Sergei Zagny. Sonata. - Daniil Pilchen, piano. (Audio & Score)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ค. 2024
- 00:00 Sonata
00:05 1.
03:15 2.
04:41 3.
06:44 4.
08:12 5.
10:10 6.
12:55 7.
14:21 8.
17:29 9.
20:29 10.
21:02 11.
21:31 12.
23:13 13.
26:50 14.
28:04 15.
32:00 16.
33:55 17.
36:19 18.
38:09 19.
40:10 20.
41:08 21.
43:14 22.
46:08 23.
47:23 24.
Sonata, piano, 1990. - Daniil Pilchen, piano. Yamaha Artist Services, Moscow, 20.02.2017. Recording: Alexey Sysoev. Editing: Alexey Sysoev, Sergei Zagny. Special thanks: Elsana Gabaraeva.
===
The music scores of Sergei Zagny:
imslp.org/wiki/Category:Zagny...
The composer your composition teacher doesn't want you to know about
Why? Aren't composition teachers typically so incompetent as to love this kind of garbage and want to praise it for its pseudo-intellectual genius?
@@Whatismusic123 _sighhhh_ Hello again, what would you like to argue about today?
@@oscargill423 illiterate
Reminds me of Henryk Mikołaj Górecki - "holy/eastern minimalism" but not so "holy" in this case. The strength of this piece lies in the repetitions and the length. I would prefere that it was ironic about the tonal gestures, however without the irony the focus is brought to marginal nuances like little changes of melodic figures and rythm, and the harmonic resonance (like in Górecki's string quartets). It's an example of a craftsmanship exploiting a verry thin border between boredom and conventional gestures - that's what seems still fresh and hard to master. Also it must be very impactful when performed live in a good concerthall.
Wow, this is awesome!
It seems vexatiously vacillating between Glass, Feldman, Cage and Satie. Interesting that triads are used but that they don't sound very pleasing or traditional. Thanks for sharing.
Beautiful
Je ne sais si il faut rire ou pleurer.
Interesante ☺️
Amazing work, simple but creative. Without ostentation and very elegante.
Brilliant piece, fantastically played
Why have I never heard of Sergei Zagny before?
Потому, что это бред сумасшедшего
@@odeholon4590 А какая музыка не "бред сумасшедшего"?
Leave it to the Russians to casually plumb the extremes of musical philosophy.
Переставьте все эти кусочки в любом порядке, ничего от этого не изменится. Вы даже разницы не заметите😂
What?
полуфабрикат,больше похоже на какието упражнения
There are some cool notations, but I feel like there are so many cracks in the unity of the piece. Plenty of moments where a long rest is followed by something entirely different from before, which makes it feel like this is not 1 piece but a bunch of random miniatures grouped together. Feels unfinished
Фамилия композитора очень соответствует произведённому им "продукту".Это загнивание мозгов,а не музыка.И это говорит не какой- нибудь невежда,а человек,любящий музыку Веберна,Штокгаузена,Лигети,Крамба итд.
So this wasn't said by some ignorant person, but it was definitely said by someone with their head up their ass
You're still an "ignoramus" you just like random noise.
Ma sarebbe musica o è una presa in giro?
Boh incommentabile
It's simple.. 🙄NARCISSISM
I don’t know… I think it’s genius. The neo-baroque x minimalism thing going on is pretty cool. Love the never-ending sequences. Love the rhythmic processes. Love the Ligeti-esque use of triads in in the slow movements. You’ve probably gotta be a fan of minimalism to enjoy this lol, but I am such a fan. Thank you for sharing this.
Music Writer.
He knows what he likes, he discovers and steals sound combinations and passages from others, extracting them from various composers.
He is very interested in graphics.
He wants to enchant without going into the organization, even minimal, of a tangible musical phrase or form. In reality he never dares.
He dares not do anything...
Only effect.
A Catalog Of Effects that can only intrigue those who are not musicians.
(n°1) It is the charm of harmonic intervals that affects creativity... (this composer must be a teenager or young man).
It happens to students, listening to the chord progressions typical of certain tonal music (Corelli, Vivaldi...) and playing them on the piano several times to try to understand where this... invincible Beauty comes from.
This work is endearing. But it's not art.
Can I ask you to expand on that last statement? (also, just for background/context he was 30 when this was written and was completing postgraduate studies at the Tchaikovsky State Conservatory, so not exactly a novice)
Edit: I've just reread that comment, I didn't mean for it to come across so brusque 😂
@@herbertsherbert7378 🙂Don't worry. You weren't abrupt./... It's complicated for me to communicate here, with precision. (I'm Italian, I'm translating every post I read from English and it takes a long time to respond...🙄 It's a lot of work! Sorry)
Define art
@@gabriel77196 It's my opinion.
Art can be defined as a particular intellectual development that resists over time. It is not only effectism, linked to the contingencies of a discipline: for example to what is unusual or surprising or to excessive self-referentialism. Mistaking the planning, the elegant graphics, the form for the essence of an art is not correct: these are just incidental aspects.
You can be a good composer but not an artist.
/But that's just my thought.
naïve art is still art
Random noise. This is not music.
I just dont get why he get this much hate
Because he can't write music? Isn't it obvious? This is just a bunch of noise.
@@Whatismusic123We have already got over that noise-music boundry in 60s and the society paved the way for modernism fortunately. You cannot just say that this is just some bunch of noise by only referancing to academic techniques and how they were handled. The pieces he composed still will be recieved by other people, it will be liked and disliked anyway. Rather than an analysis or an aesthetic approach, one should be set in stone to understand what the piece actually means. This happens in Dave Brubeck's pieces as well as they are quite basic in technique yet play significant roles to get one learned some theoric content, or at least facilitate the process on going. This is probably what happens here as well, we are living in a time where music is not only made for listening.
@@onionlipadua he is no different. This is just noise. Not music.
@@Whatismusic123 You do not seem to have enough acknowledgement on music apparently as you're insisting on its musicality rather than speaking with facts whatsoever.
@@onionlipadua you pride yourself into the fact that you enjoy noise that anyone of the right mind wouldn't. I gain nothing from arguing with you. Just knownthat you're wrong and that this is just random noise puzzled together using pseudo-scientific principles.