I don't know what would I do without you Jerry, I love your analysis style. Thank you sincerely for your effort, you and your calming voice had helped me through many rough times.
As a Najdorf player I enjoyed the game and with you explaining the ideas and moves it was really instructive. More najdorf games would be much appreciated!
I'm surprised you don't give attention to the fact that Garry "castled into it" on move 17. White has announced he is coming on the kingside and black just says "oh yeah? Come at me bro, 17....O-O!"
Please continue posting videos, I absolutely enjoy your analysis much more than any other chess channel, primarily because you are self-taught and it shows. Many other players, whether IMs or GMs, when they talk about positions, they always abstract away important details that they think "everyone knows or sees" because chess schools usually make players memorize certain things, rather than fully think them through. But I enjoy you actually explaining how to think some things through. I think it's a tragedy your clips only have 20-30k views, you should easily be in the millions
Hi Jerry. I became a subscriber a few months ago and always "like" your videos. Thank you for always posting such great games and adding interesting and educational commentary. It's very much appreciated, and I'm glad to see your channel seems to be fairly successful, and growing all the time. You deserve it.
I remember following this game live. Before the tournament, everyone were calling Kasparov a has-been after a string of mediocre results. But his last tournament became his swan song. He just ran over everyone in his vintage swashbuckling style, before announcing his retirement immediately afterwards. This was his best game of the tournament.
I really enjoyed watching this video. I used to play chess almost every weekend thirty some years ago when I was a student at college. This video evoked some of the best memories that I have from those beautiful days.
Tbh, castling at 6:40 would feel borderline suicidal to play for me. There's 2 pawns 1 square away from knocking on the front door, I'd basically already envision both rooks behind them, and the bishop queen battery is also aimed over there.
Last night at the club, the Fischer Tal , Najdorf was an excellent lesson. I said then that the only thing needed now was a look at the English/Yugoslav attacks, yo came up with this beauty. Closed for summer, so this will be the first lesson when we reopen in August. Thanks Jerry.
God has given each a unique nature. You have understood what your strength is and worked upon it to mesmerise the viewers with your powerful voice and neat explanation .Wow
I do love your videos. I like how you use different moves that do not work but you show them anyway since I'm not very good at doing those in my head and it's easier for me to learn as you move the pieces on the digital chessboard. I don't think I came up with one of Kasparov's moves. It's those times I look at a chessboard and I can't figure out what piece to push. In a way, that's an improvement for me as I'm able to rule out other pawns are pieces that I would have pushed in the past.
"I like how you use different moves that do not work but you show them anyway" but this is what chess is about, what works and what doesn't and when and why
You have an eeriely similar voice and cadence as youtuber "hoodie hair", who does videos about stories in Dwarf Fortress. He is one of my favourites, and thanks to him I find you very nice to listen to as well!
I took a look at this. f4 runs into the tactical shot Nxe4!!, a move that I saw relatively quickly but I think Jerry should have covered. This counterattacks the White queen and there's no good solution to prevent the loss of material or a massive attack or even checkmate. After f4 Nxe4!!... a. fxe5 is obviously taboo. Queen falls with check. b. Nxe4 runs into Bxd4, and the queen cannot take the bishop because of Qxc2+ Ka1 Bxe4 (the bishop in the corner takes), and there is no way to defend both a mate threat with Qa4 and the threat to take the rook on h1, winning an exchange. c. If the queen moves away instead, for example Qe3, the cleanest human variation is Nxc3+ (notice this opens up the door for the bishop in the corner to win the exchange) Qxc3 Qxc3 bxc3 Bxd4 cxd4 Bxh1, where the diagonal sniper on a8 picks off the rook. But considered better than the Nxc3+ line in the computer's eyes is the mind-boggling Nd3!!, which is utterly wild and I would need a lot more time to wrap my head around. d. Almost any other move allows the bishop to save itself and take a knight for free with Bxd4, or play Nxc3+, where the indirect pin on the b-file previously mentioned by Jerry comes into play. For example, after Qd1 Nxc3+, White has to give up the queen, because if bxc3 instead, it's a Mate in 4 for Black kicking off with Nd3+. EDIT: The reason why I think Jerry didn't cover this move is because he has shown disdain in the past over the beginner-level thinking of just pushing pawns forward shortsightedly just to make a one-move attack on a minor piece. But in this case I think the f4 move should have been covered. It's extremely important to cover the f4 move because if Black had instead replied with Bxd4, Black throws away all of their winning advantage and now White's attack gets a lot stronger.
Actually, the reason for Qc7 before b5 is not defending the Bishop or the b7-square, it's for the Rook on a8, since after e5! - the Bishop could capture on f3, but that would be answered with Qxf3!
