Epicurus’s theory is insanely impressive even with hindsight knowing how primitive their resources were, if you asked me I would’ve guessed that theory was from the 1800s
It's pretty similar to both Buddhisim and the jewish Ecclesiastes. Humanity developed it independently at least three times for it to turn out to be kind of right, which is cool. On atoms, it wasn't his theory (it was even earlier, by Leucippus) but he was a supporter.
The part you're talking about was neither unique nor novel. Epicurus was a very late Greek philosopher, and atomism predates even Socrates with Leucippus. From Plato to Aristotle most philosophical discussion of physics and metaphysics became concerned with topics like matter, form and essence rather than the composition of matter, but before Socrates/Plato and after Aristotle the discussion was largely between atomists (who believed in indivisible units of matter so small they could not be seen, that comprised everything in the universe and gave rise to the senses) and material monadists (who believed in infinitely divisible substances that interacted via waves in a kind of endless gridlock, often paired with the belief that there could be no such thing as a true void for reasons beyond the scope of a mid-length TH-cam comment). It's worth noting that atomism and monadism are generally simultaneously accepted by the empirical natural philosophers (ie "scientists") of today: There are apparent particles, some of which are even still considered indivisible, that have a finite number of stable states in which they comprise matter and energy, and there are waves in a monadic field or membrane that actually give rise to those apparent particles. None of that actually vindicates or denounces the ancients; They were operating within the best science of their time and came to different conclusions for straightforward and sensible reasons. It is a fun quirk of the history of philosophy that, for example, the Stoics and Epicureans were philosophical "enemies," often even ridiculing each other publicly, despite their ethics and definitions of a good life appearing extremely similar to a layperson, but that because philosophy was a much broader term concerning not only topics like ethics, meaning and metaphysics but also physics, Stoics were generally monadists while Epicureans were generally atomists, and this was one of the topics over which they would go at each other's throats in discourse.
No it's not. If you bother to really inform about it, you realize that it has except on some details pretty much nothing to do with our modern knowledge. And as you can expect for that time, it's just a bullshit model based on nothing. And when we say that Epicure was empiricist, it's also misleading, like just he said that knowledge comes from sense which fits the strict definition of empiricism but nothing about a empiricist method to get good knowledge like we do today. The true basis of that comes from Aristotle and his Lyceum, which made the best models of their time for pretty much everything that could be studied.
It's not that hard to figure out when you just think about it. Matter exists? Division must end somewhere otherwise we fall into the unthinkable/unknowable? Atoms must exist. Just use your mind, it's easy. Also, atomism was not invented by epicurus.
When I first read Epicurus’ essays, I felt like I was grading a high schooler’s homework on particle physics. Initially was like well yeah duh, of course atoms work like that (mostly). I had to physically pause and digest that this man wrote these words around 2000 years ago. That’s when the penny dropped and my mind was truly blown.
The idea of the atom was much older though, it already appeared centuries before Epicurus. Although I am an Epicurean myself, in all fairness it must be said that Epicurus just expanded on the ideas of those before him.
@@trnogger yea obviously he knew about what atoms were thought to be, but what we mean by this theory was impressive was because the theories we have of atoms now weren't made until the 1800s. His theories are essentially on point, and it's impressive because he had no tools that those scientist had when making his observations. Please don't tread on us when we want to express how amazing we think it is that this philosopher was able to accurately describe the world so long ago.
it not sad when ask how he should be killed in a way most fair, they thought that since socrate is the wiser he should have the answer he then said that he isn't wise , in trutht he knows only the extend of his ignoranc , he then have the realisation , that wisdom is when in the pursuit of knowledge (thus one's betterment) you know enought to know that you have much more to learn :you can learn/improve even more , and being content with taht is wisdom, it is happyness by knowing that if you know that you know nothing , then you could know everything .@@RandomVex
As brilliant as Epicurus was and remains: -- it's worth noting that he is standing on the shoulders of Democritus; a pre-Socratic philosopher who was the first to hypothesize and establish Atomism, i.e. the theory of atoms and the void.
