Which of the DRIVERS WILL BREAK THE RULES by driving in the direction of the arrow...
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- Hi, I'm Kendrick. Here you will find car driving tests, dmv written tests, learn how to drive safely and not get in an accident/car crash, Road tests, Interactive driving tests. You will learn traffic lights, how to yield, left turn on flashing yellow, road signs and etc.
All lessons and examples of traffic situations with cars and pedestrians, as well as road signs are presented according to the Laws and Rules of the Road and different state driver handbook.
For new drivers as well as experienced drivers, these videos are useful tools for understanding the process of getting a license and learning the rules of the road. Canada.
All tests are based on facts from the official driver's manual. Tests include all U.S. states:
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee,
Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.
![ผัวเถื่อน - ยูริ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P08ORRVDGl8/mqdefault.jpg)
As a Traffic Officer the sign is marked as both drivers are to proceed straight. The sign need’s to be replaced with “NO RIGHT TURNS PERMITTED”.
Agreed. Besides I consider it all one big intersection, a divided intersection.
Agreed. Not sure what country this is from but nothing I've seen in my travels in the USA.
IKR? And I usually only see yield signs AND traffic lights, when there's that right turn wedge, and the yield is telling drivers turning right, to yield to right of way traffic
To make it illegal for the red car to turn right I would expect the proper road sign that forbids right turn rather than the uncommon arrow to mandate to continue straight. This intersection makes no sense at all.
Sorry but both cars are breaking the rules. Red car as explained in the video. Green car as it has its turn signal to turn left at the first intersection. S/he should not turn it on until after the intersection.
Wrong. You should put your turn signal on up to 300 feet before the turn. The distance to his intended turn is less than 300 feet. At highway speeds 1000 feet is not too soon.
Nonsens because the trafficsign is not regular! It should show a disk with a red band around and in the white of the disk an arrow indicating “turn to the right” with a black band over the arrow. That is the official sign.
@@janvanlingen29that's an US American problem, although they committed to international traffic signs, they don't use many of them and instead created own ones.
The green Mercedes has a left signal on, prior to the first intersection. It correctly obeys the road sign and drives straight through - but signalling left at this early stage is potentially misleading to oncoming traffic. Drivers may think this car is about to illegally turn left and they could swerve or break sharply - which could cause an accident. Instead, the Mercedes driver should wait to signal until there is no danger of confusion.
Wrong. You should put your turn signal on up to 300 feet before the turn. The distance to his intended turn is less than 300 feet. At highway speeds 1000 feet is not too soon.
@@mikebarron5805 I disagree. The purpose of signalling is to clearly inform other road users what you intend to do. If you signal your intention to turn and there are roads you can turn into prior to the one you intend to take, your signal is ambiguous and potentially misleading. Rules about signalling a set distance prior to a turn assume there is only one place you can turn, within that distance; this is a case where those rules can't be safely applied. Sure, you need to signal in plenty of time - and you can do this, by slowing down - like you should do anyway, in this scenario. Within 300 ft of an intersection where you intend to turn left or right, you should not be travelling at more than 15-20 mph. That will allow plenty of time to signal at the right time, when it makes your intention clear.
@@andrewclifton429 You have a right to your opinions but if you want to "asume" something, asume you're arguing with someone that's been driving for 60+ years & happens to be an Emergency Vehicle Operations Instructor.
You're on the right track but your inexperience shows in your argument. As long as I'm breaking protocol, if you want to use asumptions to make your point valid, don't poke holes in your argument in your closing statement. 😉
@@mikebarron5805 However long you've been driving, and training Emergency Vehicle drivers, you can still cause an accident if you make an ambiguous signal, which another road user misinterprets. My relevant experience is this; I've witnessed a serious accident in which a truck driver did this very thing. He was approaching a major intersection, put a signal on early, and crashed into a car that was emerging from a side road, about 200 ft before the exit the truck was actually heading for. The trucker's signal make the car driver think it was safe to move out - but it wasn't! I'm not a driving instructor, but I've known one for many years; and he confirmed my understanding of current views on the matter. If you make misleading, early signals like this on your driving test, you'll fail. And so you should.
@@andrewclifton429 Andrew, how old are you? 15? You would really benefit by having this conversation face to face with your Drivers Ed teacher regardless of how old you are. SMH
You've witnessed an accident, I've worked over a 1000 of them, you know a driving instructor, I'm a advanced driving instructor. Ask yourself, what have I got to gain by lying to or misleading you? Nothing, that's what.
