Both these guys are great historians who make great historical documentaries. My husband love history and I really love watching programmes from both these historians. Hope they make many more documentaries.
What an arse licking missive! How much more unoriginality and turgid re-telling of the same old, money generating effluent do you need to swallow? Why do her looks (which she is obviously all too aware of and is an obvious aid to her being such a telly tart) have to get any mention? Answer = because you're obviously one to buy them, like far too many others who swallow the verbal and visual crap served up to them. She and Kate Williams are a pair. Notice how they're both interested in the same things - mistresses, woyalty, sex, money, glamour, Royal knickers, whores, Tudors, Stuarts, etc, etc, etc. Could say the same for Woosey Worsley, but she's ugly, so isn't in the same category, but just as much of a bore. Men who are like this are the ludicrous "History Guy" (it's actually on his "up his own arse" website) Dan white as Snow and Tristam Hunt (for the sake of decency I'll leave out the Cockney rhyming slang his surname alludes to; but a clue is, that he is a self evident one). You might have noticed they're all silver spoon mass debaters. Britain crawls with them - always has. You're a fore-lock tugging peasant for your obeisance displayed above.
“Several life times”, yes there is so much to do and examine further! Love Suzzie she is genuinely inquiring and enthusiastic so wonderfully refreshing! Thank you 😊
She is brilliant as a historian, really knows her subject. Sam is a great historian also. I could spend hours just listening to them talk about the The Tudors and other historical subjects
I met her in Penhryn Castle in 2016 that summer she's lovely kind and down to earth easy to talk to even more beautiful in real life got to meet Sam Willis as well he's very warm kind and funny they are much more friendly than Dan Snow he was too serious and uppity of himself these people are just like us talk to them if you get the chance
What an arse licking missive! How much more unoriginality and turgid re-telling of the same old, money generating effluent do you need to swallow? Why do her looks (which she is obviously all too aware of and is an obvious aid to her being such a telly tart) have to get any mention? Answer = because you're obviously one to buy them, like far too many others who swallow the verbal and visual crap served up to them. She and Kate Williams are a pair. Notice how they're both interested in the same things - mistresses, woyalty, sex, money, glamour, Royal knickers, whores, Tudors, Stuarts, etc, etc, etc. Could say the same for Woosey Worsley, but she's ugly, so isn't in the same category, but just as much of a bore. Men who are like this are the ludicrous "History Guy" (it's actually on his "up his own arse" website) Dan white as Snow and Tristam Hunt (for the sake of decency I'll leave out the Cockney rhyming slang his surname alludes to; but a clue is, that he is a self evident one). You might have noticed they're all silver spoon mass debaters. Britain crawls with them - always has. You're a fore-lock tugging peasant for your obeisance displayed above.
Wo wee those legs , I was wondering at first because it wasn’t showing her legs and than a couple minutes in it did and I was like oh damn lol she is extremely beeeautiful ! Wonderfully unique beautiful hair!
Suzannah Lipscomb, David Starkey and Mary Beard are my favourite TV historians. (And James Fox if we can include History of Art.) All utterly eloquent without ever being patronising.
What an arse licking missive! How much more unoriginality and turgid re-telling of the same old, money generating effluent do you need to swallow? Why do her looks (which she is obviously all too aware of and is an obvious aid to her being such a telly tart) have to get any mention? Answer = because you're obviously one to buy them, like far too many others who swallow the verbal and visual crap served up to them. She and Kate Williams are a pair. Notice how they're both interested in the same things - mistresses, woyalty, sex, money, glamour, Royal knickers, whores, Tudors, Stuarts, etc, etc, etc. Could say the same for Woosey Worsley, but she's ugly, so isn't in the same category, but just as much of a bore. Men who are like this are the ludicrous "History Guy" (it's actually on his "up his own arse" website) Dan white as Snow and Tristam Hunt (for the sake of decency I'll leave out the Cockney rhyming slang his surname alludes to; but a clue is, that he is a self evident one). You might have noticed they're all silver spoon mass debaters. Britain crawls with them - always has. You're a fore-lock tugging peasant for your obeisance displayed above.
I think they have great chemistry, I love her passion for Tudor History
2.21 was a fascinating stage of the interview.
Both these guys are great historians who make great historical documentaries. My husband love history and I really love watching programmes from both these historians. Hope they make many more documentaries.
What an arse licking missive! How much more unoriginality and turgid re-telling of the same old, money generating effluent do you need to swallow? Why do her looks (which she is obviously all too aware of and is an obvious aid to her being such a telly tart) have to get any mention? Answer = because you're obviously one to buy them, like far too many others who swallow the verbal and visual crap served up to them. She and Kate Williams are a pair. Notice how they're both interested in the same things - mistresses, woyalty, sex, money, glamour, Royal knickers, whores, Tudors, Stuarts, etc, etc, etc. Could say the same for Woosey Worsley, but she's ugly, so isn't in the same category, but just as much of a bore. Men who are like this are the ludicrous "History Guy" (it's actually on his "up his own arse" website) Dan white as Snow and Tristam Hunt (for the sake of decency I'll leave out the Cockney rhyming slang his surname alludes to; but a clue is, that he is a self evident one).
