Truth Tables - Tautology and Contradiction

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ก.ย. 2014
  • Thanks to all of you who support me on Patreon. You da real mvps! $1 per month helps!! :) / patrickjmt !! Truth Tables - Tautology and Contradiction. In this video I construct two more truth tables and use them to illustrate the notion of a tautology and a contradiction.

ความคิดเห็น • 69

  • @swizzbeats1212
    @swizzbeats1212 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I like and favorite your videos before they even start especially for the certain subject I'm looking for because I ALWAYS learn something new from your videos in an intuitive way. With that said, I'd like to thank you for all your videos. Always appreciate your work.

  • @GoldPhoenix99
    @GoldPhoenix99 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really like your channel. I spent a significant amount of time when I was in high school and early college coming up with simple explanations like these for math problems, it's nice to see someone actually putting videos like this up online. I'll definitely link the students I tutor in math to this channel!

  • @TheiLame2
    @TheiLame2 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    OH MY I JUST STARTED STUDYING THIS AND THIS IS SO MUCH HELP THANK YOU!

  • @CameronPak
    @CameronPak 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey patrickJMT! Thank you for creating this video, because my Discrete structures professor skims through the chapter, never really explaining why something is something. With your video and the videos of others on this topic, I'm going to pass the class. I can say that with confidence. Thank you!

  • @eduverse1948
    @eduverse1948 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you. I'm taking a course on Discrete Mathematics in the university and I was having a tough time understanding truth tables. Now I have a clear idea.

  • @rlira0908
    @rlira0908 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh Patrick, you're always there for me.

  • @Igglebug
    @Igglebug 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much for the clear and concise explanation!

  • @sistinerosesangalang1286
    @sistinerosesangalang1286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hello i just have this one simple question.The P row should start with T T F F right? and the Q row should be T F T F or the row can be done also reversely? thankyou and i will be looking forward to your responses.

  • @segintendorocks
    @segintendorocks 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I freaking love this man.

  • @RaelonWhite
    @RaelonWhite 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Patrick does everything :)

  • @webncyber
    @webncyber 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hmm how is if the very first row in first table all 3 are false yet the 4th column we getting it T?
    thank you

  • @_domdge_687
    @_domdge_687 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't skip the ads for my return. Thank you

  • @TechandDota2Videos
    @TechandDota2Videos 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey patrick i just started your channel and i like it already, can you cover the rules of inference please?

  • @marcosaguilar83
    @marcosaguilar83 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do a video that explains Exclusive or using statements.
    Thanks for your videos

  • @yunier91
    @yunier91 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Yes!! Finally some Discrete Math, thanks!

  • @appu363
    @appu363 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    anyone from 2020 ...thankyou sir ....it's very helpful video

  • @Matt-om1ul
    @Matt-om1ul 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video, could you do a video know logic proofs?

  • @archana946
    @archana946 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    To the point n perfect thanks dude

  • @Gagilence
    @Gagilence 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep up the good work!

  • @turboduck2902
    @turboduck2902 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey patrick, I'm currently a student and I finished my calculus 1 and 2 last year, and I am now in the more applied physics part of my program. Often times in my physics class, we are require to use integration and this causes a problem for many of us since our calculus classes only taught us to solve an integral, although we had no idea how to build on from the ground up. If you could do a video, or better yet a series of video, on how to build an integral from a physics problem, that would be awesome!
    By the way I used your videos many many times to study my calculus and it turned out quite well. My teacher was the worst I ever had, but I manage to get through it in no small part because of you so thanks alot for that!

  • @squirtlesquadblastoise7166
    @squirtlesquadblastoise7166 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    yooo im gonna need you to explain 2 specifically. im kinda pissed you dont link a video of you explaining that one.

    • @rahulshah6119
      @rahulshah6119 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      1 and 2 should both be always true through distributive laws

  • @cerebralassassin147
    @cerebralassassin147 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey Patrick your videos are really helpful , can you please do some videos on 'Business Math' I mean Cost, Revenue and profit problems.

  • @justinbanks2162
    @justinbanks2162 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is that an I Fight Dragons T-shirt on your profile?

  • @radhhpatel
    @radhhpatel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you!

  • @MichaelAllen14
    @MichaelAllen14 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @wafflelite
    @wafflelite 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Patrick, do you have a playlist for stuff like this?

    • @patrickjmt
      @patrickjmt  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      i don't even remember any more

  • @davidobregon5787
    @davidobregon5787 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome. Could not break this down any simpler.

    • @patrickjmt
      @patrickjmt  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      glad it helped!

  • @haleywang8941
    @haleywang8941 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are the man!

