I'll Never Play this Card.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 117

  • @scrafter5467
    @scrafter5467 2 ปีที่แล้ว +311

    That game versus priest was nuts, Solarian Prime just would not allow itself to die.

    • @Kakaroto3245
      @Kakaroto3245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      she has become one with the void

    • @PhoenixshadowGaming
      @PhoenixshadowGaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      She was staying alive to execute that betrayal.

  • @mykellwillits3495
    @mykellwillits3495 2 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    I know the deck is built specifically for it, but everything spiteful goes off and it pulls the 10 mana spell, the little goblin in my brain does a little dance

    • @Schmaeil
      @Schmaeil 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      everytime it got pulled i was like: oh wow neat till i realized every time anew that its the only spell in his deck

  • @joltedsol7987
    @joltedsol7987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    That priest game was a roller coaster

  • @althamus8559
    @althamus8559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +110

    I do appreciate that you always explain the goal of the deck beforehand so I'm not trying to work out what the win condition is during the video. This is literally the reason I started watching your videos xD
    The only suggestion I'd make would be to somewhere have either a W/L counter or in the preample say whether the deck is for fun or is trying to be competitive. I sometimes see your decks and think they'd be good and that I want to try them out, and then you mention in a throwaway comment that you've been playing the deck for hours trying to get a win for TH-cam and I'm "...maybe I won't play this then".

    • @FieryAF
      @FieryAF 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      he uploads raw footage of him playing the deck on his other channel RAWffle and also most of the decks that he plays are not competitive

    • @althamus8559
      @althamus8559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Yep, but there's a difference between "This deck is fun and will get like a 45-50% win rate" and "This deck is fun and will get like a 2% win rate".

    • @mateschneller9497
      @mateschneller9497 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@althamus8559 win rate over just a few hours can be extremely deceptive tho. at that small of a sample size its very easy to get lucky or unlucky streaks, inflating the statistics one way or another

    • @carlacaribe
      @carlacaribe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      69 likes, nice.

  • @locogato3488
    @locogato3488 2 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    Dragonfire Amulet could as well as be 10 Mana Tradeable without any ability and still be good.

    • @barrazzahazza1038
      @barrazzahazza1038 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Our glorious meme enabler and definitely not a real card that does things

    • @clintongriffin2077
      @clintongriffin2077 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I wish it was dual class with shaman

    • @CTEAnimator
      @CTEAnimator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@clintongriffin2077 why shaman specifically?

    • @thekingofston7591
      @thekingofston7591 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@CTEAnimator just let the man play his shaman

    • @near3d945
      @near3d945 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CTEAnimator If i have to guess its for spitefull quest shaman. The battle cry quest.

  • @notspoileratall5471
    @notspoileratall5471 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    22:04 THAT game vs priest is what I came here for. Solarians and random chances everywhere, and all for a great finale with your own solarian hitting your face for perfect lethal. Just marvellous *chef kiss*

  • @giruv3208
    @giruv3208 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    The punish for not playing reno first... We got a good laugh

  • @mir3877
    @mir3877 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    What an anti climax for the game against priest

  • @colinlee2904
    @colinlee2904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    this deck is honestly so sweet, i love me some yellow cards and hero power synergy in mage. the tradeable aspect of drakefire also makes the deck more consistent and just really fun overall

  • @clintongriffin2077
    @clintongriffin2077 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That firefight with that priest was kind of epic.

  • @zerovolt1406
    @zerovolt1406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The misdirection lethal truly brought tears to my eyes.

  • @Curious963
    @Curious963 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    That Priest game was true Hearthstone

  • @SacredBlazeXxX
    @SacredBlazeXxX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I've always loved reno decks.
    Such cool concept like pure paladin.

  • @clueless9959
    @clueless9959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Actually a 10 mana tradable spell, a deck built to take advantage of that and never play the card itself

  • @chorko696
    @chorko696 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Roffle, I don't play the game anymore - but I still watch your videos! Keep doing the awesome work.

  • @pucakuro
    @pucakuro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Every Roffle thumbnail feels like a home alone sequel

  • @theancientone1616
    @theancientone1616 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    21:51 Why not attack with the 3/3 first?

  • @cinammonstyx7622
    @cinammonstyx7622 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    22:06 live by the random bullshit, die by the random bullshit

  • @arriswaasdorp4111
    @arriswaasdorp4111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I saw that misdirection lethal coming from a mile away, still laughed out loud when it actually happened

  • @amirunique1437
    @amirunique1437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That solarian was on the enemy team from the start

  • @Zouzk
    @Zouzk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Good afternoon Roffle, Runze, Deathwing, Dylan, Diddle, Zlatan, Rom, Darth, Loco, Shallow, Rick, Ohh, Ferzan, Statisticserino, Alessio, Jynxix, Teeth Collector, William, Brian, Ali, Crimson, Kevin, Cem, Freddy, Hooman, Lawn, Kenneth, Omit, Ângelo, SihYuan, Lily, KJ2008, Mathew, Azalea, Nrgcock, Miggy, Maciej, Shokaku, Time_Keeper, Blue_Toadette, CoepliS, HuskyPuppers, IamJZ, Laurens, Pinkyd, Chuang Ken, BlindMarian, DaGuy Vikavolt, Seth Phillips and LONESOMERANGER and Some Loser IDK, I hope you guys have a good day.

