ISS Pass Over Hurricane Jose and Hurricane Irma 9/8/17

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
  • The International Space Station passed over two major Atlantic hurricanes on Friday, Sept. 8. First, the station flew approximately 250 miles over Hurricane Jose at approximately 10:10 a.m. EDT
    while the Category 3 storm was in the Atlantic just east of the Caribbean. One orbit of the Earth later, the station flew over Hurricane Irma at approximately 11:40 a.m. EDT. The powerful Category 4 storm had already brought destructive wind and rain to islands across the Caribbean and is forecast to impact the Florida peninsula.
    Raw footage download: archive.org/de...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    FOLLOW THE SPACE STATION!
    Twitter: / space_station
    Facebook: / iss
    Instagram: / iss

ความคิดเห็น • 122

  • @brmillgr
    @brmillgr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Would you look at that
    amazing curvature the Earth has.

  • @JonZoda
    @JonZoda 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredible, what a sight to behold.

  • @InfraredSpace
    @InfraredSpace 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My Heart stopped to work #SAVEFLORIDAANDENTIREAMERICAFROMIRMAANDJOSEHURRICANESGOD

  • @kariannlubin6178
    @kariannlubin6178 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super cool thanks guys!

  • @justmeonthebeach
    @justmeonthebeach 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep safe!! There are 3 hurricanes in the area.. Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Jose are on the same path with Jose following right behind Irma... while Hurricane Katia is on the Gulf of Mexico.. They said that water is BOILING at the eye of the storm, in red color...

  • @UberSkunk
    @UberSkunk 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    People need to explain to Alex Jones' fans here that a hurricane as seen from space does not look the same as a hurricane on a time-lapsed radar. Hurricanes last for days. As an example, consider that you can barely see the minute hand on a clock moving. Now consider that Irma will last for 10 days or more. If the hurricane was visibly moving from space then the whole thing would be over and done with in the course of a day. Even if the wind speeds are 180 MPH that doesn't mean the actual cloud cover is moving that fast. Because clouds are not wind.
    Admittedly I don't know why I'm bothering, it's 2017 and we live in the age of willful ignorance. It's not that people can't learn. It's that they refuse to learn. So if anything I'm not trying to convince you as much as explain that you need to try a lot harder if you're going to perpetuate stupidity.

    • @Michael-dw9uj
      @Michael-dw9uj 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed Skunk

    • @poitles
      @poitles 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      THANK YOU. PREACH

  • @new89yorknix
    @new89yorknix 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    at 3:34 you can see to the south/east of irma, little jose a few hundred miles near the lowest part of the vid towards the middle. really mind bending to consider how many jose's you can fit inside an irma!

  • @akmochiz
    @akmochiz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    NASA deserves better cameras

    • @jimmysgameclips
      @jimmysgameclips 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought they had a RED cinema camera up there

    • @IllyrianStrength
      @IllyrianStrength 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Aki Mochi Sadly, Nasa's budget is rigged by the idiocratic republican house, that are in denial of global warning.

    • @ChameleonMD123
      @ChameleonMD123 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      NASA doesn't want better cameras because too much detail reveals the fraud. Just like the moon landing, the grainy images obscure.

    • @99superjason
      @99superjason 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hmmmm maybe if we spent like a quarter of our nearly 600 billion USD military budget on nasa we could have better imaging, and maybe already sent someone to mars...

    • @new89yorknix
      @new89yorknix 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      same reason www.extremetech.com/extreme/134239-why-does-the-2-5-billion-curiosity-use-a-2-megapixel-camera

  • @giordanojeremy
    @giordanojeremy 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice planetarium footage

  • @LiveInTheNow247
    @LiveInTheNow247 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm guessing it is that quiet out there, crazy!

  • @Tsumami__
    @Tsumami__ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Irma is the reason why my house is currently full of drunk relatives and dogs

  • @EE-vp6xp
    @EE-vp6xp 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pretty amazing considering Irma is 350 miles wide

    • @hrrypittr1115
      @hrrypittr1115 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Edwin Everitt it has expanded to 640+

  • @philosopherofnature6469
    @philosopherofnature6469 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    emm.. it is beautiful

  • @DanielCorttez
    @DanielCorttez 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    omg :/ , ty John

  • @fvndee
    @fvndee 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What even makes a hurricane???

