The Best Rotovisor Deck!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @midoriyalu3958
    @midoriyalu3958 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Building just because I miss nova grappler and i love mechas, a lot of cards would be hard to find here, will try to build an awesome and strong deck as i can with this line XD

  • @michaeltsang1748
    @michaeltsang1748 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    For me, I prefer to use a bit more grade 1 units, such as Assemblead, and a bit more Bobalmines to increase my chances of a turn 2 booster. Another option i have consider is Rough Trample Monster Megagrago. When the attack it boost hits, you counter charge. Not the most consistent cc, but I find the idea of making an attack a cc2 or cc1 and EC2 pretty neat.
    My trigger line up might be weird, but i believe in my 7 Front, 4 crit, 1 OT and 4 heal line up. My reasoning for this is that I want to minimize opponent damage triggers. Its the killing factor of multi attack decks, since they trade power for more swings. It has worked out me. Also a double front trigger in a deck like this is gorgeous. I employ an early game agro rush, which is risky, due to smart players damage denying me.
    I'm glad to see other people using Rotovisor, and it's definitely a deck that requires much experimenting.
    On a side note, a budget option would be Lady Fencer of Quantum Regression for anyone looking for options. She just a 13k grade 1 when you have 2 set orders.

    • @EagletheDuck
      @EagletheDuck  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like the Megagrago since you can keep it around on board and try to maneuver yourself into a situation where your opponent has to block all of your attacks early to deny any CC.
      I can definitely see the merit in front triggers but I think Rotovisor is unique in the fact that the numbers turn 4+ are very high for a multi-attack deck that I’m not too worried by defensive triggers. I just want to get confirmed early damage and potential lethal swings when my opponent is on 4 damage, which crits help with. However my build does complement my trigger choices while running a g1 heavy build wouldn’t. Some give and some take that would need way more experimentation to solve imo

    • @raizenfall
      @raizenfall 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can you share the deck code, please? I'm trying to build my own and find yours very interesting

    • @EagletheDuck
      @EagletheDuck  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@raizenfall 4K00Q. Decklog codes are always the first thing in the description on my deck profiles

    • @raizenfall
      @raizenfall 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michaeltsang1748 do you also have a deck code that you can share?

    • @michaeltsang1748
      @michaeltsang1748 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@raizenfall I'm working with what I got with this deck. Feel free to edit it if you want.
      1L2KN

  • @TM_Ultra97
    @TM_Ultra97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What would you cut for Gallant mechanical?

    • @TM_Ultra97
      @TM_Ultra97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great deck profile by the way. Super informative,which I like!

    • @EagletheDuck
      @EagletheDuck  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I would suggest either:
      -cutting Combine Rusher because they serve similar purposes, or
      -cutting the Blitz Order and some combination of Combine Rusher and X-striker to slot in 3-4 Gallant Mechanical.
      My hesitation with the latter is that it adds more CB users so most likely you’ll have to be more mindful of how you use said CB

    • @TM_Ultra97
      @TM_Ultra97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@EagletheDuck thanks so much! Thoughts on the new support? I feel with the new grade 3 you might not have to run that many front triggers anymore with it's skill.

    • @EagletheDuck
      @EagletheDuck  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like the grade 3. Everything it does the deck likes so I definitely think it will be a 3/4-of in my updated list.
      The set order, however, I think leaves much to be desired, and my reasoning for thinking that isn’t because it’s a g2. This deck uses so much CB and can already use its energy fairly efficiently I don’t want to give up the potential CC/EC for a potential draw. I worry it will lead to getting resource denied too easily. I’ll still test the card but I don’t foresee keeping it in my list based off of how I currently play the deck and what the g3 does.
      Overall I think the deck still needs more support and better support at that to be remotely meta