I wish that I had youtube when I went to university. I got stuck here and there was no help so I couldn't continue. I am glad others can understand this, thank you.
Because higher education universities and institutes (incl. IITs) in India rank beyond 500 in world university rankings. Keep hiring those SC/ STs and sons and daughters of ministers.. what do you expect?
@@KAMU13 if u are genius u aint complain about not sc st get lot of iit it have max 20% selection stop complaining about only weak take excuse ye u are weak lol
Why didn't I search for the topic online earlier? I tried understanding this myself for the whole day, and it didn't work... And watching this 8 min video at 1.5x was enough for understanding it all
Thank you, that was helpful. I know you touched on it at the end, but just to confirm. So the parallel planes (the other three sides of the cube), they aren't required because they are just 'translations' of the planes you did shade in?
If I'm given the intercepts (2, -3, 1) the miller indices would be (3,-2,6), so far so good, but if I'm asked to draw the plane given those miller indices (reciprocants would be: 1/3, -1/2, 1/6) the sketched plane would look different from the one sketched using the original intercepts (2, -3, 1), shouldn't the have the same shape? What do I do in these cases? great video btw
If you mean just axes and not the plane also, then no. This would result in a different plane. For example, looking at the front face of a cube along the x-axis, you’d be looking at the (100) plane, but looking at a cube face along the y-axis you’d be looking at the (010) plane. If I rotated the whole thing, axes and planes, 90 degrees about the z-axis then the plane would remain the same but my perspective would have changed.
@@ScottRamsay Yes that's what I mean, effectively you're just changing the orientation of the piece of material whose properties' directions you are representing with miller indices right?
it's because the z = up axis, y = bottom axis and x = the axis or line that comes out towards you. If you switched the x and y axis, you will get your answer (210). I'm gonna guess you thought the x axis is where the y axis was supposed to be? it depends how you label the axis directions before hand.
you're so cool bruh, DW we all took linear algebra, anything beyond z axis is philosophy, but i guess we can still do calculations. tell me how you're going to draw time on this diagram.
+sahil sangwan it *is* (120) because it intercepts all the way through x, giving 1, half way through y, giving 1/2. The reciprocal for 1/2 = 2. And parallel to z, giving infinity, with the reciprocal being 0. ∴ (120)
I think the confusion is because he did not label the axis before solving. The z = up axis, y = bottom axis and x = the axis or line that comes out towards you. If you switched the x and y axis, you will get your answer (210). It all depends on how you label the axis
![[Live] : ONE FIGHT NIGHT 25 วันนี้!! "อเล็กซิส vs รีเกียน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/suVr9a6BM2g/mqdefault.jpg)
I wish that I had youtube when I went to university. I got stuck here and there was no help so I couldn't continue. I am glad others can understand this, thank you.
This video helped me understand this concept so much!!! Thank you from Louisiana!!
completely understood sir
why dont we have such professors in our college
because u of t gets the best of the best
I jus though the same bro
because they're too busy defecating on the streets
Because higher education universities and institutes (incl. IITs) in India rank beyond 500 in world university rankings. Keep hiring those SC/ STs and sons and daughters of ministers.. what do you expect?
@@KAMU13 if u are genius u aint complain about not sc st get lot of iit it have max 20% selection stop complaining about only weak take excuse ye u are weak
lol
our professor doesn't teach us like this. She'll just give us the topics then we're on our own.
Thank you so much! I've been trying to get around the odd notations in crystallography, and this was a big part of the list.
You treated it so well that anyone can understand it (my opinion). Keep up the good work.
Thanku..this lecture gives a clear and comprehensive picture about the Miller indices of planes.
6 years after publishing and this video helped me!
This is a fantastic lecture. I understood from the very first example. Thank you. 🎉
Thank you very much for your kind comment. I’m glad it helped you understand the topic!
just understood in 8 mins which i wasnt able to understand from weeks...nice 1
Thank you so very kindly professor, please take care!
Thank you!!!
Well that was easy, simple to follow - to the point discussion on planes.
Perfect explanation, you are exceptionally clear.
can you please make a vid for a negative plane, as in by shifting the origin to such a point that you have intercepts with varying signs
Perfect explanation. Thank you
Thank U from Iraq 🇮🇶💞
Why didn't I search for the topic online earlier? I tried understanding this myself for the whole day, and it didn't work...
