Public Art Study: Fred Wilson's E Pluribus Unum | The Art Assignment | PBS Digital Studios
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ค. 2024
- Pre-order our book YOU ARE AN ARTIST (which includes new assignments!) here: bit.ly/2kplj2h Today's episode has been sponsored by Squarespace. For more information, visit www.squarespace.com/artassignment
What is public art? Who funds it, owns it, and shapes it? Who does it serve? And why is it important? We try to answer some of these questions by looking at an example of public art that never came to be - Fred Wilson’s E Pluribus Unum.
Don't forget to subscribe for new episodes of The Art Assignment every Thursday!
---
Follow us elsewhere for the full Art Assignment experience!
Tumblr: theartassignment.com
Response Tumblr: all.theartassignment.com
Twitter: / artassignment
Instagram: / theartassignment
Facebook: / theartassignment
and don't forget Reddit!: / theartassignment
![[SUB] 베몬이 교관님 멘탈을 탕탕 후루후루~٩(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)۶ FOREVER 웃게 되는 갓기들의 수련회 | 돌들의침묵 | BABYMONSTER(베이비몬스터) 'FOREVER'](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FISAO7BwIxE/mqdefault.jpg)
Completely fascinating. I'd love to be apart of a wider dialogue about whether public art should engender positivity or if the purpose of public art, like most other forms of art, should be to evoke thought and conversation and maybe the ultimate realization that just because something causes you to feel mixed emotions, that doesn't mean its message cannot be positive.
Great video!
This is a really interesting episode! I really like this style of episode, a study focused mostly on just one or two artworks. More like this please!
+Divi I agree, this has been my favorite AI episode maybe ever.
+Divi Thank you! We'll likely do a few more throughout the coming year that focus on a single public art work as a way to talk through larger issues. Happy to hear suggestions about which works to consider.
this video has definitely changed the ways in which i'll look at any public art i come across now, especially here in my hometown of Frankfurt, Germany. I definitely take note of installations around me, but i've never thought about the development process behind them. (Except for the time when the university put 100 little colourful Goethe statues all over the front lawn to celebrate its centennial. That was so cute that it stuck to my mind and I had to read up on it.)
Hi estherrawr would you be so kind to write to me the complete text of Hans Haake monumento for Rose Luxemburg please???
Wow. This is a trip down memory lane. I remember reading Leroy's response in the Indianapolis Recorder in the fall of 2010 as an intern for the Walker Theatre. Watching the combination of criticism and fan-fare for Fred Wilson's E Pluribus Unum unfold in real-time was fascinating. Thanks for chronicling this!
I remember being there at the Walker Theatre when they had the debate that went way too left. I felt bad for Fred Wilson because they did not give him a chance to speak at all. I was an intern at WISH-and I heard about it through my aunt. I then told my mentor Deanna and she covered it. It was crazy.
I am so glad this series exists I have learned so much from it.
Hi Sarah,
I just wanted to thank you for all of your hard work with this show. It really has been a useful tool, and something I come back to an reference again and again. You are helping me to think more deeply, and engage with more art than I ever would have without this show. You are doing an amazing job, and I really appreciate it.
+Martin Schendel Thank you for watching, Martin! And for participating in the comments as well.
Great video! It also reminds me of other public works that were never made or removed, like Richard Serra's Tilted Arc.
+Little Art Talks Yes, one of the most famously disliked public art works of all time!
i'm reassured "you also respect the opinions of those who opposed it." 5:00 glad we got your approval on that one.
I very much don't understand art. Sometimes I see lines that tell a story, of far off lands or difficult ideas, but sometimes I just see lines. This message brought to you by staying up super late...
Amazing perspective. I can't wait to share this with my students. Each time I watch an episode, I remember why I fell for art in college. Thanks for renewing that love over and over again.
Mining the museum is one of the cornerstones of contemporary art, curatorship, museology, and the field of art and culture nowadays. It would be awesome to get an interview with Fred, to me, one of the top 10 most influential artists in XXI Century.
While Mining the Museum was at the Maryland Historical Society, Fred Wilson also worked in conjunction with The Contemporary in Baltimore :)
OHMYGODIFOUNDIT. THIS IS SO RELEVANT RIGHT NOW I CANT.
This was a fantastic episode. I love the use of a single artwork (with some context maybe) to elaborate on a broader idea or issue.
Sara,
This show is amazing. When I was first made aware of it I binged watch dozens of videos. I specially love the "A case for..." videos. As others have said because is an in-depth view of an artist or a work of art and I feel that I learn a lot. Keep up the good work!
What a great episode! I probably would have never heard of this project otherwise. Very interesting!
One of the best episodes so far!
The meaning really does change with time. Really interesting!!
