2022's Biggest Breakthroughs in Math

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
  • Mathematicians made major progress in 2022, solving a centuries-old geometry question called the interpolation problem, proving the best way to minimize the surface area of clusters of three, four and five bubbles, and proving a sweeping statement about how structure emerges in random sets and graphs. Read more about these and other mathematical advances at Quanta Magazine: www.quantamaga...
    You can read also about the biggest breakthroughs of 2022 in physics, biology, and computer science on our magazine website: www.quantamaga...
    - VISIT our Website: www.quantamaga...
    - LIKE us on Facebook: / quantanews
    - FOLLOW us Twitter: / quantamagazine
    Quanta Magazine is an editorially independent publication supported by the Simons Foundation www.simonsfoun...
    Correction: An earlier version of this video incorrectly suggested that Vogt and Larson solved the Brill-Noether theorem and has been deleted. Instead, the couple solved the interpolation problem. This video more accurately reflects what they proved. We regret the error.

ความคิดเห็น • 486

  • @QuantaScienceChannel
    @QuantaScienceChannel  ปีที่แล้ว +541

    A note to viewers: We're taking a break from producing our "Biggest Breakthroughs in Physics" and "Biggest Breakthroughs in Biology" videos this year, but you can read our curated lists for these topics, plus a summary of computer science breakthroughs, at our magazine website: www.quantamagazine.org/tag/2022-in-review/
    We’ll be back with more videos in 2023, including a full set of "Biggest Breakthroughs" videos.
    Correction: An earlier version of this video incorrectly suggested that Vogt and Larson solved the Brill-Noether theorem and has been deleted. Instead, the couple solved the interpolation problem. This video more accurately reflects what they proved. We regret the error.

    • @primenumberbuster404
      @primenumberbuster404 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Now it makes sense. It's awesome that you really deleted the earlier video. Some people don't do it. Massive respect for that.

    • @aramesh428
      @aramesh428 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's ok, sometimes Christmas presents get delayed until after the holidays 🙂

    • @realdreray
      @realdreray ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ahh I see. Fantastic math video here. I applied for your Video Producer position I'd love to help bring those other videos to life!

    • @sherlockmaverick
      @sherlockmaverick ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Amazing!
      BTW, this is a reupload, right? I remember watching this more than a day ago!

    • @jameschen2308
      @jameschen2308 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was about to say. I swear I saw this video uploaded yesterday

  • @accipitridae2128
    @accipitridae2128 ปีที่แล้ว +2366

    I appreciate the efforts in trying to make these heavily technical subjects reachable to the general public. Kudos to y'all :⁠-⁠)

    • @simonlinser8286
      @simonlinser8286 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      i enjoy watching these subjects but if they didn't explain it this way i wouldn't know why it was important that these strides are being made.

    • @soheil5710
      @soheil5710 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@simonlinser8286 I honestly still don't know

  • @jakublizon6375
    @jakublizon6375 ปีที่แล้ว +1231

    I'm happy for that math nerd couple. What a story it will be to their kids. "We met trying to solve the interpolation problem of advanced mathematics". Ahh, so sweet.

    • @stefevr
      @stefevr ปีที่แล้ว +98

      they actually named their kid Interpolation Problem

    • @Somebodyherefornow
      @Somebodyherefornow ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@stefevr " I hate you"

    • @stefevr
      @stefevr ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@Somebodyherefornow "thanks"

    • @slashtab
      @slashtab ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The way she said "well! we got married.."

    • @flyingspinners1
      @flyingspinners1 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@stefevr atleast the child will get the big brain math genes

  • @randomknowledgeperson2872
    @randomknowledgeperson2872 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    are you guys gonna do a “2022 a year in physics” and “a year in biology” like you did for 2021? i really liked both videos and would love to see how we’ve improved this past year

    • @artieschmidt3039
      @artieschmidt3039 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They explained in the pinned comment that they will not do it

  • @RaffyEdris
    @RaffyEdris ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have no idea on what I just watched, but it sounds like a really hard topic and to grasp. Kudos to all of the mathematician out there doing their best to solve a problem that could in turn help humanity. Your sacrifice will not be forgotten.

  • @yolanankaine6063
    @yolanankaine6063 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Truly mind blown by the brilliance and determination of these people.

  • @kaibuchan
    @kaibuchan ปีที่แล้ว +2

    YES. SO AWESOME. Thank you mathematicians for everything. Humanity owes you everything.