Most of it way out of my league of course. But I think one suggestion might be legitimate: I think White shot his own foot early on with 0-0-0. Just because an opening is “known for” certain followups doesn’t mean you’re obliged to fill the mold.
I find myself in a similar position all the time as black. I felt like this video was made for me! I always debate the Nc5 vs Ne5 move as well! (Move 18)
Lateral rook moves through the center of the board in the middlegame are almost completely absent from human play pre-engine era. A move like Rg4 would merit a !! in that era.
It is a key concept for white in several variations of the French defense that I used to bring an extra piece over to the kingside. Still it was not generally deployed by players.
@@bcfblackt's called Schevening systhem. After the dutch sea-spa in which Euwe played it against Maroczy in 1923. Kasparov perfected it and helped him a lot in his career. The ECO is B80 -89.
In modern theory e5 must be played, not e6. White did not take advantage of it in this game, but e6 and black is worse. I used to play this line myself. I could do some research to remember why E5 is necessary, but the immediate G4 instead of castling I believe is the starting point. There is no point in white castling early , black has not either. I think if you do the research you will find that modern engines have rendered this line unsound.
The English Attack (not English opening, which is 1.c4) is a line in several Sicilians, such as Najdorf, Scheveningen, Kan etc and is characterised by white playing f3 and Be3 intending to attack blacks king with a pawn storm starting with g4. It is called the English Attack as … wait for it … it was played by Brits such as Short, Nunn etc late last century.
Kasparov did not defeat "the English Attack" in general but only won one game against Adams and, as usual, only because his opponent made slight to medium mistakes.
@@davidshosho1173 Yes, but berndmayer's point is that Kasparov defeats his opponents, because he is Kasparov; he does NOT refute the English Attack against the Najdorf variation. Kasparov has probably used the English Attack himself, assuming any opponent would be foolhardy enough to play the Sicilian Najdorf against the greatest-ever specialist in that defence.
I do not know how you arrived at the conclusion that "defeating the English Attack" somehow implies he refuted the opening. No, of course he both played it and beat it many, many times in his career, and the English Attack remains a challenging test of the Najdorf in 2023, that much is not in dispute.
![ILLSLICK X YOUNGOHM - We're The same [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUJNkobYR0E/mqdefault.jpg)
best chess teacher in all of youtube
maybe naro but Jerry is one of the best
@@bluecocacoladanya great but also ver fast paced. I like how jerry gives us time to think and absorb positions
Agreed to a large degree
He is good but i think we love his calming voice while taking us trough the game
Thank you for the compliment.
I don't know what would I do without you Jerry, I love your analysis style. Thank you sincerely for your effort, you and your calming voice had helped me through many rough times.
❤️
As a Najdorf player I enjoyed the game and with you explaining the ideas and moves it was really instructive. More najdorf games would be much appreciated!
I'm surprised you don't give attention to the fact that Garry "castled into it" on move 17. White has announced he is coming on the kingside and black just says "oh yeah? Come at me bro, 17....O-O!"
Please continue posting videos, I absolutely enjoy your analysis much more than any other chess channel, primarily because you are self-taught and it shows. Many other players, whether IMs or GMs, when they talk about positions, they always abstract away important details that they think "everyone knows or sees" because chess schools usually make players memorize certain things, rather than fully think them through. But I enjoy you actually explaining how to think some things through. I think it's a tragedy your clips only have 20-30k views, you should easily be in the millions
Best popcorn-eating videos on TH-cam. Thanks.
One of my favorite games I've ever seen. Thankful for you demonstrating this to us. I'm going to learn this one by heart. Cheers.
Hi Jerry. I became a subscriber a few months ago and always "like" your videos. Thank you for always posting such great games and adding interesting and educational commentary. It's very much appreciated, and I'm glad to see your channel seems to be fairly successful, and growing all the time. You deserve it.
Thank you 👍
that knight move at the end was a work of art
Thanks for another video Jerry. I have been loving these since the days of Anton squared for 10 plus years now.
Brilliant analysis! I play the Nadjorf from both sides and this video was very educational. Thank you!
Enjoyed a lot. Perfectly straight forward what matters for black in the english attack. Very instructive and helpful. Thanks a lot as well.
We love you Jerry ❤
I remember following this game live. Before the tournament, everyone were calling Kasparov a has-been after a string of mediocre results. But his last tournament became his swan song. He just ran over everyone in his vintage swashbuckling style, before announcing his retirement immediately afterwards. This was his best game of the tournament.
Super instructive! Kasparov's middle games are treat to watch.
