This man is my hero. He's an honest man. And I think he's dead right about HIV/AIDS and the dead end we've been following for the past nearly 40 years. A brave man.
Def 1 of mine too, I credit him and many others fighting for truth with saving my life. Eroneously dagnosed positive 7 yrs ago (all "diagnosis" are this), went on drugs, nearly died- been off 3 yrs and never looked or felt better at 38 yrs old. Will never take "HIV meds" again thanks in large part to the brave & brilliant Dr. Duesberg, & his work
@@abhaysinghkanwar6354please do not listen to these crackpots. I know someone who tested positive, was on the drugs & healthy, learned of AIDS denialism, stopped taking them, the virus started replicating again, he got sick and developed AIDS. Many of the people who were in the AIDS denialism community in the 80’s/90’s/00’s are now dead, they died from AIDS. It’s easy to find information. Dunesberg has so much blood on his hands.
Así es, yo lo admiro mucho porque nunca traicionó su ciencia, él era parte de esa élite científica, ya tendría un premio nobel si hubiera seguido la ortodoxia vih - Sida, pero desafío a esa mafia, eso no cualquiera lo hace. Viva Peter Duesberg!!
The irony is he saved people's lives by telling the truth. Those who listened and never took lethal "medications" or listened to the hiv=aids yarn went on to live their lives, and those who listened to the politically correct line, got tested believed hiv would kill them and took the lethal drugs for the harmless passenger virus or to cure themselves of the hiv anti-bodies, all died a horrible death. Thank you Peter D.
I watched the documentary House of Numbers. It supports the theory that HIV does not cause AIDS. I found the documentary very compelling and I lean towards believing that HIV does not cause AIDS, but Christine Maggiore (who was HIV positive) and in House of Numbers passed on in 2009 or something. At the end of House of Numbers, it says that she did not pass on from HIV, but some sources say that she did. Also her daughter died. Some people think they both passed on from HIV. What do you think about their deaths?
What about the tens of millions on HAART now who are living healthy lives? Many who only found out they had HIV when they developed AIDS, and HAART saved their life and they no longer have AIDS, just HIV? We have 40 years of data now. Dunesberg crackpot theory has not changed since the beginning, even though thoroughly disproven in 2024.
There are very few men who would stand up the way this man has. He is an inspiration to us all I was on the drugs for 19 years doing everything the doctors were telling me to do and they nearly killed me. After learning the truth from the film house of numbers I stopped taking the medications I’ve been off them for five years now and I am stronger than ever through diet and exercise I have regained my life. I guess I could be better let’s sue all those bastards! But the truth is I’m glad they were lying about the whole thing! Because I plan to live out the rest of my life living too the fullest!
Five years is nothing. Give it another few years. Unless you’re a longterm nonprogressor, your health will suffer and you’ll go back to the meds. I hope you’re a longterm nonprogressor because this is an awful thing to have hit you like a ton of bricks in the next few years. Then again, if anyone listens to you, that is terribly dangerous. You do know of all the dead AIDS dissidents, right?
@@katvtay CDC is a wealthy private entity that probably would have been dismantled , but the HIV/AIDS plague gave them new life when the epidemic got the attention of the whole country.
Politically incorrect scientific conclusions. You can't just come up and say the world is round when the powers that be have vested interests and trillions at stake.
i'd love to hear Peter Duesberg's thoughts about the Corona virus. 1 question I have is would an expert like himself be able to show if a virus has been manufactured in a lab or is that not possible
Same!!! I searched and couldn't find anything. I don't know what he's been up to, but he may have given up on humanity...like why even try if you're constantly getting ostracized. Alas, I've pulled his book from my book shelf to explore in detail during this crazy time.
@@laurac2031 hi Laura, Peter Duesberg is already 83 old now so that might explain we do not hear from him a lot. I believe that man was right. I studied his work a bit back then and over the years and I believe he has always been spot on. Last interview ive seen with him was on Joe Rogan. Was pretty good
@@wordwan yes i am of the same opinion. It is all about the money and also scientists within the Universities have to conform to the standardized opinion else they risk loosing their position. I am not what they call a classical conspiracy theorist and with HIV I am pretty much convinced that Duesberg was correct but since I am not a scientist myself would not know for sure. But with 911 I know for sure that the people have been betrayed by a few rats in positions of power. I would however never take drugs against HIV if I were to test positive. I would not even want to get tested but I have been tested because it was mandatory at the time for my job. There are only a few people who can really say something worthwhile about HIV and Duesberg was 1 of them. The rest just pass the message along and do as they are told by law. It is a sad thing that people like Duesberg appear to wiped of the face of the earth with force. Look what they do to Assange.
@@wordwan i thought I became aware of HIV/AIDS denialism around 2005 but it seems to be later because the first documentary I seen about it was "HIV = AIDS, fact or fraud", see: topdocumentaryfilms.com/hiv-aids-fact-or-fraud/ And that film seems to be from 2009. I certainly was not aware around 2000 because then I was tested for my work and was really stressed about it. Back then I believed it was a death sentence and I think many killed themselves after hearing they were HIV+ even though as Duesberg explained a certain percetage of the population will have this virus (which has been so for 100's of years) and it is harmless. The scary thing is that once the community made up its mind it is all mandatory. So as a simple community doctor you might feel HIV does not cause AIDS you still will have to follow the rules as per law. Here in The Netherlands just a few years ago a physics teacher told his pupils he personally does not believe the official story of 911 and was almost fired because of it. It is all a big scam but it is now part of the official history and so it will be taught in schools as per law. If you step out of line they kick you out and you are done with. Certainly a good approach to be sceptical. I myself will only go to the doctor if it is absolutely necessary, like breaking a leg. I know because I was misdiagnosed about a shoulder injury. If I just would have let it heal by itself I would have recovered within a month. Now 25 years later I still have problems. Like you I was unaware of how crooked this world really is but your regular community doctor just follows the rules. They are presented with medicine that has been labeled safe and they will face persecution if they step out of line. Which is basically a good approach I think if only the top guys in power would not all be psychopaths.
I searched TH-cam for "Why Duesberg is wrong" and did not find any videos explaining why he is wrong. In fact, this video was on the first page of search results.