  • @ShadowBlack54
    @ShadowBlack54 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would ask nicely that next time you should put the given of the second example....[btw additional definition is "Contingency" if the values are neither true or false.]

  • @worldeconomicsbro
    @worldeconomicsbro 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Patrick. So, is it true that all sound and valid mathematical statements are based upon tautology?

    • @TheGrimravager
      @TheGrimravager 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      only statements that hold for all the values of a variable in the set where the variable lives

  • @xyanjalesseehrgood1590
    @xyanjalesseehrgood1590 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I cant follow if they continuously mess up their words

  • @xandex69
    @xandex69 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Heyy thx man

  • @gurmeeman5322
    @gurmeeman5322 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @EmmatheIsh
    @EmmatheIsh 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does this relate to law in some way? and Rhetoric? How do you apply it?

    • @yousufnimer480
      @yousufnimer480 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nigga you should know how to apply this practically before you ask this kind of question

  • @DrEnginerd1
    @DrEnginerd1 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not use the engineering notation for logic? A dot for AND and a plus for OR and a an apostrophe or a bar for NOT?

    • @Leo-pd8ww
      @Leo-pd8ww 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is a maths channel. This notation probably comes naturally to him.

  • @br75857
    @br75857 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Patrick you could have given how truth tables are derived.

  • @rajjankushwahablog..6943
    @rajjankushwahablog..6943 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    OK sir please ye question ka vedio bhej dijiyega

  • @rajjankushwahablog..6943
    @rajjankushwahablog..6943 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Sir ye question ko solve karke vedio bhejiye please
    Question 1.prove that (~p) disjunction (~q) and ~(~p) conjunction ~(~q) are contradictory to each other..

  • @tyronepearce4433
    @tyronepearce4433 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rathe use T or F instead of 1 or ) makes it easier to understand

    • @patrickjmt
      @patrickjmt  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Tyrone Pearce computer scientists would say: use 1 and 0

    • @tyronepearce4433
      @tyronepearce4433 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +patrickJMT Haha yes studying BscIT and binary 1 & 0 is right but just the T F has made it easier to understand. Love your videos though. Thanks

    • @patrickjmt
      @patrickjmt  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you like them! You will get used to the binary I am sure. Good luck in your studies!

    • @TheGrimravager
      @TheGrimravager 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      using 0 or 1 is easier when doing math in GF2

  • @septembrinol1333
    @septembrinol1333 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    You could have proved the contradiction by using the associative property of ^ , then you would have gotten contradiction and q, which is actually comtradiction. Regards

  • @TheGrimravager
    @TheGrimravager 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    pfft I was like "where the hell is this going?" untill the 5 minute mark where everything just clicked into place.
    Perhaps some constructive criticism would be to mention that you'll be giving examples of a tautology and a contradiction. But that might just be me.

  • @javier.t.adriano
    @javier.t.adriano 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    If it is 50% true, and 50% false, is it a contradiction or a tautology? Or is it neither?

    • @cameronlewis2713
      @cameronlewis2713 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anything with at least one true case and one false case is known as contingent statement. It is contingent on whether your elements are true or false.

    • @shrutisingh2641
      @shrutisingh2641 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Contingency

  • @marymireles6967
    @marymireles6967 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    date, time, place: noun

  • @patrxjacobe3561
    @patrxjacobe3561 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You teach better than my teacher! I should be paying you not that teacher 😒

    • @patrickjmt
      @patrickjmt  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      i can send my address if i need to :)

  • @jayshreemali6172
    @jayshreemali6172 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please again video made by T T & F F because very confusin create by but video is good

  • @VarunKumar-yg5fb
    @VarunKumar-yg5fb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Haa khabu ji👌

  • @manehclovis9956
    @manehclovis9956 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot

  • @arpan8076
    @arpan8076 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is absurdity

  • @prathyuxh
    @prathyuxh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyone 2023 December 😂

  • @theyasminroyal
    @theyasminroyal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why even name the video tautology and contradiction of you’re only going to talk about it for 5 seconds.

  • @eshanreza1O1
    @eshanreza1O1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    please improve your handwriting

  • @anumsmusic
    @anumsmusic 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @Matt-om1ul
    @Matt-om1ul 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video, could you do a video know logic proofs?

    • @patrickjmt
      @patrickjmt  9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Matt Park writing up stuff about valid arguments, laws of logic, etc... working towards proofs. should have some up soon.

    • @Matt-om1ul
      @Matt-om1ul 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Got it, thanks and keep up the solid work

  • @groomyClaimbodog
    @groomyClaimbodog 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks