Some comments from a neutral observer: 1. Eurofighter was designed to counter Sukhoi 27 flanker series during the cold war. The only way to acieve the maneuverability of a Sukhoi flanker without having a thrust vectoring nozzle was using a large canard with a long effort arm (distance between the center of gravity of the aircraft and the aerodynamic center of the canard). Hence, the canard are way up there, sticking out. 2. During MMRCA competition, Eurofighter was beaten by Rafale by one important parameter - Lifecyle cost. This is an extremely important factor since the life of these aircrafts are 40 years now. Initial Acquistion Cost is an important part of the Lifecycle Cost, but not the only one. 3. The second important reason why Eurofighter Typhoon was beaten by Rafale - multiple countries with mutliple vendors for parts. This means you must have good relations with all Germany, UK, Italy and Spain at all times otherwise you can be throttled by any one of them during the crisis siutation. 4. A fully loaded Su-30MKI, Su-35 etc. is in fact more maneuverable than a fully loaded Eurofighter.
BVR flight: Eurofighter(with new AESA Radar) In close combat: Eurofighter Subsonic dogfight: both are equally good Supersonic dogfight: Eurofighter Bombing missions: Rafael Interception jobs: Eurofighter Cost: Rafael (more affordable/cheaper) My Choice: Typhoon Rafael is also a very decent fighter jet specially if your budget is tight and you want a do everything kind of toy.
It's not about which one is better in what aspect , its about what are your requirements. When it comes to dogfight the su30mki is way better in maneuverability than eurofighter so why to buy a capability that is already there. When it comes to indian airforce rafel was chosen not because of cost but because of the strategic autonomy that IAf can enjoy which is not possible with eurofighter. Rafel also comes with better arsenal than eurofighter although the difference is not so much. The f4.1, f4.2, and so on upgrades on rafel will make it more versatile than its competitors in the near future. And most importantly the rafel india bought has 13 india specific enhancements for IAF which were not possible on eurofighter because of involvement of multiple countries in eurofighter program than one country in rafel aircraft program.
@@Sdrt167 your "strategic autonomy" is non existent when you buy a complete aircraft package from another country which is also bound in a closed military group aka NATO. Your so called "strategic autonomy " is decided by the NATO heads according to their interests and political situation and inclination at the any given time. Strategic autonomy is defined as the ability of a state to pursue its national interests and adopt its preferred foreign policy without depending on other foreign states. Only countries which have truly strategic autonomy in this department are USA, China, Russia and France.
@@subasthapa8323 yes it's true but IAF has enjoyed strategic autonomy in past with Russian and French aircraft so not only strategically but also with versatility rafel is a better choice.
I'm impressed with the capabilites of Typhoon. In Indian context will it be a game changer compared to Rafale? That is the main question. Typhoon has higher ceiling capacity compared to Rafale. Will it impact fight over the Himalayas? That is the crucial point.
He is just a specs reader and utterly biased TH-camr like most of out there. If you really want to learn things defense related then I highly recommend this channel named blinkov's battleground. Guy is a gem and knows what he is talking about. Self study is also very paramount, I suggest.
@@saddamhusseinFIA Nahi bhai, Eurofighter mein bahut sare countries involved hain, Indian Air Force ko bahut problem hogi repair and maintenance mein. Aur similar specs ke 2 platform use karna waise hi headache hai.
America is also using typhoon and other countries in Middle east as well but only problem is that you have good relations with every country otherwise they can block equipment during war times.So in my opinion no one should buy from America and UK unless you have very good relations and do whatever they want but France,Sweden,Russia and china don't do that things
The Typhoon has the ugliest canard position in any aircraft. Those things stick out like sore thumbs and look like a massive afterthought. In contrast, the canards on the Rafale and even our SU-30 MKI look much better implemented and are propely integrated into the aircraft's design. I'm happy the IAF got the Rafale instead of this. Atleast we have only one country to deal with when it comes to the Rafale. The Typhoon is like the proverbial "Bhanumati ka Kumba".
What a fool. Canards jitna aage honge utna maneuverability rahegi. Seesaw me baitha kabhi ?? jaise tu centre ke pas jayega to tera effect Kam hota jayega .
