Generally speaking as a parent, school really has progressed tremendously. Content like this is key. The idea that learning must be painful and boring is outdated. History and science are incredibly interesting and dramatic. We shouldn't be ashamed of that.
My son loved this, they are studying ionic,covalent, metallic, and hydrogen bonding in school right now. He said he got more out of this than the power points his teacher uses.
When I was in 8th grade I remember studying for a physical science class in which we mentioned nearly everything in this video from how atoms bond to even more complex information on the dynamics of an atom. I remember when I would read my book and study, I could recite the information like I memorized a verse from the Bible, surely my memory did me well when it came to test, however I could not understand or develop a mental model of what I was actually reading. This video creates such a beautiful representation on the actual nature of bonds reassuring my faith in understanding the nature of atoms. Thank you.
Analogies like "...and never getting the toy back" and "Like a potluck" makes it SO much easier to visualise the concept! It's things that I've experienced myself and can relate to. Very well! 👌
All i can say is that i have never understood bonds, these gods just described it in 3 minutes, i wish I could like the video twice, actually scratch that i wanna like it infinite times, because you, you have infinitely helped me.
Mindddd blown. You have cleared some of my questions of this study session in just minutes. I was losing interest by not getting right help, thankfully, finally the right video.
Really excellent stuff - nicely explained and beautifully visualised. My only quibble would be that the tug-of-war in the ionic bonding bit is almost entirely mythical - usually the two ions have already gained or lost electrons long before they meet - but the myth is still a part of standard chemistry teaching, for whatever reason, so, fair enough. :) At least you went straight from there to ionic lattices! Far too many sources stop with 'an ionic bond' forming, as if there was then a molecule of NaCl floating around...
@@angu4878 I recommend the Royal Society of Chemistry's 'Chemical Misconceptions' on this. If you have any specific questions, though, I'm happy to try and answer them here.
Showed this to my chemistry teacher to show the class one time in high school when they got to the part where they started teaching us about chemical bonds and stuff
Because we cannot see atoms and only their imprint on scanning technology these models are wrong and primitive. Think of it like this.. a giant field of energy that is and isn't at the same time as well as flickering back and fourth between states. All throughout this field membrane are pinches, tweaks, flips, and twists. Because this all is all then it is also parts in retrospection and opposition to being all. To all is part and to part is all. Each atom is and isn't within its own. Each atom is created and exists in relationship to each other atom and vice versa. You define yourself by comparing or sizing yourself up to others or things-situations. This "outside" "other" things define you and help make you be what you see yourself to be. Atoms are the same.. we only know metal by comparing it to water. Water to wood and air to rock.. we learn more about something when we see what it is not and then by deduction and reduction come to a conclusion. Atoms are intersecting waves making waves that intersect and make waves. The center of an atom cannot be seen and the electron signature is the only mystery expression we have of the geni inside. Your mind picks things apart as it's functions are to split energy (ideas-functions) and connect/combined energy. Splitters and or lumpers. If reality is created by our perception and will and reality is atoms and we are atoms then we are conscious atomic reality being funneled down through a human body so that we may do whatever. When dealing with atoms and reality remember.. you ONLY have YOUR perception and or the belief in other's perceptions which is still your perception of their perception. All atoms are one and connected as a single whole. Our minds split and divide in relation to how we feel, think, want or need. Our human specimen of a body does aromatically set some perimeters in perception and application capabilities.. for example we cannot fly by flapping our arms etc. Atoms are also functions too. For example an atom "dancing" becomes and is the dancing. The singing atom literally is only the sound singing. This is how you become what you do and what you do is what you become. Some people like to name things... Some people like to know how things function. Thus things have been named things just because or named things in which they do like a hammer or a screwdriver. Take any thing or idea (all things are ideas and all ideas are things - both are buzzing energy on diff frequencies) and try to define it. Look at the dictionary. Now that word uses other words to explain and de-scribe that word so you gotta go define those words and so on. You will find that words used to explain a word don't have anything to do with that word and those words are made up of other words that only have meaning by bringing in more words without a meaning in theirself. You will deviate far from the original word or even come right back to it! In fact the word you tried to define will end up defining itself by using itself. This is insanity. So when it comes to someone really knowing you or where you are coming from... That is very rare and special. Hope this ramble sum up helps someone. RESEARCH! CORRELATE! LOVE!