  • @BlueShellshock
    @BlueShellshock 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Big Spell Mage, with only one Big Spell. Conceptually, I actually like this a lot, and a tradeable 10 mana spell gives a lot of flex room in how to play the rest of the deck while not being constricted by having to put in X amount of big spells. I just wonder if Reno is the best setup for this..?

    • @markellospatras3039
      @markellospatras3039 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      reno is the only somewhat competitive part of this deck

  • @TitusConstantine
    @TitusConstantine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I forgot that Big Bad Archmage existed. You should use it in the future in a big deck

  • @MedRock21
    @MedRock21 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy shit, using the tradable component for spiteful procs is *chefs kiss*

  • @cesarmendozarueda826
    @cesarmendozarueda826 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That Misdirection Lethal was so funny xD

  • @Valduvia
    @Valduvia 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the misdirection self snipe was insane

  • @zezinhopescotapa3616
    @zezinhopescotapa3616 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This deck should be called One Spell Mage.

  • @joydivision1976
    @joydivision1976 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That Priest game had a very anticlimactic ending... :(

  • @lolmaomgoml
    @lolmaomgoml 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice invincible title card intro

  • @KarstenOkk
    @KarstenOkk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hate how many pirate warriors forget they can just PLAY the brigand in the later game when mana isnt a concern. at 4:00 he floated 2 mana while pulling the brigand from another pirate. he could have been one step further.

  • @marcelamoonstruck3094
    @marcelamoonstruck3094 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The game against priest was really amazing. Esp in the end

  • @Icetea-2000
    @Icetea-2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I still wonder why tradeable reveals the card

    • @DrunkAnton
      @DrunkAnton 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "balance"

    • @nick1834
      @nick1834 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why does that matter ? Do you think the opponent gets a big advantage off it

    • @Icetea-2000
      @Icetea-2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nick1834 Not really but there’s also no reason to do it in the first place.
      Like with the donkey it makes sense, "why does the opponent suddenly have two cards from drawing one card?" It can only be because they drew a donkey, that’s why it’s revealed, because that information shouldn’t be an advantage for players who know this one card.
      But this is a mechanic, it could be multiple cards and your opponent couldn’t otherwise know what card it is.
      When you plottwist, the cards are also not revealed.

    • @nick1834
      @nick1834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Icetea-2000 i agree and wish it didn’t reveal but i only have these 2 things to say, if it were an IRL card game instead of hearthstone it would definitely have to be revealed because otherwise people would just cheat and pretend all their cards had tradeable, and secondly by revealing it you at least get the funny moments where someone keeps drawing their tradeable card over and over lol

    • @Icetea-2000
      @Icetea-2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nick1834 Yeah but 1) matter of fact is that Hearthstone is an online card game, otherwise 90% of interactions wouldn’t realistically work anyway, and 2) you can still laugh at the guy trading over and over, the card is just not revealed
      I mostly am annoyed because the opponent in this video gets the funny meme deck, that trades the 10 mana card for spiteful summoner, spoiled lol

  • @cybrower5950
    @cybrower5950 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 6:40 I just appreciate how much gold is on the board

  • @GLang_E
    @GLang_E 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No, no, no, no!
    (Opponent): yes

  • @ThonsonSr
    @ThonsonSr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Play a similar list but with Khadgar. If we get to the late game and all summoner minions played, Khadgar, Dragoncaster, Amulet!

    • @KoopaKrump
      @KoopaKrump 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just wait til I get to 13 mana! 😏

  • @friskydrinklunkybank1108
    @friskydrinklunkybank1108 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Idk this, but on 5:00 , is it possible to get that 2 mana 3/2 pandaren that bounces a minion back to your hand? Because it would have been great if he could play spiteful again

    • @Redhotquagmire
      @Redhotquagmire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm not 100% on this, but I think the main reason Zeph never offers Shadowstep or Youthful Brewmaster is perhaps to avoid what could otherwise be very easy infinite combos. Plus, I think the only thing he really checks for is anything immediately impacting. A battlecry effect that already came and passed is no longer relevant, in his eyes anyways lol