@@v1x4z also democritus was shunned because his belief that atoms move randomly without any higher being pulling the strings went against the idea of "god's plan", so even if his work survived the church would have had his books burned in the medieval ages, in fact dante put democritus in hell in tge divine comedy for this exact reason
And I am amazed atomism has gotten as far as it has gotten too. It reached into the atomic age, but now has been eclipsed by grater theories of matter that show that matter is not quite separated into distinct entities.
being a man with social anxieties and seeing the horrors of the world through pleasures and materials, I couldnt agree with tjis comment better. Though I am also sticked to buddhist philosophy
Honestly, the best part is how savage Diogenes was to people around him. Man broke down egos simply by not giving a shit about social customs, and I love him for that.
maybe the reason it's so lacking in bias is because it's more or less all stolen from wikipedia? lmfao. the "sources" are in the description but conspicuously absent from the actual video. wonder why.
Because he used magic words like "atoms"? "Atom" is just Greek for in-divisible. Epicurus couldn't tell you anything about the properties of atoms. Go talk to a physicist. He or she can tell you a lot about the properties of atoms. Including the fact that they are divisible.
On TH-cam you have the advantage of showing pictures/drawings of what you’re saying in real time so I don’t think this is a fair comparison. It does work better than school though imo.
@@fanaticofmetal yes but I would still say you have an advantage on TH-cam since visiual content is a very very common thing and a lot of people wouldn`t watch without it. Slideshows are not as common/essential for teachers to do a good (enough) job.
Thats the problem tho they only do the " essential " and honestly a slideshow wont kill a teacher, if im asked to do multiple ones, i expect my teacher to do so too. @@Froahk
"When we exist, death does not exist. When death exists, we do not exist." Such wise words. Also, hands down, everybody watching this has to subscribe. This channel ain't got enough support, it DESERVES VIEWS!
He's not really taught at basic school but his name is one of the best known in philosophy/history. You can talk to literal middle schoolers that know who he is because they watched a video or something
Diogenes had my favorite theory of them all, although I think he took it to the extreme. But the idea that following your own code of morals whilst ignoring the social norms is the way to achieve happiness is a great way to live your life. I wouldn't self love in public though
If you truly think that is the preferable way to live, then pick any homeless encampment to go live in. That's exactly what you get with Diogenes' hyperindividualism.
@Arbidarb Again, as I said, He took it to the extreme. I meant more in general, the philosophy of not caring about conforming to social norms appeals to me. Not caring about how I'm supposed to talk to a female or how I'm supposed to be dressed. I do what I want and believe is right. And again, that doesn't mean I won't talk nice to a woman I like, or dress up like a clown to a fancy restaurant, but that's more about what I want to do than what other people want me to do
I'm going to say it: You're the TH-camr I wished existed long ago. There are many educational channels, but they don't cover these types of topics. But you, you simply teach, and teach quickly too. I don't want to read a 1k+ word essay or article to understand what made Socrates different from Plato. It's an immediately like when I clicked here. Your political systems video was great because of its simplicity and how well it made others understand it.
Dude, you popped up out of nowhere and made me interested in sociology and psychology, my friends study those things and they couldnt even make me. I'll legit buy some books thanks to you
Aren’t we missing the second half of the allegory of the cave? I remember man being released from his chains and climbing out into the world of sunlight (true enlightenment). The form of a bird in the allegory would be a living flying bird, not a puppet on a stick. Really enjoyed the video!