This was explained So well that I literally was trippin out! :-P Thanks bunches! Came here for wanting to learn this and you hit the nail on the head, TED-ed!
How is it wrong? You just said my statement about hydrogen forces vs covalents bonds is true, which implies that covalent bonds are the most abundant type of bonds in DNA. What's in question here isn't about why electrostatic interactions like hydrogen forces and covalent bonds are important, but about which bond is the most abundant and I think I was clear about that. However, you are right about hydrogen forces being important, it's why we have A base pairing with T and G with C.
Just luv the way you explain things un this is my favoutite,,In some cases atoms could form more bonds than you would expect but they better have a really gud reason to do so,, . A masterpiece lol .
There is no such thing as a pure ionic bond ( unless you count ions dissolved in water or another substance ). Even in Cesium Fluoride, Cesium's outermost electron spends 95% of it's time in the vicinity of the fluorine nucleus, and 5% of it's time in the vicinity of the Cesium nucleus, but not 100% of it's time in either location. Ionic versus covalent bonding is a matter of degree.
To my knowledge there is no material that completely resists erosion/abrasion. And yes, you can wear through the skin on your hands by rubbing them together enough.
The entire phosphodiester backbone and the purine or pyrimidine bases are held together with covalent bonds. Hydrogen bonding only enables base pairing between two strands. Without the H-bonds, double-stranded DNA wouldn't form (nor would interesting secondary structures in ssDNA or ssRNA, but that's another story), so they are critical, but you only get 2 per A-T pair or 3 per G-C pair, while each nucleotide comprises more than 30 covalent bonds.
At 2:08 you explained how only the outermost electrons would participate in bonding, however for transition metals if the outermost electrons are removed som from other energy levels may participate in bonding as well.
Great video! Only the depiction of a DNA molecule at 1:33 as an example of covalent bonds feels very confusing or misleading to me because the most prominent bonds seen in this image are the hydrogen bonds between complementary bases...
0:56 hey, notice anything? Na is 11th element Neon is a noble gas with 10 electrons Chlorine tries to get to argon, also an noble gas. A lot of molecules wanna be like this. Maybe. I do have data. But there will be exceptions.
What the heck that's actually a good question. I'm also extremely confused on how exactly the electrons even orbit the atom since the current observations are that the don't even have a fixed path but have a superposition like wtf is happening ??????
It’s difficult to explain, but when atoms get close, their orbitals can overlap and form molecular orbitals. These molecular orbitals are usually lower in energy than individual atomic orbitals, so every orbital combination forms what we call a bond.
after giving an electron sodium get positively and chlorine get negatively charged .then one negatively charged chlorine and one sodium should eliminate the negative-positive charge. but why sodium ion or chlorine ion paired with six other as mentioned in the video?
How do electrons behave in covalent bond though? Are they trapped in one place and don't orbit own atom nucleus anymore or do they orbit both atoms nuclei?
Hello, I'm thinking about doing a huge project on chemistry. I would like to use these animations and give you the credits. would you give me permission?
Hydrogen "bonds" aren't actually bonds b/c unlike real bonds (like covalent, ionic, metallic), they don't possess any orbital overlap (sigma, pi, delta, etc) between two atoms. They're a type of inter (and sometimes "intra") molecular force.
i get why two water atoms do a covalent bond, the have the same amount of electrons&protons, but why is the O of h2o not taking away the electrons of the water atoms, it has a stronger "magnetic" force? what am I missing? :D
Entao , na ligaçao covalente, o atomo rouba o eletron do outro, assim um ficando positivo e outro negativo, o negativo, para se neutralizar, rouba devolta o eletron, ai ficando infinitamente aleatoriamente?
This was far more informative, explained much better and more easier to understand than the classes in school.
Exactly
It's because of animation
yep
Yessssss, because of that Animation
Generally speaking as a parent, school really has progressed tremendously. Content like this is key. The idea that learning must be painful and boring is outdated. History and science are incredibly interesting and dramatic. We shouldn't be ashamed of that.
You guys are just wonderful. Pictures and animations are great ways to facilitate learning if properly made. Great works.
@astroferox883 lol bc this comment 10 years old
I really enjoy the animation of the atoms, very clean and understandable.
