Where can I read about "amal ahlul kufa" in the books of shaybani and early hanafi scholars.. and if its not there.. then how did he not know it unless the concept didn't exist in their minds and is just later people inventing an idea based on amal ahlul madinah
It's not a concept that the early hanafi scholars considered and documented on purpose but it seems that according to shaykh Ismail the influence of regional practice on the schools is a natural result of the phenomenon he seems to have observed according to his statement at 39:05
This is the second lecture to come out in a month on this topic of Fiqh or Hadith ? See the link below to the one by Dr Mufti Abdur Rahman: th-cam.com/video/W7FJyiaGBrE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=L9oD0H-ZRmkshN9c So the question is really about those Muslims who claim they can work everything out from books of hadith, which in the above link is really the salafi school, which Dr Rahman calls the fifth school. For the vast majority of Muslims, their daily lives are centred around basics of the deen: salat, fasting, marriage , divorce, death, zakat, hajj, umrah, writing a will. The differences in the ritualistic acts between the schools of fiqh is so small, as to be non existent. Ibn Rushd also quotes from the Zaheeri madhab in his great book ‘Distinguished Jurist’s Primer..’, as he lived after the time of Ibn Hazm. It seems this discussion could have been more fruitful if the Sheikh could tell us which ahadith, which are not related to ritualistic acts, but still come under the term ‘ahkam-ad deen’ which are 100% authentic and are in the Prophet’s[saw] own words. Thus we are talking about ahadith which are clearly ‘amr’ and ‘ nahy’.
Shiekh I Ibrahim is an absolute gem❤
Was happy to be a part of this
Is this the guy from IslamicAwakening forums?
Yes
Can you please explain your statement at 49:16. Who defined the mainstream? The Madanis? The Muhaddithun?
Where can I read about "amal ahlul kufa" in the books of shaybani and early hanafi scholars.. and if its not there.. then how did he not know it unless the concept didn't exist in their minds and is just later people inventing an idea based on amal ahlul madinah
It's not a concept that the early hanafi scholars considered and documented on purpose but it seems that according to shaykh Ismail the influence of regional practice on the schools is a natural result of the phenomenon he seems to have observed according to his statement at 39:05
This is the second lecture to come out in a month on this topic of Fiqh or Hadith ? See the link below to the one by Dr Mufti Abdur Rahman:
th-cam.com/video/W7FJyiaGBrE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=L9oD0H-ZRmkshN9c
So the question is really about those Muslims who claim they can work everything out from books of hadith, which in the above link is really the salafi school, which Dr Rahman calls the fifth school. For the vast majority of Muslims, their daily lives are centred around basics of the deen: salat, fasting, marriage , divorce, death, zakat, hajj, umrah, writing a will. The differences in the ritualistic acts between the schools of fiqh is so small, as to be non existent. Ibn Rushd also quotes from the Zaheeri madhab in his great book ‘Distinguished Jurist’s Primer..’, as he lived after the time of Ibn Hazm. It seems this discussion could have been more fruitful if the Sheikh could tell us which ahadith, which are not related to ritualistic acts, but still come under the term ‘ahkam-ad deen’ which are 100% authentic and are in the Prophet’s[saw] own words. Thus we are talking about ahadith which are clearly ‘amr’ and ‘ nahy’.