State of the U.S.-China relationship as countries compete economically | 60 Minutes
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ค. 2024
- America’s relationship with China is the “most important, most competitive and most dangerous” the U.S. has in the world right now, the U.S. ambassador to China says.
"60 Minutes" is the most successful television broadcast in history. Offering hard-hitting investigative reports, interviews, feature segments and profiles of people in the news, the broadcast began in 1968 and is still a hit, over 50 seasons later, regularly making Nielsen's Top 10.
Subscribe to the “60 Minutes” TH-cam channel: bit.ly/1S7CLRu
Watch full episodes: cbsn.ws/1Qkjo1F
Get more “60 Minutes” from “60 Minutes: Overtime”: cbsn.ws/1KG3sdr
Follow “60 Minutes” on Instagram: bit.ly/23Xv8Ry
Like “60 Minutes” on Facebook: on. 1Xb1Dao
Follow “60 Minutes” on Twitter: bit.ly/1KxUsqX
Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
As a Japanese, it can be said that China is not as easy as Japan in the 1980s for the United States.
China is way more dependent on the US than Japan ever was
@@mangonut 工业化的中国+14亿人口+巴西+俄罗斯 会崩溃吗？
With US army on Japan soil, Japan have no sovereignty, they have to obey US orders and destroy their own industry.
Industry is the core of strength, and China is winning in major industy, now China account for 30% global industry output and still growing, it is projected to be 50% globally eventually ; US 16.8% and declining. In only 10 years, US will lose the competition.
Well yea, China is massive both population and in size and from a historical perspective Chinese feel the need to be strong and powerful. A weak country will only be pushed around.
China is not a US vassal state. Sadly, Japan is a US vassal state.
US China relations are like two cats who hate each other but come together when it's time to eat.
I LIKE THAT ?
@@antonl3512 Yeah except one wants the government to control capitalism and the other want capitlism to be free play. You decided which is which. And i will give you a hint Apple has privacy rights in which the federal government can not find out about without taking them to court. The other will put you the jail without caring what your companies privacy rights are. This is why the U.S. is the powerful country, we give privatized companies rights and china doesnt. instead they steal.
😂😂😂😅😅😅
good one
Exactly, if you don’t come to the table to eat, you must be on the menu
As an expat living in China. A fair and balanced view of China is rare these days in western media. We need more of this.
How much Winnie paying you
Americans believe and demand fair and honest talk. A national debate on the subject of China is necessary
Serpentza is a start.
As an expat living in Taiwan, I don't think they're harsh enough.
Agreed but China is a joke in all aspects. I do believe the US has been extragerrating the danger, but that's okay.
Their system just isn't sustainable, even young people there start to "lie flat" (not even mention how serious the debt crisis that you don't often hear). They will implode without much efforts anyways.
no matter where u go in the world, the tech dudes always losing hair.
It’s not an easy job then
😂😂LOL I lost lots of my hair. I am Not a tech dude
这就叫聪明绝顶
can confirm lots of problem solving and time stress will do that to you especially if you have feelings like a human beeing
When they start losing hair in their 20's their evolutionary programming kicks in and says "You need to make a billion dollars if you're going to reproduce."
Judging from the degree of market openness, how many American companies are making huge profits in China, and how many Chinese companies are able to operate normally in the United States? I would like to ask, is China not open or is the United States closed?
There are many Chinese companies operating in the USA and do so with far far less restrictions, impediments and hassles. They don't even need to partner with an American owner!
Depending on the industry, many US companies get forced into a "partnership" for intellectual property transfer. Would Chinese companies be fine with this arrangement? Also, US has more regulations around labor, warranties for products, ect that make it cost prohibitive to enter the market.
I think it should be a 2 way traffic Chinese high tech companies not be able to access American company American market. they Chinese company , They also telling other countries not to get done business with China. How is that fair??
And the other benefit you failed to mention is that US might provide Chinese company with its abundant of lazy workers.
What? There are a plethora of Chinese owned companies in the US.
You know you are on the right track when your enemies said otherwise.
展亨利，美国不是我们的敌人
@@kimiedward5430 我没说美国是啊。看看Aaron bushnell这样的伟大烈士，我们始终寄望于美国人民！
Aaron bushnell 只是一个人行为，但是一个好现象。从谭嗣同赴死到新中国建立，中间还有半个世纪呢。尽量活久一点，看吧@@henryzhan
I know journalists have to lie to keep their jobs but are ambassadors allowed to lie blatantly in your face ?
That’s their only job! 😂😂😂
The country that can give its people safety, opportunity will win. Competition for that will benefit everyone
not always true.
@@JinKazama92 There's lots of competition in Haiti right now.
It’s what got 🇺🇸 ahead by way of slavery
National security priorities, which country doesn’t put security above everything else? When the US puts National security above everything else it's ok but when their competitor does it, it’s a major problem, especially if it hurts their companies and financial power. The world is not level!
It is called US exceptionalism. Also called double standards.
@@cr77702 You should admit that Huawei's suppression was due to so-called national security reasons. This issue was not initiated by China first, we just learned from it.
@@yunshenghe932 China can own US property. US can not own Chinese property. Fair trade or NO trade.
I vote for anyone against China until China opens up.
@@user-mc5ye5lf1iWhat were the national security issues?
