ขนาดวิดีโอ: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
แสดงแผงควบคุมโปรแกรมเล่น
เล่นอัตโนมัติ
เล่นใหม่
it was quite helpfuldue to the 3D models
Yes
The 13- simple Hexagonal structure seems to be wrong.
i too thhink the same.
Ya bro you right,I am also compused
It is a portion taken from the hexagon (unit cell) to show the angles clearly
simple exagonal is false but thank you for the others
Sir please voice not audiblr
which software you are use to making of these pattern
Thanks a ton.. I was so confused between orthorhombic and monoclinic. This video really helped. :)
Lakshya 2.O attendence here👇
Can i use this animation
No
@@kavitatiwari8430 Xd.
Which software did you use to create this animation? Could you tell me?
Did you find it😅
@@asanalmahathir2113 Not yet! I suppose he created these animation by solidworks.
I'm Junior Jr. Only using a different account!
@@gedaelfagundes6167 okay
Simple Hexagonal is correct or not
✅
7 years op
Who came here after TRS sir recommendation?
which software do you use??
For simple hexagonal the lattice points should be 14 instead of 8
12 or 14
best representation..................& quite helpful too
Loved it.....Thanks a ton.
5:05
very helpful to usso thank u
great content, thank you
thanks a lot superb 1
Thank you... It's very helpful 👍
Very nice video.. & clear all concept... & so helpful for concept
Please any one who tell or show me the atomic packing factor (APF) of triclinic.
how ho calculate atomic radii and edge length of solids??? how to use the formulas properly??
Very. Helpful thanks a lot
thanku 😊
❤️
Helpful.Thanks .
It helps me a lot
thank you
Nice work
Nice video
Wonderful!!!!!!!!!!!
Loved it😍❤️
fcc is not correct
Really nice 1...
Helpful
Tysm..
so complete , so understand thank you T T
In Primitive or simple cubic structure, the actual portions of spheres (atoms) touches one another , there is no gap between the spheres.
Simple Hexag. is wrong
yes, its y= 180• but here its shown 120•
Amber Gupta no y=120 but it should have six sides
it was quite helpful
due to the 3D models
Yes
The 13- simple Hexagonal structure seems to be wrong.
i too thhink the same.
Ya bro you right,I am also compused
It is a portion taken from the hexagon (unit cell) to show the angles clearly
simple exagonal is false but thank you for the others
Sir please voice not audiblr
which software you are use to making of these pattern
Thanks a ton.. I was so confused between orthorhombic and monoclinic. This video really helped. :)
Lakshya 2.O attendence here
👇
Can i use this animation
No
@@kavitatiwari8430 Xd.
Which software did you use to create this animation? Could you tell me?
Did you find it😅
@@asanalmahathir2113 Not yet! I suppose he created these animation by solidworks.
I'm Junior Jr. Only using a different account!
@@gedaelfagundes6167 okay
Simple Hexagonal is correct or not
✅
7 years op
Who came here after TRS sir recommendation?
which software do you use??
For simple hexagonal the lattice points should be 14 instead of 8
12 or 14
best representation..................& quite helpful too
Loved it.....
Thanks a ton.
5:05
very helpful to us
so thank u
great content, thank you
thanks a lot superb 1
Thank you... It's very helpful 👍
Very nice video.. & clear all concept... & so helpful for concept
Please any one who tell or show me the atomic packing factor (APF) of triclinic.
how ho calculate atomic radii and edge length of solids??? how to use the formulas properly??
Very. Helpful thanks a lot
thanku 😊
❤️
Helpful.Thanks .
It helps me a lot
thank you
Nice work
Nice video
Wonderful!!!!!!!!!!!
Loved it😍❤️
thanks a lot superb 1
fcc is not correct
Really nice 1...
Helpful
Tysm..
so complete , so understand thank you T T
In Primitive or simple cubic structure, the actual portions of spheres (atoms) touches one another , there is no gap between the spheres.
Simple Hexag. is wrong
yes, its y= 180• but here its shown 120•
Amber Gupta no y=120 but it should have six sides