Eurofighter was designed to counter Sukhoi 27 flanker series. The only way to acieve this level of maneuverability without having a thrust vectoring nozzle was using a large canard with a long effort arm (distance between the center of gravity and aerodynamic center of the canard).
@@alpha001ful I totally understand the rationale of canards, I was simply talking about the implementation on this aircraft. Remember the Tejas MK2 is also likely to have canards up front.
Some comments from a neutral observer:
1. Eurofighter was designed to counter Sukhoi 27 flanker series during the cold war. The only way to acieve the maneuverability of a Sukhoi flanker without having a thrust vectoring nozzle was using a large canard with a long effort arm (distance between the center of gravity of the aircraft and the aerodynamic center of the canard). Hence, the canard are way up there, sticking out.
2. During MMRCA competition, Eurofighter was beaten by Rafale by one important parameter - Lifecyle cost. This is an extremely important factor since the life of these aircrafts are 40 years now. Initial Acquistion Cost is an important part of the Lifecycle Cost, but not the only one.
3. The second important reason why Eurofighter Typhoon was beaten by Rafale - multiple countries with mutliple vendors for parts. This means you must have good relations with all Germany, UK, Italy and Spain at all times otherwise you can be throttled by any one of them during the crisis siutation.
4. A fully loaded Su-30MKI, Su-35 etc. is in fact more maneuverable than a fully loaded Eurofighter.
oh the music intro taken from HACKERs by Karl Casey :)
Yeah bro he has mentioned that in his full intro music video
Kahi se bh ho jab bjta hai to wo jethalal ka meme dance krne ka man krta h 🤣🥳
Thanks
Yami yugi rap background music
I missed your ending with ' like kariye, subscribe kariye,Jai Hind, ', this time you missed the Jai Hind.
BVR flight: Eurofighter(with new AESA Radar)
In close combat: Eurofighter
Subsonic dogfight: both are equally good
Supersonic dogfight: Eurofighter
Bombing missions: Rafael
Interception jobs: Eurofighter
Cost: Rafael (more affordable/cheaper)
My Choice: Typhoon
Rafael is also a very decent fighter jet specially if your budget is tight and you want a do everything kind of toy.
Eurofighter bahut se desh mil kar banate hai ...
War situations me kaha kaha tail lagate phiroge 😂
Rafael is better'
It's not about which one is better in what aspect , its about what are your requirements.
When it comes to dogfight the su30mki is way better in maneuverability than eurofighter so why to buy a capability that is already there.
When it comes to indian airforce rafel was chosen not because of cost but because of the strategic autonomy that IAf can enjoy which is not possible with eurofighter.
Rafel also comes with better arsenal than eurofighter although the difference is not so much.
The f4.1, f4.2, and so on upgrades on rafel will make it more versatile than its competitors in the near future.
And most importantly the rafel india bought has 13 india specific enhancements for IAF which were not possible on eurofighter because of involvement of multiple countries in eurofighter program than one country in rafel aircraft program.
@@Sdrt167 your "strategic autonomy" is non existent when you buy a complete aircraft package from another country which is also bound in a closed military group aka NATO. Your so called "strategic autonomy " is decided by the NATO heads according to their interests and political situation and inclination at the any given time.
Strategic autonomy is defined as the ability of a state to pursue its national interests and adopt its preferred foreign policy without depending on other foreign states. Only countries which have truly strategic autonomy in this department are USA, China, Russia and France.
@@subasthapa8323 yes it's true but IAF has enjoyed strategic autonomy in past with Russian and French aircraft so not only strategically but also with versatility rafel is a better choice.
engine is very good ej-200 turbojet
Excellent video. A10 warthog next ?
Disclaimer- This video sponsored by Eurofighter Typhoon manufacturers..
😂 ha aj hi 2 typhoon kharid ke laya
@@indianguy5866 Bhai orders se pehle thori marketing and maska marna padta hai manufacturers ko lol
What an effort .
Respect
It seems Tejas pulled 30°+ ITR and over 16° STR in the Bahrain airshow.
Which is pretty good for a canardless delta wing.
I'm impressed with the capabilites of Typhoon. In Indian context will it be a game changer compared to Rafale? That is the main question. Typhoon has higher ceiling capacity compared to Rafale. Will it impact fight over the Himalayas? That is the crucial point.