Because China is a dictatorship that suppresses any dissent by showing up at your door. There's a gigantic difference
Is it just me or is 60 mins so back? Been some great stories last few weeks
It's you. They are an arm of the Communist in aMerica agenda.
Amazing reporting
They must have stopped being “woke”!
@@denniszenanywhere If you have blinkers on. Unadulterated anti-Chinese BS.
It’s you
What happens to " if your neighbor is doing better than you, learn from him to better yourself " ?
In this way, everyone will only be more tired, it is best not to compare with neighbors, what you need to create what is more efficient than comparing with neighbors
Well the civic advancement of patenting made it so that people actually had a reason to invest effort into inventing new things because they got temporary exclusive rights to sell them. It was and still is a significant contributor to the advancement of human civilisation. But when you allow anyone to use a technology that someone just researched, you've taken away their monetary incentive for having made it in the first place.
China is doing better and builds better.
The US: China is bad, we need to hold negative view against China, so as to slow them down.
China is developing fast.
The US: Chinese products are unsafe, they steal our big data. Let's forbid tech and products sold to China.
China finds solution and develops alternative tech.
The US: China could freeze 3 million cars on our road at the same time.
Ya well don't be creepy about it
What do you do if your neighbor is a thief?
BYD has 90,000 engineers. They can develop products & automation nquickly on many fronts at the same time.
Yeah!they are very good by stealing technology intelligence and patents of other countries!
Check BYD's February, 2024 sales. They dropped 30% in one month. It's over for the Chinese economy. You can thank dictator Xi for destroying the economy.
Yes & it’s protectionism thats not allowing us Americans to purchase them which is a shame since they’re cheaper & better than Teslas, same with huawei
Saying 750,000 jobs makes the implications of total decoupling seem small. 750,000 people are less than 0.3% of the US population. The US economy added 2.7 million jobs last year. The real costs are a lot higher, of course, I just think 750K jobs is a weird line.
I think it's way more than that. Burns also said 60 countries count China as their main trading partner. It's actually closer to 140
@@Jkl62200 Most of these countries import mostly consumer goods from China, and run up trade deficits.
You should look at those numbers released by the US government more closely. Good gameplay as always.
they get affaordable goods though. They would have run both a deficit and much higher inflation without China @@user-4m9-dr80h4
just to think, apple does all of its manufacturing in china and no where else would it be remotely possible
American companies thinking India can replace China are in for a rude shock. China may not be easy to navigate but neither is India. At least in China, you can make money like all the big names are... Tesla, apple, Intel, Nvidia, GE, GM, Ford, caterpillar, Starbucks, McDonalds, Yum brand etc... Not so in India.. People are at subsistence levels in India with hardly much material disposable income. As for exports, a single Chinese factory is worth several Indian ones in terms of output. Ask apple.
American Companies are looking at Mexico. India is in the mix but Mexico is where you will see physical plants built out.
The problem for India is that it is an autocracy with bad human right records.
@@keitheirelandmore accurately it is called mexico 2.0. tried once already.
India had the advantage of an English speaking population.
@@youngc0930 And China is beacon of democracy and human rights lol.😂
Why wouldn’t the reporter and ambassador talk about Huawei or Julian Assange.
It would be impossible for his interview to proceed
Best questions in the comments.
Tf does Assange have to do with anything 🤡
@@benmirault5933 you haven’t been following it very well. Read his reports.
For what?
The ambassador's final comments consider China's perspective from the U.S. point of view. Unlike the Soviet Union, China does not have a need to export its ideology. What China needs is to become wealthier and stronger to protect its prosperity and cleanse shame - unifying Taiwan. If China's influence is projected globally and has the potential to replace the United States, it may not necessarily be a bad thing for the world. The global competition between China and the United States might be a blessing for many countries. For example, the competition between China and Japan not only brought high-speed trains to Indonesia but also advanced high-speed train manufacturing technology. If many countries hope for China's peaceful rise and benefit from it, the United States should accept it, and can only accept it. The world is no longer a unipolar world after the disintegration of the Soviet Union.
USA does not see any benefit from competition 'cause it loses for sure.
Yes but unifying Taiwan requires starting World War III and collapsing the global economy. The Taiwanese continue to vote for DPP and younger Taiwanese are far less likely to identify as Chinese compared to older generations. Therefore unification will not be achieved by peaceful means and will require the CCP to launch an amphibious invasion more difficult than D Day while Taiwanese, Japanese, and American anti ship missiles rain on the invasion force
China may be an equal to the United States some day but overtaking the United States in Global dominance and global cultural influence will probably never happen. There’s a lot of things about Chinese culture mixed with communist ideology that are never going to be accepted by a free market society. Just like how there’s a lot of things in western culture that just don’t work in China. For this to work out peacefully, China needs to learn how to be more free, and the United States needs to learn how to be more accepting… and China needs to let Taiwan go, that is never going to end well.
This ambassador is one of the few extreme ideologues in the US government who hates China very much. For example, he recently said (absolutely not willing to live in a world where China is the dominant player).
