I have confirmed with my local judges that both players could agree to a game draw in a situation where neither one wants to attack. At that point the players could either also agree to a match draw or they could remake the game and play again. This is because Flesh and Blood is "first to one," not "best of one."
I have confirmed with my local judges that both players could agree to a game draw in a situation where neither one wants to attack. At that point the players could either also agree to a match draw or they could remake the game and play again. This is because Flesh and Blood is "first to one," not "best of one."
if both players don't want to attack it will be a draw as there is no possible way to advance the game state
I have confirmed with my local judges that both players could agree to a game draw in a situation where neither one wants to attack. At that point the players could either also agree to a match draw or they could remake the game and play again. This is because Flesh and Blood is "first to one," not "best of one."
I believe if both players are not willing to attack and have legitimate reasons why. It should be a remake, if no time for a remake then its a draw.
I have confirmed with my local judges that both players could agree to a game draw in a situation where neither one wants to attack. At that point the players could either also agree to a match draw or they could remake the game and play again. This is because Flesh and Blood is "first to one," not "best of one."