Typhoon won't sell outside of Europe because parts are sourcesld from half dozen countries .
The only 4.5 gen aircraft capable of countering the rafale fighter jet.
@@AemondTomahawk Middle eastern countries already using it
No, height of Himalayas are 25000 feet, any fighter jet can have service celling of more than 500000 feet.
@@rupeshjha0
Kf21 block 1 and block 2 says hii 😂
Nice
Sir Rafal bhi iske lavel ki advance technology use karta hai kya dono ki koi tulna ki ja sakti hai
Please make a video on typhoon vs rafale😊
Is se to f@15 ex bahut best hai
Next generation weapon system hai fir ❤
Nice video
Tagda review bhai...
Amazing
How about details on GCAP next ??
This is good choice
Eurofighter typhoon 🌀.
Please make a video on history of mig 25
Bhai aisa content banaya Karo ye news channels so called defence channel ki tarah mat bano thank u
He is just a specs reader and utterly biased TH-camr like most of out there.
If you really want to learn things defense related then I highly recommend this channel named blinkov's battleground. Guy is a gem and knows what he is talking about.
Self study is also very paramount, I suggest.
@@subasthapa8323 ok I will see , thank u ☺️
Compare the upgrade of rafales and thypoon
🙏🤔
We made a grave mistake by choosing Rafale over Eurofighter
No, we did not.
Koi nahi is mrfa tender mein le lenge isko ❤
@@saddamhusseinFIA Nahi bhai, Eurofighter mein bahut sare countries involved hain, Indian Air Force ko bahut problem hogi repair and maintenance mein. Aur similar specs ke 2 platform use karna waise hi headache hai.
Sirf 1 problem he ye multination ka banaya platform he jis me Germany jaise desh bhi he
Turkish BYRAKTAR TB3 IN DETAIL VIDEO
Tejas 2 kaha hai 😂😂😂
When are we going to purchase Eurofighter Typhoon in numbers like 150+?
Or we are just spending time in evaluating for decades 😅😅😂😂😂
Why would we buy typhoon?
IAF is fully committed for Rafale
@@fly463we should buy F-18 for indian navy...
@@leonidus370
Nope
Rafale-M will be enough
F18 will be very costly
We already have MRO facilities for Rafale
EURO FIGHTER TYPHOON IS A BEST AND WORLD CLASS FIGHTER JETS
Kya Eurofighter battle proven ha ?
America is also using typhoon and other countries in Middle east as well but only problem is that you have good relations with every country otherwise they can block equipment during war times.So in my opinion no one should buy from America and UK unless you have very good relations and do whatever they want but France,Sweden,Russia and china don't do that things
Day 2 of asking amca vs f 35 and su 57 and tai kaan .
bhai ban to jan de
You done this before...
Maybe you forget it😅😅😅
Aaila USB C Mobile charger Nahi hai 🙂
The Typhoon has the ugliest canard position in any aircraft.
Those things stick out like sore thumbs and look like a massive afterthought.
In contrast, the canards on the Rafale and even our SU-30 MKI look much better implemented and are propely integrated into the aircraft's design.
I'm happy the IAF got the Rafale instead of this. Atleast we have only one country to deal with when it comes to the Rafale.
The Typhoon is like the proverbial "Bhanumati ka Kumba".
What a fool. Canards jitna aage honge utna maneuverability rahegi.
Seesaw me baitha kabhi ?? jaise tu centre ke pas jayega to tera effect Kam hota jayega .
Kidz
Eurofighter was designed to counter Sukhoi 27 flanker series. The only way to acieve this level of maneuverability without having a thrust vectoring nozzle was using a large canard with a long effort arm (distance between the center of gravity and aerodynamic center of the canard).
@@alpha001ful I totally understand the rationale of canards, I was simply talking about the implementation on this aircraft.
Remember the Tejas MK2 is also likely to have canards up front.
@@warrior_singh111 It will be much better executed, design wise. Have faith in Indian engineers.
First here to comment
It's a re upload
Bro why can't we take second hand eurofighter from Britain .......which we will get cheap
Usse better hum do chaar nai laathi le le wo better hoga😂
@@vickybharti3845😂😂😂
cheap mindset......u r not future ready
Your new to defence!
This might be the dumbest thing i have ever heard.
Nice