@@tycobandit
Certainly, the separation of Taiwan from China is absolutely impossible. The combination of Taiwan's independence and direct U.S. intervention would almost certainly lead to a nuclear war, pending an irreparable defeat for China in conventional warfare. Due to the ongoing political unrest in Hong Kong and the current retrogressive practices of the Chinese government regarding democracy and freedom, the implementation of a "One Country, Two Systems" approach through peaceful negotiations in the Taiwan issue has become almost impossible. However, achieving it through force is not entirely ruled out. Taiwan is merely a pawn for the United States, and if not for the Korean War, Taiwan would likely have been unified with China long ago. I have encountered Chinese individuals with differing political views, but I have not come across anyone (excluding Taiwanese Chinese) who agrees with Taiwan's independence. It didn't happen when China was weak in the past, and it is even less likely to happen in the future.
The isolation of the People's Republic of China has indeed resulted in significant cultural and ideological differences from the widely accepted mainstream thoughts and cultures in today's Western society on a global scale. However, it's important not to forget that Taiwan has successfully established and operated a democratic system over several decades, and mainland China also possesses the capacity for tolerance and absorption. In fact, before the fall of the Qing Empire more than 110 years ago, it had already established a parliamentary system in various provinces. Some provincial governments were even forced to cease operations because the parliament did not approve the government's budget, similar to the frequent budget disputes in the U.S. federal government. Unfortunately, this system did not bring about any substantial changes in China's power dynamics. Subsequent turmoil, warlord conflicts, and Japan's aggression during World War II have marred the modern history of this ancient nation. Today, as China gradually becomes wealthier and stronger, the country is regaining its confidence. Although a clear path for China to synchronize quickly with the world is not visible, if democracy and freedom are indeed universal values, their arrival in China is only a matter of time.
Very interesting interview, let’s assume now India overtake China and become the biggest competitor of US, what will the ambassador say? It is not about democracy, it is about quoto” who is on the top of the food chain”
You're giving India a hard time
YOU R RIGHT. IT IS NOT ABOUT regime,it is about money!DOLLARS！US刀了！
exactly！
If India overtook the US, we would congratulate India, since India is not a bully on the world stage, and does not want to destroy the west and rule the world.
@@loremasteringwion9930 who telling you that chinese gov want to destroy west and control the world?
THis US ambassador is a an amazing person to take on such a job .. huge respect to him !..... The US can be proud to have such people to offer their service. !
It is the bureaucrats that keep the country running, not the politicians who only care about their next election
@@HuskyOwner-bl1jf Its people like the ambassador the US civil service that keep my Faith in America going, the politicians elected on the other hand don't offer a lot to be optimistic about, on either side. The days of the great American statesmen are over unfortunately, its the age of populism
@@popinjay3000 True, there was. time when america produced Regan, Kennedy, Carter, Clinton now its produces you guessed it "Donald Trump". I don't know what happened
Leave it to Disney which preaches equality to explain their operations and even film millions of dollars if not billions of dollars worth of movies on territory that has act of concentration camps lol
This ambassador is talking sense and he looks at things positively unlike the MSM that tend to bash China day and night for the sake of bashing as part of anti-China propaganda.
Good lord Leslie/60 minutes! The global geopolitics has changed. The US and the West are concerned about national security in relation to China. Did you not notice the questioning of Tik Tok’s CEO by the US congress about American users’ data? Decoupling is an American and EU’s driven policy. China had to adjust its national security policies to these changes.
Why would the Chinese government care about some random person in alabama?
One reason that many foreign companies left China is because these foreign companied can't make easy money any longer due to stronger China domestical companies. for example, the FORD, GM car makers are losing market share quickly in China market. So why would they invest more in China.
Well, that's certainly a factor, but the truth is actually more interesting than that. It's cause the US is moving manufacturing to Mexico for cheaper labor. As China grows so does it's standard of living and that's causing stuff to be more expensive there.
It's finally gotten to that point where it actually costs LESS money to build entire infrastructure on the Mexican border to support manufacturing there than it is to continue using Chinas already built infrastructure.
Plus covid showed the world how unreliable it is for complex supply chains to rely on another country all the way across the pacific ocean. Any delays from that far away can have devastating consequences.
South America and Central America will be being built up here soon and overtake China for the western worlds source of manufacturing. Mexico has already overtaken China as the US main trading partner as of the last year or 2.
And they are eager for growth just as the Chinese was before all this began. Poor and hungry. As well as having a strong work ethic built into their culture, very strong, both Central America and Chinese have such strong work ethic.
是的，中美正在争霸地球，covid19导致中国封城，中国封城对美国的影响不亚于直接发动一场战争！想象一下，美国所依赖的工厂突然停工了，不再发货了，美国将立刻陷入混乱。所以从国家安全考虑，美国必须重建一条供应链，不需要很好很便宜，但是在危急关头可以使用。@@PherPhur
Moreover, they were also spooked by their western govts constant saber-rattling like ratcheting up military & diplomatic tensions playing the Taiwan card more intensively, more frequent close-up military surveillance & spying, FONOPs, getting its Filipino poodle to stir up SCS tensions, constant talk of de-risking or decoupling, adding more Chinese companies on "Entities List" & impose restrictions on tech investment in China. I mean, who would invest in a country when your home govt is doing everything & anything to make it more difficult for you to do so.
@@PherPhurNo no no no no，You are not right All The question is tax In fact, to Mexico production is only to Mexico to paste a label raw materials or in China in order to avoid U.S. tariffs
what they don’t tell u is foreign companies are losing this market and local brands are shriving
1.4+ billion even if it shrunk by 20% by the end of 2100 is still over 1 billion people !
