Detailed tour around a Republic F-105 Thunderchief - Century Series Ep. 5

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 97

  • @PaulStewartAviation
    @PaulStewartAviation  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Thanks for watching everyone! Actually it's a Republic F-105, not a North American! Sorry about that!!

    • @jamesvanderwoude8413
      @jamesvanderwoude8413 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No worries! Can we expect a video on the F106 soon?

    • @NoManClatuer-pd8ck
      @NoManClatuer-pd8ck หลายเดือนก่อน

      When thou maketh a mistake about a plane offer thy correction without delay. First Epistle to the Canadians, chapter 4:1 -Paul the aircraft apostle.

    • @helios1912
      @helios1912 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Paul--are you going to highlight the RC/EC/KC-135 with a tour?

  • @troiscinq7650
    @troiscinq7650 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is a great video. Always loved the F-105 Thunder chief. It’s probably my favorite Vietnam era plane, F-8 crusader is in close contention. There is something endearing about a plane that has to complete a mission that is nearly impossible but still fly’s it tough

  • @SaturnCanuck
    @SaturnCanuck 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Ya gotta love the Thud. I love how a big bomber like this is called a fighter. In reality she was a fighter bomber. Alexander Kartvelli, we are not worthy. Can't wait for the F-106

    • @thelandofnod123
      @thelandofnod123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Like the F-111.

    • @SaturnCanuck
      @SaturnCanuck 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thelandofnod123 Yes true

  • @NoManClatuer-pd8ck
    @NoManClatuer-pd8ck หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    She gets such flak for being what she was meant to be. I think she's a beauty. Plus she actually has 27.5 a2a victories and she's a bomber. A bomber. Respect.

    • @Reggie-b3e
      @Reggie-b3e 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      A Mig-killer with beautiful lines! ❤ the F-105!!

  • @briandenison2325
    @briandenison2325 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    What a gorgeous beast. My favorite Cold War aircraft.

  • @Reggie-b3e
    @Reggie-b3e 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thanks 4 the walk-around Paul! ❤ the F-105 "Thunderchief" dude!!

  • @toddbroeker187
    @toddbroeker187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Got to give a lot of credit to the NMUSAF for letting you get up close to all these aircraft. Makes your videos even that more special.

    • @PaulStewartAviation
      @PaulStewartAviation  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Absolutely! They let me in early to film before the regular opening hours so I'm very much in their debt! PIMA were also very helpful, the Smithsonian less so...

    • @toddbroeker187
      @toddbroeker187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Awesome, I've been to all three museums. keep up the great work!@@PaulStewartAviation

  • @zoperxplex
    @zoperxplex 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    It seems that Republic managed to design an early example of a stealth aircraft by accident.

    • @Einwetok
      @Einwetok 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      YB35's had similar issues, although those were early radars.

  • @well-blazeredman6187
    @well-blazeredman6187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Good video. Liked those perspex panels.
    Enjoyed reading 'Thud Ridge', by Colonel Jack Broughton, a little while back.

  • @user-tn1vc1xz5d
    @user-tn1vc1xz5d 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Yes yes yes yes 😂😂😂 one of my favourites 🥰🥰🥰🥰. Thanks Paul, raining outside happy inside.

  • @Calebs_Aviation
    @Calebs_Aviation หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fabulous video mate! I saw the post on your page about this video which apparently I haven’t seen as I’ve watched all the other videos in this series! This one was great too, I think this one may be my favorite beating out the Delta Dart!
    Cheers mate! 🥂
    What a great video

  • @rob737700
    @rob737700 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    One of my favorites since learning about this jet while reading "Thud Ridge" as a kid. Thanks for another great video.

  • @TheHobartAviationFan
    @TheHobartAviationFan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Beautiful plane!

  • @roberttalarsky4238
    @roberttalarsky4238 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great show thanks for your hard work

  • @flanerpete2040
    @flanerpete2040 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I remember them during my Air Force tours in Vietnam...

    • @guaporeturns9472
      @guaporeturns9472 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Over half of the total production run was lost in Vietnam. This plane fought hard

  • @ironman7261
    @ironman7261 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great informative video was struck on who big a plane they were seeing them for the first time.

