority of the global demand is from there and it make sense that majority of the big renewable companies are being there. Simple ECONOMICS which majority of westoids like you don't understand these days....

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@markosmataasii2000 I think US Government in its open system know the scale of Chinese exports and production. Insulting people doesn't help the CCP influence westerners

  • @jcteo1
    @jcteo1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    “Overcapacity” 😂
    Got to give it to American politicians. When you can’t compete, blame your opponent for running too fast. It is so embarrassing.

  • @oka2046
    @oka2046 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Hey the US is now simply too large for the rest of the world to absorb this enormous capacity of Tesla, Apple, Coca Cola, Boeing, Nike, Disney, Microsoft, Starbucks, Intel, IBM, McDonald's, KFC products (and the list goes on).

    • @haoyuan8463
      @haoyuan8463 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      top of the list, weapons

  • @DDGGVVMM
    @DDGGVVMM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    never knew a country could dictate how much another country can produce

  • @liamporter1137
    @liamporter1137 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +133

    I think China should tell US to tell Apple to produce fewer iPhone, Microsoft selling fewer Windows licenses 😂😂😂

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Agreed They could do that

    • @privacyhelp
      @privacyhelp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It would be better to tell America's mcd, burgerking, kfc, starbucks, etc.. to produce less junk food.

    • @esphilee
      @esphilee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      China should stop using Apple and Microsoft, seriously.

    • @fannyalbi9040
      @fannyalbi9040 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@esphileethey already started, that’s y sale fell 20%+

    • @thebridgepodcast5463
      @thebridgepodcast5463 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And Starbucks to sell fewer cups of coffee. I had one this morning though in Beijing, China.

  • @user-km2bz8iy5o
    @user-km2bz8iy5o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    If Chinese companies is willing sell us goods more cheaply than every other supplier we should be thanking them

  • @wroughtforge7547
    @wroughtforge7547 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    What about overcapacity on military bases

  • @zackwang9314
    @zackwang9314 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    The US government must protect americans from cheap products. Inflation is the way to go

    • @Starwarrior9831
      @Starwarrior9831 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Rate cuts by Fed is always round the corner but forever out of sight

    • @habibcisse9809
      @habibcisse9809 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      😂😂😂 stop printing money and inflation will go away 😂

    • @fannyalbi9040
      @fannyalbi9040 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      is not protecting american but the elite few

  • @vertikultursg8532
    @vertikultursg8532 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Translation: "Hey, you have to be as incompetent as us. Otherwise we deemed it as unfair"

  • @e_valley2707
    @e_valley2707 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    The language is that of "dumping" but the US can't use that so it invents "overproduction" - show us the supply/demand stats; protectionism indeed.

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      She knows. China produces 3x world demand solar panels. People now use them to pave drives.

    • @e_valley2707
      @e_valley2707 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Andy-P ... I'm from Missouri... show me ...

  • @amunra5330
    @amunra5330 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    Yellen cannot stop 1.4Billion people from their ambitions.

    • @antihypocrisy8978
      @antihypocrisy8978 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Never underestimate how low they can go.

    • @aramtime7368
      @aramtime7368 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Bro 1 Billion of them have 140$ a month...

    • @RickBlaine
      @RickBlaine 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@aramtime7368 So Google personal savings of the "CCP slaves!" Now google the credit card debt for your own country.

    • @danwelterweight4137
      @danwelterweight4137 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​​​​@@aramtime7368Yet 70% of Americans don't even have $2000 in cash at hand for an emergency or rainy day while in China 70% of Chinese do have $2000 in cash at hand saved for an emergency or a rainy day.
      Meaning that if most Americans got a heart attack or a stroke they would not even be able to afford to pay for the ambulance ride taking them to the hospital out of their own pocket, nevermind the medical care they would need once they got there.
      They would need to borrow it from their credit card or get a loan.
      Meanwhile the average Chinese has that money saved and stacked at home.
      Maybe that is why the life expectancy of the average Chinese is now higher than the life expectancy of the Average American.
      The moral of the story is sometimes GDP per capita figures don't tell the whole story.

    • @amunra5330
      @amunra5330 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@aramtime7368 Chinese people save ALOT. In 2022 they saved 3 TRILLION dollar. Thats larger than the economy of the UK

  • @MickZorro
    @MickZorro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Question for Janet Yellen: -- What the USA would say, and do, if it was USA having such overcapacity of production,
    and Chinese had come to Washington, telling us to slow down?

  • @thomastang3140
    @thomastang3140 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Microsoft OS is installed in almost all PCs and laptops, so by the same logic, it is over-capacity! Is she really an economist?