I know I'm 4 years late, but here is a very good counter study favoring the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: A large prospective study followed a group of 715 homosexual men in the Vancouver, Canada, area; approximately half were HIV-seropositive or became so during the follow-up period, and the remainder were HIV-seronegative. After more than 8 years of follow-up, despite similar rates of drug use, sexual contact, and other supposed risk factors in both groups, only the HIV-positive group suffered from opportunistic infections. Similarly, CD4 counts dropped in the patients who were HIV-infected, but remained stable in the HIV-negative patients, despite similar rates of risk behavior.The authors concluded that "the risk-AIDS hypothesis ... is clearly rejected by our data," and that "the evidence supports the hypothesis that HIV-1 has an integral role in the CD4 depletion and progressive immune dysfunction that characterise AIDS.'' My source is the wikipedia page titled "Duesberg hypothesis"
@@scruffymakaveli6870 Were those who were sero positive on toxic drugs? if so that would explain their high level of infections. But either way the tests themselves are meaningless and it has also not been proven that a low cd4 count corresponds with a low state of health. Healthy folk have been found to have low cd4 counts. HIV itself has not been proven to exist let alone cause disease. I think in 2024 these things are becoming clear as day light and anyone can verify things for himself. I don't have to convince anyone of anything.
@@Adam-xf6sq So u don't believe in informed medical consent, and freedom to choose treatment for your own damn self? That's all we're talking about here. Please educate yourself- Housenof Numbers, The Emperor's New Virus, FREE, right here on YT (so u have no excuse.) I'm living proof of everything they prove btw
@@Adam-xf6sq Well, I'm no longer totally disabled and dying at 125 lbs, and in best shape of my life at 38- 3 yrs after quiting so-called "meds" (back up to 155 lbs)- so I'd say I made a very well informed choice. But even if someone wants to quit for reasons others don't find credible, we still need to respect their choice to do what they want w their own body & listen to them- that's all we're saying, really... so if I seem bold, it's because I'm living proof of what Dr. Duesberg risks his life & career to say, and I don't like having been lied to & poisoned for 5 yrs- and I don't appreciate people shitting on the hero who helped save my life by simply referring to evidence
Then my dear friend must have on it, he came here to San Francisco because the city was known for the best treatment and he got into it. I didn't get to see him for last several months before he passed, his mother put him in hospice and forbade me from seeing him because he wouldn't have wanted me to see him looking as bad as he was. So I don't know all the facts he just looked horrid and she said he had dementia.
I lean towards believing that HIV does not cause AIDS. The documentary House of Numbers was very compelling. But I saw that Christine Maggiore and her daughter passed on. Christine was one of the HIV positive people in House of Numbers. At the end of House of Numbers, it says that she did not pass on from HIV, but I read a few sources online saying that she and her daughter both died from HIV. What do you think about her death? Are you sure she and her daughter didn't die from HIV?
@@grainedthoughts6004 U regret hearing other scientists view points u searched for? Have u read the many people's comments- including my own- thanking him for saving their lives?
@Giorgio_A below, as a reply; reposted once here so people don't miss it: Allow me to correct a possible minor inaccuracy you stated. The Chinese 'rolled out the PCR tests ...' which isn't accurate at all, albeit they did reintroduce practices that could have been coerced onto other countries using shame, etc. Your exact quote: "China was only used as a "trojan horse" to jump start the scam. A communist country with a slavish population was ideal to roll out the useless PCR tests that create "healthy asymptomatics" and "covid patients with underlying conditions". These tests, coupled with propaganda, convinced first the Chinese people, and then the rest of the world that a new disease was causing a pandemic. [snip]" In a totalitarian/authoritarian society, you don't really have to convince the Chinese population of anything nearly as much as you do in freer societies. If I recall correctly, Germany and South Korea offered the US PCR and perhaps other diagnostic tests as early as January 2020, with ample supplies to boot, and I know that the US turned them down flat. Surely PCR tests were not utilized in the first weeks or months of China's response, if we are to believe the newscasts, people were flooding the hospitals and being locked down without any testing or comprehension of what they were facing. After all, you can't administer a test if you hadn't triple checked the alleged genome until the end of 2019. What is true is that the 7 of 9 useful patients yielded a mess of a combination of genetic material which the Chinese used to deduce in silico, i.e. theoretically, the genome of the said Covid-19. As far as I know, there are extant claims that no one has been able to purify a sample of Covid 19, as well as the completely apparently contradictory claim that electronic microscopy images are available of the virus [for starters, and much much more]. To add to this, in many diseases, I've read that no one has been able to meet Koch's germ theory criteria, that once a purified sample of the pathogen is isolated, can the infection and disease be reproduced in animal subjects? I am not prepared to do the deep dive into the scientific literature or interviews of scientists for several reasons. 1. There's a paywall to read what taxpayers have funded re scientific research-an obscenity. 2. Many studies are terrible, so there is the noise factor. I've spoken to America's Greatest Scientist[s] and I've observed it myself. To cite just a couple of fallacies that are common: full professor in the 2nd best endowed university system, as well as Loma Linda, another huge institution, defended their NIH grant proposal[s] and/or arguments with the fallacy that correlation implies causation; another is selection bias: let's sort the x-rays into two categories, the ones that display the researchers thesis are used, the rest are ignored; in that manner, I can show you that a pack of 52-playing cards has only red cards, and no black cards. 