My son loved this, they are studying ionic,covalent, metallic, and hydrogen bonding in school right now. He said he got more out of this than the power points his teacher uses.
When I was in 8th grade I remember studying for a physical science class in which we mentioned nearly everything in this video from how atoms bond to even more complex information on the dynamics of an atom. I remember when I would read my book and study, I could recite the information like I memorized a verse from the Bible, surely my memory did me well when it came to test, however I could not understand or develop a mental model of what I was actually reading. This video creates such a beautiful representation on the actual nature of bonds reassuring my faith in understanding the nature of atoms. Thank you.
How old are u now?
I'm in 8 grade now and we are in the same country 🇪🇬
@@X-7PG3D18 maybe
Analogies like "...and never getting the toy back" and "Like a potluck" makes it SO much easier to visualise the concept! It's things that I've experienced myself and can relate to.
Very well! 👌
Yes, using analogies can be super helpful.
This is something i got 16 years ago. Thanks for reminding. Very good explaining. One of your best movies imo.
This is great coincidence ... We've learned this on chemistry lecture yesterday. But that one took about 1,5 hour and this takes only 3,5 minutes :-)
Hello Ted ED. I am 11 and your videos have made me ace my science classes. My science teacher thinks that I am cheating or something. LOL
Quetzalcoatlus, we share the same fate then, must admit Ted Ed is pretty fun and educational
Good name by the way, Hatzegopteryx is my favorite, although Dimorphodon is a very close second.
Quetzalcoatlus well you are actually cheating
How?
oof is she mad at you?
This is the 2nd great video from George Zaidan and Charles Morton I have seen this week. Need more teachers like this.
This is the only way I can understand anything
Apart from maybe my History teacher, she's amazing and actually understands that students are people
All i can say is that i have never understood bonds, these gods just described it in 3 minutes, i wish I could like the video twice, actually scratch that i wanna like it infinite times, because you, you have infinitely helped me.
best animation on youtube. thank you!
extremely simplified but yeah - if this were taught this way in school I would get interested in chemistry way sooner
Where have you been all my chem life!!! Things feel a lot more clear seeing after seeing this!
Lewis’s notation explains that more simply
you taught me in 3 minutes what my teacher couldnt do in 4 weeks
Incredible animations!
Brilliant. Produce more just like this.
Mindddd blown. You have cleared some of my questions of this study session in just minutes.
I was losing interest by not getting right help, thankfully, finally the right video.
This is an excellent visualization of bonding.
Really excellent video.
Could you do one on metallic bonds, please?
That a very good request
as a 7th grade, this was still MUCH more helpful than our teachers at school, thanks!
I just love how you use so many different styles of animation 💓 I do have my favorites, but I like all of them
Grazie, uso spesso i tuoi video in classe, le animazioni sono stupende e le spiegazioni chiarissime! Sei il mio salvatore!
This explanation is so totally easy to understand! Thank you for your creativity!
Amazing lesson ☺️
continue simplifying such concepts please
Thank you for this lovely video!
Amazing video!
Wish my chemistry teacher could explain like that.
Really excellent stuff - nicely explained and beautifully visualised. My only quibble would be that the tug-of-war in the ionic bonding bit is almost entirely mythical - usually the two ions have already gained or lost electrons long before they meet - but the myth is still a part of standard chemistry teaching, for whatever reason, so, fair enough. :)
At least you went straight from there to ionic lattices! Far too many sources stop with 'an ionic bond' forming, as if there was then a molecule of NaCl floating around...
Could you elaborate more please? About ionic bonding. Thankyou.
@@angu4878 I recommend the Royal Society of Chemistry's 'Chemical Misconceptions' on this.
If you have any specific questions, though, I'm happy to try and answer them here.
woah, still responding after 8 years :O props to u dude
Hello ted ed this is my homework and this helps so much ty
TED-Ed is AMAZING
Showed this to my chemistry teacher to show the class one time in high school when they got to the part where they started teaching us about chemical bonds and stuff
Just loved the explanation , thank you sir 😍😍😍💖💖💖
thanks you teach better than even our textbook
Thank you so much, I like how you described the bonds.
Nice visuals
Great video
i still can't picture them with the model of atom in quantum mechanics
right? how do these both models fit together?