The laws of nature will adjust the world's population to the right number, which is not a question for human beings to think about
20% shrinkage by 2100?
The best current projections say 50% (FIFTY percent) drop off!
@@ArmageddonIsHere Population will not keep falling, just like a market economy. When there are not enough goods in the market, prices will rise, and the market will expand its production capacity. When the population decreases and wages rise, people will naturally be more willing to have children.
As a Chinese, I am glad to see some foreign comapanies are leaving, because it means native brand are thriving and more competitive.
The young generation love homegrown products and be proud of our own products more than ever before, Huawei phone, BYD car etc. It may has something to do with national pride but more importantly these homemade product are simply just much much better.
Can this be a reason that some foreign companies are leaving: they are just not as good as before?
Yes you are right
Only a fraction of foreign companies left, but the most still stay in China. The investment is still swarming into China, because they can make money.
High unemployment in China is showing the world the true story.
Yes, honestly speaking, foreign companies did help push the local brand to be more competivitive@@JohnDoe01
哈哈哈哈 品客中学生 典 哈哈哈哈哈哈 笑死我了
Adopt what is applicable to you does not mean copying. Copying is also unwise.
在第一次工业革命的时候，美国抄袭英国的棉纺织技术，德国抄袭英国的蒸汽机技术，在第二次世界大战前，苏联抄袭美国的工业技术。抄袭或者说模仿没有什么可耻的，我想写一本书，难道我还要为此先创造一种语言？I AM NOT J. R. R. Tolkien.
People who bought unfinished properties not only lost their down payment, but also had to continue paying their monthly mortgage payments.
Should we speculate more whether communist politics is more efficient or not comparing to our democracy in dealing with economy?
communist is not the reason that china GOV efficient,but centralization of authority（集权）.真正的共产主义是没有国家，阶级，政府的。中国现在走的根本不是共产主义，而是国家资本主义。和1933年美国罗斯福新政一个套路。
no，Americans have not seriously studied the reality of Chinese politics. China is still elite politics in essence. The seven people on the table have the highest power, but they can’t solve too many problems. They must choose the solutions proposed by the elites in the industry in each policy.
The Chinese government has put on a ”communist“ hat, but he can give up short-term fairness for efficiency at any time.
The efficiency of the U.S. economy is absolutely not low, especially on Wall Street. They have incomparable efficiency to get the maximum profit. Don‘t forget that the U.S. economy has been growing rapidly, even if the factories have been moved away.
As a person who grew up in Beijing, I recall fond memories of the park that the ambassador ambled through every morning... I used to pass through the park as a shortcut en route to school
I invite you to accept the right religion Islam so that you will success in this world and here after thank you it is your benefit you save yourself from hell fire after death ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤.
Both countries need mature and cool-headed politicians to lead instead of the hot-headed ones that we have now.
The central planners aren't in the government. The transnational rentier oligarchy at the top of wall street (the deep state) does central planning for their private benefit, and they are the employers of politicians. The job of the politician is to deliver voters to the oligarchy by campaigning on whatever gets them elected with oligarchy funding, then do whatever the oligarchy wants, and they are taken care of whether they are reelected or not.
"Reagan’s election marked the ascension of deep political forces to a position of sovereignty. Practically speaking, what emerged was an exceptionist tripartite state comprised of (1) a feckless public state, (2) a sprawling security state, and (3) the anti-democratic deep state to which they are subordinated. This consolidation and institutionalization of top-down power was such that US governance could thereafter be described as a deep state system."
Good, Aaron. American Exception: Empire and the Deep State (p. 260).
“Today, the statistics are good. They reveal that 50 percent of the world’s wealth is in the hands of US-based corporations, even though the national account, GDP, is not anywhere near that.”
Chomsky, Noam; Waterstone, Marv. Consequences of Capitalism: Manufacturing Discontent and Resistance (p. 138).
"Whose ideas should lead the world? And we believe those are American ideas."
That sounds like it's from the last century. To me, it sounds like a naive battle, a childish kid saying my toy is more powerful than yours. No one in China, including the Communist Party, would say that China's system is superior to that of the U.S. The Communist Party has always propagated that each country has its own right to choose its own path, and that the system that suits its own situation is the best. It's a great pity that the US ambassador still thinks it's a competition of ideologies.Perhaps as an American viewer, this interview is very objective and the content shown is very much in line with the general American public's perception of China, but as an international student, I found that often the two sides cared about completely different things, which shows that both sides may not understand what the other side is saying. Unfortunately, the current rivalry between the two sides makes cultural exchanges very difficult, and in the long run, it will only increase the stereotypes of each other. Of course, for the strong side, the United States, there is the option of either confrontation or a soft policy, with the former probably being less costly. For the weaker party, China, there may be no choice, because the choice is not theirs. How to choose is a matter for politicians, but as ordinary people, we can choose to let go of our preconceptions and look at the other world with open eyes, more understanding and tolerance, and the world may be different as a result.
The CCP is poison for the Chinese people. Xi has purged many of his critics. Corruption is still running rampant. Youth have gone from "lie flat" to just giving up on life. The weather, earthquakes, tofu dreg construction, etc., is not helping matters.
