Movie is a classic. Best one liners ever. Not boring at all. Plenty of laughing with all the action and puns. Saw this with my dad and family Christmas day when it came out.
Roger Ebert gets it... This movie had some of the best lines ever. "Why don't you just sit there and bleed a while before you taste some real pain" "The Marines are looking for a few good men. Unfortunately you ain't it."
HR is a gold mine of one-liners."The only thing you could build, Webster, is a good case of hemorrhoids." "I'll tell you what's black and bleeding if it don't shut its face.""Does his mama know he's playing Marine?""You go hump someone else's leg, muttface, before I push yours in." And many, MANY more. LOL
+gb032645 Highway: Shut your face, hippie! Corporal 'Stitch' Jones: Hippie? [whispers in ear] Corporal 'Stitch' Jones: There haven't been hippies in centuries. Are you freeze-dried or doing hard time?
+gb032645 Jail Binger: If you wanna pop that puppy's can you don't have to grease him so hard, jarhead. Highway: Well, it sounds like you're a man of experience.
I literally had a sore throat for a couple of days after seeing this movie in the theater and trying to imitate Clint's voice. I got some great laughs from my friends but I paid for it.
Love this movie and how it portrayed the Marines. The first time I saw it was at Military Circle Mall, the theater was full of Marines and Navy, it was great!
I can't argue with regards to being in the Military. I did try to join, however, I was not physically suitable. I always love watching Siskel and Ebert. I love the passion they have for film, it's the basis for their friendship and a friendship that should set an example. I love these guys!!!
Ebert was one of the few critics to understand why this movie works (the dialogue) and one of the few to NOT get why Full Metal Jacket was a great movie.
May Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert both rest in peace. What I loved about the two of them especially was when they would agree to disagree on the way movies were presented; and for lack of seeing similar shows -- if they exist today -- that dynamic is both lacking and sorely missed. Apart from that, as a former U.S. Marine, Heartbreak Ridge did portray Marines of that time in a more truthful light than some groups of people would lead others to believe. At one point, Roger said that Clint Eastwood didn't portray a typical Marine in the movie. I begged to differ, though. For the Marines both former and current, how many Marines in your time did you know who went out to town and did a pub crawl, go to a strip bar, pick up hookers, look for fights after getting loaded, or get into one form of trouble or another whether they got caught or not? At the same time, how many other Marines did you know in your time in the Corps who essentially did the opposite of the above examples? Personally, I saw my fair share on both sides. Then there is also the internal politics relating to the Corps and other branches of the Armed Forces. There are the enlisted members training to get their hands dirty in combat, the guys who eat and sleep and hang out together like family, and then there are the officers who seem to care more about strictly enforcing rules than to knowing their troops well enough to equal parts relate to them and more effectively lead them in and out of combat. Basically, Ebert and Siskel were both right about the movie in a lot of respects. However, there were still many subplots and details to the movie that those who have lived as such -- as Marines -- can relate to far better than any civilian, movie critic or otherwise, ever could or will.
And the Eastwood character was in the army at the time. He won the medal of honor with the army, and later joined the Marines. Did you ever see the film? It's actually pretty good.
And there ya have it, folks-another movie that Siskel panned that went on to become a big hit at the box office. This movie scored over 100,000,000 at the box office.
I liked their spirited debate in this review. I agree with Ebert though. This isn’t one of the greatest war movies or anything, but it’s just a fun movie. Seen it atleast 30 times, and will probably watch again and again.
What makes this film different is that it ISN'T about a raw recruits and a tough DI, like Full Metal Jacket and other Marine movies.. These guys had been Marines for awhile and totally had their way with previous platoon sergeants who gave up on them. Eastwood's character refused to give up on them.
Can you imagine Clint Eastwood and Arnold in a movie together? Omg!!!! Those two will be spewing bad-ass one liners back and fourth like its air in the sky. :))))
My brother served in the first war in Iraq. Perhaps I am overly sensitive when anyone describes the courage and sacrifice it takes to serve your country for citizens you don't know and will never meet as trivial. Thank you for your service Sir. God Bless
@@thelordofhellaz It's not the same thing. That's like saying "Well I didn't have cancer but I know a lot of people who did." That's just idiotic. Siskel wants a love story focus in a movie about a near retirement Sgt. and young, untrained Marines going into their first battle together... what a jackass Siskel is! He also said the same thing about "The Terminator", he wanted the focus on the love story between Sara Connor and Reese when it's a story about the origin point of the fight for the future of mankind against machines before it ever happens. He's so far off in a lot of these reviews. And it's not about the action in Heartbreak Ridge or The Terminator that are important, it's the story and characters in focus but Siskel wants a different character focus.