3. Many scientists have problems, including deficits in logic and reasoning, dishonesty, and financial or other hidden agendas; all of which I don't have the resources to ferret out. I joked to a friend once, society is very good at discovering the best singer or athlete using financial incentives. One could argue society is proficient with technological applications, but when it comes to science, it's as bad as politics. I can't verify some of the allegations and insinuations, just putting them out there. Lastly, I read but didn't verify that Pasteur on his death bed said it's not the germ, it's the terrain. I believe and guess this is what the good professor is implying; that amplification and infection manifests in subjects that for various reasons have weakened immune systems due to lifestyle, epigenetics and/or environmental factors, etc. So here's a simplification that works. Viewing the 3h video by Zach Bush MD is a good introduction to the fact that we have over 10 to the power 32 and 31 viruses in the oceans and soil respectively on earth. Typically, exposure to infectious agents for many healthy individuals in many but not all circumstances is a good thing, your innate immune system can usually in the instance of Covid 19 handle 50-99 virus particles you might typically encounter per day [so this is a partial argument against masking and excessive distancing]. Zach then points out a number of stressors that compromise the healthy immune system, including particulate pollution [PM2.5] and other substantiated stressors [I'd rather you view his youtube video than list them, for fear of having my comment removed, I would just ignore the first 12 minutes of babbling and the last 3 minutes]. GMOs: Engineering the Nature out of Humanity, Webinar Replay with Dr. Zach Bush [the TH-cam link keeps disappearing so just type the above line and you will get it along with ten or more other of his hits; all of which are GOLD.] In fact, only one friend mentioned a serious pollutant that I have not seen mentioned associated at all with C 19 which really sticks out, so consider upvoting this gift of a revelation irrespective of whether it pans out or ever gets substantiated: In early spring, 2019, my friend said that three or four hotspots possibly shared a characteristic that amplified outbreaks, the banned freon R-22 refrigerant he claimed happened to be used heavily and illegally in Wuhan, Northern Italy, Iran and possibly the NY/NJ area. The idea is that the virus is already widespread in populations that are strong enough to resist serious illness or transmission, but once you add enough stressors, it is sufficient to amplify the pathological response. Support of the idea that it is already widespread is obvious due to at least a dozen independent reports: look up US, Italy, France, Spain, Brazil, Netherlands, Australia and 'covid existed in population before Wuhan' in your youtube or internet searches. e.g. US nine states donated blood samples yielded over 109 positive Covid between Dec 13, 2019 and Jan 17, 2020; implying US patient zero happened July-Aug 2020. Italy covid present before Wuhan in Milan, Turin Spain, Barcelona March 1-12, 2019 covid in sewage samples [a common and effective epidemiological technique] Brazil ditto, sewage, earlier than Wuhan Also remember to look up studies re a more probable origin in the province south of Hubei, therefore less stress on the B-4 lab in Wuhan. Also remember the intellectual dishonesty when WHO and the cabal of dishonest reporters and agencies ignore the samples found that predate Wuhan, specifically the summer outbreaks near Fort Detrick [that smartly refutes the claim that the Chinese are hiding facts and are dishonest, when the USA and France never get accused of the same--see French military and government silencing and failing to treat French athletes]. Please upvote this, before it gets banned, I hope it's been helpful. I learned of the earlier sources of c 19 appearances from two China friendly TH-camrs, NathanRich and Cyrus Jannsen. Nathan Rich Still think COVID-19 Came From China? th-cam.com/video/DyKp8-uPssA/w-d-xo.html Cyrus Jannsen Why You Shouldn't Blame China for Covid-19 th-cam.com/video/-jZXEa-XOVw/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/RF9aoLmWJ-A/w-d-xo.html GMOs: Engineering the Nature out of Humanity, Webinar Replay with Dr. Zach Bush Update, I suggest you can skip the first 12 minutes and the last 3 minutes of this 3h 25 minute video. Also, you can search for biome and innate immunity within the Zach Bush searches. Very fruitful background, even for this retired surgeon who has only three scientists in his extended family; all three ran their own institutes, all three were of a higher status than professor emeritus [not that this says anything about me except they were surprised that I could ask the right questions all the time and that I grasped answers immediately]. At your service, always.
I experienced a severe neurological downturn when I tried reducing my medication. Considering the size of the current economic downturn in Europe, it won't be long before they "run out of stock" in France, i.e.; until they stop covering the cost of the medication. I'm rather desperate to find an alternative solution. I'm trying Andreas Kahlkert's CDS. If anyone has a suggestion, it would mean a lot to me if you could share it.
If we have conflicting opinions then we are both denialists (paraphrased)2:36 . I liked that. But the Dr. Is also an idealist. Most people just take the money and buy a synthetic conscience. The road he has chosen can be very arduous and even fatal. Look at what happened to Jesus. Humans don't like a nice guy for very long.
I don't know who shall I trust, but the fact is someone that i know for a long time, he diagnosed with hiv positive 25 years ago, guess what, he is still living healthy now, when he was first diagnosed his doctor suggested him to take those medicine which so call will help him to suppress the virus, he started to take, but for period of time, he started to feel his body getting weaker, more symptoms showed up, he finally decided to stop the medicine himself ,yes of course he continued to receive the medicine but he chosen not to take ,few weeks after, he recovered , stamina and getting healthier...illogical isn't ? He told me, shall I believe ? I font know, but i don't think he lied to me , what for ? He gets nothing if he lies to me
What worked for me was diet and exercise. Your body will detox stop eating all processed food take sugar out of your diet. You have been given a second chance take it vantage of it!
@@goodbepositive9051 AIDS is a disease that was made up to prove there was a new infection caused by HIV so the CDC could get funding. AIDS was nothing new, but it was simply a trick of taking already well known disease conditions and consolidating them all under AIDS. Scientists said HIV causes AIDS. Prior to this new protocol that was justified now with assumption that HIV causes AIDS, then the treatment plan or drug protocol changed. I don't think ARV's were used before AIDS was fabricated, but they had tried and true protocols. I am not an expert, but from what I have learned you will be fine, and I don't think you will die, but just like anybody you need a healthy lifestyle. Docs may think they are right, but it is their training.
He was so ridiculed for his stance and his own research. It was unfair treatment what he went thru but there were so many problems with Galo and his research that it had to be questioned. AZT was the drug given when it was a DNA terminator and killed anyone who took it basically advancing the AIDS virus. He was so right about his own research and still was hated for it. He was a great man!
If this is true. Why is the HI virus or its antibodies only found in such a small number of people? There are many people being tested every day. It seems to be a very rare virus which occurrence is correlated with immune deficiency. Furthermore it can be transmitted because, I guess, almost always there is someone to be associated with the infection (somebody who is HIV positive). Only thing which I could imagine, contrary to what is officially claimed, is that "aids", so immune deficiency, may cause/create the hi virus which then can be transmitted but maybe doesn't cause "aids". Another thing I don't understand is why did the infection rate of hiv or aids go down in USA and Europe with the use of condoms? Did people also start using less drugs?
