Error 1 - collecting as many citations as possible (quality > quantity) Error 2- claiming research is entirely unique, that there is nothing published on the topic ( know knowledge giants) Error 3- citing only second and third hand accounts of classics (read classics but critically as the findings or methods might b outdated so exercise caution) Hope that saved you time!
As a Humanities PhD student in her first year, and grappling with the literature at the moment, I cannot tell you how helpful this is. Thank you for sharing such wisdom!
Thank you, Dr. Patton and the Center for Research Quality. I have not considered, in terms of my "intellectual heritage," the many sources of established work and knowledge available to build on. Perhaps, I have taken for granted and stand guilty of "quantitative" gathering of articles in my study approach. This is a defining and humbling moment for me... and at the appropriate time.
Thank you Dr. Patton. Awesome explanation of where the scholar-practitioner is in terms of the known knowledge of their chosen research problem, research questions and research topic and how to contribute to that knowledge based on the intellectual gyneology and traditions by identifying the knowledge gap specifically and addressing the gap within the knowledge gyneology context. The other point of focusing on the theoretical and methodological streams was very interesting in terms of the method-finding link because it provided insight into the validity, reliability, and amenability to a scientific inquiry of the research problem and research questions relevant to the research topic.
Doctor, you have given me a much clearer path and loved your coin terms(i plan to implement during my defense) like " Intellectual Heritage and Genealogy, etc. You are now on my top list of Scholars. Thanks from the depths of my heart for your transferring of knowledge that is helping me to be successful....
This is like there is only one way to think in research. I mean there is a lot of good point to fetch from this video, but learning how researchers think (he phrases it like science thinks) is to take it too far. Try to look at the litterature review that Einstein, Bohr or Nash did. They are actually not very alike and very different from what Ph.D fellows are supposed to do today. By the way I am not even sure if either Darwin, Marx or Freud ever did any litterature review as such. No doubt they read a lot, but that is a completely different matter. What I am pointing towards is that litterature review can be a way of documenting you research inheritage but it is not the only way - it is more the way our schools demand it. Great new knowledge is created or found outside those schools.
Interesting point. However, I am not sure the speech implies there is only one way and denies there may be multiple ones. Perhaps the speech is given with in mind his primary audience, informing them of standard practices suitable for a course within a specific time frame
Thanks for this, many scholars use 30% of target population as a sample size by citing (patton,2002) but I cannot access the book saying this. Can any one confirm this to me please?
Sorry, but Marx was not the only to ask those questions. Where did child labor laws and workplace regulation come from, Marx?? Noo, they came from others had the same observations and sought to improve working conditions without massive gov't bureaucracy (which you admit was a failure) but by legislation. By the way your not referring to Groucho, right? Just checking because much of communism is more like the Marx Bros, than the idealized one your thinking of.
![SAFEPLANET - ดาวเคราะห์ [ THE PLANET ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4X1XL3I_k3c/mqdefault.jpg)
Error 1 - collecting as many citations as possible (quality > quantity)
Error 2- claiming research is entirely unique, that there is nothing published on the topic ( know knowledge giants)
Error 3- citing only second and third hand accounts of classics (read classics but critically as the findings or methods might b outdated so exercise caution)
Hope that saved you time!
Thank you so much, this made easy for me to revisit Dr. Patton's sharing.
It saved me having to listen again for these notes!
May I ask for further explanation for the 3rd
My practical research module brought me here
same :
Send answer
same
Same
As a Humanities PhD student in her first year, and grappling with the literature at the moment, I cannot tell you how helpful this is. Thank you for sharing such wisdom!
Thank you, Dr. Patton and the Center for Research Quality. I have not considered, in terms of my "intellectual heritage," the many sources of established work and knowledge available to build on. Perhaps, I have taken for granted and stand guilty of "quantitative" gathering of articles in my study approach. This is a defining and humbling moment for me... and at the appropriate time.
Thank you Dr. Patton. Awesome explanation of where the scholar-practitioner is in terms of the known knowledge of their chosen research problem, research questions and research topic and how to contribute to that knowledge based on the intellectual gyneology and traditions by identifying the knowledge gap specifically and addressing the gap within the knowledge gyneology context. The other point of focusing on the theoretical and methodological streams was very interesting in terms of the method-finding link because it provided insight into the validity, reliability, and amenability to a scientific inquiry of the research problem and research questions relevant to the research topic.