Because we cannot see atoms and only their imprint on scanning technology these models are wrong and primitive. Think of it like this.. a giant field of energy that is and isn't at the same time as well as flickering back and fourth between states. All throughout this field membrane are pinches, tweaks, flips, and twists. Because this all is all then it is also parts in retrospection and opposition to being all. To all is part and to part is all. Each atom is and isn't within its own. Each atom is created and exists in relationship to each other atom and vice versa. You define yourself by comparing or sizing yourself up to others or things-situations. This "outside" "other" things define you and help make you be what you see yourself to be. Atoms are the same.. we only know metal by comparing it to water. Water to wood and air to rock.. we learn more about something when we see what it is not and then by deduction and reduction come to a conclusion. Atoms are intersecting waves making waves that intersect and make waves. The center of an atom cannot be seen and the electron signature is the only mystery expression we have of the geni inside. Your mind picks things apart as it's functions are to split energy (ideas-functions) and connect/combined energy. Splitters and or lumpers. If reality is created by our perception and will and reality is atoms and we are atoms then we are conscious atomic reality being funneled down through a human body so that we may do whatever. When dealing with atoms and reality remember.. you ONLY have YOUR perception and or the belief in other's perceptions which is still your perception of their perception. All atoms are one and connected as a single whole. Our minds split and divide in relation to how we feel, think, want or need. Our human specimen of a body does aromatically set some perimeters in perception and application capabilities.. for example we cannot fly by flapping our arms etc. Atoms are also functions too. For example an atom "dancing" becomes and is the dancing. The singing atom literally is only the sound singing. This is how you become what you do and what you do is what you become. Some people like to name things... Some people like to know how things function. Thus things have been named things just because or named things in which they do like a hammer or a screwdriver. Take any thing or idea (all things are ideas and all ideas are things - both are buzzing energy on diff frequencies) and try to define it. Look at the dictionary. Now that word uses other words to explain and de-scribe that word so you gotta go define those words and so on. You will find that words used to explain a word don't have anything to do with that word and those words are made up of other words that only have meaning by bringing in more words without a meaning in theirself. You will deviate far from the original word or even come right back to it! In fact the word you tried to define will end up defining itself by using itself. This is insanity. So when it comes to someone really knowing you or where you are coming from... That is very rare and special. Hope this ramble sum up helps someone. RESEARCH! CORRELATE! LOVE!
Hmm.. Search for Valence bond theory and hybridization. also VSEPR
Thanks for making this video. It helps me.
This was excellent.
This was so useful
Can you do a video on mainly on Ionic bond and how bonding work with more than 2 atoms
Thank You so Much !
This was explained So well that I literally was trippin out! :-P Thanks bunches! Came here for wanting to learn this and you hit the nail on the head, TED-ed!
How is it wrong? You just said my statement about hydrogen forces vs covalents bonds is true, which implies that covalent bonds are the most abundant type of bonds in DNA. What's in question here isn't about why electrostatic interactions like hydrogen forces and covalent bonds are important, but about which bond is the most abundant and I think I was clear about that. However, you are right about hydrogen forces being important, it's why we have A base pairing with T and G with C.
PERFEITO!
Just luv the way you explain things un this is my favoutite,,In some cases atoms could form more bonds than you would expect but they better have a really gud reason to do so,, . A masterpiece lol .
No momento certo Deus fará acontecer ❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thank you for providing such an awesome lecture!
i'm doing a university degree in physics and you just described bonds in a much clearer way then my course material lol.
SO GOOD
Thank you
There is no such thing as a pure ionic bond ( unless you count ions dissolved in water or another substance ). Even in Cesium Fluoride, Cesium's outermost electron spends 95% of it's time in the vicinity of the fluorine nucleus, and 5% of it's time in the vicinity of the Cesium nucleus, but not 100% of it's time in either location. Ionic versus covalent bonding is a matter of degree.
The pull of the nucleus keeps them attracted in a different location at all times. good question. watch quantum mechanics for a visual display.
awesome bro
To my knowledge there is no material that completely resists erosion/abrasion. And yes, you can wear through the skin on your hands by rubbing them together enough.
