Ah that was an uphill argument for the Appellant. They had to argue that, even in the modern day, de facto couples are different from legally married couples (which is no longer recognised in most areas including in the Family Court), and further that same-sex relationships should be treated differently from heterosexual relationship (which is not, or rather no longer, morally sustainable).
I disagree. So if I put a deposit and 3 months later we sell. Do you get half my deposit? Who would agree to that? Might as well just hand over the cash.
Im here to hear the accent.
fair enough
Ah that was an uphill argument for the Appellant. They had to argue that, even in the modern day, de facto couples are different from legally married couples (which is no longer recognised in most areas including in the Family Court), and further that same-sex relationships should be treated differently from heterosexual relationship (which is not, or rather no longer, morally sustainable).
How is it not morally sustainable?
this isnt suits????
I am here preparing for simultaneous interpretation…
Who won?
Really motivational
D agree
I disagree. So if I put a deposit and 3 months later we sell. Do you get half my deposit? Who would agree to that? Might as well just hand over the cash.
BONNIE412.
Story psitv
Devils
Yes, you are!
Please give me some information about unsw......
AND SCHOLARSHIP ALSO
@@ak-he4zq it's a university in Sydney Australia
@@joshuakhan4870 ok
why would a prestigious uni give scholarships to students who can't do their research?
@@leslieandrew1925
小妞
你的水平稍低!
呵呵 @@yunghuang6028
same sex couple can not make a child! End of Story! God Speaks!
@@emmaconnelly6162 not when it comes to children!
@@emmaconnelly6162 SPOT ON SWEETY!
SINCE WHEN CAN CHILDREN MAKE BABIES?
@@emmaconnelly6162 WHO MENTIONED ABUSE?
@@emmaconnelly6162 oh snd im not judging, im stating a true fact!
ALEJANDRA ALVAREZ@ CATHERYGNE WATKINS?....