  • @Joshuaissa
    @Joshuaissa 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well Irma already fell on Puerto Rico :/

    • @nickalvarez3779
      @nickalvarez3779 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Joshua Issai how bad was the damage on the island? I couldnt find too much news on it from the US

  • @Rockerzbd
    @Rockerzbd 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    it looks innocent

  • @dudamarochio2123
    @dudamarochio2123 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mês passado

  • @bambamwiggy7039
    @bambamwiggy7039 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful CGI

  • @TheJoU50
    @TheJoU50 7 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    earth is flat!!!
    NOT

    • @muzosh
      @muzosh 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looks pretty flat to me.

    • @likofws
      @likofws 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/26QWMMT1c8Y/w-d-xo.html Earth is flat? Are you sure? hahahaha

  • @prabhnoor_
    @prabhnoor_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Are these storms directly a result of Global Warning?

    • @Greenleaf_
      @Greenleaf_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No, they are unrelated to global warming.

    • @piffyplays
      @piffyplays 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Hurricanes happen every year...

    • @rossw5720
      @rossw5720 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Prabhnoor Singh perhaps not a direct result of global warming, but the warm oceans caused the hurricanes to be even stronger

    • @m1sh474
      @m1sh474 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Not the creation, but the intensity and power is directly related with Global Warning.

    • @Dzonemp
      @Dzonemp 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes and before global warming we never had storms. If you go back 2000 years ago, nobody ever reported storms like these. Look up the last 20,000 years in North America and see what the temperatures were like. It might open your eyes and blow all the GW CC crap out of your brain.

  • @new89yorknix
    @new89yorknix 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    made in a hollywood basement

    • @new89yorknix
      @new89yorknix 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      the production value is astonishing

  • @azurithsarchive
    @azurithsarchive 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Second #pray4florida

    • @ladivpr
      @ladivpr 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leilani gaming u fir

    • @kennyplop
      @kennyplop 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ahah, yeah as a Floridian idk if we're f-ed or not.

    • @imporial5613
      @imporial5613 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      #prayforthesouthernstates

    • @Tsumami__
      @Tsumami__ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Leilani gaming Praying won't help us. We've gone through this before. We prep and evacuate, we don't pray.

  • @Lando6969
    @Lando6969 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its that suppose to happen when you zoom in the eye or walls, no movement? Im not saying is fake but why theres no thunder nor movement when the person zooms in.

    • @lon227
      @lon227 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ItsLobo Because the eye is the calmest part, but the walls of the eye are the fastest.

    • @Lando6969
      @Lando6969 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lon yes i understand that , i meant the walls not the eye. Thanks

    • @Andrew0you0tube
      @Andrew0you0tube 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ItsLobo Its speed is just 180 MPH, so approximately 1 revolution per 45 minutes, you're not gonna see it

    • @surajjapath6816
      @surajjapath6816 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      the ISS orbits the Earth every 92 minutes, so in the time it takes to pass a certain cloud in this video, it might only be 5-10 minutes. Clouds don't change shape much in 5 minutes, at least not enough to be noticeable from 400+km away. Distance makes things appear slower

    • @surajjapath6816
      @surajjapath6816 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dave Johnson, What do you suggest instead of this called Space?

  • @ClarenceCM3
    @ClarenceCM3 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is an Act of God! Prove me wrong in 2 talking points organized in a coherent paragraph with linked References... Go!!!

    • @FCLuzern1901s
      @FCLuzern1901s 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This causality makes no freakin sense.. you're the one who makes a statement that its an act of god! You're the one who has to prove! I can argue with you on a neutral scientific base but only if you let go of the dogma that god is the reason this happens

    • @nickrulercreator
      @nickrulercreator 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      If god loves us why is he sending hurricanes to constantly kill hundreds, cause billions of $ in damage, and put thousands of people without water, food, electricity, and homes.
      This isn't any act of god, it's nature

  • @listentothisdream
    @listentothisdream 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fish eye lense curvature!