I dont have an answer to your first question, but is it possible that people started being less paranoid about HIV around the time that condoms became more popular (perhaps because of it) so people stopped getting tested as often, causing overall less positive cases?
1. Increase of use in condoms 2. It's not incredibly contagious 3. It's mostly sexually transmitted. It's not like Flu where you're spreading it all around just by breathing, coughing and touching stuff.
@@methinkskotov3752 Condoms do not protect against all STD's, only those passed by bodily fluids/blood. You can still be infected by chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes, syphilis, HPV etc. The easiest transmission route of HIV is through blood, this is why gay men have higher rates of HIV. Anal sex causes tears - blood. That doesn't mean you cannot get HIV from sex with a woman, but, it's generally a bit harder.
Oh no... oh no. oh no. oh no. I’m in Karen territory. Too many people to argue with... this comment will blow up with the sounds of hundreds of people screaming at me about how I’m wrong.
@@antonlevkovsky1667 But am I having an unknown reason which is different from my friends, who didn't have risky sex behaviour? I did not get illness unless I found myself positive in a screening test. Later confirmed by ELISA and then PCR and then again someother tests
@@pozindia1831 My opinion is that one should forget about sex risks of HIV. Maybe overly active persons collect a lot of other germs that give negative effect on immunity. Try watching this, maybe it will help you change your mind: th-cam.com/video/JZ3n6icJIXA/w-d-xo.html
@@pozindia1831 Tests mean nothing and they fully admit they do not test for any virus. I recommend u arm yourself w real knowledge which can be obtained for free in a few hrs by watching House of Numbers & Emperor's New Virus. I'm living proof "HIV/AIDS" is a giant scam, that I believed for 5 yrs & nearly died from the so-called "treatment"
@@pozindia1831 Dr. Karry Mullis "I InventeD the test (PCR) and it DOES NOT TEST FOR ANY SPECIFIC VIRUS." He tells u, on video, how its not designed to even do that- and so does package insert
It's so nice to know that we don't have to take those drugs when we've been HIV+, to stay healthy; yet what happens if it fails, what happens if that HIV virus ends up turning into AIDS? Would it be so foolish to obey if we accept the doctors' suggestions to start taking these antiretrovirals? I think that we can choose well whether we live in our own flesh that HIV is harmless for years, or if it has become a serious health problem.
This man has so much blood on his hands. Many who were in the early denialism community (who were told they had HIV but didn’t get treated because they denied the causation) died ‘suspiciously’ of what are known as AIDS defining illnesses like KS, pneumocystis, CMV, toxoplasmosis. Oh, but of course it wasn’t AIDS. Cos dying with 3-4 opportunistic infections detected in your body is common apparently (that was heavy sarcasm, they died from AIDS).
![ปฏิเสธไม่ไหว (Crush on you) - LIPTA feat. No One Else [TEASER MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VC689EgdSIw/mqdefault.jpg)
So few men like this. I aspire to have such integrity as this. Our culture holds up the shameless and ignores and derides men like this, it pains me.
FACTS! The Great Dr. Peter Duesberg; you will triumph in the end sir. You are one to look up to.
Completamente de acuerdo con tu comentario, acabo de leer uno de sus libros, "inventando el virus del sida", estoy impactado. Viva Peter Duesberg!!
I hate to say it, but its very satisfying watching him be vindicated while he is still alive. I owe him a great debt.
@@tybgycfmb8697hii can I contact you
This man is my hero. He's an honest man. And I think he's dead right about HIV/AIDS and the dead end we've been following for the past nearly 40 years. A brave man.
Def 1 of mine too, I credit him and many others fighting for truth with saving my life. Eroneously dagnosed positive 7 yrs ago (all "diagnosis" are this), went on drugs, nearly died- been off 3 yrs and never looked or felt better at 38 yrs old. Will never take "HIV meds" again thanks in large part to the brave & brilliant Dr. Duesberg, & his work
@@MattGalter Watch Myles Powers' debunking of House of Numbers.
@@MattGalter hey how are yoy
@@MattGalter hey how are you now? I got tested positive this March so tensed
@@abhaysinghkanwar6354please do not listen to these crackpots. I know someone who tested positive, was on the drugs & healthy, learned of AIDS denialism, stopped taking them, the virus started replicating again, he got sick and developed AIDS. Many of the people who were in the AIDS denialism community in the 80’s/90’s/00’s are now dead, they died from AIDS. It’s easy to find information. Dunesberg has so much blood on his hands.
Just bought his book. The price was quite high but the price of ignorance as you can see in today's society is much higher.
You should've gotten it from his actual website you can get it for 25 dollars !And he signs it too!
@@loveitorhateit7395 Wow! Wish I'd known that before : )
he publish his book on research gate for free
Peter Duesberg, don't change never. A great man. Un fuerte abrazo, profesor.
He obviously need psichiatric consult.
@@danielstuparu9195 who tf are you to say that??
@@rodriguerra3639 He has the infected blood of 330,000 ppl on his hands.
@@rodriguerra3639 Peter Duesberg is narcissist
@@krankel6715oh really and injecting people with toxins is philanthrophy ?
Professor Duesberg thank you! Another hero for truth!
another criminal who kill many like Karri Stokely and Maria Papagiannidou and Lindsey Nagel and tommy morrison and many more
@@alixanderjohnson7378 have you any proved ..?
@@Extra-Knowladge1997 Nope, he does not, just another victim of the religion of $cientism.
👏 Peter Duesberg, you are a real life *super hero,* and this is not the slightest exaggeration.
Así es, yo lo admiro mucho porque nunca traicionó su ciencia, él era parte de esa élite científica, ya tendría un premio nobel si hubiera seguido la ortodoxia vih - Sida, pero desafío a esa mafia, eso no cualquiera lo hace. Viva Peter Duesberg!!
@@alexisvega7964 Estoy totalmente de acuerdo. 👍
The irony is he saved people's lives by telling the truth. Those who listened and never took lethal "medications" or listened to the hiv=aids yarn went on to live their lives, and those who listened to the politically correct line, got tested believed hiv would kill them and took the lethal drugs for the harmless passenger virus or to cure themselves of the hiv anti-bodies, all died a horrible death. Thank you Peter D.