The entire phosphodiester backbone and the purine or pyrimidine bases are held together with covalent bonds. Hydrogen bonding only enables base pairing between two strands. Without the H-bonds, double-stranded DNA wouldn't form (nor would interesting secondary structures in ssDNA or ssRNA, but that's another story), so they are critical, but you only get 2 per A-T pair or 3 per G-C pair, while each nucleotide comprises more than 30 covalent bonds.
At 2:08 you explained how only the outermost electrons would participate in bonding, however for transition metals if the outermost electrons are removed som from other energy levels may participate in bonding as well.
Just learnt this in school! THANKS
Thanks very useful
too sort !!! WE WANT MOAR
great. zabrdast... video
Really good video, just awesome.
But isn't it missing the metallic bonds?
i love this explIaning and tht its fast thanks!
On what basis do elements combine with other elements like in
HCl + H2O → H3O+ + Cl- why the reaction doesn't look like
HCl + H2O → H3ClO
H3ClO is energetically unstable, so if the atoms were in the position to form this or H3O+/Cl-, they would form the lower energy H3O+/Cl-.
Great video! Only the depiction of a DNA molecule at 1:33 as an example of covalent bonds feels very confusing or misleading to me because the most prominent bonds seen in this image are the hydrogen bonds between complementary bases...
If I had 1 dollar for every atom in a molecule money would be completely meaningless to me. Must be how the 1% feels
2:49 Do all molecules of explosive materials have this characteristic? Bonds that break given a burst of extra energy?
The names Bond, Ionic Bond #katelovesthisjoke
@@yasminyehia9085 hahahahaha 😅😅😅
what a way o teach
in 3 minutes i learned what my teachers could not properly explain to me in 3 weeks.
Me learned something, me like!
really nice !##
please do a video on dot structure and # redox reactions
thanks
0:56 hey, notice anything?
Na is 11th element
Neon is a noble gas with 10 electrons
Chlorine tries to get to argon, also an noble gas.
A lot of molecules wanna be like this.
Maybe.
I do have data. But there will be exceptions.
This video taught me so much in 4 minutes than my science teacher did in 50 minutes
It's good to be the first one!! Not only to comment, but to watch as well!!
Beautiful!
Wrong picture in reality the picture is much different this is just theortical explanation of practical results
Of course it's a theoretical model, what'd you think everything is?
Excellent :)
Last year my 8th grade science teacher mr pencille always showed us your videos
It’s good to learn 🤘🏽🥰
The "mettalic bond" term was not claimed until 2014.
this is so realisic woah
One question: is the pull force exerted by the electron on the proton the same as the force exerted by the proton on the electron
I still don't understand everything... If electrons orbit around the nucleus, how can atoms share one ?
What the heck that's actually a good question. I'm also extremely confused on how exactly the electrons even orbit the atom since the current observations are that the don't even have a fixed path but have a superposition like wtf is happening ??????
It’s difficult to explain, but when atoms get close, their orbitals can overlap and form molecular orbitals. These molecular orbitals are usually lower in energy than individual atomic orbitals, so every orbital combination forms what we call a bond.
Thank you 8->
Thanks for the video, really help explain more the just reading 😂
All electrons are negatively charged which means they all repel each other like magnets.
And that’s how it’s done 👌
after giving an electron sodium get positively and chlorine get negatively charged .then one negatively charged chlorine and one sodium should eliminate the negative-positive charge. but why sodium ion or chlorine ion paired with six other as mentioned in the video?
How do electrons behave in covalent bond though? Are they trapped in one place and don't orbit own atom nucleus anymore or do they orbit both atoms nuclei?
They orbit both in a shared orbital.
Hello, I'm thinking about doing a huge project on chemistry. I would like to use these animations and give you the credits. would you give me permission?
I liked that it was good
Hydrogen "bonds" aren't actually bonds b/c unlike real bonds (like covalent, ionic, metallic), they don't possess any orbital overlap (sigma, pi, delta, etc) between two atoms. They're a type of inter (and sometimes "intra") molecular force.
i get why two water atoms do a covalent bond, the have the same amount of electrons&protons, but why is the O of h2o not taking away the electrons of the water atoms, it has a stronger "magnetic" force? what am I missing? :D
figured it out already ^^
Entao , na ligaçao covalente, o atomo rouba o eletron do outro, assim um ficando positivo e outro negativo, o negativo, para se neutralizar, rouba devolta o eletron, ai ficando infinitamente aleatoriamente?