  • @maratmkhitaryan9723
    @maratmkhitaryan9723 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3:22 I see penus and amongus

  • @johnleecooper8520
    @johnleecooper8520 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    clusters of Sullivan's shadow bubbles is definitely a dnd spell

  • @takyc7883
    @takyc7883 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People don’t understand how huge a discovery this is

  • @matthewp4046
    @matthewp4046 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool stuff! Can we get youtube chapters on these videos?

  • @luciojb
    @luciojb ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:23 oh no

  • @ninjmaster5609
    @ninjmaster5609 ปีที่แล้ว

    I understand the part with the Bubbles

  • @viernesarcranielb.103
    @viernesarcranielb.103 ปีที่แล้ว

    is Eric Larsen any way related to Daniel Larsen? The prime number guy?

  • @kheshirekat9623
    @kheshirekat9623 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is 3 points a circle and not a triangle??

    • @Professionalyoutubeviewer
      @Professionalyoutubeviewer ปีที่แล้ว

      💀

    • @Professionalyoutubeviewer
      @Professionalyoutubeviewer ปีที่แล้ว

      The points here are in reference to curves not shapes

    • @kheshirekat9623
      @kheshirekat9623 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Professionalyoutubeviewer by why is 2 points a straight line then?? (I’m sorry if I’m missing something,, I know it already went over my head but I’m still curious)

    • @Professionalyoutubeviewer
      @Professionalyoutubeviewer ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kheshirekat9623 Lol no need to feel embarrassed for not knowing something! In this context, a straight line is a curve with curvature 0.

    • @Professionalyoutubeviewer
      @Professionalyoutubeviewer ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kheshirekat9623 I’m only barely grasping what they are talking about myself, without the prior knowledge they have on the subjects these discussions can truly feel alien to us huh

  • @CloudMaking
    @CloudMaking ปีที่แล้ว

    This video will be the start of major things. ,☁️

  • @Ewr42
    @Ewr42 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't you just observe foam to solve bubbles's minimal surface area?
    Just make them increasingly more solid/perfectly spherical after(if that's the objective) and do basic calculus to see if variations converge to that solution or another one.
    Let me guess: triangle(like a rugby ball) for 3 bubbles, a tetrahedra for 4 bubbles and two pointed tetrahedra for 5 bubbles?
    I must not have the slightest clue about it, surely

    • @hillaryclinton2415
      @hillaryclinton2415 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Foam solves the least possible stresses.. not the connections for random points. But your comment was entertaining....

    • @Ewr42
      @Ewr42 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hillaryclinton2415 what would "the connections between random points" mean exactly in this context?
      Please paint me a picture of what I should be thinking of, feel free to use an excess of words if needed

  • @donnacabot3550
    @donnacabot3550 ปีที่แล้ว

    E=(J)mc2

  • @jaketheathiest3927
    @jaketheathiest3927 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:22 🤨📸

  • @Nobody-Nowhere-Nothing
    @Nobody-Nowhere-Nothing ปีที่แล้ว

    10:11 his name is literally pronounced as "WE FAM"... dope

  • @maxmacfarland8439
    @maxmacfarland8439 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:26 sus?

  • @accipitridae2128
    @accipitridae2128 ปีที่แล้ว +1459

    I feel like a caveman compared to these smart guys. Keep up the good work!

    • @akshatgupta8898
      @akshatgupta8898 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      right
      me tooo

    • @resiliencewithin
      @resiliencewithin ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Thanks for sharing your feelings on the comment section.

    • @CSTEnjoyer
      @CSTEnjoyer ปีที่แล้ว +54

      That is because we are. Mathematicians are a species of their own

    • @Wabbelpaddel
      @Wabbelpaddel ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@CSTEnjoyer Sure about that? The significant things that truly distinguish them are their imagination and building on abstraction moreso than mere language offers, via fully blown logic.

    • @CSTEnjoyer
      @CSTEnjoyer ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Wabbelpaddel there's a reason why almost all mathmaticians are kinda "weird" people. What they lack in social skills, they have in IQ.

  • @FirstnameLastname-fn6ik
    @FirstnameLastname-fn6ik ปีที่แล้ว +1759

    Thank god somebody likes math so I don't have to think about it and we can still advance as a society.