And watching this 8 min video at 1.5x was enough for understanding it all
completely understood sir... Thank you
Thank you, that was helpful. I know you touched on it at the end, but just to confirm. So the parallel planes (the other three sides of the cube), they aren't required because they are just 'translations' of the planes you did shade in?
Beautifully explained! Thank you
If I'm given the intercepts (2, -3, 1) the miller indices would be (3,-2,6), so far so good, but if I'm asked to draw the plane given those miller indices (reciprocants would be: 1/3, -1/2, 1/6) the sketched plane would look different from the one sketched using the original intercepts (2, -3, 1), shouldn't the have the same shape? What do I do in these cases? great video btw
Thanks.... quick, easy, concise explanation.
Awesomely taught sir. thanks a lot
thank u verymuch. u are the man, once again thanksss
thank you so much, such a very clear explanation
Great instruction- thank you!
thank you so much! Really helped
Since I can choose any origin for any plane won't it give a different set of miller indices?
Thank you so much.
Outstanding, thank you for sharing!
great video! thank you
Thank you so much
Clearly explained.
Thankyou.
thank you!!
Dilay Ulutaş hii
perfectly explained thanls so much
why family of palne became {001} ?
I don't understand why we draw these planes. My teacher told me how and never said why, but wants us to explain the significance of the plane itself.
Britt Wade that’s the direction of Crystal grow
perfect explanation
thank you so much sir you are completly owsom.
thank you for the video sir
wanna easy ways for other more &Thanx for this
Gratitude by Ear: Left 80% Right 20%
Thank you soo much !
Thanks
thanks so much, really understand it now :D
Good. Thank you!
Thank you so much!!
Thank you !
thank you . very helpfull
thank you sir.
Thank you Sir
Sir, intersection of planes what is this and how many possible planes can intersect
Thank you :)
thanx it was helpful
Thanks !
Can I rotate the coordinate system by 90 degrees in any direction? If my intercepts are correct, I should be fine, right?
If you mean just axes and not the plane also, then no. This would result in a different plane. For example, looking at the front face of a cube along the x-axis, you’d be looking at the (100) plane, but looking at a cube face along the y-axis you’d be looking at the (010) plane. If I rotated the whole thing, axes and planes, 90 degrees about the z-axis then the plane would remain the same but my perspective would have changed.
@@ScottRamsay Yes that's what I mean, effectively you're just changing the orientation of the piece of material whose properties' directions you are representing with miller indices right?
Hey in India we learn this in high school competive is this normal?
Great!
Why is it not (210) in the second plane?
we are not multiplying it rather we are taking inverse of the indices
it's because the z = up axis, y = bottom axis and x = the axis or line that comes out towards you. If you switched the x and y axis, you will get your answer (210). I'm gonna guess you thought the x axis is where the y axis was supposed to be? it depends how you label the axis directions before hand.
nice lecture sir
you da best
Why does 1/2 become 2 in the second miller indices?
Exactly. Shouldnt it be (210) after reducing it by multiplying with 2
i don’t understand why the 2nd cube is (120) anyone can explain
Peace be upon you, excuse me doctor, I have a question I can't solve. Can you help me solve a question, please?
zed is the proper way of saying z guys
Lol shut up.
👍👍
the second plane (121)
x,y,z,e,d there are 5 dimensions
you're so cool bruh, DW we all took linear algebra, anything beyond z axis is philosophy, but i guess we can still do calculations. tell me how you're going to draw time on this diagram.
Too easy examples
second plane is( 210) not (120).
+sahil sangwan How so? It looks like 1/2 in y.
jesi you are right
+sahil sangwan it *is* (120) because it intercepts all the way through x, giving 1, half way through y, giving 1/2. The reciprocal for 1/2 = 2. And parallel to z, giving infinity, with the reciprocal being 0. ∴ (120)
I think the confusion is because he did not label the axis before solving. The z = up axis, y = bottom axis and x = the axis or line that comes out towards you. If you switched the x and y axis, you will get your answer (210). It all depends on how you label the axis
thank you very much
Thank you!
thank you very much