Whatever!! "Die hard" and "die hard with a vengeance" are both amazing action movies.John mctiernan the director of those two,also did the first "predator".He was a genius.
EBERT: You missed the whole sub-point of the movie which is this guy is almost at retirement. He has seen battle. He's there at Heartbreak Ridge. The kids and his commanding officer have never been in battle before. The whole movie is about a peacetime army who suddenly finds that one of these phony alerts is for real. SISKEL: Yeah. And, and, uh...it's, uh...it's boring. LOL
A great and under rated movie. At first I thought, oh no, another Clint movie, then it grew on me, based on stuff I experienced in the military. Funny and "semi" real, yet believable in ways, I trained some at Camp Pendleton. To me this movie puts a comedic value to war, hardly what we need these days. Being in the military, from my experience, it is tough, people die, and I wanted to get out ASAP.
Ebert is right on. This was a movie in which Clint had to be a mentor and the only way he knows how is being a tough mentors. This movie is in a lot of ways a predecessor for gran torinom
I thought it was a very average film but was made very enjoyable because of Clint's central performance...that's what movie star's are for though- elevating boring material into something enjoyable, and no one does that like Clint Eastwood
Make no mistake, Heartbreak Ridge has a lot of flaws, but it is iconic in so many ways. I was in the Army when this move came out and it was a huge favorite of all of us in my battery. Totally disagree with Siskel (rip). The part of the film between Eastwood and Mason, which Siskel wanted to see MORE of for chrissake, was one of its biggest flaws. Siskel obviously never served.
@ brothertee1017: I thought that was a bit odd too. The _Dirty Harry_ films, for only a few examples, were much more violent than _Heartbreak Ridge_ . I think it's good that _Heartbreak Ridge_ wasn't terribly violent as I'd bet that wouldn't have mixed well with the oft comedic moments within the same film. Besides that, I have to go with Ebert's take over Siskel's: I liked _Heartbreak Ridge_ too and would give it a Thumb Up also.
I have to agree with Siskel on this one. If I want to see how young kids handle being tossed into combat, there is always the magnificent Apocalypse Now, The Boys in Company C or Full Metal Jacket. Now those are chuck full them.
It makes me sad and a little angry that Siskel wanted this to be a love story with only a touch of military sprinkled here and there. If he had a man card it should have been revoked right there.
The movie is so boring that my brother joined up as a candiate officer and retired as Marine colonel because of that movie. He keeps a dvd of it in his collection.
Exactly. It's a very passable, time waster movie, but highly enjoyable. Not every film needs to rewrite the genre, be an Oscar contender, and reinvent the wheel. This is good popcorn fare, especially for Eastwood fans.
It's great when these film reviewers disagree. I wouldn't have changed a thing about Siskel or Ebert. If they had agreed on everything, their show would have been boring. Heartbreak Ridge is not an Oscar-worthy film, it was predictable, it wasn't life changing, but it was still pretty entertaining to me.
WTF-- Did these guys actually WATCH the film? Spoiler Alert-- These Marines were NOT recruits. They were NOT recruits. It's important to the story. They were were not green recruits, and these guys thinking they were, only shows they slept through the movie... or something! BTW... This film was actually pretty good.
I thought this movie started off as a good idea that was just destroyed by making it in a totally ridiculous "Any Which Way But Loose" fashion. This movie could've been a good movie but it seemed as though someone was thinking about "Stripes" when they made it, bad cinematography, just bad characters, Eastwood's ridiculous voice here, nahhh, this movie was just bad bad bad!!! Its a shame because if it would've been taken more seriously, it could've been really good. Like I said, this movie was maybe a cut above "Stripes", which isn't saying much 😢
At first when I saw this film I mainly agreed with Roger Ebert, but as time has passed I do not think it has aged well, and I am now more of Gene Siskel's point of view. Clint does appear tired, the training of the green recruits we have all seen a million times before, the experienced "grunt" versus the inexperienced boss is very cliche, and quite frankly Grenada was a "war" of very little consequence. Marsha Mason was a strong point in the film, and I agree with Siskel that she should have had more screen time with Clint.