This reminds me of the Daily Show episode a few days (weeks?) ago about the town seal in upstate New York, which features an offensive depiction of a Native American being choked by a white man, which wasn't the historical scene that actually took place. The scene was a wrestling match intending to show how friendly the two groups of people were. Art gets interpreted differently over time, and it's important to acknowledge both the history and why we now view something as offensive that wasn't before, and why artistic intention doesn't matter as much as the consequence in some cases.
This was a fantastic video
It's the same when rape victims include rape in their writings or art yet some people outside their circle say that they cannot do that as it may or may not send the right message. It's complicated and neither are wrong.
This reminds me of my local public art. In San Jose, California there is a controversial "Park God" statue. The statue sits in the heart of down town and was commissioned by the City of San Jose to represent the local Mexican population. The artist Robert Graham, chose to do a "Plumed Serpent" based on the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl. The serpent sits in a coil on a low concrete pedestal and really looks like a giant peace of dog poop. The statue's plaque doesn't say the name of the statue "Plumed Serpent", instead it reads "Park God", or "Dog Krap" if you spell it backwards. When I walk past it, I always think about how it is truly symbolic of San Jose's disconnect from the art and cultural relevance of it's neighboring cities of San Francisco and Oakland.
Thanks to this video I did some research to check the facts about the "Park God" and I was pleasantly surprised that the story I'd been told about the statue was actually close to the truth. Amazing.
www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Jose-sculpture-described-as-waste-3156625.php
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Graham_(sculptor)
+Jackie Bennett I can't tell you how gratifying it was to see the image of this sculpture after reading your description. I almost cried I laughed so hard. It's less funny for the residents of San Jose, I imagine.
I have some difficulty with the concept of a "commissioned work of art" when it comes to public art. Probably because I have my personal work and then there is the commissioned work I do. The first one is whatever rocks my boat and the public can take or leave it. ( and they mostly leave it to be honest ;-) ) and then there is the commissioned work that is all about what others want, but I can create and of course it gets created with my style. Watching this video all I could think of is "what a nightmare for the artist. It is almost an impossible endeavor, since communities rarely have a unified perspective and that will mean that in order to succeed the artist would have to consider every possible interpretation of his work in an effort to be mindful of everybody's possible feedback (trying to please everybody) which you know from the get go is not achievable. Kind of like getting hire for a gig with thousands of art directors to please. And you know before hand what way is gonna go because if the goal is not to disturb anyone you know flat and boring art is your safest bet.
Good job not making a pubic art typo in the title or description!
+Joshua Janecek Thanks, Joshua. I do my best.
Interesting how this relates to another great controversy involving “E pluribus unum”-the phrase, not the sculpture. This was the official motto of the United States until “In God we trust?” was adopted in 1956, around the same time that “under God” was added to the Pledge of Allegiance. Now many people (including me) think the later motto inappropriately ties a religious element to the government. Is either phrase really a good motto?
4:17 "The meaning of the artwork was unclear to many, raising questions instead of answering them." lol i wonder what art that answers questions would look like. hmmm, probably like your typical city monument.
What does it _mean_ that you respect those voices here?
I was completely taken out of the video when Sara said she was in middle school in 1992. I didn't realize that she was so young.
That said, I think that there is a definite need for representations of Black culture that are not prefaced through the lens of white culture first. I believe Mr. Wilson's idea shows not only respect for the original piece and that artist but an understanding of what images and the placement of those images would be the most resonant to his audience.
It does seem the trend in public art is going one of two ways.
First way something becomes public art is that a wealthy person donates a piece they have purchased or commissioned- so what the 1% values gets a lot of representation.
Second way something becomes public art is that interested people try to make something meaningful, but because one single complaint gets so much weight the only type of art that can survive the public scrutiny is so generic and un-remarkably unobjectionable that that is can barely be called art.
That sounded like a great artwork... but issues are so complex that I understand how it could have raised negative feelings. Still, I'm not convinced that having no monument at all is an improvement.
Ps: I found the numerous cutting in and out a bit distracting, and not really adding any value to what Sarah was saying.
Why are people so stupid? That sounds like a fantastic sculpture idea!!!!!
+Acquavallo People aren't stupid, they just are interpreting the art differently from it's creator, which is not necessarily wrong. The thoughts and feelings that a work causes are just as valid as the intent of its creator, and I would argue that they can be more valid, as the work is usually made to communicate. If the reading of a work is misunderstood, it is my opinion that the creator is the one who should have foreseen that interpretation, and made their intention clearer.
I don't agree. Just because people have opinions, it doesn't mean they're valid; they can come form mistaken points, false ideas or sometimes willful misinformation. And in the case of this work I have absolutely no idea how anyone could consider this work offensive to african americans... It turns the side character of the freed slave into a leading actor of the self liberated person
It was mentioned in the video that the opposition to the sculpture found its placement distasteful. It's hard to know what their entire argument was without researching more, but I think we need to at least hear them out before writing them off as stupid.