    • @vaisakhkm783
      @vaisakhkm783 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      ikr

    • @HilbertXVI
      @HilbertXVI ปีที่แล้ว +197

      If you don't like it you haven't been taught math right, unfortunately

    • @ethanzheng1368
      @ethanzheng1368 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@HilbertXVI 🤓

    • @hello-hb1ll
      @hello-hb1ll ปีที่แล้ว +128

      @@ethanzheng1368 he's right. "Nerd" is just a compliment

    • @Max-jm6md
      @Max-jm6md ปีที่แล้ว +95

      @@HilbertXVI what evidence suggests everyone is keen on learning math if "taught properly?" we're all unique and complicated individuals with different interests.

  • @kebman
    @kebman ปีที่แล้ว +159

    I probably got this video because I was interested in another video on splines by Freya Holmér. She has the most in-depth videos on the topic, and they are beautifully animated too!

    • @vascomarques637
      @vascomarques637 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      we stan freya holmér

    • @xylh5085
      @xylh5085 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thanks for the recommendation. I've played with splines before and they are very strange and interesting at first blush

    • @jayd2279
      @jayd2279 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vascomarques637 All the way!

    • @themannyzaur
      @themannyzaur ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Ayyyyy Freya appreciator in the wild!
      Les goooooooooooooooo
      My foundation in math is very weak but I managed to catch a few things in her video

    • @chotai
      @chotai ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I just jumped here from that video

  • @zitagus9207
    @zitagus9207 ปีที่แล้ว +320

    It's realy amazing seeing young mathematicians doing big discoveries 👏👏👏

    • @DrRiq
      @DrRiq ปีที่แล้ว +2

      as well as big mathematicians doing young discoveries! 👏👏👏

    • @Nat-oj2uc
      @Nat-oj2uc ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Not really would be more surprising if they were old

    • @DrRiq
      @DrRiq ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Nat-oj2uc i was being dumb for the sake of the funny

  • @quantumbyte-studios
    @quantumbyte-studios ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Networks, bubbles, and curves.. never realized how technical and deep these can be.. kind of like chess, simple to grasp the basics but takes a lifetime to master

    • @perseusgeorgiadis7821
      @perseusgeorgiadis7821 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The most complex problems, often have very simple rules.
      Try proving that each even number bigger than 2 can be written as the sum of two primes…

    • @neville132bbk
      @neville132bbk ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm sure there are 13 *n possible opening plays in Bridge..... whenever I am on lead... the possibilities seem limitless :-)
      where n must be > 13.......

  • @MAFiA303
    @MAFiA303 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    wheh the guy spoke, i didnt expect this to be his voice. amazing accomplishment regardless

  • @Bhargav_Sarma
    @Bhargav_Sarma ปีที่แล้ว +96

    Quanta Magazine should start a special category for Chemistry too!!!

    • @EMC273
      @EMC273 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree

    • @zinzhao8231
      @zinzhao8231 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Hell no

    • @DariusTheClairvoyant
      @DariusTheClairvoyant ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Fuck chemistry

    • @astroid-ws4py
      @astroid-ws4py ปีที่แล้ว

      Only if it is Computational Chemistry !

    • @Fonsecaj89
      @Fonsecaj89 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m ok thinking that chemistry is plain magic

  • @160p2GHz
    @160p2GHz ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Was just telling my friend I don't even pay attention to who won the Nobel anymore, I just watch the Quanta biggest breakthroughs in X each year... feels more cutting edge, inclusive, and not just a friend of a friend... genuinely the new things that should excite me. And y'all do a great job making it understandable.

  • @Ubsje
    @Ubsje ปีที่แล้ว +43

    3:21 at first it's just sus, but then it turns into something even more SUS

    • @yotams6168
      @yotams6168 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      LOL STOOOOOOOOOOP

    • @swaree
      @swaree ปีที่แล้ว +1

      came to the comments to say just that

    • @clawed_xo
      @clawed_xo ปีที่แล้ว +10

      "They were able to get something simple enough that they can attack with their bare hands."
      Surely🗿

    • @berliansuryani1401
      @berliansuryani1401 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Certified sussy^2 baka moment

  • @Patashu
    @Patashu ปีที่แล้ว +84

    I love hearing about the progress being made in math!

  • @lycantropos
    @lycantropos ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I see what you've done here at 3:23 😉

  • @IanGrams
    @IanGrams ปีที่แล้ว +75

    Dang, talk about relationship goals. It would be pretty cool to publish a paper with your partner, let alone one so substantial.
    Also cheers Quanta for reuploading to correct the error in the original. It was a small one but the commitment to accuracy is much appreciated.