Yeah Also the so called now freed man returns to the cave to free his other people that were down there with him but they refused and laughed at him which is meant to represent the philosophers attempt to make people see and face the truth and help them but the people are ignorant. A really interesting Mythos must i say
The cool thing about these videos is that you give us enough info to make every topic very interesting, and the videos being on the shorter side must make people want to go read up on a thing you talked about. Maybe it wasn't your intention, and maybe not everyone feels the same, but it made me want to look more in depth into Epicurus and Diogenes and maybe even read more on philosophy again. You've got that "professor that makes you want to learn and actually know the stuff being discussed " vibe
Please consider covering some of the Enlightenment period philosophies, Nietzsche, the German Romanticists and perhaps Jung and Freud. I think they'd be great. Love your videos, always so enlightening. Saudações do Brasil! 🇧🇷
The idea of your content is so simple which makes it incredibly good. Maybe do a video on Markus Aurelius or a video explaining every tenet of stoicism
Coming from a Greek, great video!But unfortunately I found one mistake, Epicurus didn't came up with the atom theory, Lefkippos did the professor of Democritus. Hope I helped 😊
Socrates asked the questions, Plato gave us the shadows, Aristotle said it's all inside, Epicurus told us to chill, and Diogenes lived shamelessly. OG philosophers dropping wisdom!
At this point, become our teacher, you actually taught me what I was mean't to learn in English class, history class and art class lmfao. Free education right here, straight to the point. You've got a new fan!
I really enjoyed this video. Hopefully we can see more about philosophy on this channel. Discussing the German Philosophers will certainly be an interesting video.
everybody in this comment section is so impressed by epicurus to the point that the other ones are almost forgotten. (his theories are really impressive though, especially for their time)
he's not underrated, he's just recently started and is doing really well for when he's started, he's gonna be a massive creator one day and is definitely on track to it rn
This channel’s growth is the most impressive shit I’ve ever seen. Six videos and man has 84k subs with millions of views. He’s been on the platform for six months.
What I learned: I don't wanna talk about plato, aristotle and pythagoras. There is a cycle among epicurus, diogenes, socrates, which I call "purpose of life" cycle. Epicurus believes the purpose of life must be "to make people happy and remove their pain and fear". Diogenes describes happiness as" not pursuing money, power,and fame but to pursue virtue". I don't like his definitin of virtue. Here, Socrates defines virtue as" wisdom, courage, justice, piety, ... combining all into one, and that is knowledge". And the better person is the one with more knowledge. But this cycle lacks in the end and it completes when we go back to Epicurus definiton of the "purpose of life".
First, I would like to say how happy it makes me to see people react so well to Epicurus. I've been interested in true philosophy since last year, and time and again I find myself going back to the Doctrines and to the correct view of phenomena that happen all around us every day. My path to _ataraxia_ is not easy, but reading the positive feedback here sure is heartwarming. Just to add, but I agree with many here that this video is fantastic, and would love to see more content made in this format. A part 2 for philosophy would be nice, if you can.
Even tho all have their usefulness I agree the most with Epicurus ( who seems very knowledgeable for his day and age ) and Diogenes (gets extra points for shaving a chicken just to flex on other philosophers)
Please oh please keep making videos on philosophy! Your short form videos keeps on being fascinating to me but perhaps a more in-depth explanation of these incredibly complicated subject matters would be equally as great. I’d too love it, if you don’t mind of course, if you’d explain your own background/education.
Epicurus is one of my favorite Greek philosophers. this video only scratches the surface of his very interesting and unique way of viewing life, death, religion, and knowledge. it's also worth mentioning that Epicurus is not the one to come up with the idea of atoms, which were thought before him by a different philosopher, but only improved upon an existing theory.
Small note that I feel is important: Epicurious is a large part of why we call atoms atoms. See the ancient Greek idea of an atom was that it was the smallest possible unit of matter and undividable. Even the name is derived from the Greek word "Uncuttable." So you can already see some ways in which ancient "atoms" were different from the modern understanding. The other important thing is that the ancient interpretation of atoms asserted many false things about their "atoms" so Epicurus was brilliant, but his atomic theory is just why we have some names in our atomic theory, they are basically entirely unrrelated beyond the broadesr strokes. TL;DR: We named atoms after Epicurus' idea, but his idea of "atoms" is entirely seperate from ours.
