Gauss Law Problems, Cylindrical Conductor, Linear & Surface Charge Denisty, Electric Field & Flux,

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024
  • This physics video tutorial explains how to solve typical gauss law problems such as finding the electric field of a cylindrical conductor by drawing a gaussian cylinder. This video also shows you how to calculate the electric flux in the gaussian cylinder as well as the total electric charge enclosed by the gaussian surface. It explains how to derive the electric field formula in terms of the linear charge density and the surface charge density. Gauss's Law is a very useful concept when dealing with electric fields.
    Physics 2 - Basic Introduction:
    • Physics 2 - Basic Intr...
    Electric Charge - Physics:
    • Electric Charge - Physics
    Conservation of Electric Charge:
    • Law of Conservation of...
    Coulomb's Law and Electric Force:
    • Coulomb's Law - Net El...
    Electric Fields:
    • Electric Field Due To ...
    ________________________
    Electric Dipole Moment:
    • Electric Dipole Moment...
    Electric Flux:
    • Electric Flux, Gauss's...
    Gauss Law Problems:
    • Gauss Law Problems, In...
    Electric Potential:
    • Electric Potential
    Equipotential Lines:
    • Equipotential Lines & ...
    _______________________
    The Electron Volt:
    • Electron Volt Explaine...
    Electric Potential Energy:
    • Electric Potential Energy
    Parallel Plate Capacitor:
    • Parallel Plate Capacit...
    Energy Stored In a Capacitor:
    • How To Calculate The E...
    Physics PDF Worksheets:
    www.video-tuto...

ความคิดเห็น • 65

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/

  • @Cheeseson
    @Cheeseson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    for those confused why .3 radius is used instead of 1.5. its asking for the CHARGE inside guassian cylinder. that means you use .3 because that's the cylinder causing the charge. the only thing we care about is the small cylinder not the big one

    • @6ng31ique
      @6ng31ique 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      wait i didn’t know that i wondering that too! thank you!!😊

  • @ting5422
    @ting5422 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    you have helped me so much in ochem and physics2!!!! i just cant emphasize enough that you have explained these complex concepts so well and so organized!!!!! your mind is so clear when you are going through the example problems one by one with specific steps and explanation. You are such a responsible teacher!!!

    • @NGWESESTEVENCLAIR-ht8pr
      @NGWESESTEVENCLAIR-ht8pr ปีที่แล้ว

      He's indeed Good in his work , thank you sir

    • @goldy_on_pc930
      @goldy_on_pc930 หลายเดือนก่อน

      physics 2? physics got so good they had to make a sequel

  • @dimitricondax9129
    @dimitricondax9129 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    i hope you make lots and lots of money from youtube, you deserve it. you along with Sal Khan have guided thousands of us through school. thank you

  • @toluwalogoalase2078
    @toluwalogoalase2078 5 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    i love you in ways that i cannot explain

    •  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Toluwalogo Alase exactly same..

    • @PenguinPlacenta
      @PenguinPlacenta 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Same. He got me through physics 1 and here we are again getting me through physics 2

  • @alihakimoglu3242
    @alihakimoglu3242 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    .Thanks man, with the help of you I could pass, Calculus, Physics1, and the general chemistry. You are the BEASTTTTT!!!!!!

  • @marioleon4102
    @marioleon4102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The thing I struggle the most with is deriving the equations in the first place. Your videos have definitely helped though! I'll continue to practice, and eventually, I will be better at it. If anyone has any advice, I would more than welcome it.

  • @unknownperson480
    @unknownperson480 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    When solving the "c" part, you can just use the formula : electric flux=electric field intensity x area of gauss's cylinder.
    It is much easier this way and the answer is also same

  • @erlynaureliogaba2030
    @erlynaureliogaba2030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You don't know how thankful I am to this channel from saving me to this situation (modular learning). Keep making videos sir. I'm with you💜💯

  • @aloysius7570
    @aloysius7570 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You would be praised as a saint in ancient era

  • @ahmetkarakartal9563
    @ahmetkarakartal9563 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    What I like most is that your calculator voice :D

  • @nanasquirrlei
    @nanasquirrlei 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    why part a use r= 0.3, but part c use r= 1.5? when the question is both 1.5m from the conductor, thank you

    • @Resistor-u7e
      @Resistor-u7e 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      0.3 is finding Qs of conductor

  • @arielcampos2008
    @arielcampos2008 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for this video, its helped me. Hugs from Brazil

  • @princessvalles2281
    @princessvalles2281 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What is the electric field 1.5m away from the cylindrical conductor? Idk but I thought it means computing the electric field outside the cylindrical conductor and not inside it yet you used the radius of it as the small r ;-; I don't understand.
    Anyways, thanks for making my life easier :D we love you TOCT!

    • @abdullahabouheif8200
      @abdullahabouheif8200 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah you're right brother I just noticed. Just substitute the 0.3 with 1.5 since it asked for a gaussian surface with radius 1.5m

    • @adarshdodeja5173
      @adarshdodeja5173 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did u figure this out?

  • @NebaBetrandAkombo
    @NebaBetrandAkombo 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i have a question. the charge of the conductor in the cylindrical gaussian surface is a surface charge distribution or a volume charge distribution

  • @maths2bsquared172
    @maths2bsquared172 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why are we using the lateral area of the cylinder,instead of using the surface area of the whole cylinder,SA=2(pi)R^2+2(pi)Rh to calculate the charge.