  • @thelocalsage
    @thelocalsage ปีที่แล้ว +21

    i am nowhere near proficient enough in mathematics to understand these problems in depth, but i remember watching a couple lectures by jinyoung park earlier this year and being mystified by the subject matter and enjoying her lecture style! would love to understand all these questions more intimately

  • @AlignedIT
    @AlignedIT ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Beautifully presented and made these complex topics interesting and accessible.

  • @veks374
    @veks374 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love the video but Eric's voice caught me fully off-guard lmao

  • @angel-ig
    @angel-ig ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Guys, read the description please lol.
    Edit: nevermind, now it's pinned also

  • @Nat-oj2uc
    @Nat-oj2uc ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Math is the most fundamental and important science. The advancements in other fields often depend on how advanced we are in math.
    Respect to those people. Hypothesis is easy. Actually shutting up and proving it that's what is hard

  • @marcelcoetzee48
    @marcelcoetzee48 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Can anyone explain why solving the interpolation problem can improve data storage? Where can I read more on this?

    • @hedgechasing
      @hedgechasing ปีที่แล้ว +122

      I think the rough idea is that if you can capture all the points on a single curve, storing just the data you need to create the curve could allow you to recreate all the points. Like if I want to remember the numbers 5 6 7 8 9 I can just remember that there are 5 of them and they increase stepwise from 5 which is simpler than storing all five of them (especially as the number of points increases). I am not sure this is correct and I am not sure where you can find out more, but this seems like the intuitive reason it might be useful for that process.

    • @marcelcoetzee48
      @marcelcoetzee48 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@hedgechasing incredible. Thank you

    • @leonmozambique533
      @leonmozambique533 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      they can also be used for error correction. Look up “Reed Solomon codes”

    • @maxmuller445
      @maxmuller445 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@leonmozambique533 Yes, compression and correction always walk hand in hand.

    • @kindlin
      @kindlin ปีที่แล้ว

      @Black Screen That's an approximation tho, this is dealing with exacts. I think hedge has a good handle on what's happening here.

  • @badouceesay4468
    @badouceesay4468 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That first guy's voice caught me off guard 😭😭😭😭

  • @ThumbsTup
    @ThumbsTup ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I hate myself for never being able to advance the world of maths

  • @LolIGuess123
    @LolIGuess123 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The best part of these videos is hearing the struggles and challenges and how they were overcome. Please continue these types of inquiry!

  • @3starsfell
    @3starsfell ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Math is the language of God. Robert Edward grant has proven this

  • @rujotheone
    @rujotheone ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Me: "They look like a couple, are we sure they are not dating? "
    1:35 : "We got married"
    Me: "Oh😅"

  • @fknGandalf
    @fknGandalf ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Little did they know... the answer lies in the windows 2000 pipes screensaver

  • @freydawg56
    @freydawg56 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I love these videos at the end of the year. I always look forward to all the different topics of science.

  • @pressfinchat
    @pressfinchat ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3:22 Woah Woah… WHAT exactly are you drawing?? 🤨

  • @drewweber7874
    @drewweber7874 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    3:22 had me nervous for a second…

  • @hitarthk
    @hitarthk ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thanks to the Simon Foundation for highlighting and maybe even fueling such fundamental discoveries!

  • @mueezadam8438
    @mueezadam8438 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So much lame self-deprecation in the comments. Math is to reason as language is to communication, literally: just as all humans are born with a capacity for language acquisition, so to does every human possess the innate ability to reason in the abstract.

  • @justapassie
    @justapassie ปีที่แล้ว +7

    the bubble thingy...it looks like shapes of hybridization lol

    • @tcaDNAp
      @tcaDNAp ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought the same thing... that example seems to drive home the applications of the theorem!

  • @martinauld670
    @martinauld670 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’m jealous of these people’s minds. So innovative

  • @MadeBySeva
    @MadeBySeva ปีที่แล้ว +1

    andrew tate voice: "NERDS!!!!"
    just kidding Im just compensating

  • @The-EJ-Factor
    @The-EJ-Factor ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What ever you do do not look at the bottom left corner of 3:23 😅

  • @Jenny-tu9fc
    @Jenny-tu9fc ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Fascinating stuff!!!! I admire and respect the individuals who tackle such beautiful problems. I wish I could be on that level.

  • @spodeian
    @spodeian ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can the interpolation problem be used to solve the travelling salesman problem I wonder?