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA W1D5 | Fall | เก็บแต้มของจริง คือวันนี้](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EciIAlCXg5k/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] “อภิสิทธิ์” ครม.อุ๊งอิ๊ง แย่งเก้าอี้กันฝุ่นตลบ “ทักษิณ” บงการเอง Iคนดังนั่งเคลียร์I 21ส.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/a_b-kItw2jY/mqdefault.jpg)
Epicurus’s theory is insanely impressive even with hindsight knowing how primitive their resources were, if you asked me I would’ve guessed that theory was from the 1800s
It's pretty similar to both Buddhisim and the jewish Ecclesiastes. Humanity developed it independently at least three times for it to turn out to be kind of right, which is cool.
On atoms, it wasn't his theory (it was even earlier, by Leucippus) but he was a supporter.
@@stefanofeblesverastegui8869some theories pass on, some theories are found later. its pretty cool
You don’t read so that’s not relevamt
The part you're talking about was neither unique nor novel. Epicurus was a very late Greek philosopher, and atomism predates even Socrates with Leucippus. From Plato to Aristotle most philosophical discussion of physics and metaphysics became concerned with topics like matter, form and essence rather than the composition of matter, but before Socrates/Plato and after Aristotle the discussion was largely between atomists (who believed in indivisible units of matter so small they could not be seen, that comprised everything in the universe and gave rise to the senses) and material monadists (who believed in infinitely divisible substances that interacted via waves in a kind of endless gridlock, often paired with the belief that there could be no such thing as a true void for reasons beyond the scope of a mid-length TH-cam comment).
It's worth noting that atomism and monadism are generally simultaneously accepted by the empirical natural philosophers (ie "scientists") of today: There are apparent particles, some of which are even still considered indivisible, that have a finite number of stable states in which they comprise matter and energy, and there are waves in a monadic field or membrane that actually give rise to those apparent particles. None of that actually vindicates or denounces the ancients; They were operating within the best science of their time and came to different conclusions for straightforward and sensible reasons.
It is a fun quirk of the history of philosophy that, for example, the Stoics and Epicureans were philosophical "enemies," often even ridiculing each other publicly, despite their ethics and definitions of a good life appearing extremely similar to a layperson, but that because philosophy was a much broader term concerning not only topics like ethics, meaning and metaphysics but also physics, Stoics were generally monadists while Epicureans were generally atomists, and this was one of the topics over which they would go at each other's throats in discourse.
No it's not. If you bother to really inform about it, you realize that it has except on some details pretty much nothing to do with our modern knowledge. And as you can expect for that time, it's just a bullshit model based on nothing. And when we say that Epicure was empiricist, it's also misleading, like just he said that knowledge comes from sense which fits the strict definition of empiricism but nothing about a empiricist method to get good knowledge like we do today. The true basis of that comes from Aristotle and his Lyceum, which made the best models of their time for pretty much everything that could be studied.
There is no way Epicurus isn't a time traveller doing a little trolling
Even his name is epic
It's not that hard to figure out when you just think about it. Matter exists? Division must end somewhere otherwise we fall into the unthinkable/unknowable? Atoms must exist. Just use your mind, it's easy.
Also, atomism was not invented by epicurus.
@@dreyri2736??? They didn't have anything to prove cells, imagine atoms, all they could do was think, because not even calculus existed.
@@dreyri2736 ok captain hindsight
@@dreyri2736now try saying that without the power of hindsight
Its crazy how advanced epicurus was
"ok guys
i have a idea to solve pain and suffering but first let me destroy your notion of reality in a wy that change nothing
why ?
WHY NOT"
You are not dead when you are alive...
@@freXamplim assuming the commenter was referring to his theories about atoms
@@tffbwd1 I know, but i find it one of the best ways to get rid of fear of death.
Yeah, dude had it all figured out!
When I first read Epicurus’ essays, I felt like I was grading a high schooler’s homework on particle physics. Initially was like well yeah duh, of course atoms work like that (mostly). I had to physically pause and digest that this man wrote these words around 2000 years ago. That’s when the penny dropped and my mind was truly blown.
I mean, we learn the pythagorean theorem at high school. Many stuff we take for granted is recent enough to know the name of the inventor.