    • @maxhuang2254
      @maxhuang2254 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yellen's current status is that of a politician. She's the kind who talks nonsense and shirks responsibility.

  • @arnoldsaunders6073
    @arnoldsaunders6073 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Step aside US, you've had your day in the sun.

  • @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane
    @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    China told her that they weren't going to sell into the US market anyways.

  • @kaimingraymondchoi9909
    @kaimingraymondchoi9909 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    She knows best how to shame her own country.

  • @brianlowe3529
    @brianlowe3529 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Old friend said if you can’t make money make progress China makes money and progress USA no money no progress

    • @esphilee
      @esphilee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      USA makes war.

  • @ssss8162
    @ssss8162 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Yellen has absolutely nothing to offer the Chinese 😅

    • @Andy-P
      @Andy-P 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China and America talk past each other. China says American friends and allies are lapdog. There will be war in the SCS

  • @KLRH23
    @KLRH23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    So it’s bad I buy more affordable goods. Got it

  • @moreless2690
    @moreless2690 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I am clueless about how she obtained her Ph.D. in economics from Yale University in 1971.

  • @robbinghook3571
    @robbinghook3571 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Yellen is serving the interest of the oil & gas companies.
    2,000 women in Switzerland won a case against their government on climate change inaction.
    Same need to be done in other countries.

  • @James-mc5hc
    @James-mc5hc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    EVs is the best way to save foreign exchange used to purchase oil. Incredibly perfect.

  • @WalkOverHotCoal
    @WalkOverHotCoal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Think of a Marathon. The two main contenders are China and the US. This time, the US finds itself in an uncomfortable second. Not only is it lagging, the gap is widening ! So what is the US doing? Instead of digging deeper to catch up with China, it tells China to slow down so that it could catch up with it.
    The brutal truth is that the US is stuck in a rather uncomfortable situation. It has a foot on each canoe. One canoe is in the traditional industries such as the internal combustion engine automobile industry, the other foot is tentatively on a modern tech such as EV. The canoes are drifting apart, threatening to dump the US into the water.
    Biden knows his voting base is in the blue collar, older generation auto industry, that is why he was regularly seen licking a cone of ice cream in front of a factory. Losing jobs in the traditional autos industry could spell disaster for either political parties.

  • @daramy9507
    @daramy9507 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you China for selling us cheaper products. It is a good thing.

  • @hc1897
    @hc1897 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    0:32 Who wants artificially cheap products, we want naturally expensive ones!!

    • @user-zf6zc5im1u
      @user-zf6zc5im1u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stupid muricans

    • @david50665
      @david50665 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      u can get it easily from USA and Europe...100% natural organic expensive products

  • @PVLTD
    @PVLTD 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hey Yellen, if it’s really “overcapacity”, that “overcapacity” is not meant for the US market. The world is big enough to absorb whatever the “overcapacity” you mentioned and stop thinking so highly about your own market. It’s a plus if most Chinese firms can sell their products in the US, but most can survive without entering US market too, just like Huawei.

  • @petergreen5337
    @petergreen5337 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    ❤ This is good for the consumer
    China has helped the consumer for 40 years now. Is this a BAD THING??

  • @capritorez3793
    @capritorez3793 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You are telling China not to produce to their max bc we can compete? What right do you have to tell others what to do or not? This is crazy.

  • @thuattan6540
    @thuattan6540 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I cannot see in how low cost and over capacity can disrupt the world in anyway and these are newly developed high tech product like EV, EV modular battery and solar panel.

  • @catinbootsnow4267
    @catinbootsnow4267 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Next time Yellen will complain about the overcapacity of shoes, socks, and garment in Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia. 😅

  • @daramy9507
    @daramy9507 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I agree with the commentator, China is growing a new segment of the global market with Electric Vehicles, Solar, and Batteries that is revolutionizing the world with essential products at a cheap price.
    The new generation of batteries will power jet planes and make air travel inexpensive. That is a major benefit for the world. China has a population of 1.4 billion people to feed. The U.S. has only 300 million. The priorities of both countries are different. The U.S. is concerned about jobs and profits while China is concerned about social welfare and stability.

  • @user-re3qx4gn3h
    @user-re3qx4gn3h 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hey why should i buy products at USD5k in China when i can buy it for USD30k from the US. Yeah got it

  • @uofawayne
    @uofawayne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Overcapacity in EV? How many gasoline cars are still out there? Yellen whatever you are taking, I want some.