MAGA！！！！
"The Communist Party has always propagated that each country has its own right to choose its own path" Well why do they support Russia then instead of Ukraine?
This sounds like doublespeak. Obviously there is a trust problem. It's the same thing with Russia, where Putin says one thing but does another. Let's see what happens
I do think that American ideas of governance are some of the best on earth, and that other nations should adopt them. Now, forcing those ideas on people is never gonna work. The only condition where we should militarily intervene to alter another nation's politics is if there's a genuine desire in that nation to install a democratic system. If it's a place where our troops won't be seen as liberators, our troops probably shouldn't be there.
@@BoliceOccifer people start to oppose America even without anyone forcing anything. America is so open that the ideas etc will spread anyway and some may want to adopt them but dictators and nationalist will get furious and start to hate America ans the west for just existing
That is also when their grip on the country will tighten. They need to protect themselves against superior ideas etc. That’s also how ISis, boko haram etc. exist, they literally need to use force to protect their culture or whatever from the bad west, even when the west did not use force/hard power. And of course its a threat to the dictators and their power and imperialism, ”western” values that is
Also at the same the west becomes a scapegoat
The ambassador got it right and his positions are both fair and accurate. Nice job on this documentary, it summed up exactly what the issues are and how critically fragile things are right now without being overly sensationalist.
Communist troll
@@rmf9567 And what makes you say that?
These kinds of coverages about China is just a waste! This coverages will never be shown in Chinese TV, media, or online... cause the communist Chinese gov block everything Western media, except what they can steal from the West.
I agree ,an excellent interview.
US is in great decline while China is in breathtaking ascendency. Be honest, 60 Minutes! Trump actually distrust Lesley absolutely.
As a Chinese I would say this video is very informing. It helps me understand what's wrong with China exactly.
To broadly swipe it off wholesale is really unwise. You are so young compared to thousand year history to accept to improve yourselves.
What??😂
What a load of hogwash lol
This interview is great , opened a window for a fair view of what China and US relationship is in 2024. But I don’t believe that the two countries are an ideological competition , imagine that one day India becomes the second largest economy in the world , will US still be able to hold the coalition with India?
By the time India becomes second, China will be 3 times US economy.
America historically has never been friendly with countries that start to challenge their number 1 spot.
i think they'll have an easier time giving it up to India than China because it's a democracy but they'll still provide resistance of course. @@MacrosFTW
@alandeutsch9987 You must be a simple child. In your eyes, "common ideals" must > "personal interests". Hope you can keep it up forever.
US is in great decline while China is in breathtaking ascendency. Be honest, 60 Minutes! Trump actually distrusts Lesley absolutely.
It doesn’t make sense that they would need money from banks to finish/continue construction when they already received the money from the buyer. Granted, people finally stopped paying but only after they found out their units would never be built.
Evergrande was taking money from both the banks and property purchasers. The funds were then put against the next development which is their secret for fast expansion.
The trade relationship with China is completely lopsided. How about a little discussion about that? As an example of how inept and reliant on China the US has become the US couldn't even make its own N95 masks during the pandemic.
Having a national currency as the reserve currency means that the reserve currency country must constantly export more debt (money) to supply the demand of the rest of the world. When this system was set up, the economist Keynes was completely against a national currency being the reserve currency, but he was overruled by US imperialists.
Let's go BRANDON!
skinny margin, why bother.........just take any old chance for a nice rubbishing of USA eh comrade. "America reliant on China" displays great ignorance as the polar opposite is true. China`s ppl starve except for the West`s food shipments. How about a little bit of discussion on that as you say comrade
keynes was a socialist git and wrong, the USD will remain because it is stable. It is stable because the nation is prosperous. The nation is so due to Free Enterprise Capitalism@@spiritofgoldfish
how come video only 26 minutes
If we watch 60 minutes in just 26 minuets, isn't that concerning?
lol
Very informative interview and reporting by the 60 Minutes team. Thanks.
The interview is monologue but the comments reflect a more clear picture. Interesting!
😂😂😂😂 The Tesla battery station was a demonstration site at Harris Ranch where Tesla performed traction motor battery swapping as an alternative to recharging its vehicles. The site opened in March 2015 and operated by appointment only but showed little demand by June 2015; it was closed permanently before November 2016.
It's not 80 million units that are unfinished and/or empty in China. It is estimated that 1.5 BILLION units are empty.
Chinese people live on roads and all buildings are empty. 😂😅 In fact 99% of Chinese buildings are sold but 20-30% of them are vacant, because rich people own more than one unit.
@@JohnDoe01 Yup.
So what..why Americans are judge and jury around the world in the places where they want to oppress for their benefits. That's what the war is. It's like having someone in your home torturing you.
When I visited China in the fall of 2019, people working for the government were mean--yelling at everyone, and especially American tourists. Also, there are cameras everywhere, constantly monitoring everything. Not very pleasant. Although the food was great and the average people I met were wonderful, especially dancing in the park. Still...things would really need to change for me to want to go there again.
Compare to how Asians, especially Chinese, have been treated here in USA, random attacks on the streets, some even got murdered, Americans have been treated pretty well I would say.
No one care if you come or not, trust me.
@@edwardchen9920no one asked your opinion.