Heartbreak Ridge was as much a comedy as anything else with very colourful characters. Very tongue-in-cheek movie which these guys are trying to read way to much into. Do these clowns ever just sit back and enjoy a movie with some popcorn, or are they permanently hunched over their keyboards analysing every second of something that's just their to entertain people?.
I just got done watching this movie.polite the radioman dies when they're in the building and they praise Eastwood for leading the pack but forget the lost man in battle...then they get home and where are polites family? It's all celebration and forget our lost men in battle? Horrible depiction of war and the marines
Just watched this film for the first time. It almost felt like it should be a campy B-movie, but it was played dead serious. It made the marines look terrible. Soldiers were obnoxious morons, officers were incompetent pencil pushers, and Highway was anachronistic. While Eastwood had a few good one-liners, it wasn't enough to carry the movie. It all felt so predictable and unrealistic.
The one liners were good, the Suede part seems to be the most popular, and could have dealt little more with his wife. But it seems like it could have been written better. I think Ebert kisses ass sometimes. The Grenada comment was right on, that little battle seemed very poorly done. I think they made the Marines look real bad here, real stupid. These guys looked like real whimps, esp that scrawny guy. A marine platoon is not like that...maybe at the beginning of basic training I could see them like that. Clint Eastwood is one of my all time favorites. This movie could have been done great but it wasn't. Yes was a little boring, and the final battle scene was a total boner killer.
Gene's favorite word is boring. The movie might be stupid, but to call Granada boring in real life is really stupid. like calling It unworthy of coverage.
@Dottiecurran : You don't know much, do you. His what you call "out of style" IS his style, and I'd bet your insignificant life that it was and is better than yours, lame wannabe fashion police. I think it's not your heart (which you don't have one) that broken but your head (which has no brain in there).
I loved these two, so much chemistry. This one had me crying 😂 I'm with Ebert, thumbs up to HR
Movie is a classic. Best one liners ever. Not boring at all. Plenty of laughing with all the action and puns. Saw this with my dad and family Christmas day when it came out.
One of my favorite Clint movies. The dialogue is great.
I have to go with Roger Ebert :) on this one :) Heartbreak Ridge was literslly my first Eastwood film :) and I always enjoy it :)
Roger Ebert gets it...
This movie had some of the best lines ever.
"Why don't you just sit there and bleed a while before you taste some real pain"
"The Marines are looking for a few good men. Unfortunately you ain't it."
HR is a gold mine of one-liners."The only thing you could build, Webster, is a good case of hemorrhoids." "I'll tell you what's black and bleeding if it don't shut its face.""Does his mama know he's playing Marine?""You go hump someone else's leg, muttface, before I push yours in." And many, MANY more. LOL
+gb032645
Highway: Shut your face, hippie! Corporal 'Stitch' Jones: Hippie? [whispers in ear] Corporal 'Stitch' Jones: There haven't been hippies in centuries. Are you freeze-dried or doing hard time?
+gb032645 Here's to J.J. and all the pieces of him we couldn't find.
+VZ935 Mr. Jones, you fall out in that street or I'm gonna kick your ass right off this fucking planet!
+gb032645
Jail Binger: If you wanna pop that puppy's can you don't have to grease him so hard, jarhead.
Highway: Well, it sounds like you're a man of experience.
I literally had a sore throat for a couple of days after seeing this movie in the theater and trying to imitate Clint's voice. I got some great laughs from my friends but I paid for it.
Love this movie and how it portrayed the Marines. The first time I saw it was at Military Circle Mall, the theater was full of Marines and Navy, it was great!
Siskel, you do not IMPRESS ME!
He wouldn't be talking so smart with HIS BALLS STUFFED IN HIS MOUTH!
I can't argue with regards to being in the Military. I did try to join, however, I was not physically suitable. I always love watching Siskel and Ebert. I love the passion they have for film, it's the basis for their friendship and a friendship that should set an example. I love these guys!!!
“Keep your head low around Powers” my favorite line.
Ebert was one of the few critics to understand why this movie works (the dialogue) and one of the few to NOT get why Full Metal Jacket was a great movie.
May Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert both rest in peace. What I loved about the two of them especially was when they would agree to disagree on the way movies were presented; and for lack of seeing similar shows -- if they exist today -- that dynamic is both lacking and sorely missed.
Apart from that, as a former U.S. Marine, Heartbreak Ridge did portray Marines of that time in a more truthful light than some groups of people would lead others to believe. At one point, Roger said that Clint Eastwood didn't portray a typical Marine in the movie. I begged to differ, though.
For the Marines both former and current, how many Marines in your time did you know who went out to town and did a pub crawl, go to a strip bar, pick up hookers, look for fights after getting loaded, or get into one form of trouble or another whether they got caught or not?
At the same time, how many other Marines did you know in your time in the Corps who essentially did the opposite of the above examples? Personally, I saw my fair share on both sides.
Then there is also the internal politics relating to the Corps and other branches of the Armed Forces. There are the enlisted members training to get their hands dirty in combat, the guys who eat and sleep and hang out together like family, and then there are the officers who seem to care more about strictly enforcing rules than to knowing their troops well enough to equal parts relate to them and more effectively lead them in and out of combat.
Basically, Ebert and Siskel were both right about the movie in a lot of respects. However, there were still many subplots and details to the movie that those who have lived as such -- as Marines -- can relate to far better than any civilian, movie critic or otherwise, ever could or will.
as an Army vet, I can honestly say that we did the same shit
And the Eastwood character was in the army at the time. He won the medal of honor with the army, and later joined the Marines. Did you ever see the film? It's actually pretty good.
Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert had such a great dynamic!
One of Clints best roles.
"With the birth of an artist comes the inevitable afterbirth, the critic." Mel Brooks
The movie was perfect. It had it all, action, comedy and drama.
And there ya have it, folks-another movie that Siskel panned that went on to become a big hit at the box office. This movie scored over 100,000,000 at the box office.
That was in the 80's too
I don't know a Marine that doesn't like this movie.
have to agree with siskel which is rare. i could not even finish this movie
Agree. I think the whole movie is boring.
Roger with the win. Great movie.
love this movie. it seemed like the thing to do.
critics missed it by a mile ... they are totally divorced from everyday life.
i love everett mcgill. i saw this movie a long time ago. i remember it as being not bad.
I liked their spirited debate in this review. I agree with Ebert though. This isn’t one of the greatest war movies or anything, but it’s just a fun movie. Seen it atleast 30 times, and will probably watch again and again.
What makes this film different is that it ISN'T about a raw recruits and a tough DI, like Full Metal Jacket and other Marine movies.. These guys had been Marines for awhile and totally had their way with previous platoon sergeants who gave up on them. Eastwood's character refused to give up on them.
Clint Eastwood. Legend. R.I.P.
As much as I've wanted to dislike this movie, it has grown to become one of my favorites. Sure its campy, but its good 80's fun! Thumbs up!
Can you imagine Clint Eastwood and Arnold in a movie together? Omg!!!! Those two will be spewing bad-ass one liners back and fourth like its air in the sky. :))))
I wonder how "uninteresting" Siskel would have thought about the war in Grenada if he were the one being shot at.
+carlos perez : A lot of soldiers died in Grenada. Some guys from my unit, though I missed this skirmish, was out by then.
My brother served in the first war in Iraq. Perhaps I am overly sensitive when anyone describes the courage and sacrifice it takes to serve your country for citizens you don't know and will never meet as trivial. Thank you for your service Sir. God Bless
Gene Siskel was in the Army Reserves in 1968.......He didn't see any action, but he saw a lot of people who did back then.......
@@thelordofhellaz It's not the same thing. That's like saying "Well I didn't have cancer but I know a lot of people who did." That's just idiotic. Siskel wants a love story focus in a movie about a near retirement Sgt. and young, untrained Marines going into their first battle together... what a jackass Siskel is! He also said the same thing about "The Terminator", he wanted the focus on the love story between Sara Connor and Reese when it's a story about the origin point of the fight for the future of mankind against machines before it ever happens. He's so far off in a lot of these reviews. And it's not about the action in Heartbreak Ridge or The Terminator that are important, it's the story and characters in focus but Siskel wants a different character focus.
Whatever!! "Die hard" and "die hard with a vengeance" are both amazing action movies.John mctiernan the director of those two,also did the first "predator".He was a genius.