  • @MikeG42
    @MikeG42 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great video Paul. A nice Vietnam era plane.

  • @joeg5414
    @joeg5414 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I was at a customers house last week and saw his license plate said "thud." I knew immediately what it was. Made his day when I asked if he was an F105 pilot. Said very few people know what it's in reference to.
    I'll have to get more info from him next time I'm there.

  • @lynnpreuninger5050
    @lynnpreuninger5050 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice video. I remember the F-105Ds flying low level across our farm. They were from Carswell AFB. These were Thunderstick equipped 105s. Great memories.

  • @davidcole333
    @davidcole333 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    While you were at the USAF Museum, did you get any footage of SCAT XXVII, the F-4 Phantom piloted by Colonel Robin Olds? This video of the F-105 reminds me so much of the famous mission Colonel Olds orchestrated to bring out the Migs for a dogfight.

    • @PaulStewartAviation
      @PaulStewartAviation  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think I've filmed everything with my 'whole museum' video so you should see it there. It might take me a few years to finish editing, though :)

  • @noobepro_7146
    @noobepro_7146 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Lucky for us. We do not need waiting for century for this video to come out

  • @daniellatimer1876
    @daniellatimer1876 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's a great museum!

  • @ChronicViper
    @ChronicViper หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Subscribed, this is my favorite TH-cam channel. Keep it up.
    -aero engineer and fighter pilot

  • @Mopar_logic
    @Mopar_logic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks Paul for another awesome video!

  • @erickenyon4457
    @erickenyon4457 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great informative video

  • @johnt.4947
    @johnt.4947 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm coming here 3 weeks old, but have to say "thank-you" Paul, for another great video. I might've said this before, but I enjoy your "nose to tail" descriptions, showing the smaller details of the aircraft, and explaining their functions.

  • @RobertCraft-re5sf
    @RobertCraft-re5sf 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    WOOOOOO I just saw a cool video with an interview of a pilot that was shot down in one of these over Vietnam. Dronescapes

  • @nobodyyouknow4319
    @nobodyyouknow4319 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    it still amazes me that this came just 10 years after the war, from piston powered fighters maxing out at 400mph to swept back jets capable of Mach 2.1. Today there are variations of fighters that were penned 50 years ago (F15, 16, 18)

  • @staralliancefan1245
    @staralliancefan1245 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another really enjoyable video Paul. Thanks for the explanation about the air inlets as I always wondered why they looked so odd on this jet.

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome Paul 👍✈️🇳🇿

  • @Einwetok
    @Einwetok 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice presentation! That plane was stuffed full of goodies.

  • @OldmanGamerYT
    @OldmanGamerYT 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I live in Ohio and toured the Air Force Museum many years ago. It's so cool to see your video about the aircraft there. Thanks for sharing!

    • @PaulStewartAviation
      @PaulStewartAviation  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're very welcome! I'm working on more videos from the same museum :)

  • @johnnyzippo7109
    @johnnyzippo7109 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great content , very well done , all of them .

  • @cdjeeyore
    @cdjeeyore หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This aircraft was a absolute beast. One of my favorites. It was designed to deliver nuclear weapons into Soviet territory. It would come in at low level then pitch up and lob the bomb and do a immelman and kick in full afterburner to leave the area to avoid the bomb blast. At least in theory.

  • @zackaryshipard8572
    @zackaryshipard8572 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of the best videos I've seen ❤

  • @caspercat39
    @caspercat39 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Superb video as always 👍

  • @Bad_Karma1968
    @Bad_Karma1968 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Paul u did it again ! Superb

  • @MrSinlock
    @MrSinlock 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of my A&P instructors had a big scar on his head from this pipe during his time in Vietnam. Said the damn thing got everybody one time or another when servicing the aircraft. 6:45. Would love to see you cover more Helos

  • @markbuckley4152
    @markbuckley4152 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great video as usual!

  • @azimutazimut3165
    @azimutazimut3165 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    awesome channel.. it deserves way more Subscribers !!!

  • @akabill79
    @akabill79 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Got my RM Williams and Polo Shirt on it’s time for my fav Paul Stewart vid!🎉 Love your vids Paul..What’s everyone’s favourite Century series plane?