The idea of the atom was much older though, it already appeared centuries before Epicurus. Although I am an Epicurean myself, in all fairness it must be said that Epicurus just expanded on the ideas of those before him.
@@trnogger yea obviously he knew about what atoms were thought to be, but what we mean by this theory was impressive was because the theories we have of atoms now weren't made until the 1800s. His theories are essentially on point, and it's impressive because he had no tools that those scientist had when making his observations. Please don't tread on us when we want to express how amazing we think it is that this philosopher was able to accurately describe the world so long ago.
@@trnoggerYeah, gotta thank Leucippus and Democritus
Why are u impressed? He was far from right, and he made up the whole shit without any evidence
“All I know is that I know nothing” is one of the hardest lines of all time
Also saddest 😢
True
it not sad
when ask how he should be killed in a way most fair, they thought that since socrate is the wiser he should have the answer
he then said that he isn't wise , in trutht he knows only the extend of his ignoranc , he then have the realisation , that wisdom is when in the pursuit of knowledge (thus one's betterment) you know enought to know that you have much more to learn :you can learn/improve even more , and being content with taht is wisdom, it is happyness by knowing that if you know that you know nothing , then you could know everything .@@RandomVex
"I think therefore I am" goes even harder though.
It's right up there up along with "I don't know everything, i only know what I know"
Bro, Epicurus was so ahead of his time that we didn't know he was ahead of his time for like 2000 years...
4000+
As brilliant as Epicurus was and remains: -- it's worth noting that he is standing on the shoulders of Democritus; a pre-Socratic philosopher who was the first to hypothesize and establish Atomism, i.e. the theory of atoms and the void.
Shame none of his work has survived, as many other Ancient Greek philosophers'
@@v1x4z also democritus was shunned because his belief that atoms move randomly without any higher being pulling the strings went against the idea of "god's plan", so even if his work survived the church would have had his books burned in the medieval ages, in fact dante put democritus in hell in tge divine comedy for this exact reason
And I am amazed atomism has gotten as far as it has gotten too. It reached into the atomic age, but now has been eclipsed by grater theories of matter that show that matter is not quite separated into distinct entities.
@@wsads420 holy hell seems like democritus was so advanced
This guy is my new favorite educational youtuber, he makes everything really simple while still getting the point across. Props to him.
Except everything is extremely oversimplified. You should still do your research.
Yep👍
@@pappi8338 Yes but for a quick overview it is perfect and it is a great way to look into what you want to study more about
this is true
Dont know about favorite, but he is definately up there for me. It's cool to see how quickly he rose
Diogenes is my favorite simply because of how based he was.
being a man with social anxieties and seeing the horrors of the world through pleasures and materials, I couldnt agree with tjis comment better. Though I am also sticked to buddhist philosophy
Shitpost philosopher
@@togrind_toseekreal 😂
Honestly, the best part is how savage Diogenes was to people around him. Man broke down egos simply by not giving a shit about social customs, and I love him for that.
@Spiritnick yep, he's a legend.
Concise, clear, and completely free of bias. A combination of these three is becoming rarer on the internet, and that’s why I love these videos!
Hes also pumping these out really quickly which is impressive
It's not completely free of bias, whenever you think that, the bias probably just suits your own personal biases
maybe the reason it's so lacking in bias is because it's more or less all stolen from wikipedia? lmfao. the "sources" are in the description but conspicuously absent from the actual video. wonder why.
@@MrBananun ok, fair enough, but what bias where you referring to?
@@MrBananun weak bait
Epicurus is obviously the guy who invented a time machine and got stuck in the past.
Because he used magic words like "atoms"?
"Atom" is just Greek for in-divisible. Epicurus couldn't tell you anything about the properties of atoms. Go talk to a physicist. He or she can tell you a lot about the properties of atoms. Including the fact that they are divisible.
@@peterknutsen3070 🤓
He explains it better than any teacher could in a year
On TH-cam you have the advantage of showing pictures/drawings of what you’re saying in real time so I don’t think this is a fair comparison. It does work better than school though imo.