6:59 I don't think I would be that calm watching the pawns storming my king but Kasparov simply plays bf6 and it's all good.
inredibly tough to spot these moves and the computer one blew my mind
this was a treat, nice analysis
I really enjoyed watching this video. I used to play chess almost every weekend thirty some years ago when I was a student at college. This video evoked some of the best memories that I have from those beautiful days.
👍😎
Good to see some analysis from ChessNetwork again.
Very intrigued by that engine move. Great video btw.
thanks, sensei
Welcome 👍
Hi, Jerry, it's everyone)
Hi Jerry and Everyone, its me :)
What a game by Kasparov
Hi Jerry, thx😊
A very instructive video. Thank you.
Tbh, castling at 6:40 would feel borderline suicidal to play for me. There's 2 pawns 1 square away from knocking on the front door, I'd basically already envision both rooks behind them, and the bishop queen battery is also aimed over there.
Another great video! Thanks!
That man is the greatest player that ever lived...
Thanks for posting, brother
Keep up the excellent work
Beautiful game by Kasparov, a legend
I like your calm voice.
Learning. Thanks,
👍
Last night at the club, the Fischer Tal , Najdorf was an excellent lesson. I said then that the only thing needed now was a look at the English/Yugoslav attacks, yo came up with this beauty. Closed for summer, so this will be the first lesson when we reopen in August. Thanks Jerry.
Great 👍
God has given each a unique nature. You have understood what your strength is and worked upon it to mesmerise the viewers with your powerful voice and neat explanation .Wow
I agree
what a game, great analysis
I do love your videos.
I like how you use different moves that do not work but you show them anyway since I'm not very good at doing those in my head and it's easier for me to learn as you move the pieces on the digital chessboard.
I don't think I came up with one of Kasparov's moves. It's those times I look at a chessboard and I can't figure out what piece to push. In a way, that's an improvement for me as I'm able to rule out other pawns are pieces that I would have pushed in the past.
"I like how you use different moves that do not work but you show them anyway"
but this is what chess is about, what works and what doesn't and when and why
Extremely informative analysis - thanks for sharing the game, Jerry!
Such a good game, so as the coverage
Great video ! Thank you!!!
You have an eeriely similar voice and cadence as youtuber "hoodie hair", who does videos about stories in Dwarf Fortress. He is one of my favourites, and thanks to him I find you very nice to listen to as well!
👍
Great teaching
Thank you 👍
I hope we will one day hear the town of Linares uttered in the context of top chess tournaments.
Michael Adams vs SCARY Kasparov....
Face this queen side castle and pawn attack from white all the time. Helps, Thanks Jerry!
11:11 why not play f4? Yes i know e4 collapsed then but atleast i am bullying the bishop.
I took a look at this. f4 runs into the tactical shot Nxe4!!, a move that I saw relatively quickly but I think Jerry should have covered. This counterattacks the White queen and there's no good solution to prevent the loss of material or a massive attack or even checkmate.
After f4 Nxe4!!...
a. fxe5 is obviously taboo. Queen falls with check.
b. Nxe4 runs into Bxd4, and the queen cannot take the bishop because of Qxc2+ Ka1 Bxe4 (the bishop in the corner takes), and there is no way to defend both a mate threat with Qa4 and the threat to take the rook on h1, winning an exchange.
c. If the queen moves away instead, for example Qe3, the cleanest human variation is Nxc3+ (notice this opens up the door for the bishop in the corner to win the exchange) Qxc3 Qxc3 bxc3 Bxd4 cxd4 Bxh1, where the diagonal sniper on a8 picks off the rook. But considered better than the Nxc3+ line in the computer's eyes is the mind-boggling Nd3!!, which is utterly wild and I would need a lot more time to wrap my head around.
d. Almost any other move allows the bishop to save itself and take a knight for free with Bxd4, or play Nxc3+, where the indirect pin on the b-file previously mentioned by Jerry comes into play. For example, after Qd1 Nxc3+, White has to give up the queen, because if bxc3 instead, it's a Mate in 4 for Black kicking off with Nd3+.
EDIT: The reason why I think Jerry didn't cover this move is because he has shown disdain in the past over the beginner-level thinking of just pushing pawns forward shortsightedly just to make a one-move attack on a minor piece. But in this case I think the f4 move should have been covered. It's extremely important to cover the f4 move because if Black had instead replied with Bxd4, Black throws away all of their winning advantage and now White's attack gets a lot stronger.
Love your content Jerry! I would love to see you anylize a game on paul morphy.
Would love to hear a book read by you my man, southing voice not gonna lie 😊
Actually, the reason for Qc7 before b5 is not defending the Bishop or the b7-square, it's for the Rook on a8, since after e5! - the Bishop could capture on f3, but that would be answered with Qxf3!
