The memory construction part reminded me of childbirth. There's so much pain but the baby at the end kind of makes the mother seemingly forget everything before.
The five behavioral science principles she explained; 07:34 1. Social Identity Priming 09:44 2. Agency & Control 12:12 3. Operational Transparency 14:22 4. Memory Construction 16:50 5. The power of the Messenger
You left out GANG STALKING. People who study, analyze, stalk and make life difficult for their "victim". Th9se who study behavior have no problem participating in this activity for its under pretense that its for long term betterment of society. These behavioral scientists are thigs wearing bifocals n long coats. If you have no family, connections, credibility or are an x con, they MIGHT select you to "study". Morally corrupt, unethical, devious and conniving individuals seeking career advancement AT YOUR EXPENSE. F behavioral scientists.... With a rusty metal pipe➡️💯✔️👏
Sorry if I missed it but I don't think she ever gave credit to tons of research and experiments on "behavioral science/economics" by Daniel Kahneman ("thinking fast and slow") or Richard thaler ("nudge") or Dan Ariely ("irrational behavior") or many many other professors and scientists and psychologists (author - Rolf Dobelli - "Art of thinking clearly"). there's tons of material available (just search online). I don't think anything she talked about was outside of those known findings (since many years). I wish she had given relevant recognition to their work and given references to resources..
She doesn't have to reference them in her talk. Citing is especially Relevant in the case for literary work. Every speaker of a profession and key not speaker stands on the shoulder of numerous people who built the ground work. You just happen to be familiar with the work of behavioural economists. But in every talk for every field, be it nutrition , environmental science, technology etc, everything is built off others findings. It would be a different case if she wrote a book or published a paper without referencing where her work was coming from if at all it came from them. There comes a time as well when the work doesn't need even need mentioning. Are you going to mention Isaac Newton Everytime you explain why something falls? It's not necessary.
People don't want to sit on the driving seat, they like to be controlled by someone else. People want someone else to decide so that they don't have to bear the responsibility for the consequences of those decisions.
Natural language programming was discredited by Dijkstra, but it is best applicable to live humans. The only thing you need is knowledge about how your own neurocomputer works.
@@Mavish11 no i would rather a bit of death chaos and destruction due to bad indiviudal choices than the government planning and manipulating peoples behaviour
Know that for every govt behavioral engineering employee working to bind us closer together in common purpose there are a thousand of them in private industry working to get you to empty your wallet and destroy your future.
I disagree that this is true. Government marketing to getting people into the military, and the training they get says one thing, then when they are often abandoned, they are not sure the government is on their side. The wording now changed, says you do deserve it. It may even feel like gov is saying sorry.
She mentions about being the first name on the ballot gets more votes which is funny, because on the ballot with Donald Trump and Joe Biden, Joe Bidens name was first and Donald Trumps was last, which I found so strange that I mentioned it to my family when I got home. I told them I would’ve thought the current President,(or anyone trying to get re-elected) should get the first position on the ballots.
So basically the independent decision we are set to make are also manipulated in different ways. Her examples are of informative scenarios but what if someone wants to persuade its people over an opinion asking for neutrality? Not ethical. Great information though.
Who are you to decide what policies are effected? Manipulating peoples behaviour towards your policy is unethical. It is manipulation. Even if you think it's the right thing to do, we live in complex systems that you have no idea what will happen with your manipulation. Just look at countless examples in history, when one group want to impose their values on others.
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
![PASULOL รามเกียรติ์ ตอนที่ 4 นนทกพบรัก [Ramakien Ep.4: Nonthok in love]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tMUQgmZzf_A/mqdefault.jpg)
What a person!
15 years of study & research
Experience with multiple departments in govt..
Impressive!
The memory construction part reminded me of childbirth. There's so much pain but the baby at the end kind of makes the mother seemingly forget everything before.
07:32 1. Social Identity Priming
09:45 2. Agency & Control
12:12 3. Operational Transparency
She's a really good public speaker.
Nope.
And her compadres make superb, splendid GANG STALKERS!
The five behavioral science principles she explained;
07:34 1. Social Identity Priming
09:44 2. Agency & Control
12:12 3. Operational Transparency
14:22 4. Memory Construction
16:50 5. The power of the Messenger
You left out GANG STALKING. People who study, analyze, stalk and make life difficult for their "victim". Th9se who study behavior have no problem participating in this activity for its under pretense that its for long term betterment of society. These behavioral scientists are thigs wearing bifocals n long coats. If you have no family, connections, credibility or are an x con, they MIGHT select you to "study". Morally corrupt, unethical, devious and conniving individuals seeking career advancement AT YOUR EXPENSE. F behavioral scientists.... With a rusty metal pipe➡️💯✔️👏
Very genuine energy which makes a very suited public speaker with good material the energy elevates the speaker
AS AN INDIAN, IT GIVES ME AN IMMENSE PRIDE TO SEE OUR INDIAN DAUGHTERS IN SUCH A POSITION. JAI HIND.
