ChatGPT: A Doctor's Nightmare?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.ค. 2024
  • Whoa, hold up! 🤯 37% of ChatGPT answers are deemed untrustworthy by real experts! 😱 🤔 #ChatGPT #AI #TrustIssues

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @ContrarianCorner
    @ContrarianCorner หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I'd venture to say that it's a much higher percentage of accuracy than the corporate media.

    • @PamelaJohnson-xt8hu
      @PamelaJohnson-xt8hu 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Doctors have to pay mortgages, insurances, rent, etc. etc. etcs. If you are healthly they don't make money, without mentioning some of them have big deals under the table with labs 😂

  • @daved4120
    @daved4120 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I've been exploring the best way to wire solar panels for an RV project, series and parallel, with positive and negative bus bars, solar controller amp requirements, inverter requirement specs, breakers, fuse box, cut out switches, where to place the amp fuses, all that and more, chat gpt gave an answer that would probably have set my rv on fire, i learned that the cable gauge (thickness) supplied by Chat GPT was way off, additionally it got the wiring order wrong for parallel, and didn't calculate the formula of volts X Amps = Watts correctly. Read, it's a lot safer than trusting an unproven A.I.

    • @skoparweaver7692
      @skoparweaver7692 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you need help from chat gpt to figure out how to wire a circuit in parallel you shouldn't be doing your own wiring. Read more about electrical theory and study basic wiring diagrams. I'm not saying people shouldn't do this stuff themselves, but chat gpt is ok for ideas, but theory and hard facts like wiring size based on loads going through them should be considered from a better source. Chat gpt will "hallucinate" because it's literally a better version of auto complete. Plenty of building codes, websites and books offer basic gauge requirements for wire sizes in cars and houses. The theory is the same even if some of the stuff different. Stay safe and don't kill yourself.

    • @daved4120
      @daved4120 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@skoparweaver7692 Thanks for the non useful help. I stated that a person shouldn't use Chat GPT for such a task, but what's the harm in exploring it, isn't that how one finds out if it's right or not? I have done my reading since I tried the easy way, I know what needs to be done now, and it's not helpful to tell someone that if they tried Chat GPT then they shouldn't be doing it themselves. I'm not an electrician, have no formal training, but I've successfully wired a 50 amp sub panel in my basement (to code), and many other jobs, all DIY. The point of the video in the first place is to tell people not to just trust Chap GPT as some doctors are doing, and I was giving my experience with it, if you have issue with that then just move on.

  • @MikeHuckleberry88
    @MikeHuckleberry88 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I did my own tests on chatgpt....
    Its a whole mess..

  • @zhuljinjager402
    @zhuljinjager402 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The best use for AI is for representative democracy.
    It will train on the votes and information from it's people, open source algorithms managed by elected technicians etc, and will represent us without bias as it can't have one

    • @skoparweaver7692
      @skoparweaver7692 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A true representative democracy would have kept segregation in place and countless other terrible ideas. Governing people by what the majority wants seems great until you realize the average person is a complete moron and shouldn't be trusted making decisions. What you want is multiple chat gpts government the democratic republic with a few extra AIs that have a court system to figure out what ideas the other AIs came up with that are bad. Then one singular AI to function as a figure head of our nation.

  • @Paogrin
    @Paogrin หลายเดือนก่อน

    and forget

  • @fudgeeo1609
    @fudgeeo1609 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They use google too

  • @benjaminford1863
    @benjaminford1863 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yeah Those critics know that their jobs will be the first to go. This analysis is misleading. Share what it said about brain bleeding. I'd like to second guess your claim. Also, if you question GPT, it's brief responses it will go into a deeper explanation. I dont like it. This just what I think. Objective truth is hard to get, from experts or language models.

  • @PamelaJohnson-xt8hu
    @PamelaJohnson-xt8hu 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Doctors have to pay mortgages, insurances, rent, etc. etc. etcs. If you are healthly they don't make money, without mentioning some of them have big deals under the table with labs. ChatGPT has "literally" nothing to pay. You get the point, or should explain it with apples? 😂😂😂

  • @Serenity-vn5on
    @Serenity-vn5on หลายเดือนก่อน

    There’s a whole building of millennials pretending to be ChatGPT 😂

  • @thomasaghotmail
    @thomasaghotmail หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's early....guve it time.

  • @Cyberduff
    @Cyberduff หลายเดือนก่อน

    So what you telling me it’s the same thing as the mind of a gen z teen

  • @micahfarrell7402
    @micahfarrell7402 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've tested this myself and found that it seems very left wing focused.

    • @ozbelltemp
      @ozbelltemp หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't believe it was at first, I remember reports of AI spouting "Racist" and "Sexist" things. So programmers "Fixed" the problems.

  • @LiDARs
    @LiDARs หลายเดือนก่อน

    When you make it woke… of course it’s going to be stupid.

  • @allananonimozeta9345
    @allananonimozeta9345 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pros that give clot shots... wgaf what the drug peddlars think