I watched the documentary House of Numbers. It supports the theory that HIV does not cause AIDS. I found the documentary very compelling and I lean towards believing that HIV does not cause AIDS, but Christine Maggiore (who was HIV positive) and in House of Numbers passed on in 2009 or something. At the end of House of Numbers, it says that she did not pass on from HIV, but some sources say that she did. Also her daughter died. Some people think they both passed on from HIV. What do you think about their deaths?
What about the tens of millions on HAART now who are living healthy lives? Many who only found out they had HIV when they developed AIDS, and HAART saved their life and they no longer have AIDS, just HIV? We have 40 years of data now. Dunesberg crackpot theory has not changed since the beginning, even though thoroughly disproven in 2024.
Hii can I contact you
I want to ask some questions regarding this disease
FACTS, i watched them murder a close friend with AZT, as if Fraudhi didn;t know this was a deadly cancer drug banned from human use.
There are very few men who would stand up the way this man has. He is an inspiration to us all I was on the drugs for 19 years doing everything the doctors were telling me to do and they nearly killed me. After learning the truth from the film house of numbers I stopped taking the medications I’ve been off them for five years now and I am stronger than ever through diet and exercise I have regained my life. I guess I could be better let’s sue all those bastards! But the truth is I’m glad they were lying about the whole thing! Because I plan to live out the rest of my life living too the fullest!
Can we please message privately through mail?
Derk Duke sure jmminfreetown@yahoo.com
Five years is nothing. Give it another few years. Unless you’re a longterm nonprogressor, your health will suffer and you’ll go back to the meds. I hope you’re a longterm nonprogressor because this is an awful thing to have hit you like a ton of bricks in the next few years. Then again, if anyone listens to you, that is terribly dangerous. You do know of all the dead AIDS dissidents, right?
@@katvtay What is a long term nonprogressor? Is that supposed to be a genetic thing that protects some from relapse?
@@katvtay CDC is a wealthy private entity that probably would have been dismantled , but the HIV/AIDS plague gave them new life when the epidemic got the attention of the whole country.
Hiv positive since 91 , always been very healthy , I took Deusbergs advise . Never took tóxic antirretrovirals ..
+Jesmin ortega really?? man it's great, so you never took hiv drugs?
Yes ..
Jesmin ortega are you still alive?
Hiv Is Fake Hiv Doesnt Exist In World
@@AsadAli-bh4js is it really happen
A modern day Galileo!
Politically incorrect scientific conclusions. You can't just come up and say the world is round when the powers that be have vested interests and trillions at stake.
Denis Mutabazi m
i'd love to hear Peter Duesberg's thoughts about the Corona virus. 1 question I have is would an expert like himself be able to show if a virus has been manufactured in a lab or is that not possible
Same!!! I searched and couldn't find anything. I don't know what he's been up to, but he may have given up on humanity...like why even try if you're constantly getting ostracized. Alas, I've pulled his book from my book shelf to explore in detail during this crazy time.
@@laurac2031 hi Laura, Peter Duesberg is already 83 old now so that might explain we do not hear from him a lot. I believe that man was right. I studied his work a bit back then and over the years and I believe he has always been spot on. Last interview ive seen with him was on Joe Rogan. Was pretty good
Dutchy just was searching and that interview popped up. I’ve got it saved to my watchlist.
@@wordwan yes i am of the same opinion. It is all about the money and also scientists within the Universities have to conform to the standardized opinion else they risk loosing their position. I am not what they call a classical conspiracy theorist and with HIV I am pretty much convinced that Duesberg was correct but since I am not a scientist myself would not know for sure. But with 911 I know for sure that the people have been betrayed by a few rats in positions of power. I would however never take drugs against HIV if I were to test positive. I would not even want to get tested but I have been tested because it was mandatory at the time for my job. There are only a few people who can really say something worthwhile about HIV and Duesberg was 1 of them. The rest just pass the message along and do as they are told by law. It is a sad thing that people like Duesberg appear to wiped of the face of the earth with force. Look what they do to Assange.
@@wordwan i thought I became aware of HIV/AIDS denialism around 2005 but it seems to be later because the first documentary I seen about it was "HIV = AIDS, fact or fraud", see:
topdocumentaryfilms.com/hiv-aids-fact-or-fraud/ And that film seems to be from 2009. I certainly was not aware around 2000 because then I was tested for my work and was really stressed about it. Back then I believed it was a death sentence and I think many killed themselves after hearing they were HIV+ even though as Duesberg explained a certain percetage of the population will have this virus (which has been so for 100's of years) and it is harmless.
The scary thing is that once the community made up its mind it is all mandatory. So as a simple community doctor you might feel HIV does not cause AIDS you still will have to follow the rules as per law. Here in The Netherlands just a few years ago a physics teacher told his pupils he personally does not believe the official story of 911 and was almost fired because of it. It is all a big scam but it is now part of the official history and so it will be taught in schools as per law. If you step out of line they kick you out and you are done with.
Certainly a good approach to be sceptical. I myself will only go to the doctor if it is absolutely necessary, like breaking a leg. I know because I was misdiagnosed about a shoulder injury. If I just would have let it heal by itself I would have recovered within a month. Now 25 years later I still have problems. Like you I was unaware of how crooked this world really is but your regular community doctor just follows the rules. They are presented with medicine that has been labeled safe and they will face persecution if they step out of line. Which is basically a good approach I think if only the top guys in power would not all be psychopaths.
Prof. Peter Duesberg et al. -Career sacrificing heroes
...don't change you're colors for anyone!
Respect to you sir 🙏🙏
Keep up the good work, your a great man & I wish I could talk to you
I searched TH-cam for "Why Duesberg is wrong" and did not find any videos explaining why he is wrong.
In fact, this video was on the first page of search results.
Welcome to The Twilight Zone!
Yeah, they just call him a murderer... unreal
Still looking for that same video.