@@FroahkTeachers can use slideshows
@@fanaticofmetal yes but I would still say you have an advantage on TH-cam since visiual content is a very very common thing and a lot of people wouldn`t watch without it. Slideshows are not as common/essential for teachers to do a good (enough) job.
Thats the problem tho they only do the " essential " and honestly a slideshow wont kill a teacher, if im asked to do multiple ones, i expect my teacher to do so too. @@Froahk
Recall what you say in this video tomorrow. I can imagine you'd struggle to recollect half of what you saw
"When we exist, death does not exist. When death exists, we do not exist."
Such wise words. Also, hands down, everybody watching this has to subscribe. This channel ain't got enough support, it DESERVES VIEWS!
A philosopher-worthy quote. Oh wait, it *is* a quote from a philosopher!
wrong tho
Please do one on the stoics! Would love to see an easier side by side of Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus, etc.
Marcus!
The famous Marcus
Would be interesting, yes.
How have I never heard of epicurus? He was so smart!
He's not really taught at basic school but his name is one of the best known in philosophy/history. You can talk to literal middle schoolers that know who he is because they watched a video or something
I've recently gotten into learning more about Epicureanism, and it makes me so happy to see people interested in true philosophy.
Hey, so are so many names on this list!
Diogenes had my favorite theory of them all, although I think he took it to the extreme. But the idea that following your own code of morals whilst ignoring the social norms is the way to achieve happiness is a great way to live your life. I wouldn't self love in public though
Diogenes was wrong to say, that we should follow our own code of conduct. We should follow the code of conduct of our creator, Jesus Christ.
@@pumpkin4391 I mean, Jesus wasn't born yet at the time of his life so you can't blame him for not following rules that haven't been shown to him yet.
@@pumpkin4391 That's just like, your opinion man
If you truly think that is the preferable way to live, then pick any homeless encampment to go live in. That's exactly what you get with Diogenes' hyperindividualism.
@Arbidarb Again, as I said, He took it to the extreme. I meant more in general, the philosophy of not caring about conforming to social norms appeals to me. Not caring about how I'm supposed to talk to a female or how I'm supposed to be dressed. I do what I want and believe is right. And again, that doesn't mean I won't talk nice to a woman I like, or dress up like a clown to a fancy restaurant, but that's more about what I want to do than what other people want me to do
I'm going to say it: You're the TH-camr I wished existed long ago. There are many educational channels, but they don't cover these types of topics. But you, you simply teach, and teach quickly too. I don't want to read a 1k+ word essay or article to understand what made Socrates different from Plato. It's an immediately like when I clicked here. Your political systems video was great because of its simplicity and how well it made others understand it.
Pythagoras had like 30 seconds of coverage so this definitely could have been better
Dude, you popped up out of nowhere and made me interested in sociology and psychology, my friends study those things and they couldnt even make me. I'll legit buy some books thanks to you
You explained the Allegory of the Cave so easily!
Plato was the first object orientated programmer, he kinda invented inheritance
And Aristotle practically describes classes and class instances/objects. Incredible.
"If only I could satiate my hunger by simply rubbing my belly" - Diogenes, when asked to stop cranking it in public
Aren’t we missing the second half of the allegory of the cave? I remember man being released from his chains and climbing out into the world of sunlight (true enlightenment). The form of a bird in the allegory would be a living flying bird, not a puppet on a stick.
Really enjoyed the video!
Yeah Also the so called now freed man returns to the cave to free his other people that were down there with him but they refused and laughed at him which is meant to represent the philosophers attempt to make people see and face the truth and help them but the people are ignorant.
A really interesting Mythos must i say
Just go watch the first Matrix movie.
I simply love that socrates,plato and aristotle all built their philosophies of one another like they are the big 3 of greek philosothy
They were all alive at the same time so it's not a surprise
I'm shocked as to how Epicurus was far ahead of his time
The cool thing about these videos is that you give us enough info to make every topic very interesting, and the videos being on the shorter side must make people want to go read up on a thing you talked about.