    • @david50665
      @david50665 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it just shows a PHD in economics from Yale is useless....she doesnt even understand economics 101

  • @TST1234
    @TST1234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Temperature is rising. We have to cool down the globe.. Maybe fast production and flooding the green technology could bring some much needed immediate balance to earth.. we have to reduce fossil use.. the faster the better

  • @datianlongan5567
    @datianlongan5567 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In the US only rich people can afford EV. China can help make EV affordable (< $20K) to everybody.

  • @YongLi-np3wg
    @YongLi-np3wg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Artificially cheap Chinese product? Chinese EV sales more expensive oversea. How does subsidy work backward?

  • @yuppyhoo
    @yuppyhoo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The world need clean tech fast!
    US should specialize in AI and China should specialize in green tech; each leveraging on their respective strengths.

  • @roddiechan
    @roddiechan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    she went there to beg for more money (wanted China to buy more treasury) and yet didn't want to buy goods at lower prices 🤣

  • @greaterbayareahero1401
    @greaterbayareahero1401 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    How can there be over capacity when EV cars have not even been adopted by many countries. Everyone is still driving petrol cars haha!

    • @david50665
      @david50665 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it seems the word overcapacity is not the same one as in economics textbooks but 1 just thrown out for this occasion to paint a narrative...it will become a favorite buzzword to bash china going forward

  • @acuantjahyadi7393
    @acuantjahyadi7393 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Jangan mengeluh , jangan menangis Amerika, gunakan keungulan kamu maksimalkan industry pencetakan dolar anda 😂😂 ecundang !!!! 😂😂😂

  • @stereomtl9001
    @stereomtl9001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Xi said "Ya ok, sure ..." and then went to meet Lavrov 😂

  • @davidxu2013
    @davidxu2013 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    China stop green energy and technology, let climate change continue 😅

  • @Fortune-md5jk
    @Fortune-md5jk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Prices are principally determined ay the law of supply and demand, cheaper goods will benefit the ultimate end -users which are the consumers during this time of high inflation.

  • @danalain4126
    @danalain4126 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The us is begging China.

  • @fangtom9128
    @fangtom9128 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If the US want to make it competitive, then make it by itself, but not accuse of any country’s overcapacity, since all of the product is based on market, even if the US doesn’t buy, other country will buy it. The politic cannot beat market in a long run

  • @lv9657
    @lv9657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Debtor trying to threaten the Banker. LoL

  • @duinay3
    @duinay3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    US: let's all switch to green energy for the climate.
    China: ok, here's our green machines.
    US: let's not switch anymore

  • @zuroneuro4665
    @zuroneuro4665 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Free Trade obviously only applies to the US, if they have the better product ... Once again, the US auto industry cant compete with others and must be saved by high tariffs. It's all 1980ies again, when Japan built far better cars than the US auto industry and Reagan put high tariffs on them ...

  • @MASMIWA
    @MASMIWA 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yellen should remember the saying: "“It is better to remain silent at the risk of being thought a fool, than to talk and remove all doubt of it.”
    ― Maurice Switzer, Mrs. Goose, Her Book

    • @stchan8569
      @stchan8569 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. "It is better to remain silent and thought a fool than to speak out to confirm it."

  • @chiakeesame972
    @chiakeesame972 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am smiling too.😁😁😁Since when Janet Yellen was elected to speak on behalf of the World? Then they been saying also that China's economy is collapsing🤣🤣🤣

  • @herta3286
    @herta3286 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If China could sell their EV for usd1000, we all shoukd buy and Thank China for selling their car so cheap, if possible ask China to subsidize it to zero usd so we all could enjoy free car 😅

  • @kaimingraymondchoi9909
    @kaimingraymondchoi9909 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    She was there to praise the Chinese contribution towards combating climate change and at the same time exposed the selfishness, arrogance, ignorance, incompetence.... of her own country. What a marvellous lady.

  • @vincentliu7716
    @vincentliu7716 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cheaper and more efficient solar panels lowers the cost electricity produced, and wider adoption of EVs reduces the consumption of gasoline and diesel which leads to lower oil prices. Therefore it benefits everyone, including those who do not drive EVs or have solar panels on their roofs. Lower energy prices directly bring down the headline inflation rate, so central banks can start cutting interest rates sooner. US government can refinance its debt at lower rates, so it's a win-win for both American consumers and US government. And lower rates worldwide promotes global economic growth.

  • @oka2046
    @oka2046 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The iPhone prices are too artificially cheap, please make them more expensive! Don’t flood the market with your cheap products!

  • @gamesnerd6806
    @gamesnerd6806 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am damn sure the world can. Everyone wants cheaper quality products and as much as possible. No such thing as overcapacity.