I know I'm 4 years late, but here is a very good counter study favoring the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: A large prospective study followed a group of 715 homosexual men in the Vancouver, Canada, area; approximately half were HIV-seropositive or became so during the follow-up period, and the remainder were HIV-seronegative. After more than 8 years of follow-up, despite similar rates of drug use, sexual contact, and other supposed risk factors in both groups, only the HIV-positive group suffered from opportunistic infections. Similarly, CD4 counts dropped in the patients who were HIV-infected, but remained stable in the HIV-negative patients, despite similar rates of risk behavior.The authors concluded that "the risk-AIDS hypothesis ... is clearly rejected by our data," and that "the evidence supports the hypothesis that HIV-1 has an integral role in the CD4 depletion and progressive immune dysfunction that characterise AIDS.''
My source is the wikipedia page titled "Duesberg hypothesis"
@@scruffymakaveli6870 Were those who were sero positive on toxic drugs? if so that would explain their high level of infections. But either way the tests themselves are meaningless and it has also not been proven that a low cd4 count corresponds with a low state of health. Healthy folk have been found to have low cd4 counts. HIV itself has not been proven to exist let alone cause disease. I think in 2024 these things are becoming clear as day light and anyone can verify things for himself. I don't have to convince anyone of anything.
god please help this man..if this is the truth..
Good please help this righteous man
God please help these people if they are wrong
@@Adam-xf6sq So u don't believe in informed medical consent, and freedom to choose treatment for your own damn self? That's all we're talking about here. Please educate yourself- Housenof Numbers, The Emperor's New Virus, FREE, right here on YT (so u have no excuse.) I'm living proof of everything they prove btw
@@MattGalter Very bold of you to assume that. Go ahead and make your informed medical choices, just make sure your sources are credible first…
@@Adam-xf6sq Well, I'm no longer totally disabled and dying at 125 lbs, and in best shape of my life at 38- 3 yrs after quiting so-called "meds" (back up to 155 lbs)- so I'd say I made a very well informed choice. But even if someone wants to quit for reasons others don't find credible, we still need to respect their choice to do what they want w their own body & listen to them- that's all we're saying, really... so if I seem bold, it's because I'm living proof of what Dr. Duesberg risks his life & career to say, and I don't like having been lied to & poisoned for 5 yrs- and I don't appreciate people shitting on the hero who helped save my life by simply referring to evidence
Best man. Eggs of steel. Not buyable and smart
Hiv does cause aids, i see on my own
i think those meds are toxic i took them for six months instead of getting better i became very ill i stopped and am doing fine
Then my dear friend must have on it, he came here to San Francisco because the city was known for the best treatment and he got into it. I didn't get to see him for last several months before he passed, his mother put him in hospice and forbade me from seeing him because he wouldn't have wanted me to see him looking as bad as he was. So I don't know all the facts he just looked horrid and she said he had dementia.
@@SpiritGirlSF The drugs do this everytime in the long run.
@@SpiritGirlSF Lets also not forget one's own mind power and belief in the religion of $cientism.
@@jamesbarrett9066 So you know about Doc Fowchee and how he created the first case of cancel culture with Hiv?
I wish he would make another video about corona.
👍
The book of luc Montagnier ,Virus..
speak in the chapter 7 about the oxidative stress as the cause of AIDS
Real hero 😎prof duesburg 😎
Bless you brave man 👍
Peter is on the mark!
whenever I listen to this guy I get inspired
Documentary to watch - House of Numbers
I lean towards believing that HIV does not cause AIDS. The documentary House of Numbers was very compelling. But I saw that Christine Maggiore and her daughter passed on. Christine was one of the HIV positive people in House of Numbers. At the end of House of Numbers, it says that she did not pass on from HIV, but I read a few sources online saying that she and her daughter both died from HIV. What do you think about her death? Are you sure she and her daughter didn't die from HIV?
This video is hard to find. Google does a good job of hiding it.
it took me 2sec to find this video. i regret it though
@@grainedthoughts6004 U regret hearing other scientists view points u searched for? Have u read the many people's comments- including my own- thanking him for saving their lives?
@@MattGalter cults members also said that their cults saved their lives
I wonder if HIV was tuberculosis renaimed. Tb seems to present same symptoms and many have underlying TB infection.
No, its Kaposi carcinoma....
No, Tuberculosis responds to antibiotics.
@@johnnopeyy4129 ok
@@elingrome5853 ok
Strongyloides infection for sure. Take ivermectin to eradicate it completely and increase Glutathione level as well.
The antigen test is P24.
Mycoplasma produces protein P24
Hii can you suggest me books or documents pdf or videos that hypothesis about hiv
Hero.
@Giorgio_A below, as a reply; reposted once here so people don't miss it:
Allow me to correct a possible minor inaccuracy you stated. The Chinese 'rolled out the PCR tests ...' which isn't accurate at all, albeit they did reintroduce practices that could have been coerced onto other countries using shame, etc. Your exact quote:
"China was only used as a "trojan horse" to jump start the scam. A communist country with a slavish population was ideal to roll out the useless PCR tests that create "healthy asymptomatics" and "covid patients with underlying conditions". These tests, coupled with propaganda, convinced first the Chinese people, and then the rest of the world that a new disease was causing a pandemic. [snip]"
In a totalitarian/authoritarian society, you don't really have to convince the Chinese population of anything nearly as much as you do in freer societies. If I recall correctly, Germany and South Korea offered the US PCR and perhaps other diagnostic tests as early as January 2020, with ample supplies to boot, and I know that the US turned them down flat. Surely PCR tests were not utilized in the first weeks or months of China's response, if we are to believe the newscasts, people were flooding the hospitals and being locked down without any testing or comprehension of what they were facing. After all, you can't administer a test if you hadn't triple checked the alleged genome until the end of 2019.
What is true is that the 7 of 9 useful patients yielded a mess of a combination of genetic material which the Chinese used to deduce in silico, i.e. theoretically, the genome of the said Covid-19. As far as I know, there are extant claims that no one has been able to purify a sample of Covid 19, as well as the completely apparently contradictory claim that electronic microscopy images are available of the virus [for starters, and much much more].
To add to this, in many diseases, I've read that no one has been able to meet Koch's germ theory criteria, that once a purified sample of the pathogen is isolated, can the infection and disease be reproduced in animal subjects? I am not prepared to do the deep dive into the scientific literature or interviews of scientists for several reasons.