In all my studies, no one had explained the purpose of a literature review like this video has. Thank you Dr. Patton.
Great presentation Dr. Panton, as a scholar-practitioner, I learned more from your video. God blesses you
Oh man, this open up my mind. I thought that quantity that counts.
Doctor, you have given me a much clearer path and loved your coin terms(i plan to implement during my defense) like " Intellectual Heritage and Genealogy, etc.
You are now on my top list of Scholars. Thanks from the depths of my heart for your transferring of knowledge that is helping me to be successful....
(5:45)
Identify people /intellectual giants..
Identify traditions...
Identifyt your Intellectual DNA
Great video on typical errors to avoid within a literature review!
Thank you Dr. Patton for this overview.
This is like there is only one way to think in research. I mean there is a lot of good point to fetch from this video, but learning how researchers think (he phrases it like science thinks) is to take it too far. Try to look at the litterature review that Einstein, Bohr or Nash did. They are actually not very alike and very different from what Ph.D fellows are supposed to do today. By the way I am not even sure if either Darwin, Marx or Freud ever did any litterature review as such. No doubt they read a lot, but that is a completely different matter.
What I am pointing towards is that litterature review can be a way of documenting you research inheritage but it is not the only way - it is more the way our schools demand it. Great new knowledge is created or found outside those schools.
Interesting point. However, I am not sure the speech implies there is only one way and denies there may be multiple ones. Perhaps the speech is given with in mind his primary audience, informing them of standard practices suitable for a course within a specific time frame
Theoretical and methodological streams.(11:42)
You're the man, Doctor.
Thank you very much Dr. Patton
Thank you! I also found the homosexual-penguin research topic quite funny.
Thank you so much, Dr. Patton. I take with me many learning points from your sharings in this video. Regards from Kolkata, India.
goodluck sa module mga pre! HSJAHSJA
great explanation and the examples making it easy to be understood. Thank you
Thanks for this, many scholars use 30% of target population as a sample size by citing (patton,2002) but I cannot access the book saying this. Can any one confirm this to me please?
unfortunately, many instructors only allow sources within the last 5 years. The classics are not valuable to many instructors.
Thank you! Very clear, informative, and open-minded!
I like it, learned something new -> 204 likes 0 dislikes, I think that tells a lot!
nine dislikes.. had to qinx it, aye? :P
Thank you Dr.Patton
Incredibly helpful
Very helpful explication.
this has helped so much - thank you!
Very inspiring. Thank you
Thanks for sharing...Best regards, SH
Thank you for this one! :)
Impressive! Thank you.
Thanks! Very inspiring!
Thank you so much for this knowledge you are sharing. It has really made my work towards lit review much more focused now
Thank you for this explanation
i come after one year.I will come back when I finish my doctoral journey😊
Very Informative
it is better if you are added the time
Great work that is useful to me! Thank you very much!1
Very helpful thank you.
PR2 Activity 1: Take a View
Great work.
Very helpful!
Im find it difficult to find literature on the area of "is Gay BDSM really only just a pain in the ass"
Great! Thanks a lot.
Who's here because of modules?
wew. activity 1: take a view page 29
@@jimmichaelracaza1007 Senior High School Student? Appear!!!
Same hahaha
Very useful! Thank you for sharing!
PR brought me here 😕
He's good
My module brought me here... Activity 1: Take a view
(2)
thanks doctor
Thank you very much
thank you thank you thank you thank you!!!!!!
Thank you very much for adding very good information to my knowledge which without any doubt it will help me with my writing
2:48
Thank...!
useful , thank you
before i clicked i was sure he is george carlin
send answer sa practical reserach hahaaha
Hi classmates HAHAHAHA
ginagawa mo HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
Ba't kayo herr ahh?
Hi pare
Hello 😂😂😂😂😂😂
nice
goodluck sa module ahhahaa
hi to my pangit classmates
eww
🙋🙋
fruitful
Sorry, but Marx was not the only to ask those questions. Where did child labor laws and workplace regulation come from, Marx?? Noo, they came from others had the same observations and sought to improve working conditions without massive gov't bureaucracy (which you admit was a failure) but by legislation. By the way your not referring to Groucho, right? Just checking because much of communism is more like the Marx Bros, than the idealized one your thinking of.
My module brought me here... Activity 1: Take a view