Very underrated video in TH-cam
Sorry if I missed it but I don't think she ever gave credit to tons of research and experiments on "behavioral science/economics" by Daniel Kahneman ("thinking fast and slow") or Richard thaler ("nudge") or Dan Ariely ("irrational behavior") or many many other professors and scientists and psychologists (author - Rolf Dobelli - "Art of thinking clearly"). there's tons of material available (just search online). I don't think anything she talked about was outside of those known findings (since many years). I wish she had given relevant recognition to their work and given references to resources..
She doesn't have to reference them in her talk. Citing is especially Relevant in the case for literary work. Every speaker of a profession and key not speaker stands on the shoulder of numerous people who built the ground work.
You just happen to be familiar with the work of behavioural economists. But in every talk for every field, be it nutrition , environmental science, technology etc, everything is built off others findings.
It would be a different case if she wrote a book or published a paper without referencing where her work was coming from if at all it came from them.
There comes a time as well when the work doesn't need even need mentioning. Are you going to mention Isaac Newton Everytime you explain why something falls? It's not necessary.
It's a 21 minute talk.
You wanted a three hour symposium?
Thank you for sharing the names & books
She is quoting everything from the Book " influence".
People don't want to sit on the driving seat, they like to be controlled by someone else. People want someone else to decide so that they don't have to bear the responsibility for the consequences of those decisions.
what a weird way to start a speech, but it was awesome
truly amazing video!!
Natural language programming was discredited by Dijkstra, but it is best applicable to live humans. The only thing you need is knowledge about how your own neurocomputer works.
I'm not that thrilled at the idea that the government has a behavioural engineering department and might use it on people.
Welcome to society.
Trust me, it's necessary. Especially with how shifty everyone is at taking care of themselves.
@@Mavish11 no i would rather a bit of death chaos and destruction due to bad indiviudal choices than the government planning and manipulating peoples behaviour
As long as it’s used for the greater good for mankind I’m all in. Not for making the rich and powerful more of the same
Know that for every govt behavioral engineering employee working to bind us closer together in common purpose there are a thousand of them in private industry working to get you to empty your wallet and destroy your future.
The scientific studies of human habits, action and intentions known as behavioral science.
Simply amazing
Have a nice weekend. Happy holidays
3:15 One word Change 'You earned it' lead to 9% Increase #Endowment Effect
I disagree that this is true.
Government marketing to getting people into the military, and the training they get says one thing, then when they are often abandoned, they are not sure the government is on their side. The wording now changed, says you do deserve it. It may even feel like gov is saying sorry.
Daniel Airley discusses much of this and more
Just looking . Not being rude see he has half a beard. What going on there may I ask
@@Add_Account485 damaged skin due to burns
Thank you!
thank you for the video
I find the pacing back and forth very distracting.
Said no one.
@@805espy I refer my honorable friend to the answer I gave some months ago.
Call the cops
@@bankruptcy_blueprint It's already been filed with Editpol.
She mentions about being the first name on the ballot gets more votes which is funny, because on the ballot with Donald Trump and Joe Biden, Joe Bidens name was first and Donald Trumps was last, which I found so strange that I mentioned it to my family when I got home. I told them I would’ve thought the current President,(or anyone trying to get re-elected) should get the first position on the ballots.
I think this may happen when you have similar attitudes towards all candidates and your involvement is low.
She cute in smart
So basically the independent decision we are set to make are also manipulated in different ways. Her examples are of informative scenarios but what if someone wants to persuade its people over an opinion asking for neutrality? Not ethical.
Great information though.
Who are you to decide what policies are effected? Manipulating peoples behaviour towards your policy is unethical. It is manipulation. Even if you think it's the right thing to do, we live in complex systems that you have no idea what will happen with your manipulation. Just look at countless examples in history, when one group want to impose their values on others.
9:17
To think science can predict human behaviour is ludicrous...
Science predicted this exact comment 😆
@@samkim872 Everything begins with choice...
@@buddhaneosiddhananda8499 yes but our choices can be influenced or affected by so many things
@@samkim872 Choices stem from our thoughts, science can't say how a.person thinks unless they control them...
Ever heard of psychology or behavioral science?
She called the Obama Whitehouse, the glory days? 🙄
Endownment effect.
Pin
Behavioral "science" is an oxymoron.
looking for actual information not an Obama fan girl
If you didn't get any actual information from this extremely informative video, I really don't know what tell ya 😅😂
she's way above your league bud. stick to watching your clay pigeon shooting videos and let the pros handle this subject matter.