1. There's a paywall to read what taxpayers have funded re scientific research-an obscenity.
2. Many studies are terrible, so there is the noise factor. I've spoken to America's Greatest Scientist[s] and I've observed it myself.
To cite just a couple of fallacies that are common: full professor in the 2nd best endowed university system, as well as Loma Linda, another huge institution, defended their NIH grant proposal[s] and/or arguments with the fallacy that correlation implies causation; another is selection bias: let's sort the x-rays into two categories, the ones that display the researchers thesis are used, the rest are ignored; in that manner, I can show you that a pack of 52-playing cards has only red cards, and no black cards.
3. Many scientists have problems, including deficits in logic and reasoning, dishonesty, and financial or other hidden agendas; all of which I don't have the resources to ferret out. I joked to a friend once, society is very good at discovering the best singer or athlete using financial incentives. One could argue society is proficient with technological applications, but when it comes to science, it's as bad as politics.
I can't verify some of the allegations and insinuations, just putting them out there. Lastly, I read but didn't verify that Pasteur on his death bed said it's not the germ, it's the terrain.
I believe and guess this is what the good professor is implying; that amplification and infection manifests in subjects that for various reasons have weakened immune systems due to lifestyle, epigenetics and/or environmental factors, etc.
So here's a simplification that works.
Viewing the 3h video by Zach Bush MD is a good introduction to the fact that we have over 10 to the power 32 and 31 viruses in the oceans and soil respectively on earth.
Typically, exposure to infectious agents for many healthy individuals in many but not all circumstances is a good thing, your innate immune system can usually in the instance of Covid 19 handle 50-99 virus particles you might typically encounter per day [so this is a partial argument against masking and excessive distancing].
Zach then points out a number of stressors that compromise the healthy immune system, including particulate pollution [PM2.5] and other substantiated stressors [I'd rather you view his youtube video than list them, for fear of having my comment removed, I would just ignore the first 12 minutes of babbling and the last 3 minutes].
GMOs: Engineering the Nature out of Humanity, Webinar Replay with Dr. Zach Bush
[the TH-cam link keeps disappearing so just type the above line and you will get it along with ten or more other of his hits; all of which are GOLD.]
In fact, only one friend mentioned a serious pollutant that I have not seen mentioned associated at all with C 19 which really sticks out, so consider upvoting this gift of a revelation irrespective of whether it pans out or ever gets substantiated:
In early spring, 2019, my friend said that three or four hotspots possibly shared a characteristic that amplified outbreaks, the banned freon R-22 refrigerant he claimed happened to be used heavily and illegally in Wuhan, Northern Italy, Iran and possibly the NY/NJ area.
The idea is that the virus is already widespread in populations that are strong enough to resist serious illness or transmission, but once you add enough stressors, it is sufficient to amplify the pathological response.
Support of the idea that it is already widespread is obvious due to at least a dozen independent reports:
look up US, Italy, France, Spain, Brazil, Netherlands, Australia and 'covid existed in population before Wuhan' in your youtube or internet searches.
e.g.
US nine states donated blood samples yielded over 109 positive Covid between Dec 13, 2019 and Jan 17, 2020; implying US patient zero happened July-Aug 2020.
Italy covid present before Wuhan in Milan, Turin
Spain, Barcelona March 1-12, 2019 covid in sewage samples [a common and effective epidemiological technique]
Brazil ditto, sewage, earlier than Wuhan
Also remember to look up studies re a more probable origin in the province south of Hubei, therefore less stress on the B-4 lab in Wuhan.
Also remember the intellectual dishonesty when WHO and the cabal of dishonest reporters and agencies ignore the samples found that predate Wuhan, specifically the summer outbreaks near Fort Detrick [that smartly refutes the claim that the Chinese are hiding facts and are dishonest, when the USA and France never get accused of the same--see French military and government silencing and failing to treat French athletes].
Please upvote this, before it gets banned, I hope it's been helpful. I learned of the earlier sources of c 19 appearances from two China friendly TH-camrs, NathanRich and Cyrus Jannsen.
Nathan Rich
Still think COVID-19 Came From China?
th-cam.com/video/DyKp8-uPssA/w-d-xo.html
Cyrus Jannsen
Why You Shouldn't Blame China for Covid-19
th-cam.com/video/-jZXEa-XOVw/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/RF9aoLmWJ-A/w-d-xo.html
GMOs: Engineering the Nature out of Humanity, Webinar Replay with Dr. Zach Bush
Update, I suggest you can skip the first 12 minutes and the last 3 minutes of this 3h 25 minute video. Also, you can search for biome and innate immunity within the Zach Bush searches. Very fruitful background, even for this retired surgeon who has only three scientists in his extended family; all three ran their own institutes, all three were of a higher status than professor emeritus [not that this says anything about me except they were surprised that I could ask the right questions all the time and that I grasped answers immediately]. At your service, always.
I experienced a severe neurological downturn when I tried reducing my medication. Considering the size of the current economic downturn in Europe, it won't be long before they "run out of stock" in France, i.e.; until they stop covering the cost of the medication. I'm rather desperate to find an alternative solution. I'm trying Andreas Kahlkert's CDS. If anyone has a suggestion, it would mean a lot to me if you could share it.
Have you had any luck with the CDS?
If we have conflicting opinions then we are both denialists (paraphrased)2:36 . I liked that. But the Dr. Is also an idealist. Most people just take the money and buy a synthetic conscience. The road he has chosen can be very arduous and even fatal. Look at what happened to Jesus. Humans don't like a nice guy for very long.
12 years old with only 35k views.
YT buried the hell out of this video.
Lost his job due to the religion of $cientism.
How typical of TH-cam to produce pro-Fauci videos, when I tried to find out about this professor. I bet he's right.
I don't know who shall I trust, but the fact is someone that i know for a long time, he diagnosed with hiv positive 25 years ago, guess what, he is still living healthy now, when he was first diagnosed his doctor suggested him to take those medicine which so call will help him to suppress the virus, he started to take, but for period of time, he started to feel his body getting weaker, more symptoms showed up, he finally decided to stop the medicine himself ,yes of course he continued to receive the medicine but he chosen not to take ,few weeks after, he recovered , stamina and getting healthier...illogical isn't ? He told me, shall I believe ? I font know, but i don't think he lied to me , what for ? He gets nothing if he lies to me
? Duesberg uses the scientific method? What’s the controversy?