Maybe it wasn't your intention, and maybe not everyone feels the same, but it made me want to look more in depth into Epicurus and Diogenes and maybe even read more on philosophy again.
You've got that "professor that makes you want to learn and actually know the stuff being discussed " vibe
Epicurus was like "Why are fearing death when you could just not"
Please consider covering some of the Enlightenment period philosophies, Nietzsche, the German Romanticists and perhaps Jung and Freud. I think they'd be great. Love your videos, always so enlightening.
Saudações do Brasil! 🇧🇷
The idea of your content is so simple which makes it incredibly good. Maybe do a video on Markus Aurelius or a video explaining every tenet of stoicism
Coming from a Greek, great video!But unfortunately I found one mistake, Epicurus didn't came up with the atom theory, Lefkippos did the professor of Democritus. Hope I helped 😊
Yeah, he agreed with it
It should be noted that, apparently, Epicurus denied the existence of Leucippus entirely. Why he did, I'm not sure.
Plato’s theories sound weird at first but they have a unique ability to teach you how to abstract a deeper reality from what you perceive
Socrates asked the questions, Plato gave us the shadows, Aristotle said it's all inside, Epicurus told us to chill, and Diogenes lived shamelessly. OG philosophers dropping wisdom!
I love your way of explaining things
You should totally explain the different punk civilisations and their ideologies like atompunk, solar punk, steampunk etc
Just look them up yourself
The punk genres you mean
@@pappi8338stfu, you could say that about everything even this video about philosphers
those are called aesthetics lol
All religions explained?
All Norse gods explained?
love you content by the way, KEEP GOING!
Yeah. Epicurus was dope. I'd love a Chinese Philosophers next please! Zhuang Zhou is lit
This guy just keeps churning out banger after banger, please keep going and I will continue to feed the algorithm for you!
NAH insane content, respect. You gonna blow, Keep going
At this point, become our teacher, you actually taught me what I was mean't to learn in English class, history class and art class lmfao. Free education right here, straight to the point. You've got a new fan!
I really enjoyed this video. Hopefully we can see more about philosophy on this channel. Discussing the German Philosophers will certainly be an interesting video.
i love this guy even tho he only has around 4 vids he still produces quality content and all his vids are bangers
everybody in this comment section is so impressed by epicurus to the point that the other ones are almost forgotten. (his theories are really impressive though, especially for their time)
most underrated youtuber
he's not underrated, he's just recently started and is doing really well for when he's started, he's gonna be a massive creator one day and is definitely on track to it rn
Here just for Diogenes
Very helpful for my upcoming philosophy class
You're is going to be a huge creator on youtube, I just know it
These were tier 1 philosophers. I am now waiting for the tier 2, numbering Anaxagoras.
This content is actually really good!
This is great. A guide to philosophers delivered to me on a dinner plato
Loving the content! Thank you so much!
So was epicurus just had a glimpse of the future, and took what understanding he could get from that flash.
This is my favourite channel on TH-cam now.
This was my favorite of your videos so far
just found this channel and i'm really impressed with how easy to understand it is, i'm looking forward to watching you grow!
I’m taking a philosophy class right now and this was sooo helpful thank you!
This channel’s growth is the most impressive shit I’ve ever seen. Six videos and man has 84k subs with millions of views. He’s been on the platform for six months.
i saw this video when it was first uploaded but forgot to comment. Great video, kudos to you and much support!
What's really crazy is just how close and yet so far all philosophers of that age were
I love how this simple and to the point content is popping off, good work man, wish you all the best.
I really like this video, the way you explained concepts of Plato and Aristotle really help me as a writer
Glad your channel is doing so well, good luck!
What I learned:
I don't wanna talk about plato, aristotle and pythagoras. There is a cycle among epicurus, diogenes, socrates, which I call "purpose of life" cycle.
Epicurus believes the purpose of life must be "to make people happy and remove their pain and fear". Diogenes describes happiness as" not pursuing money, power,and fame but to pursue virtue". I don't like his definitin of virtue. Here, Socrates defines virtue as" wisdom, courage, justice, piety, ... combining all into one, and that is knowledge". And the better person is the one with more knowledge. But this cycle lacks in the end and it completes when we go back to Epicurus definiton of the "purpose of life".