    • @thelandofnod123
      @thelandofnod123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      F-111. Mainly because I briefly worked on them. Then the F-100.

  • @GRosa250
    @GRosa250 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent video as always Paul

  • @kirtreeves7777
    @kirtreeves7777 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its clear ypu really do your research ! I have learned things about the F105 that i have never even seen mentioned elsewhere.

    • @PaulStewartAviation
      @PaulStewartAviation  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! There are a lot of videos on TH-cam with someone reading of wikipaedia added to old footage. With my videos I hope to add something more.

  • @koh_ling
    @koh_ling 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video Paul!

  • @RyanN880EP
    @RyanN880EP 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yep. The airplane was hard to pickup on radar. Republic actually developed the very first stealth airplane and didn't even know it at the time😊

  • @NoManClatuer-pd8ck
    @NoManClatuer-pd8ck หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    27.5 Air to air victories. Pretty amazing for a bomber that could carry 16, 750lb bombs. One of the highest attrition rates for a USAF aircraft ever, 40%. Probably higher if you count "non operational combat related losses", the USAF being nearly as creative about 'missing curfew' as my boys.

  • @gavinhawkin6632
    @gavinhawkin6632 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can you do a Video on the A10 tank buster.
    You would have done all my favourite military planes then👍👍👍

  • @MaxPF-89
    @MaxPF-89 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A great video but I do miss the old flight reviews 😢 will they be back anytime soon?

    • @PaulStewartAviation
      @PaulStewartAviation  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I did one last week on a 747-8 ;)

    • @MaxPF-89
      @MaxPF-89 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PaulStewartAviationI would love to see Australia flight reviews again though as I do live there and love your flight reviews.

  • @thelandofnod123
    @thelandofnod123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting that they started with probe air to air refuelling and then switched to the USAF standard receptacle system.

  • @1shARyn3
    @1shARyn3 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    1963 model:
    8320 1964: TOS USAF. Assigned to 8th Tactical Fighter Squadron, 49th Tactical Fighter Wing, Spangdahlem AB,
    Germany.
    Ca.1965: 23rd TFW, McConnell AFB, KS.
    Ca.9/66: 4525th Fighter Weapons Wing, Nellis AFB, NV.
    1967: 355th TFW, Takhli Royal Thai AFB, Thailand.
    UNK: 388th TFW, Korat RTAFB, Thailand.
    1967: 333rd TFS, 355th TFW, Takhli RTAFB, Thailand.
    11 or 12/67: Maj. G. Guss; while clearing the aircraft of ordnance and racks in preparation for a
    dogfight with a flight of 4 MiG-17s, a MiG flew straight into the ejected racks and was
    destroyed. Date not certain. MiG kill not officially granted.
    12/19/67: Maj. R Huntley (Pilot) and Capt. R. Stearman (EWO) encountered several MiG-17s and fired
    at one hitting it. They claimed credit for a MiG kill but after a two year investigation,
    the claim was disallowed by Seventh Air Force's Enemy Aircraft Claims Evaluation Board.
    Unknown date: Maj. Dalton (pilot) and Maj. J. Graham (EWO) flying F-105F 63-8329 shared a MiG kill
    with an F-4D. Some histories erroneously credit this crew with a MiG kill while flying 63-8320.
    1970: Converted to EF-105F. NMUSAF
    1970: 17th Wild Weasel Squadron, 388th TFW, Korat RTAFB, Thailand.
    1972: Converted to F-105G.
    1972 to 1973: 561st TFS, 388th TFW, Korat RTAFB, Thailand.
    Ca.1973: 562nd TFS, 35th TFW, George AFB, CA.
    2/80: Ferry flight to Wright Field, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH for display at the Air Force Museum.