In the scenario that you offered the truck driver had the right of way, it was the car drivers responsibility to wait till the truck completes whatever maneuver regardless of any signals it was displaying. The car driver was at fault in any investigators report.
As for your last statement, there isn't a Driving Manual or drivers license test in the USA that mentions ambiguous signals or when not to use turn signals.
Have a great life. And good luck.
There are no yellow lines on the cross streets. So, this is one big intersection and the cross street is divided by a median. Therefore, green also breaks the rules
I chose both cars because the green car has its turn signals on at the first intersection, indicating a left turn there, which is a violation in some jurisdictions (signaling a turn you don't take - could be considered inattentive driving, for example). That driver should turn on the turn signal after he or she is well into the intersection or beyond it.
50 plus years of driving, 40 commercial rigs. never have I seen a sign as shown !!
I've never seen an intersection like that
Same here. I've never seen a yield sign under a traffic light.
Why is there a yield sign on a traffic light?
That's if the traffic light stops working
@@detvedjegikkedk I've never seen a yield sign on a traffic light. If the light stops working, it becomes a stop. Also never seen a straight only sign like that. It should show a "no right turn" sign. Also no lane dividers between first and second intersection. Very poor graphics.
@@JJVPYOU I have seen some traffic lights with a yield sign, but most traffic lights become a stop if it stops working.
@@JJVPYOU there are still some of them leftover from the 1950s & 60s before the DOT added all the new sinage.😉
This one is kind of tricky I think it’s the Green Mercedes because it’s going farther ahead then the Red Audi and I think you shouldn’t do that.
Never mind I was wrong
Doesn't the additional sign say you can only go straight at this intersection? Accordingly, the red car would have to behave incorrectly. But if the green car simply drives through and then simply turns left, the driver of the same has also committed an error. The 2nd intersection is unsigned.
yeah, if there's ain't a clear way to see lines in the center, everything from the start from the "first" and "second" is a single intersection.
Look at the crosswalks. It's 1 intersection with the cross street being one way, each set of lanes in opposite directions. PS, the cross street is divided by a wide green space median
Bit confusing
If any of the cars are BMW 's the driver will do whatever they want
never has a statement been more true.
No one. The arrow under the “Yield” sign is not recognized traffic sign. Either a sign that reads “No Right Turn”, or an arrow pointing straight ahead that is painted on the road surface in that lane would be recognized traffic control signs.
Courtesy of Half Vast
Wrong. Re read the drivers manual. This time look at the pictures.😂
In addition the first cross street should be marked at the left of the intersection “DO NOT ENTER one way traffic”.
I think the bigger take away is… if most drivers are getting these videos wrong ,,, it ain’t THEM!!! Wished I lived in a country where all the rules were the same,,, but no, I live in AMERICA!!!!.
If this was in Las Vegas, the signs would be covered in graffiti and unreadable and the white pavement markings would be faded and stained with blood from the red light runner fatality accidents.
Watched the video again. I forgot the number one rule of the road in America,,, traffic fines = money for local municipalities. My bad!!!.
There is no information in which direction traffic on a one-way road takes place, additionally a green car signals a left turn into the nearest road, what the hell is going on?
It's a big intersection. Look at the crosswalks.
I vote 3) Both because the sign means straight only. But it's unclear if that sign if just for the right lane or both lanes. In cases like this, arrows are painted on the road and signs are strung overhead. Plus, a yield sign under a traffic signal makes no sense. It's also unclear if this is crossing a divided highway and whether or the far left turn is allowed. So, as with a lot of your scenarios, this intersection is just very poorly marked and so the fault lies mainly with the drugs that the road engineer was on when he designed this intersection, rather than either car driver. A decent lawyer could get either of these drivers out of their tickets just by presenting the image of this intersection from your video to the judge.
Use of the improper sign does not make the red car at fault for traffic violations for turning. The yield over an only sign arrow that is denoted as straight is to yield while traversing that direction only.
It looks like one intersection to me, with a big median in the middle of it!
I thought this first. But in that case, there should be some do not enter signs on the left side of the first intersection and on the right side of the second.
The sing indicating straight only is not easily read or interpreted in this video since the word "only" cannot be clearly seen.
The roads have white lines. So why isn't this entire image a single intersection?