EBERT: You missed the whole sub-point of the movie which is this guy is almost at retirement. He has seen battle. He's there at Heartbreak Ridge. The kids and his commanding officer have never been in battle before. The whole movie is about a peacetime army who suddenly finds that one of these phony alerts is for real.
SISKEL: Yeah. And, and, uh...it's, uh...it's boring.
LOL
Siskel was right. The film was boring AF.
A great movie and I couldn't give a crap what the critics think.
A great and under rated movie. At first I thought, oh no, another Clint movie, then it grew on me, based on stuff I experienced in the military. Funny and "semi" real, yet believable in ways, I trained some at Camp Pendleton. To me this movie puts a comedic value to war, hardly what we need these days. Being in the military, from my experience, it is tough, people die, and I wanted to get out ASAP.
Gene Siskel i believe owned the original Saturday Night Fever suit...ugh!
Siskel just missed it. The movie is about leadership. It works.
Are you kidding me Roger?
Some of the best service members and leaders are the ones who break the rules. But for the greater good.
Ebert is right on. This was a movie in which Clint had to be a mentor and the only way he knows how is being a tough mentors. This movie is in a lot of ways a predecessor for gran torinom
I thought it was a very average film but was made very enjoyable because of Clint's central performance...that's what movie star's are for though- elevating boring material into something enjoyable, and no one does that like Clint Eastwood
Make no mistake, Heartbreak Ridge has a lot of flaws, but it is iconic in so many ways. I was in the Army when this move came out and it was a huge favorite of all of us in my battery. Totally disagree with Siskel (rip). The part of the film between Eastwood and Mason, which Siskel wanted to see MORE of for chrissake, was one of its biggest flaws. Siskel obviously never served.
I bought this movie not knowing what it was about. It's not great, but it is pretty entertaining.
Roger Ebert thought that this film was VIOLENT?
@
brothertee1017:
I thought that was a bit odd too. The _Dirty Harry_ films, for only a few examples, were much more violent than _Heartbreak Ridge_ . I think it's good that _Heartbreak Ridge_ wasn't terribly violent as I'd bet that wouldn't have mixed well with the oft comedic moments within the same film.
Besides that, I have to go with Ebert's take over Siskel's: I liked _Heartbreak Ridge_ too and would give it a Thumb Up also.
Yeah I love their disagreements.
No he's not. Gene and Roger were the two greatest critics of all time. I love this movie, but I can see where Gene is coming from on this one.
I think Roger won this one. Sometimes, Gene missed the point of the movie and how effective it was. This was one of those.
I have to agree with Siskel on this one.
If I want to see how young kids handle being tossed into combat, there is always the magnificent Apocalypse Now, The Boys in Company C or Full Metal Jacket. Now those are chuck full them.
It makes me sad and a little angry that Siskel wanted this to be a love story with only a touch of military sprinkled here and there. If he had a man card it should have been revoked right there.
The movie is so boring that my brother joined up as a candiate officer and retired as Marine colonel because of that movie. He keeps a dvd of it in his collection.
they’re both right. i liked it when i was younger but it doesn’t hold up that well.
I think the title is misleading being US ARMY 9th Infantry Reg "Manchus" 2nd ID that actually fought the battle of Heartbreak Ridge.
And Army Rangers were involved in the Battle of Grenada, not Marines.
the movie itself is ok, i'd say see it only if your a clint eastwood fan. his performance makes this film.
I thought it was pretty good. I can think of numerous Eastwood movies I like more though.
Exactly. It's a very passable, time waster movie, but highly enjoyable. Not every film needs to rewrite the genre, be an Oscar contender, and reinvent the wheel. This is good popcorn fare, especially for Eastwood fans.
It's great when these film reviewers disagree. I wouldn't have changed a thing about Siskel or Ebert. If they had agreed on everything, their show would have been boring.
Heartbreak Ridge is not an Oscar-worthy film, it was predictable, it wasn't life changing, but it was still pretty entertaining to me.
If Stupid could fly Siskel would be a jet plane
I thought it was a good movie, the performances (most notably Eastwood) were solid all around and the humor was sharp instead of offensive.
WTF-- Did these guys actually WATCH the film? Spoiler Alert-- These Marines were NOT recruits. They were NOT recruits. It's important to the story. They were were not green recruits, and these guys thinking they were, only shows they slept through the movie... or something! BTW... This film was actually pretty good.
you do understand they werent recruits right?
swede swede swede.....oh damn swede Ill catch you later.
I thought this movie started off as a good idea that was just destroyed by making it in a totally ridiculous "Any Which Way But Loose" fashion. This movie could've been a good movie but it seemed as though someone was thinking about "Stripes" when they made it, bad cinematography, just bad characters, Eastwood's ridiculous voice here, nahhh, this movie was just bad bad bad!!! Its a shame because if it would've been taken more seriously, it could've been really good. Like I said, this movie was maybe a cut above "Stripes", which isn't saying much 😢
siskel was right on this one
Siskel's upset that the movie didn't get to the war fast enough? That's completely missing the point right there.
At first when I saw this film I mainly agreed with Roger Ebert, but as time has passed I do not think it has aged well, and I am now more of Gene Siskel's point of view. Clint does appear tired, the training of the green recruits we have all seen a million times before, the experienced "grunt" versus the inexperienced boss is very cliche, and quite frankly Grenada was a "war" of very little consequence. Marsha Mason was a strong point in the film, and I agree with Siskel that she should have had more screen time with Clint.
Not your ideal marine? HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA very ideal and badass marine.
He gave thumps up to Saving Private Ryan and so forth.
Funny Clint Eastwood is a Korean vet that never saw combat he was a California life guard lol
Eh, he's an actor. John Wayne never served at all. Neither did Stallone.
He did his duty. That's where he was stationed.
According to Sondra Locke, Clint always bragged about being drafted during the Korean War even though he was stationed state side.
Grenada was the nutmeg capital. Scarrrry.
buddinganarchist smoke some
Siskel the contrarian
Heartbreak Ridge was as much a comedy as anything else with very colourful characters. Very tongue-in-cheek movie which these guys are trying to read way to much into. Do these clowns ever just sit back and enjoy a movie with some popcorn, or are they permanently hunched over their keyboards analysing every second of something that's just their to entertain people?.
Hunched over their "typewriters"
God forbid some of us actually have a passion for film and generally demand that each film posses some modicum of substance.
Of course Siskel didn't like it. Did he like his own children??
They we not recruits!
I just got done watching this movie.polite the radioman dies when they're in the building and they praise Eastwood for leading the pack but forget the lost man in battle...then they get home and where are polites family? It's all celebration and forget our lost men in battle? Horrible depiction of war and the marines
Just watched this film for the first time. It almost felt like it should be a campy B-movie, but it was played dead serious. It made the marines look terrible. Soldiers were obnoxious morons, officers were incompetent pencil pushers, and Highway was anachronistic. While Eastwood had a few good one-liners, it wasn't enough to carry the movie. It all felt so predictable and unrealistic.
My reaction to the film as well. This is a traditional product of Hollywood that features dialogue that is cut above most but not enough to save it.
The one liners were good, the Suede part seems to be the most popular, and could have dealt little more with his wife. But it seems like it could have been written better. I think Ebert kisses ass sometimes. The Grenada comment was right on, that little battle seemed very poorly done. I think they made the Marines look real bad here, real stupid. These guys looked like real whimps, esp that scrawny guy. A marine platoon is not like that...maybe at the beginning of basic training I could see them like that. Clint Eastwood is one of my all time favorites. This movie could have been done great but it wasn't. Yes was a little boring, and the final battle scene was a total boner killer.
I agree with Gene. It was predictable.
Lol.... Not recruits! They didn't do their homework before they critiqued the movie...Lol!
Gene's favorite word is boring. The movie might be stupid, but to call Granada boring in real life is really stupid. like calling It unworthy of coverage.
This movie was disappointing. That shootout at the end was so lame. The one liners get annoying after a while.
Ok, [movies] are FAKE BELIEVE. THE RIDGE characters were ANIMATED.
It's a heartbreak to look at Ebert. Tasteless and out of style always
@Dottiecurran
:
You don't know much, do you. His what you call "out of style" IS his style, and I'd bet your insignificant life that it was and is better than yours, lame wannabe fashion police. I think it's not your heart (which you don't have one) that broken but your head (which has no brain in there).
Thumbnail is a reptilian noid face morph!
😂😂😂😂
I found it pretty boring, too.
This movie is awful