You might have noticed they're all silver spoon mass debaters. Britain crawls with them - always has. You're a fore-lock tugging peasant for your obeisance displayed above.
“Several life times”, yes there is so much to do and examine further! Love Suzzie she is genuinely inquiring and enthusiastic so wonderfully refreshing! Thank you 😊
This is so fascinating. And Suzannah is a great historian.
She is a fantastic historian but as a male I find it impossible to concentrate on a word she says lol.
Haha! Even as a woman, I admit, she is gorgeous. I can understand your difficulty in focusing on what she's saying.
Catherine Heridis
Oh come on now. Anyone would be a little narcissistic if they looked like her.
Why do you say she plays games?
She has a double masters degree in history and other high distinctions.
@@greeny202ab Telling you can't say you're a man. You are very easily pleased.
She is brilliant as a historian, really knows her subject. Sam is a great historian also. I could spend hours just listening to them talk about the The Tudors and other historical subjects
Martini Dry why are you copy and pasting your own replies? Are you ok? Can we help you?
@@siliconjim2554 Patronising Penguin Freud possessing prat. PS: Don't use the Royal "we". It's so "you".
I met her in Penhryn Castle in 2016 that summer she's lovely kind and down to earth easy to talk to even more beautiful in real life got to meet Sam Willis as well he's very warm kind and funny they are much more friendly than Dan Snow he was too serious and uppity of himself these people are just like us talk to them if you get the chance
Yes I felt that way about Dan snow too lol
He did well interviewing her and looking her in the eyes, with that amazing hair and those fantastic legs she is stunning, I would be distracted!
What an arse licking missive! How much more unoriginality and turgid re-telling of the same old, money generating effluent do you need to swallow? Why do her looks (which she is obviously all too aware of and is an obvious aid to her being such a telly tart) have to get any mention? Answer = because you're obviously one to buy them, like far too many others who swallow the verbal and visual crap served up to them. She and Kate Williams are a pair. Notice how they're both interested in the same things - mistresses, woyalty, sex, money, glamour, Royal knickers, whores, Tudors, Stuarts, etc, etc, etc. Could say the same for Woosey Worsley, but she's ugly, so isn't in the same category, but just as much of a bore. Men who are like this are the ludicrous "History Guy" (it's actually on his "up his own arse" website) Dan white as Snow and Tristam Hunt (for the sake of decency I'll leave out the Cockney rhyming slang his surname alludes to; but a clue is, that he is a self evident one).
You might have noticed they're all silver spoon mass debaters. Britain crawls with them - always has. You're a fore-lock tugging peasant for your obeisance displayed above.
Wo wee those legs , I was wondering at first because it wasn’t showing her legs and than a couple minutes in it did and I was like oh damn lol she is extremely beeeautiful ! Wonderfully unique beautiful hair!
Fascinating, i'm going to have to watch this again or maybe even twice more to take it all in...oh well.
Dr. Lipscomb is truly well versed in her field. I enjoy her discussions.
she knows what she is doing.
Suzannah Lipscomb, David Starkey and Mary Beard are my favourite TV historians. (And James Fox if we can include History of Art.)
All utterly eloquent without ever being patronising.
"utterly eloquent" = ridiculous grammar. Unsurprising you approve of equally ridiculous "historians" on TV.
Yes agree 👍
So true
Big fan of "Susie".
What an arse licking missive! How much more unoriginality and turgid re-telling of the same old, money generating effluent do you need to swallow? Why do her looks (which she is obviously all too aware of and is an obvious aid to her being such a telly tart) have to get any mention? Answer = because you're obviously one to buy them, like far too many others who swallow the verbal and visual crap served up to them. She and Kate Williams are a pair. Notice how they're both interested in the same things - mistresses, woyalty, sex, money, glamour, Royal knickers, whores, Tudors, Stuarts, etc, etc, etc. Could say the same for Woosey Worsley, but she's ugly, so isn't in the same category, but just as much of a bore. Men who are like this are the ludicrous "History Guy" (it's actually on his "up his own arse" website) Dan white as Snow and Tristam Hunt (for the sake of decency I'll leave out the Cockney rhyming slang his surname alludes to; but a clue is, that he is a self evident one).
You might have noticed they're all silver spoon mass debaters. Britain crawls with them - always has. You're a fore-lock tugging peasant for your obeisance displayed above.
Martini Dry oh dear.
Is it just me or does her skirt keep riding up between shots? Not complaining obviously!!
We just wish it was ;-)
No complaints from me there with this adorable
Lady ❤ 💋 clever woman
Great historian loved her
Show's for years
Exquisite lady with beautiful long legs and a stunning body, a truly phenomenal female specimen.
Googles b hider immediately 😅