I can see myself coming back to this channel over and over again
im looking forward to more philosopher descriptions. particularly looking forward to the skeptics like Pyrrho, Stories about him make me laugh
Thanks for you. I am glad i can review all this info with your videos
I was vibing heavy with Diogenes until that last part but i was brought back with that wonderful line - “i am a citizen of the world” 😂
Short, but amazing video. Love it!
First, I would like to say how happy it makes me to see people react so well to Epicurus. I've been interested in true philosophy since last year, and time and again I find myself going back to the Doctrines and to the correct view of phenomena that happen all around us every day. My path to _ataraxia_ is not easy, but reading the positive feedback here sure is heartwarming.
Just to add, but I agree with many here that this video is fantastic, and would love to see more content made in this format. A part 2 for philosophy would be nice, if you can.
"In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face."
Diogenes
Epicurus was a time traveler, dayum.
Diogenes was, and still is, my favorite Ancient Greece philosopher, the dude was just the greatest Badass of his time
Even tho all have their usefulness I agree the most with Epicurus ( who seems very knowledgeable for his day and age ) and Diogenes (gets extra points for shaving a chicken just to flex on other philosophers)
Aristotle's ethics + Epicurus' metaphysics = gigabased
Been a while since I thought about some of these fellas
This is all stuff I realized from tripping on acid lol. On a different note epicurus was an absolute genius...
Please oh please keep making videos on philosophy!
Your short form videos keeps on being fascinating to me but perhaps a more in-depth explanation of these incredibly complicated subject matters would be equally as great.
I’d too love it, if you don’t mind of course, if you’d explain your own background/education.
“i’m a citizen of the world” goes so unbelievably hard
Bro is about to be my favorite TH-cam teacher
Let's go, new video! 🎉
I love you Paint Explainer man
I love your channel man.
I would love to see more videos. keep going my friend!
bro keep posting this is amazinf
Empiricus is the original G apparently. Blud solved the universe.
Love your channel! ♥️ Thank you so much for these videos 🙏
These are such good videos, I hope you're getting money from the ads I intentionally watch
Great video! You should definitely make a part 2!
This is the new only way i can learn about complex things dont stop making these
I already can't wrap my head around plato
this one good mr. paint explainer
Epicurus was a simple 2000+ years ahead of his time
Informative and well presented. Your Sir are a Gentleman and a Scholar. :)
You don't fear the death of yourself, you fear the death of others.
You should do one on types of fallacies
Epicurus is one of my favorite Greek philosophers. this video only scratches the surface of his very interesting and unique way of viewing life, death, religion, and knowledge.
it's also worth mentioning that Epicurus is not the one to come up with the idea of atoms, which were thought before him by a different philosopher, but only improved upon an existing theory.
I love how you don’t even introduce yourself and tell us to like and subscribe
he never did, and I didnt even notice it😂. still my fav channel tbh
I am surprised how much the comments favor Epicurus, when the philosophers on the psychology end could walk circles around him with his own ideas.
what i would give to watch all six of these philosophers have a discussion in a theater about their philosophies.
Small note that I feel is important: Epicurious is a large part of why we call atoms atoms. See the ancient Greek idea of an atom was that it was the smallest possible unit of matter and undividable. Even the name is derived from the Greek word "Uncuttable." So you can already see some ways in which ancient "atoms" were different from the modern understanding. The other important thing is that the ancient interpretation of atoms asserted many false things about their "atoms" so Epicurus was brilliant, but his atomic theory is just why we have some names in our atomic theory, they are basically entirely unrrelated beyond the broadesr strokes.
TL;DR: We named atoms after Epicurus' idea, but his idea of "atoms" is entirely seperate from ours.
"Now farewell, and remember all my words!"
Last words of Epicurus, the majority of his works have been lost
I am learning so much in just a matter of minutes through your videos. Smashed the sub button. Please keep more videos coming!