Great videos regarding BWM.But I had a confusion that how you get those values under three alternatives in priority sheet wheather that values are taken from response .Is that value had taken from best or worst response?
Those are from additional survey questions. If you are using bwm in your thesis, send an email to Ziaulhaquemunim@gmail.com, we will provide you access to the full course.
Sir, Do we have any other method to aggregate the response of multiple respondents other than the Geometric Mean or Arithmetic Mean? Has a new method been introduced to aggregate multiple respondents responses? If so can you please, guide me
Hello! Thank you for the videos on BWM. They are really well done and very explanatory. I wander if this study on big data capabilities is already published. Thank you in advance!
what if i have 17 criteria and i cannot cluster the criteria into group since it is not related between one another. what should i do? my current sheet to calculate the weight is up to 9 criteria only. i did not have the sheet for more than 9 criteria. what should i do?
@@RESEARCHHUB do i need to determine the weight among the sub-criteria for each of the criteria first then determine the weight of the criteria. Do i need to recollect the score since i already done with the QA? what your opinion?
Those are from survey as well. If you have alternatives in your study design, you need to do a bit for extended survey additional to the pair-wise comparisons.
@@RESEARCHHUB Can you open a little more for me? What you mean is to take pairwise comparison of all sub-criteria in the survey and average these survey results?
@@mehmethan4843 No. Those values come from additional survey questions, not part of the comparison. See step 6 under section 3.4 at www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620322034
@@RESEARCHHUB Thank you for your help. Good luck with your spirit. We are also waiting for your videos about multi-criteria decision making techniques such as the Edas method. :)
Hello, Your videos helped me a lot but I have one confusion so if you can help me with that it would be great. The confusion is how you get those three alternatives? (Economic performance, social performance and environmental) and how you got those values? because in the C=3 sheet there were another three criteria. Please help me. Thanks in advance.
Hallo i love your video! I am studing about this method in my university but i am missing part MCDM (3,4): Best-Worst Method are you want to share it to us?
Those are part of our online course, see researchhub.org/course/best-worst-method/ If you are really interested in the course but have financial limitation, send an email to support@researchhub.org
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.15 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TLBjiHvkKtE/mqdefault.jpg)
BWM short course: researchhub.org/course/best-worst-method/
Thanks for putting together this video on BWM. This made my work so easy. I really appreciate your assistance.
Thank you so much these videos helped me to understand about BWM, which I'm using for my masters thesis!!
if you are interested in the full BWM course, send an email to admin@researchhub.org. we will give you access.
@@RESEARCHHUB Thank you!! I sent an email
you should have access now@@nouraabdelrady620
Hi, could I have your excel file? I tried to search it in the links you have shared but cant find it.
Great videos regarding BWM.But I had a confusion that how you get those values under three alternatives in priority sheet wheather that values are taken from response .Is that value had taken from best or worst response?
Those are from additional survey questions. If you are using bwm in your thesis, send an email to Ziaulhaquemunim@gmail.com, we will provide you access to the full course.
Sir, Do we have any other method to aggregate the response of multiple respondents other than the Geometric Mean or Arithmetic Mean? Has a new method been introduced to aggregate multiple respondents responses? If so can you please, guide me
hi, you can use the Bayesian BWM which reverts aggregate scores. researchhub.org/p/best-worst-mcdm-method
Hello! Thank you for the videos on BWM. They are really well done and very explanatory. I wander if this study on big data capabilities is already published. Thank you in advance!
Thank you, the study on big data is in the later stages of publication, should be online in a month or so. Will post the link as soon as it is online.
when part 3 & 4 are post ?? i'll miss some information here
Hello sir . can you explain how we can solve best worst method model when our datas are fuzzy numbers and gray numbers ??????
hi. it was great; but i didn't understand how did you obtain weights at all. 🤕
the weights were achieved by minimizing inconsistency, see th-cam.com/video/aHgeDKDtLf4/w-d-xo.html
i want to ask, if there are more than 1 data, how to merge that? thank youu
You should take geometric mean of the priorities.
Does this handle two criteria?
hallo sir, i need ur help to answer my question.
how's BWM implemented in the level alternatives and have more than one decission maker?
You can aggregate priorities of multiple respondents. Please see method and results section of this paper doi.org/10.1007/s00773-021-00836-8
i had a doubt that .....ksi value must be less than 0.10....but here consistency value is greater than 0.10 is it okey?.......
what if i have 17 criteria and i cannot cluster the criteria into group since it is not related between one another. what should i do? my current sheet to calculate the weight is up to 9 criteria only. i did not have the sheet for more than 9 criteria. what should i do?
You must use criteria and sub-criteria structure.
@@RESEARCHHUB do i need to determine the weight among the sub-criteria for each of the criteria first then determine the weight of the criteria. Do i need to recollect the score since i already done with the QA? what your opinion?
why didn't share part 3 and 4?
plz share these parts?
thanks
We will do soon.
Hello, how did you find the B3 B4 values in the first table in the "Priority" tab? Can you help me
Those are from survey as well. If you have alternatives in your study design, you need to do a bit for extended survey additional to the pair-wise comparisons.
@@RESEARCHHUB Can you open a little more for me? What you mean is to take pairwise comparison of all sub-criteria in the survey and average these survey results?
@@mehmethan4843 No. Those values come from additional survey questions, not part of the comparison. See step 6 under section 3.4 at www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620322034
@@RESEARCHHUB Thank you for your help. Good luck with your spirit. We are also waiting for your videos about multi-criteria decision making techniques such as the Edas method. :)
Hello,
Your videos helped me a lot but I have one confusion so if you can help me with that it would be great. The confusion is how you get those three alternatives? (Economic performance, social performance and environmental) and how you got those values? because in the C=3 sheet there were another three criteria. Please help me. Thanks in advance.
The are based on literature review. See for example, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620322034
Hallo i love your video!
I am studing about this method in my university
but i am missing part MCDM (3,4): Best-Worst Method are you want to share it to us?
Part 3 and 4 shows data that we used in a paper. We will make the videos public after our paper is published.
@@RESEARCHHUB ok i will be waiting!
@@RESEARCHHUB Hi, any update on this?
How to get priority calculations sheet on BWM solver
Every study will have a unique priority calculations sheet. Pls prepare your own as we show in the video.
Is part 3 and 4 missing?
Those are part of our online course, see researchhub.org/course/best-worst-method/
If you are really interested in the course but have financial limitation, send an email to support@researchhub.org