Most of it way out of my league of course. But I think one suggestion might be legitimate: I think White shot his own foot early on with 0-0-0. Just because an opening is “known for” certain followups doesn’t mean you’re obliged to fill the mold.
Yes, I was thinking the same thing. Since Kasparov pawns were much more advanced.
13:10 Love that move. Very Kasparov-like. Beautiful chess
I find myself in a similar position all the time as black. I felt like this video was made for me! I always debate the Nc5 vs Ne5 move as well! (Move 18)
Been playing the najdorf for 20 years because Kasparov
İ love your videos
Strong 💪
Thanks Jerry. Detroit Michigan 48221. Thank you very much. I sub, liked and commented : Video paid for.
Thank you 👍
great game. this guys voice, i mean, isn't it the voice you'd want your best friend to have ? lol
Haha that's cute
6:43 chess 2.0 is invented, but only benefits white by castling queen side on b1 and kingside on g8
More kasparov please
Well done!
Interesting game, I think if that white Bishop on the white squares was not placed in it's best diagonal, the black squares Bishop would fall easily
Cool ass game here
what happens after 21. f4? Great post btw.
at least 3 mistakes I play in this line corrected in this one video
👍👍👍
ooohh This games was GHOSTLY!!😭😭
Lateral rook moves through the center of the board in the middlegame are almost completely absent from human play pre-engine era. A move like Rg4 would merit a !! in that era.
It is a key concept for white in several variations of the French defense that I used to bring an extra piece over to the kingside. Still it was not generally deployed by players.
Jerry legendo, care.
❤
How are you doing Jerry? Did you play any physical tournaments as of late?
Doing good thanks. Nope, I haven’t competed OTB for about 12 years now.
@@ChessNetwork Damn. Do you think you could perform decent if played a game now?
Combine attack with defense. Check! TY, GM.
I'm a good player because I agree with everything Gary did this game
I'm surprised that Garry didn't castle sooner.
nice video
If white plays h6 I often play g6 and hide behind the h pawn in similar lines as white has a hard time getting at the b1-h7 diagonal.
Yes, brilliant game for chess player enthusiast. The accuracy of the move is so high...
Did they not expect these moves from him. He was like that is too much.
Nc2 was beautiful. I thought the move was Nc4, that's why I'm not a super GM😂
feedback!
What about 20. ... B:e4
LIKED
Why would you not play 6 ... e5?
You certainly can. But that would be a different opening/game. Why not play 1... c6 or 1... e5? This is the opening Kasparov wanted to play.
@@bcfblackt's called Schevening systhem. After the dutch sea-spa in which Euwe played it against Maroczy in 1923. Kasparov perfected it and helped him a lot in his career. The ECO is B80 -89.
Hi Jerry.
6:41 - Black, not White.
racist
@@stoned8034lol
“Sicilian defense English attack Russian counter attack”?
Nc2. Okay that's just gross. Garry was a monster.
In modern theory e5 must be played, not e6. White did not take advantage of it in this game, but e6 and black is worse. I used to play this line myself. I could do some research to remember why E5 is necessary, but the immediate G4 instead of castling I believe is the starting point. There is no point in white castling early , black has not either. I think if you do the research you will find that modern engines have rendered this line unsound.
21.f4 looks good bxd5 qxd5
Ko kasparov
:)
Damn. Just an overwhelming positional attack.
hhell
🤣👍3rd🥉
*beep*
The title needs a rework. This is not an English opening, but played by an Englishman.
The English Attack (not English opening, which is 1.c4) is a line in several Sicilians, such as Najdorf, Scheveningen, Kan etc and is characterised by white playing f3 and Be3 intending to attack blacks king with a pawn storm starting with g4. It is called the English Attack as … wait for it … it was played by Brits such as Short, Nunn etc late last century.
Kasparov did not defeat "the English Attack" in general but only won one game against Adams and, as usual, only because his opponent made slight to medium mistakes.
He's won hundreds of games on the black side of Sicilian against stronger players than Adams.
@@davidshosho1173 Yes, but berndmayer's point is that Kasparov defeats his opponents, because he is Kasparov; he does NOT refute the English Attack against the Najdorf variation. Kasparov has probably used the English Attack himself, assuming any opponent would be foolhardy enough to play the Sicilian Najdorf against the greatest-ever specialist in that defence.
I do not know how you arrived at the conclusion that "defeating the English Attack" somehow implies he refuted the opening. No, of course he both played it and beat it many, many times in his career, and the English Attack remains a challenging test of the Najdorf in 2023, that much is not in dispute.