And the AIDS IS JUST A HYPOTHESIS
And Doc F was there then doing what he does best. RIP ❤🔥Aaron Arnold Enoch Runningroad Quirk.
In which years this video????
Smart man .
I HAVE A QUESTION PLS NOTICE ME ....
HOW CAN WE ELIMINATE THESE DRUGS IN OUR BODY AFTER STOPPING FROM TAKING IT. PLS HELP ME
What worked for me was diet and exercise. Your body will detox stop eating all processed food take sugar out of your diet. You have been given a second chance take it vantage of it!
James Morgan i want to stop taking arv but my doc tell me, once i stop taking the med i will die slowly.its true.i need clearified.
@@goodbepositive9051 please don't stop.I lost a friend who did the same
dumisani mbense really??
@@goodbepositive9051 AIDS is a disease that was made up to prove there was a new infection caused by HIV so the CDC could get funding. AIDS was nothing new, but it was simply a trick of taking already well known disease conditions and consolidating them all under AIDS. Scientists said HIV causes AIDS. Prior to this new protocol that was justified now with assumption that HIV causes AIDS, then the treatment plan or drug protocol changed. I don't think ARV's were used before AIDS was fabricated, but they had tried and true protocols. I am not an expert, but from what I have learned you will be fine, and I don't think you will die, but just like anybody you need a healthy lifestyle. Docs may think they are right, but it is their training.
He was so ridiculed for his stance and his own research. It was unfair treatment what he went thru but there were so many problems with Galo and his research that it had to be questioned. AZT was the drug given when it was a DNA terminator and killed anyone who took it basically advancing the AIDS virus. He was so right about his own research and still was hated for it. He was a great man!
If this is true. Why is the HI virus or its antibodies only found in such a small number of people? There are many people being tested every day. It seems to be a very rare virus which occurrence is correlated with immune deficiency. Furthermore it can be transmitted because, I guess, almost always there is someone to be associated with the infection (somebody who is HIV positive). Only thing which I could imagine, contrary to what is officially claimed, is that "aids", so immune deficiency, may cause/create the hi virus which then can be transmitted but maybe doesn't cause "aids".
Another thing I don't understand is why did the infection rate of hiv or aids go down in USA and Europe with the use of condoms? Did people also start using less drugs?
I dont have an answer to your first question, but is it possible that people started being less paranoid about HIV around the time that condoms became more popular (perhaps because of it) so people stopped getting tested as often, causing overall less positive cases?
@@dittery No. Positive cases decline when people start using contraceptions which reduced contractions of STDs.
@@inovakovsky only problem is other STDs were rising over the same period that AIDS declining, so I doubt that condoms explain the lack of spread.
1. Increase of use in condoms 2. It's not incredibly contagious 3. It's mostly sexually transmitted. It's not like Flu where you're spreading it all around just by breathing, coughing and touching stuff.
@@methinkskotov3752 Condoms do not protect against all STD's, only those passed by bodily fluids/blood. You can still be infected by chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes, syphilis, HPV etc.
The easiest transmission route of HIV is through blood, this is why gay men have higher rates of HIV. Anal sex causes tears - blood. That doesn't mean you cannot get HIV from sex with a woman, but, it's generally a bit harder.
watching this during covid pandemic
Buenos dias te saludo de colombia 🇨🇴
Fredy mercury
Oh no... oh no. oh no. oh no. I’m in Karen territory. Too many people to argue with... this comment will blow up with the sounds of hundreds of people screaming at me about how I’m wrong.
I feel the same brother. Be strong
They have an army of people to apose this truth because if it was truly challenged they would go to jail.
@@jerryjamify Because medical denialisms harms people.
@@inovakovskyidiot its not denialism it is counter arguement ..
I don't think this is relevant to today's treatment. Why we are seeing drop in CD4 counts and HIV PCR Tests positives?
Google alternative opinion. You will learn that CD4 count is very volatile regardless of HIV and is unlikely a marker of immunity's strength.
@@antonlevkovsky1667 But am I having an unknown reason which is different from my friends, who didn't have risky sex behaviour?
I did not get illness unless I found myself positive in a screening test. Later confirmed by ELISA and then PCR and then again someother tests
@@pozindia1831 My opinion is that one should forget about sex risks of HIV. Maybe overly active persons collect a lot of other germs that give negative effect on immunity. Try watching this, maybe it will help you change your mind: th-cam.com/video/JZ3n6icJIXA/w-d-xo.html
@@pozindia1831 Tests mean nothing and they fully admit they do not test for any virus. I recommend u arm yourself w real knowledge which can be obtained for free in a few hrs by watching House of Numbers & Emperor's New Virus. I'm living proof "HIV/AIDS" is a giant scam, that I believed for 5 yrs & nearly died from the so-called "treatment"
@@pozindia1831 Dr. Karry Mullis "I InventeD the test (PCR) and it DOES NOT TEST FOR ANY SPECIFIC VIRUS." He tells u, on video, how its not designed to even do that- and so does package insert
It's so nice to know that we don't have to take those drugs when we've been HIV+, to stay healthy; yet what happens if it fails, what happens if that HIV virus ends up turning into AIDS? Would it be so foolish to obey if we accept the doctors' suggestions to start taking these antiretrovirals? I think that we can choose well whether we live in our own flesh that HIV is harmless for years, or if it has become a serious health problem.
HIV without treatment has a fatality rate in most people of around 99.8% ... It's DANGEROUS.
This man has so much blood on his hands. Many who were in the early denialism community (who were told they had HIV but didn’t get treated because they denied the causation) died ‘suspiciously’ of what are known as AIDS defining illnesses like KS, pneumocystis, CMV, toxoplasmosis. Oh, but of course it wasn’t AIDS. Cos dying with 3-4 opportunistic infections detected in your body is common apparently (that was heavy sarcasm, they died from AIDS).
Watch the documentary www.behindthefear.com to see more footage of Duesberg and his views on HIV
Thank you!