  • @nelsonvisconti222
    @nelsonvisconti222 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    FISH EYE LENSE MAKING EVEYTHING HAVE A CURVE. High altittde planes taking pictures. And flying through the eye of the huricane

    • @nickrulercreator
      @nickrulercreator 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Skipping Stone planes don't travel that high above the earth to be able to see all of the hurricane.

  • @ChameleonMD123
    @ChameleonMD123 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perfectly still clouds. So fake.

    • @polotiks-w7f
      @polotiks-w7f 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hurricane Jose and irma are not fake there real hurricanes

    • @ChameleonMD123
      @ChameleonMD123 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. But these images are fake. There are no satellites. There are weather balloons. There are aircraft. But no satellites.

    • @ChameleonMD123
      @ChameleonMD123 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does the size of the cloud have to do with seeing the movement of the clouds? Explain the science of that for me.

    • @nickrulercreator
      @nickrulercreator 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ChameleonMD123 the larger the hurricane, the longer it takes to make one full rotation. This is common sense. The ISS orbits once every 90 minutes. What you're seeing here is likely under 10. At the speed the ISS moves, as well as the huge scale of the hurricane, it is unlikely to see much movement.
      Think about it. When you're in your car and look up to see clouds on a really windy day, you're likely not going to see them move, no matter the direction you're traveling in. If you stood still on the ground, then yes, you will see the clouds move.
      But to claim no movement of the clouds is visible is false. Look closely at the eye and surrounding clouds, you can see they move slightly between the beginning and end of each pass over the hurricane.
      Lastly, satellites are real. When I look up at night and see the ISS, that's the only thing it can be, because we've taken photos of it from earth. It looks like the ISS, moves like the ISS, and your view of it changes, as if it were something in space. Can't be a balloon, balloons don't move that fast across the sky. Can't be a plane, because it doesn't look anything like a plane.

    • @ChameleonMD123
      @ChameleonMD123 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's not an explanation at all. There is literally no movement in the clouds at all when obviously different parts of the clouds would be spinning at different speeds, like a fan blade. Satellites are not real, show me some video of them whizzing by the ISS in space, there are literally tens if not hundreds of thousands of them up their right? You sound like a pseudointellectual school teacher trying to convince me a magic force called gravity exists that can somehow keep Pluto in orbit but not pull Mercury into the Sun. You don't work for NASA, you have no other information or evidence than what I have, this video, where the clouds do not move at all. And actually if you watch some videos of weather stations showing the hurricanes it actually says satellite animation! Why in the hell would they ever need to use satellite animation with a global positioning system? I mean the entire span of the "planet" is inundated with "satellites"! You then actually implied the movement of a light in the sky proves an ISS! Good lord. The ISS is about the size of a 747. At 7 miles up a plane is barely visible. You think you can see that same sized object at 400 miles? You think this ISS is dodging the millions of bullet size meteorites whizzing toward the earth at 11-72 km per second? Daft.

  • @tcathunder
    @tcathunder 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    LMAO totally fake. Notice clouds not moving at all.

    • @Walo3pjE
      @Walo3pjE 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Be happy go to school

    • @surajjapath6816
      @surajjapath6816 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      the ISS orbits the Earth every 92 minutes, so in the time it takes to pass a certain cloud in this video, it might only be 5-10 minutes. Clouds don't change shape much in 5 minutes, at least not enough to be noticeable from 400+km away. Distance makes things appear slower

    • @misterjoerg8086
      @misterjoerg8086 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Be happy What did you expect? A whirling vortex of terror?
      Can you imagine, what rotational speed it would take, to make it visible from that distance?
      It´s real, deal with it.

    • @wayneshilcock3027
      @wayneshilcock3027 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Be happy hey, you be ok to go fishing in that area then, considering it's all fake you know.

    • @ExpertAdviceTV
      @ExpertAdviceTV 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Be happy
      Yeah we know. Everything is fake and everyone is lying.
      Now go play in the street.