They don't just yell at Americans, they yell at everyone. Authoritarian country. I lived there for 2 years & was there during zero covid from 2020-2022. Average Chinese people are lovely and are just used to taking abuse from their government & authorities always & just stay silent in the face of evil. So happy when I left that place for good. Very lucky to be an American.
I went to China in 2019 and I absolutely loved it. The people there were so nice and welcoming and helpful to me whenever I asked questions for directions….if I get a chance, I would love to visit again.
Change the playback speed to 1.5x and 60 minutes cuts down to 30 minutes.
Wouldn’t it be 2x
60 minutes is really false propaganda against China likewise Against Russia and use the media in order to spread misinformation. that why today media is trying to win war through false propaganda it does not stick any more. I do not watch 60 minutes also television. also distort information to convince everyone.they are right.
I CHOOSE 0.75X
You maths is as good as the average Americans 😂😂
Informative research
How about Huawei/BYD/DJI/Tiktok in US?
They don't like competition, U.S. has always been a protectionist nation.
This is very objective lens. Respect to the 60 min crew. The economic problems and the demographic problems are REAL. But at least it is a positive sign that the authorities are allowing these interviews to happen, a big step towards solving the problem is recognizing it.
Agree with your comment
Disney is majority owned by China.
As a Chinese, many of these views are misunderstood and hypocritical. 1000%
Objective? How gullible can you be?
Objective lens ?? Oh boy you are so blind sided. Lets take a moment to realize the following, this interview is done to the US embassador....not exactly an unbiased source to tell about what they think they know about China. Second, only doom and gloom about China even thought is surpassed the 5.2% grown in their economy....ya know that's way more than what the US is doing...yeah totally not US anti-China propaganda..no sir nope.
Everytime i see 60 minutes, it reminds me of 'Marcel the shell with Shoes On' 🐚 👟
Ambassador,'we dont want to live in a world where Chinese is dorminating country'got me rolling down my chair,😜😜😜,the earlier you accept it the better
The difference is that it generates all its efforts in warlike corporatism, creating wars of all kinds; China generates all its efforts by investing in a balance between its people and its corporations, it regulates them to create true well-being, not wars to maintain its hegemony based on the law of the strongest, or by force, that is its best letter of introduction attracting other countries, which is why today it is more successful than the USA.
These two guys dare say that in China without worrying about being arrested?
China is a legitimate country, not one whimsical. You have lost basic understanding of China from a political bias.
@@JohnDoe01 Hahaha, an offended little pink. I've lived in China for 15 years and I know China is a dictatorship that is not shy about arbitrary arrests and detention of dissidents.
come on,we are in 21th centry
IN AMERICA 🇺🇸 THEY RATHER HAVE MADE IN JAPAN THAN MADE IN CHINA 🇨🇳, BUT TODAY WE ALL SEE MADE IN CHINA THAN IN JAPAN. SO WHAT IS UP WITH THAT ????❤❤❤❤
Blame everything on the union! The greed drove the manufacturing away and relocate to China. The Chinese are willing to work for less and longer hours. The Chinese created this economy phenomenal by working 10-14 hours a day 7 days a week! Average American are only to work 8 hours a day 40 hours a week.
OMG! This lady forgot how US deal with Huawei and Chinese electric cars 😂😂😂in the meantime, Apple and tesla still top selling brands in China! I’m American but I can’t agree with you here 😢
I invite you to accept the right religion the religion of Jesus Christ peace be upon him and His mother Mary peace be upon her and all the messenger's of Allah Islam so that you will success in this world and here after thank you it is your benefit you save yourself from hell fire after death ❤❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉🎉❤🎉❤🎉,it is light guidance and the complete code of life.❤❤❤
Even though China’s growth is slowing down but the economy has moving into high tech industries and the lower labour intensive industries are suffering due to high labour cost . As economy matures, high growth will not be able sustain for long period of time and overall global economy is less robust due to high interest rates and inflation.
Those American owned companies needs to be over here on our land.... wtf man! Bs!!!
They pay them pennies on the dollar in China. That’s why the US & others go there. It would be nice if all those companies manufactured here, but we make too much money and have much higher standards for employees.
You need a jet built?
Well, We Now have So many migrants here in the USA, we can build Factories here in the US and allow these Companies to pay these illegal immigrants less than minimum wage.
Boomers let this happen to millennials
This means US companies shrink
If US will simply focus on America's many problems that will go a long way to improve American relations with China.
Xi Jinping is not the sharpest knife 🔪 in the drawer.
😊😊😊
Trust Kissenger then suffering the consequences
It would serve our own countries if these company owners manufactured in their home country instead of chasing cheap labour.
The accumulation of original capital is often painful, and Americans have experienced such a history before becoming strong, before becoming strong, you don't want to pay, you will never live the good life you want
sounds like you need T- T- T - TAAAARIFS BAYBEE!!11!!
@@BoliceOccifer Saya perlu tahu sedikit bahasa inggris, tapi tidak terlalu fasih dalam bekerja, jadi saya tidak bisa mengerti komentar anda
19:35
It's even worse, those who put their money in those unfinished apartment has to keep paying even it's like that.
It's much worse than anything.
Painting a black picture of China.
Lol
IDK 60 minutes got me back hooked.