  • @viewer9999
    @viewer9999 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    can you do 2022's Biggest Breakthroughs neurology/ medicine. please and thank you

    • @kangaroo1q
      @kangaroo1q ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow you read about neurology interesting

    • @viewer9999
      @viewer9999 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's not what you think .

  • @und3rcut535
    @und3rcut535 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow the buble problem can lead to major improvments in Pharmacy and drug design

  • @sypen1
    @sypen1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    His voice was not what I expected.

  • @HeWhoProclaims
    @HeWhoProclaims ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The first animation shown is two dots and the narrator asks "What kind of curve is uniquely defined by these two points?". Then proceeds to draw a straight line through it as if that was the answer to the question. Am I missing something here or is it obvious that, a line isn't a curve. I even Googled if a line can be considered a type of curve in any way shape or form and it says that a true definitive term of a line is a straight direction with no curve at all. I'm watching this to become smarter. Not be misinformed, so what's truly happening right now and is did the video's creator just make a mistake or something?

    • @nicolasoyarce9734
      @nicolasoyarce9734 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematicians considered straight lines to be curves. There's a technical definition of curve that includes straight lines

    • @guilhermefurquim8179
      @guilhermefurquim8179 ปีที่แล้ว

      "watching this to become smarter" is the dumbest thing I heard today. You're just procrastinating. The only way to actually be smarter is to study.

  • @anishkumaranjan
    @anishkumaranjan ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Which tools have been used to create these animations??

    • @matthewao
      @matthewao ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most likely AfterEffects

  • @MustangKepler
    @MustangKepler ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:23 some kind of serious curves, Must be graet a graet discovery.

  • @griseld
    @griseld ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I can swear i saw this video yesterday but it's published one hour ago, wtf?

    • @zhinkunakur4751
      @zhinkunakur4751 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Reup

    • @IanGrams
      @IanGrams ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There is a pinned comment explaining the original version had an error in it so they re-uploaded to correct that.

    • @griseld
      @griseld ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@IanGrams thanks!!

    • @IanGrams
      @IanGrams ปีที่แล้ว

      @@griseld you're very welcome :]

  • @Kaiwizz
    @Kaiwizz ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Levi was actually on to something when he said "Give up on your dreams and DIE!!!"

  • @isaacd1045
    @isaacd1045 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Goofy ahh voice on that husband

  • @jurijaerts1086
    @jurijaerts1086 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hahahaahhah the dude from the interpolation problem. his voice hahahahahah

  • @thesigmaenigma9102
    @thesigmaenigma9102 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wonder how many of these problems will be solved via AI in the near future.

  • @addisk22
    @addisk22 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love that these people have a chance to pursue their passions and solve these difficult problems.

  • @accipitridae2128
    @accipitridae2128 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    4:54 Having a surname like Neiman and dressing up like Magnus seems to be the new trend.

  • @studypurposeonly69
    @studypurposeonly69 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This video has way less views for its quality of content even though it's just a day old. Keep up your amazing work!

  • @mikenator6682
    @mikenator6682 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3:22 GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD

  • @WinterAliceLilac
    @WinterAliceLilac ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:23 bottom left lol

  • @GCKteamKrispy
    @GCKteamKrispy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:34 - They are real-life Sheldon and Amy "The big bang theory" 😂

  • @TymexComputing
    @TymexComputing ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Really, naturally interesting - thank you!

  • @thesnazzmaster
    @thesnazzmaster ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can't wait until I get farther in college and can actually understand this

  • @bungalowjuice7225
    @bungalowjuice7225 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel smart watching math videos that I don't understand.

  • @johnvonachen1672
    @johnvonachen1672 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m interested in how much these people depend on smaller simpler pieces of math/algorithms applied iteratively using computers. This is something hinted at in wolfram’s famous/infamous book.

  • @elijahpharoah9807
    @elijahpharoah9807 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You have no idea how long I look forward to these videos

  • @YuTv1408
    @YuTv1408 ปีที่แล้ว

    You work of anything, specially pure math hard enough, sht will happen. Nothing genius about this. Just normal hard work, non toxic environment and be modestly well off financially.

  • @ConnoisseurOfExistence
    @ConnoisseurOfExistence ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice! The graph solution of the last guys might combine nicely with the Wolfram physics model...