    • @friskydrinklunkybank1108
      @friskydrinklunkybank1108 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Redhotquagmire ahh so he's not in zeph's pool. Gotcha.
      I was just wondering if he even appears in the first place

    • @Redhotquagmire
      @Redhotquagmire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@friskydrinklunkybank1108 I wondered that, too. I'm pretty sure Zeph was the MAIN reason Vanish got rotated to wild, because otherwise for 6 mana, you not only clear the board, you're getting your Zeph back just to do it all over again next turn! Lol

    • @friskydrinklunkybank1108
      @friskydrinklunkybank1108 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Redhotquagmire oh yeah that makes sense as well

  • @vewitched5288
    @vewitched5288 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone else die inside when he didn’t play the reno before attacking

  • @turma8eac
    @turma8eac 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    22:10
    He had Reno on his hand for so long

  • @jonathan_e_holmberg
    @jonathan_e_holmberg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kills devilsaur instead of 7/7 for lethal with misdirection. What a 1000 IQ play

  • @williammartinsyay
    @williammartinsyay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The ultimate Spiteful deck

  • @hellothere9167
    @hellothere9167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Reno mage without Reno hero card. What blasphemy is this

    • @mustafacemaksu4706
      @mustafacemaksu4706 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      From my personal experience, running the Reno here is the best way to suicide. Most of the time it kills you instead of doing something useful, is it fun; yes, is it viable; no

    • @_hipflexion
      @_hipflexion 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s better when playing from behind. Highlander specific cards do that already. Reno hero card is a lot like old Yogg. Control game till you almost lose, pray to RNGesus, sometimes win the game.

  • @jajamicham8126
    @jajamicham8126 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the second game was wild

  • @Begeru
    @Begeru 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That first game was amazing

  • @connorh628
    @connorh628 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:32 You cut off the roffle there

  • @lokegerhardsson8979
    @lokegerhardsson8979 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    21:51 skill issue moment

  • @Procprocproc726
    @Procprocproc726 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not balinda? She seems good for this deck

  • @votecthulhu9378
    @votecthulhu9378 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Dont hit my face"

  • @akbmfm
    @akbmfm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The worst part about that priest game was that afterwards, you can see it really started to sink in how incorrect his order of actions were.

  • @Wig3888
    @Wig3888 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That kaz preist haha

  • @usernameed
    @usernameed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well, you found lethal at 22:00 at least…

  • @Kleavers
    @Kleavers 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    21:58 FeelsBadMan

  • @lunasigmund8096
    @lunasigmund8096 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    trading it to ensure the 10 cost spell value is 5head ngl

  • @wraxiusgaming
    @wraxiusgaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Roffle, do you have any tips for learning the wild meta? I've been getting back into HS but I keep on making mistakes by playing into specific cards.

    • @popeneiad7968
      @popeneiad7968 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well what decks are you playing? That would be a good start

    • @wraxiusgaming
      @wraxiusgaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@popeneiad7968 I'm currently playing Pirate Warrior to climb, Mecha'thunLock and a homebrew Shuffle Rogue to have fun. I primarily face Kazakuzan Druids and Pirate warriors, with a mix of Evenlock and Quest Rogue, as well as the occasional Frog Shaman.

  • @majesticblobfish4466
    @majesticblobfish4466 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the vid

  • @stompy1231
    @stompy1231 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't hit my face XD

  • @warthog1590
    @warthog1590 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That misdirection.....

  • @alexandermartinez732
    @alexandermartinez732 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    LMAO! That was a fun first game

  • @rozkyfariza1449
    @rozkyfariza1449 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So thats what the title means.

  • @scrizzlybatch69
    @scrizzlybatch69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    “Exacties?”

  • @sleepyjoe333
    @sleepyjoe333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    10:57 hobbs moment

  • @felipegx4495
    @felipegx4495 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    22:00 too much anti-climatic

  • @thatguyfrominvincible
    @thatguyfrominvincible 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you will never know what I typed first

  • @duelistsdragons1789
    @duelistsdragons1789 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    HEY I WANTED THIS ONE

  • @31codyskater
    @31codyskater 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    modresh i think was a kind questionable inclusion. reckless apprentice and wild fire are what make the card useable most of the time.

    • @RickyMuzakki
      @RickyMuzakki 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He have multiple card that buff hero power like spirit, fallen hero and the 3 mana 2/5 elemental

    • @31codyskater
      @31codyskater 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RickyMuzakki yeah but without consistent use of your hero power it's just not going to be online most of the time. it's been a bit since i've seen this video but i'm pretty sure he never even got it active and if he did then it didn't matter.

  • @NSDaishi
    @NSDaishi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    people who tap "AFTER" playing molten golems need to be thrown into bronze.

  • @DrunkAnton
    @DrunkAnton 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow

  • @robertweill4790
    @robertweill4790 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Roffle I love you assassasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa