Tariq Ali: World Literature and World Languages - SOAS, University of London

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @colibri1
    @colibri1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    He is so right about people knowing less about other cultures since the inception of the era of "globalization," which ought really to have been called corporate globalization, the imposition of Western businessmen's ideas, rules, and values on the world.

  • @lauramckendric5
    @lauramckendric5 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yep. That sounds about right. Great CV! What an Endorsement!

  • @sharjeeljawaid
    @sharjeeljawaid 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Great lecture Tariq Saheb

  • @rogermarcos40
    @rogermarcos40 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent!! Brilliant!! Bravo, Mr. Tariq.

  • @zulkiflijamil6172
    @zulkiflijamil6172 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Master of Ceremony mentioned about The British Revolution " it will come " and certainly it will happen.

  • @JZBaltazar
    @JZBaltazar 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A great thought-provoking lecture. Perhaps greater familiarity with world history and literature would prevent some from confusing criticism of the XVI century Spain with criticism of Catholicism.

  • @Leibo07
    @Leibo07 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    starts at 7:24

  • @scriabiniste
    @scriabiniste 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Brilliant

  • @margaretc.3736
    @margaretc.3736 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Easternodyssey: Pramoedya Ananta Toer. Did you catch the last names of Doug?

  • @lauramckendric5
    @lauramckendric5 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    #NowPlaying Gonna start a revoluuuution, heh, we all wanna change the world! Only some of us can. #NowPlaying Equally Cursed and Blessed

  • @lauramckendric5
    @lauramckendric5 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Open University, Beginner's French.

  • @lauramckendric5
    @lauramckendric5 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man, he looks like Donald Sutherland.

  • @lauramckendric5
    @lauramckendric5 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Christ, this is long.

  • @waded2628
    @waded2628 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Tariq Ali comes off as lacking basic knowledge of history, economics and human nature. Al-Andalus was only tolerant to people who hate Western civilization and ignore writings from the entirety of its history rather than Muslim apologists. He continuously criticizes Western civilization; even Communism is portrayed as a victim. This whole lecture is envious Muslim whining about Western power and influence without any introspection about why the West became so powerful. It's implied this is solely due to imperialism which is ironic considering that imperialism is the sole reason Islam gained influence.