Why are there no lines painted on the road just past the first intersection?
seem like both will break the rules since there is a sign saying straight only
Kendrick needs to inform us as to where these scenarios take place. I have NEVER seen the "Straight Through" sign shown here, and it's too small in this video. Also, signs that apply to multiple lanes need to be placed where they are visible to both lanes = overhead.
There have been other videos by Kendrick that use signs not seen anywhere I have lived, like the US west coast, Colorado, and have traveled states between those.
At :04 seconds Kendrick is misspelled.
They are both on the wrong side of the road to start with.
Is your name Kendrick or Kedrick as it says on screen?
Thank God you're not my instructor
This road situation doesnt exist in real life.
My Answer is 4 No One Will Break
Both will breaj thee rules
Ɓoth2car break roll
both break the rules
I take exception with a Yield sign and Traffic light controlling an intersection. What does it mean? Can you procede on red if there is no cross traffic?? I don't think so. This is a made up thing that I think doesn't actual;ly exist. Correct me if I'm wrong - PLEASE.
Actually there's no traffic sign going straight with the green light.
The yield sign takes control over the intersection in case the light is off for any reason.
This is a trick question. Both cars will break the rules and here is why. At the first intersection we see the horizontal roadway is a one-way street with traffic flowing from right to left, which is why the red car cannot turn right into oncoming traffic. The second intersection is also a one-way street as denoted by the white line partially obscured by the tree/bush. One-way streets are NEVER 'stacked' with two one-way streets going the same direction within a block of each other, they alternate back and forth each block which means that since the first block is going right to left, the second block is going left to right meaning the green car cannot make a left-hand turn into oncoming traffic.
The majority of your videos include make-believe scenarios and situations and I pray that I never encounter anyone who has learned to drive by watching them.
Where are the signs indicating it's a one way road? If you get a ticket from an officer in this situation as the red car and there are no signs indicating it's a one way road, you have a solid ground to fight your ticket in court.
Which you should absolutely do since it's your right
The red car
Red
This intersection layout breaks all the rules also with only one trafficlight and poor visibilety so the green car can get away with anything
Red car
Blue
NEXT TIME PUT A PLATE = NO TURN LEFT AND THE NEXT ROAD PUT A PLATE FOR TURN LEFT .
LIKE THAT WILL HELP ALL DRIVER AND LESS ACCIDENT
4
1
4
3
1
3
1
3
2
4
1
2
3
4
1
4
There is a straight-only arrow. The red car can not turn right. the left turn is in the next intersection he can turn left
i have never seen a go straight sign, usually they will say no right turn or left turn
Hi Kendrick' s where do you live ?
Sometimes the "instructor" is wrong.
Sometimes the lesson is also a test. In this case he didn't point out all of the clues.😉
And often times the "instructor" is stupid. It seems like he's not a real "instructor" at all, just pretending to be one.
The red car is definitely breaking the rule because there’s a forward direction only yield sign. This means that the red car must not only go straight but also yield to traffic coming from any of the three sides. The green car must yield as well if there’s oncoming traffic.
The red car doesn't have to obey the yield sign, the traffic light supersedes it
It appears to me that both horizontal streets belong to the same intersection. Therefore, green can only go straight.
Have you ever seen an intersection like this? I know I haven't.
@@saucecastillo460Whether or not such an intersection is realistic is a question to the original video. In my experience, most controlled intersections have clear lights and lines indicating where the other side of the intersection is. For the case in the video, since there are no lights other than the green one, I can only assume that the pedestrian lines indicate the scope of the intersection.
@@royitaqi I agree with you, but even if you remove the signs, there's nothing stopping the red car from going straight
@@saucecastillo460 I don't think I get your point. I didn't say there is anything stopping the red car from going straight. So I think I'm missing some pieces which can link your comment to mine and to the question in the video.
@@royitaqi when you referenced green, were you referring to the light? If so,I thought you were talking about the car
This one I needed to be exposed to. Thank you.
1
1
Green Meredes signals too early! Both violate rules.
When should they signal?
@@saucecastillo460 prior to the turning point behind the last crossroads.
@@ghlscitel6714 they're doing that
@@saucecastillo460 The green Meredes not.
@@ghlscitel6714 based on the arrow, they're signaling when they need to be. Where are you saying they should signal?
The traffic sign is misleading. When green right turn should be allowed.
three