I think my biggest eye-opening comment made in that interview was when he described Our agricultural exports totaling $40 billion a year to China and how we don’t want to lose that, yet we handed $80 billion without blanking an eye to the Ukraine. Clearly, there is a disconnect on how to spend money in this country and what’s important.
Very true. Agricultural products that we subsidize too.
That $65 billion to Ukraine is actually going straight to the military industrial complex and all the American companies that make the weapons. Maybe a few billion to the pockets of the corrupt Ukrainian government and puppet Zelensky.
Us never handed $80bn to Ukraine, stockpiles sent were upgraded. US weakness letting Russia take over Ukraine will be its greatest strategic blunder.
It’s incredibly important that we don’t allow Putin to roll through ukraine. Appeasement is not an acceptable foreign policy to aggressive rivals
Most all of the money from the US to Ukraine ends up in the USA because Ukraine uses the money to buy weapons and artillery from US companies. This also keeps thousands of US people employed.
Helping Ukraine is a win-win situation.
"40.9 billion in agriculture, so we need this" meanwhile Bidens budget is 7 trillion...... 😂😂😂
I definitely enjoyed the honesty from the Ambassador!
The first concern is the allegiance American corporations in China would have to the US in a war with China, especially if the US economy slows down, currently, its GDP is 3%. Second concern is that American ideas are not working for Americans as part of those ideas hollowed out the industrial manufacturing base of the US to produce in China.
its 2% dont inflate ur numbers.
So true, just look at the Evergrande disaster.
how long can a tie get?
So it is ok for US company to collect Chinese data in China, but we need to banned Tiktak in USA because they collect data in USA? Someone please explain to me.
The ambassador says "it's complicated". It's really not. American food producers found a market to sell 20% more of their products in China and ramped up production to meet the new demand. The ambassador now says "we" can"t "afford" to not sell the food to China because of unemployement here. These agribusiness corporations could have simply been satisfied to keep the level of production where it was and ignored the Chinese market. As to the people who would lose their jobs, what were they doing before that? Of course we know who fills these agricultural jobs and they are low wage immigrants brought in to fill the new jobs created.
Capitalism is based on this sort of insanity. It's all about greed and now that greed is "coming home to roost".
Capitalism allows the markets to change based on demands of the people and markets that buy the products and services. A free market allows for businesses to easily change markets, and any workers effected by a business change or the business losing money and laying off people can find other employment in other growing business sectors of the economy. Pretty basic economics.
Greed boils down to the individual. Not Capitalism itself.
We certainly are in a grand global fight over philosophy. On one side is the West, whose ideals involve the more complex but durable democratization of public discourse. On the other is what a Russian friend of mine describes as the "Orientalist" mindset, the traditional and simpler but more socially brittle arrangement where lesser nations basically yield their dreams to the current "reality" (i.e. their regional hegemon) indefinitely.
Depending on which nations you ask, the world already exists under the “orientalist” model, where the West has the top of the heap and smaller nations have needed to accept this reality.
The real issue is that you can't leave China alone because they are too competitive. Efforts to contain them seem to fall short. Nobody really cares about philosophy since China doesn't export their philosophy. Nobody in the West really knows the Chinese system anyways.
@@henli-rw5dw chinese themself do not understand the system
But it work
That is the most important thing
@@henli-rw5dwChina's political system has been evolving on its own. All the political models in the world today are ones that have already been used in Chinese history. America? Equivalent to the Spring and Autumn period in China, the federal election system was used. The United Kingdom? It is equivalent to the political model of China's Song Dynasty. My guess is that Genghis Khan brought this political model to Europe.
@@WingkKong well I looked at it a little, there a lot of black boxes but it's not that mysterious
I love it😂🎉"this question for ambassador "
Very accurate report of China today. This lady should really stop cutting her guests off.
finally see some honest talk on the subject of China. two thumbs up!
There are reasons why after 6 years of de-coupling, not much has 'moved out' of China to countries like India. For every low to mid end factory India announces and boasts about with great fanfare, foreign companies are still opening 5 to 10 higher value-added ones all over China. For every billion, it's 5B in China.
India has shown themselves to not be a good ally PTO America. There are far, far better choices than China or India.
Can you give readers any examples?
Basf, Tesla, TSMC, Foxconn... Even Micron which India has been harping about invested again quietly
Low end manufacturing moved to western of China. For goods exported to US it now go through Mexico factories.
@@gliu1431 some have gone to vietnam, Indonesia and India also but in terms of sheer value, it has not been a lot. Some are doing so to circumvent Trump tariffs or outright Biden ban. And many of the factories moving are owned by Chinese subcontractors doing work for western brands.
This is an excellent example of lies by omission.
By Pete Okuhira
"China has raided seven American businesses in Beijing and arrested employees on suspicion of espionage, ambassador Nicholas Burns reveals",
Yet somehow fails to mention how the head of the raided Mintz Group firm was literally the Chief CIA Representative in China!