  • @rxampageaxe4216
    @rxampageaxe4216 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We have "overcapacity" of inflation since 2022, but the US kept exporting them.

  • @chi-jenyang9752
    @chi-jenyang9752 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In a free market, the government should do nothing regarding overcapacity and leave it to the market mechanism. Yellen certainly did not go to China to ask them to do nothing.

  • @zeetvisascam3443
    @zeetvisascam3443 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Chinese money is not cheap and please buy more US debts!!😅😅😅😅😅

  • @willeisinga2089
    @willeisinga2089 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Send them a Thank You Note. Thank You China ❤️. And Thank You President Xi Jinping ❤️. And Thank You CPC❤. Send them a Thank You Note. Well Said.

  • @oriocoookie
    @oriocoookie หลายเดือนก่อน

    as a solar energy producer, I can tell you that the cost of producing electricity at current panel prices is below 1 euro cent per kWh. No private company can indeed fight off a government subsidized competitors, but i don't mind a bit of help every now and then

  • @eternalobi
    @eternalobi หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Only 15% of Chinese cars are sold outside of China. Germany 75%, South Korea 70%, Japan 50%. I wonder why only China is blamed for excess production?

  • @pt20829
    @pt20829 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you. I remember this too from my high school economics class.

  • @peterchan3889
    @peterchan3889 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is like telling China not to eat so much.

  • @michaelnurse9089
    @michaelnurse9089 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unlike other imports, making vehicles locally creates a large number of high quality jobs. BYD is known to have 60000 engineers, to say nothing of the number of assembly line workers.

  • @user-br9oi2sh7o
    @user-br9oi2sh7o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Overcapacity, the best example will be the military industrial complex of US that has created non stop wars and human suffering around the world whereas China in the case if it's true it's benefiting to the whole world and reduce cost of living and improving life.

  • @mchammer3927
    @mchammer3927 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds like Yellen is working for the oil companies ?!?! Keeping us addicted to the hose !!! Trying to slow down affordable green tech

  • @QuietJagung
    @QuietJagung 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Global fossil fuels installed capacity is about 5,000 GW. Global solar increases about 400 GW in 2023. It will take nearly 30 years to switch fossil fuels to solar assuming energy consumption does not increase or increase in production keeps up with energy consumption increase. In fact solar production is far from overcapacity and needs to be increased so that it can replace fossil fuels in less than 30 years.

  • @Jim-nt7xy
    @Jim-nt7xy หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Commissar Yellen.

  • @babublue69
    @babublue69 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    people should understand the real reason yellen gone there ,,,talk about plaza 2 accord .. without that next wars in south China and around the world is very near ,she want to say Chinese people if you go by like this that is inevitable ..letssee what China will do ,somebody has to accommodate

  • @frankblangeard8865
    @frankblangeard8865 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The problem with 'comparative advantage' economics is that the U.S. has no comparative advantage in anything.

  • @douglaswong6975
    @douglaswong6975 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Competitive advantage
    In the middle of a soccer game the America is losing, so the American simply move it's goal 🥅 post further away 😅😅😅😂😂😂

  • @NomadicAstro
    @NomadicAstro หลายเดือนก่อน

    'buy products other country can make cheaply in exchange something we can make cheaply. ' well said, the thing is, we dont make ANYthing cheaply here in the states. Mcdonalds now 12 bucks a combo with large fries and maybe a sux piece nugget.

  • @mistman5640
    @mistman5640 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yellen is barking on the wrong tree. Every expoet driven economy has excessive capacity. That is most of Asia, Germany and so on. She only addressed half of the problem. The flip side of the coin is US excessive printing of the dollar. There is too much US dollar in the world, more than the world can absorb, as the world moves away from trading in the dollar and the looming interest cut in the fed.
    Demand for the US dollar is dwindling, that plummets the value of the dollar and causes inflation at home. As the dollar lose value, its reserve status is also threatened because people will lose money by holding the dollar.

  • @MarcoPolo-hn8or
    @MarcoPolo-hn8or 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    lol… isn’t affordable Chinese products benefit the world 😂

  • @jsc3417
    @jsc3417 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Yellen can go take a hike

  • @dariomendoza191
    @dariomendoza191 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the most Imperialist. Colonialist Racist Goverment int he World!!!! greetings from Mexico

  • @danalain4126
    @danalain4126 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Chinese will ignore yellen’s babbling.

  • @phillip76
    @phillip76 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is pretty funny how Yellen go to China and ask, your firm are over producing, because my firms can 't compete.