  • @thearchangel9835
    @thearchangel9835 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 3:22 who is that bad student who can point out the dirty curve?! 😆🤣

  • @wearethefruitoftheuniverse
    @wearethefruitoftheuniverse ปีที่แล้ว

    Every particle had a time where it was apex particle....
    Little by little the universe had to be reborn over and over again till we get all the particle types we see today...
    Apex doesn't mean only. There is apex powerful😅
    And then there is apex overwhelming
    The powerful are alot less therefore recycling the "Main" apex, giving enough room for particle evolution.
    Higgs era stars and black holes
    Lepton era stars and black holes
    Etc etc
    Eventually you'll reach a limit where inevitably it all collects into black holes.... Till all protons are obsorbed and there is nothing left to the universe except a black hole that's evaporating back to it's simplest truest form possible
    Or we were always wrong and the black hole is the mouth and the anus of matter, the big void is dark energy quede for matter reassembly

  • @randomchannel-px6ho
    @randomchannel-px6ho 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Alright, is that bubble problem solution not evidence of the holographic principle / the likelihood our universe has n-dimensions beyond 4 (12 imo f theory seems promising)

  • @bergrugu
    @bergrugu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I did not expect his voice to sound like that

  • @bijanajamlou5152
    @bijanajamlou5152 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Amazing video! Please do more of these.

  • @Ibloop
    @Ibloop ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🟥

  • @abdelmoulagari8252
    @abdelmoulagari8252 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nerds💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓

  • @sinesierra
    @sinesierra ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazed by the enthusiasm and determination of researchers. Great video, well presented

  • @hillaryclinton2415
    @hillaryclinton2415 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The solution is 42.

  • @ABHAY-hu9kw
    @ABHAY-hu9kw ปีที่แล้ว +9

    All of the mathematicians may not know other ones in this video but, There is a person in this video who now knows solutions of all three problems ,
    The narrator: Thomas Hagena

  • @scozember
    @scozember ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have no clue what they' re talking about but I still watch to the end.

  • @ImchautzuCHAUTZU
    @ImchautzuCHAUTZU ปีที่แล้ว

    6:42 the guy on the right looks like Hugh Jackman
    We got Wolverine solving math problems
    When we gonna get Darwin solving quantum problems....

  • @jrspringston
    @jrspringston ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'll be honest, I clicked on this because my first thought was "there are breakthroughs in math??"
    And now I know. Pretty neat

    • @Dr.Gamboa
      @Dr.Gamboa ปีที่แล้ว

      On a weekly basis, my friend.

  • @STA-3
    @STA-3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, something I found out is that if you make a list of n to the power of 2 like this: (I'm not sure if someone has found this math easter-egg)
    0² = 0 -> You subtract the results and get those numbers: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9... and if you subtract *again* you get a constant number: 2
    1² = 1
    2² = 4
    3² = 9
    4² = 16
    5² = 25
    ...
    Now what's interesting is that this also works in exponents bigger than 2. Like:
    0³ = 0 -> You subtract like before and you get: 7, 19, 37, 61... and if you subtract *again* you get 12, 18, 24, 30, 36... if you subtract it again, you
    1³ = 1 come up with 6
    2³ = 8
    3³ = 27
    4³ = 64
    5³ = 125
    ...
    So far i did experimenting with the numbers and came up with a table like this:
    Exponent: 2 3 4 5
    Constant: 2 6 24 120
    Times subtracted: 2 3 4 5
    So what we find that the exponent *matches* the amount of subtractions. But when i was looking at the constant, i immediately thought about the factorials, wich means that the constant *matches* the factorial of the exponent. Huh, thats very cool.

    • @sarahtsakopulos76
      @sarahtsakopulos76 ปีที่แล้ว

      Broooo🤯

    • @barakeel
      @barakeel ปีที่แล้ว

      you rediscovered calculus (derivation in the discrete case)

    • @STA-3
      @STA-3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@barakeel Oh damn. Haha!

  • @joshua1188
    @joshua1188 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for bringing attention to the people who are the least appreciated but most impactful.

  • @MatBat__
    @MatBat__ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Incredible! Thank you for this great video and thanks to the researchers for pushing humanity foward.
    Cheers

  • @danielhuhtala2773
    @danielhuhtala2773 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:23 they knew what they were doing 😏

  • @jdthebomb
    @jdthebomb ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5:05 Oh yeah I have experience 😏.

  • @billy-cg1qq
    @billy-cg1qq ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok, so are we seing a breakthrough in math or a happy life of a couple being together and I'm single since Eons

  • @mygirl737g2
    @mygirl737g2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    this is so neat! Love Math!