  • @VasanthBattula
    @VasanthBattula 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    At 4.40 min the radius of the guassian cylinder is 1.5m but u substituted radius as .3 meter

  • @hossiluc
    @hossiluc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful, subscribed

  • @eleniOG
    @eleniOG 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish you were my professor :(

  • @umugabekaziumusalama4648
    @umugabekaziumusalama4648 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    thanks for the video. but i have the problem at (a) the place we were finding total charges enclosed by gaussian. when didn't you use 1.5m as radius as the way they give us in the question. i am confused at that point.?

    • @princeklutse4950
      @princeklutse4950 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Kevin Le wow...really

    • @princeklutse4950
      @princeklutse4950 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Kevin Le but why

    • @whackapigeon3583
      @whackapigeon3583 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@princeklutse4950 I guess we will never know Lmao

    • @anvayaiyer5614
      @anvayaiyer5614 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@whackapigeon3583 haha yeah

    • @sabkxw9834
      @sabkxw9834 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@princeklutse4950 i think it is because the charge does not depend on the Gaussian cylinder. They are 2 unrelated things that r used in the qn. Not sure whether this is true though

  • @glizzygoblin69
    @glizzygoblin69 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hearing your calculator buttons click is very asmr

  • @udehjosiahsnowwhite7761
    @udehjosiahsnowwhite7761 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My question sir.. the electric flux that passes through the Gaussian surface . The electric field is perpendicular to the Gaussian surface so I thought it should be zero. Help me please

  • @jnr.k594
    @jnr.k594 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please is the formular for total charge =surface density×area or total charge=surface density/area;

  • @abdelkarimbadaoui6586
    @abdelkarimbadaoui6586 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why you didn't do a reviw of the lesson befor examples as usall

  • @notagain.12456
    @notagain.12456 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    is there any way to solve it using coulomb'w law?

  • @jeffreychen7115
    @jeffreychen7115 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    commenting vid for reference

  • @duckymomo7935
    @duckymomo7935 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    would the problem be different if the rod was finite length?

    • @erikburzinski8248
      @erikburzinski8248 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes it whould

    • @maaan8494
      @maaan8494 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would because the electric field lines from the rod would not be perpendicularly away from it. When the rod is infinite, vector addition of field lines from neighbouring charges result in this configuration but not when its finite length

    • @shiyalpiyal6729
      @shiyalpiyal6729 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@maaan8494 thanks dude you're a life saver. I was wondering about that from the get go.

  • @madurigupta6222
    @madurigupta6222 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir how to draw the electric field lines for infinite charge length

  • @Sedonapass
    @Sedonapass 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WHY is it sometimes we use 4PIr^2(area) and sometimes 4/3PIr^3(volume)? for a sphere

    • @matthewscott6135
      @matthewscott6135 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The gaussian (external) sphere would be calculated as 4pir^2 as the charge enclosed by any closed gaussian surface is E x epsilon x Surface area. You could then equate this to the charge stored in the conducting sphere by using 4/3pir^3 x volume density. Hope this helps :)

  • @joshuwa3953
    @joshuwa3953 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Port part a why isn’t 1.5 used instead of 30 cm?

    • @moetasembellakhalifa3452
      @moetasembellakhalifa3452 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      because you are using the radius of the conducting cylinder and not the guassian area. Read part a once more, we need the charge on the conducting cylinder that's enclosed by the guassian area.

    • @adarshdodeja5173
      @adarshdodeja5173 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t get it still

    • @kdramaslove6028
      @kdramaslove6028 ปีที่แล้ว

      same TT@@adarshdodeja5173

  • @DragoZeroOne
    @DragoZeroOne 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nobody ever mentioned there is a typo in the title?

  • @AnmolKatiyar-h6h
    @AnmolKatiyar-h6h 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why gaussian surface was taken as cylinder why not sphere

  • @lathem01
    @lathem01 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isnt the length for the Area in flux = E.A, supposed to be L2 = L1 + 1.5 ?

    • @lecctron
      @lecctron 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      4 years later i'm sure u figured it out right lol

    • @lathem01
      @lathem01 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lecctron Bruh dont remind me

  • @leeroymajoni3451
    @leeroymajoni3451 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is that if i use E=kq/r^2 for the electric field 1.5m from the cylinder,im getting a different answer

    • @jdextlab
      @jdextlab 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leeroy Majoni maybe depends on what constant k you’re using versus the epsilon naught “free space” value he’s using

  • @donalmoloney2695
    @donalmoloney2695 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    why do you use surface area sometimes and volume in other videos.

    • @33buhhh
      @33buhhh 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Donal Moloney if it’s a shape enclosed within a shape you use volume of the shape that’s enclosed. A good example is if there is a sphere within a sphere. So you use volume of the inner sphere and then surface area of the sphere enclosing the small sphere

  • @mohammedisarezwani
    @mohammedisarezwani 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    😵‍💫

  • @baguette9669
    @baguette9669 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:19

  • @klotmam8163
    @klotmam8163 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    وشوو ذاااا ؟؟؟