    • @1shARyn3
      @1shARyn3 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      F-105D 1960 model:
      0504 (MSN D192) 10/61: TOS USAF. Assigned to 23rd Tactical Fighter Squadron, 36th Tactical Fighter Wing,
      Bitburg AB, Germany.
      Ca.1964: 4th TFW, Seymour Johnson AFB, NC.
      3/67: 333rd TFS, 355th TFW, Takhli RTAB, Thailand. Marked as “Memphis Belle II.”
      4/28/67: Shot down MiG-17 over North Vietnam.
      4/30/67: Shot down MiG-17 over North Vietnam.
      1968-1970: 357th TFS, 355th TFW, Takhli RTAB, Thailand.
      1970: 127th TFS (ANG), 184th Tactical Fighter Group, McConnell AFB, KS.
      1976: 121st TFS (ANG), 113rd TFW, Andrews AFB, MD.
      Jun 12, 1981: MASDC, Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ as FK0044, with 5,934.6 flying hours.
      Apr 7, 1990: USAF Museum, Wright Field, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.
      7/91: Placed on display.

  • @kevinbarry71
    @kevinbarry71 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It had a bomb bay which was rarely used except for storing fuel

  • @josephpiskac2781
    @josephpiskac2781 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I never understood how the 105 fit in the mix of aircraft. Now I can see what was going on.

  • @nielsdorhout058
    @nielsdorhout058 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They need to make a F-100, F-101, F-102, F-104, F-105 and F-106 heritage flight..all flying models..how great would that be? I would fly over from Europe for that 😂

  • @user-tn1vc1xz5d
    @user-tn1vc1xz5d 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Slightly more rounds than the F-15. Since only one barrel is firing it can be tucked in. 1028 rounds must be a bit weighty.

  • @wormyboot
    @wormyboot 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why do external fuel tanks have fins on them?

    • @thelandofnod123
      @thelandofnod123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I understand the fins aid in separation when jettisoned. One tank design had the ability to have the angle and location of the fins changed to suit the aircraft they were attached to.
      Most modern tanks don’t have the fins. Separation is achieved with explosive cartridges fitted to the pylon that push the nose off first.
      If you can find videos of ordinance and external equipment jettison trials, they can be, ahem, interesting.

  • @guylancaster2055
    @guylancaster2055 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is that the plane GWB flew in the TANG…. And which non-story killed Dan Rather’s career?

    • @grizwoldphantasia5005
      @grizwoldphantasia5005 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      F-102 or F-106, and while Dan Rather was an idiot, GWB was a draft dodger (his Pa jumped him two years to head of the NG to avoid Vietnam service) and a deserter (he stopped going to his required reserve meetings so he could play politics). There's not a lot of honor in the elites on either side.

    • @guylancaster2055
      @guylancaster2055 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@grizwoldphantasia5005 i think it was the Thud…

  • @Eirik36
    @Eirik36 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why does the tail code of the G start with 38?

    • @Eirik36
      @Eirik36 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We all know that the bird wasn’t produced in 1938 so I’m confused

  • @mytube001
    @mytube001 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ugly but good. The vertical fin always looked far too small in proportion to the rest of the aircraft, throwing its appearance off...

    • @dr.jiIIaIicecooper2587
      @dr.jiIIaIicecooper2587 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's not ugly at all but I agree on fin being a bit too small on such a large aircraft.

  • @espinozanovak831
    @espinozanovak831 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    designed for low altitude, but then always flew high altitude bombing. Thus, the high loss rate to sams

    • @gort8203
      @gort8203 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did not always or even mostly do high altitude bombing. It did mostly dive bombing, rolling in from medium altitude. The tactics for ingress into the target area underwent changes during the war. One F-105 WIng in Thailand liked to go in on the deck and then pop up to bomb, the other liked to penetrate at medium altitude. Far more F-105s were lost to AAA than to SAMs, so the medium altitude ingress became the favored tactic, especially after the radar jamming pods became available in quantity. SAMs actually had a low direct kill rate against maneuvering fighter bombers, but they did serve to force avoidance maneuvers that could drive the plane down into the AAA envelope.

  • @HankyInTheTanky
    @HankyInTheTanky 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    First

  • @matthewmorrissey3280
    @matthewmorrissey3280 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First statement….WRONG.

    • @PaulStewartAviation
      @PaulStewartAviation  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which bit?

    • @mansgotplans
      @mansgotplans 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@PaulStewartAviationdidn’t mention the dirty deeds