"Randal Phillips is founder and president of HFBB Associates, a strategic consultancy on China and Asia issues. Until recently Randy also served as managing partner for Asia of the Mintz Group, managing the group’s activities across Asia. He spent 28 years with the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Operations, most recently serving as the chief CIA representative in China and has an extensive background in foreign field operations, policy and program management, and leadership development. He is fluent in Mandarin and Bahasa Indonesian. Randy has lived and traveled extensively throughout China and Asia. He has managed worldwide and regional programs from Washington, has extensive relationships with officials and business leaders throughout the continent, and previously served as vice chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in China. "
I thought she was talking about New York several times there.
this is just a third of 60 minutes! WTF!?!!???!????
its free on youtube
60 minute episodes regularly have 2 or 3 topics. Not just one.
😂
Sincere thanks from Brazil, 60 minutes is a priceless gift to our intelligence.
👍
Ah, biased Western propaganda is your cup of tea? Then your world must be tilted and very small.🤔
an insult more like
The 'balloon spy' incident .....that's just tell you what to expect from the remainder of this episode 😂😂😂
lol at the Chinese i-robots 😂
There may not be a universal common system suitable for all the ppl all the country on the earth. Each country and its ppl has the right to choose the right system for themselves. There has not to be a consensus for everyone, ppl have the right to choose their own way.
Thus, it should be understood that when pro-US figures use the term, “rules-based international order,” they are not referring to anything analogous to the rule of law. Quite the opposite, they are using Orwellian language to describe a system in which essentially no rules can be established and/or observed, given that the dominant state has the prerogative to violate and/or rewrite “rules” at its whim.
Good, Aaron. American Exception: Empire and the Deep State (p. 42).
The US is encountering difficulties in Ukraine and facing widespread international criticism over the situation in Palestine, while also heightening tensions with China through propaganda and military exercises. These actions seem to serve the interests of the US military-industrial complex at the expense of American taxpayers and vital social programs that are urgently needed by the citizens. This scenario is indicative of the broader challenges faced by an empire in decline.
China is working on One Belt One Road , on Trades & Infrastructure projects .
The US is working on One Bomb One Road , on Wars & Bad Mouthing China .
All these companies are worried of the inevitable.. being replaced and never catching up henceforth..
U know shrinkflation is real when 60 minutes became 26 minutes 😅
In the past, the United States viewed Sino-US relations as only a life-and-death competition. The United States summarized this competition into two simple types: either the United States wins and China loses, or China wins and the United States loses. However, in the end, the winning party takes everything!
After four years of trade war and technology war, the United States has revised its Sino-American relationship to include both competition and cooperation, and cooperation is cooperation where the United States needs cooperation, without considering China's need for cooperation with the United States!
The United States does not listen to China's view. Why does it not define competition in Sino-US relations as win-win competition? Even if the competition results in China surpassing the United States to become the No. 1, the United States has improved itself in the process of competition, improved its social structure, further narrowed the gap between the rich and the poor, avoided the hollowing out of its manufacturing industry, and worked with China to promote greater progress in science and technology and improve the global environment. Increased global food production!
The American rulers stubbornly believe that the result of competition is that China cannot surpass the United States and the world cannot be freed from American leadership
' freed from American leadership" So you want China or Russia to be Global policeman do you?
You see things very clearly, the United States has always maintained a zero-sum thinking, which is similar to the gang society who is the boss, similar to the law of the jungle, Once the new Monkey King defeats the old Monkey King, the old Monkey King has nowhere to go. America is the jungle law mentality
Few things are ever black and white. Clearly the American Ambassador to China is going to paint America as the good guy. It’s his job…. As an American living in Beijing, I can say China has really challenged my paradigm. Again, I don’t think things are ever solely good or solely bad. I will say this: China is extremely safe, on the whole people value education and are hard working, there is a strong sense of community (how many parks in the USA do you see bustling with people every morning?), and having a government that has more control than citizens means crap gets done fast. Way more electric vehicles here, high speed rail, public transit, and delivery services are way better than the USA, etc. Does that make China the good guy and the USA the bad guy? No. But it you believe America is always right and everyone else is always wrong, if you see how polarized our news sources are in our “free press,” or deny the effects lobbying have on policy decisions, etc. you are living in a state of American propaganda and denial.
People like Burns is part of the core causes why US-China relation is so low. It is just funny to have Burns speaking of improving that relation. What a joke.
You mean the Communist government of China who wants to destroy America and rule the world.
That is smart about swiping the battery
the stable enviroment is irresaable for investor. Worker in China is the most stable factor for US investors.
60 Min used to be great
What’s wrong with this piece?
This is such a one-sided report.
Why?
They went a little light on China.
@@craigb8228
Indeed. Leslie should start her own independence side-channel without CBS’s corporate sponsors, where she calls it like she sees it ;)
Read about the OPIUM Wars, when China burnt an opium shipment and UK seized Hong Kong, which was returned to China about 25 years ago
Obviously you have not recently been to China. It is way ahead in advancement.
TH-cam pushes this video nonsense propaganda to me.
China is not communism, China is state capitalism with socialism characteristics.
A documentary about china and US relations but only western people were interviewed..
Chinese people still love tea, they go to Starbucks for the free wifi.
murican government working completely against china and then they make videos like that saying the chinese are the bad guys 🤣
750,000 Americans would be out of work? That's pretty small. Our population is 315 million. Seems its a price we should pay for national security and decoupling. Its a necessary move.
If the economic relationship of China and USA is of utmost important :: why this two kept on competing ??? If it’s tough for both to separate because both economies of these countries will be negatively and highly affected , WHY NOT JUST COOPERATE ????