Regularization Part 2: Lasso (L1) Regression

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ค. 2024
  • Lasso Regression is super similar to Ridge Regression, but there is one big, huge difference between the two. In this video, I start by talking about all of the similarities, and then show you the cool thing that Lasso Regression can do that Ridge Regression can't.
    NOTE: This StatQuest follows up on the the StatQuest on Ridge Regression:
    • Regularization Part 1:...
    For a complete index of all the StatQuest videos, check out:
    statquest.org/video-index/
    If you'd like to support StatQuest, please consider...
    Buying The StatQuest Illustrated Guide to Machine Learning!!!
    PDF - statquest.gumroad.com/l/wvtmc
    Paperback - www.amazon.com/dp/B09ZCKR4H6
    Kindle eBook - www.amazon.com/dp/B09ZG79HXC
    Patreon: / statquest
    ...or...
    TH-cam Membership: / @statquest
    ...a cool StatQuest t-shirt or sweatshirt:
    shop.spreadshirt.com/statques...
    ...buying one or two of my songs (or go large and get a whole album!)
    joshuastarmer.bandcamp.com/
    ...or just donating to StatQuest!
    www.paypal.me/statquest
    Lastly, if you want to keep up with me as I research and create new StatQuests, follow me on twitter:
    / joshuastarmer
    #statquest #regularization

ความคิดเห็น • 644

  • @statquest
    @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    If you want to see why Lasso can set parameters to 0 and Ridge can not, check out: th-cam.com/video/Xm2C_gTAl8c/w-d-xo.html
    Support StatQuest by buying my book The StatQuest Illustrated Guide to Machine Learning or a Study Guide or Merch!!! statquest.org/statquest-store/

  • @hughsignoriello
    @hughsignoriello ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Love how you keep these videos introductory and don't go into the heavy math right away to confuse;
    Love the series!

  • @citypunter1413
    @citypunter1413 5 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    One of the best explanation of Ridge and Lasso regression I have seen till date... Keep up the good work....Kudos !!!

  • @marisa4942
    @marisa4942 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I am eternally grateful to you and those videos!! Really saves me time in preparing for exams!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Happy to help!

  • @patrickwu5837
    @patrickwu5837 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    That "Bam???" cracks me up. Thanks for your work!

  • @markparee99
    @markparee99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Every time I think your video subject is going to be daunting, I find you explanation dispel that thought pretty quickly. Nice job!

  • @gonzaloferreirovolpi1237
    @gonzaloferreirovolpi1237 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi man, really LOVE your videos. Right now I'm studying Data Science and Machine Learning and more often than not your videos are the light at the end of the tunnel, sot thanks!

  • @admw3436
    @admw3436 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    My teacher is 75 years old, explained us Lasso during one hour , without explaining it. But this is a war I can win :), thanks to your efforts.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I love it!!! Glad my video is helpful! :) p.s. I got the joke too. Nice! ;)

    • @ak-ot2wn
      @ak-ot2wn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is this scenario many times the reality? Also, I check StatQuest's vids very often to really understand the things. Thanks @StatQuest

  • @qiaomuzheng5800
    @qiaomuzheng5800 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Hi, I can't thank you enough for explaining the core concepts in such short amount of time. Your videos help a lot! My appreciations are beyond words.

  • @Phobos11
    @Phobos11 5 ปีที่แล้ว +262

    Good video, but didn't really explain how LASSO gets to make a variable zero. What's the difference between squaring a term and using the absolute value for that?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +140

      Intuitively, the closer slope gets to zero, the square of that number becomes insignificant compared to the increase in the sum of the squared error. In other words, the smaller you slope, the square gets asymptotically close to 0 because it can't outweigh the increase in the sum of squared error. In contrast, the absolute value adds a fixed amount to the regularization penalty and can overcome the increase in the sum of squared error.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@theethatanuraksoontorn2517 Maybe this discussion on stack-exchange will clear things up for you: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/151954/sparsity-in-lasso-and-advantage-over-ridge-statistical-learning

    • @programminginterviewprep1808
      @programminginterviewprep1808 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@statquest Thanks for reading the comments and responding!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@programminginterviewprep1808 I'm glad to help. :)

    • @Phobos11
      @Phobos11 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@statquest I didn't reply before, but the answer really helped me a lot, with basic machine learning and now artificial neural networks, thank you very much for the videos and the replies :D

  • @chrisg0901
    @chrisg0901 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Don't think your Monty Python reference went unnoticed
    (Terrific and very helpful video, as always)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks so much!!! :)

    • @ajha100
      @ajha100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh it absolutely did. And it was much loved!

  • @tymothylim6550
    @tymothylim6550 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you, Josh, for this exciting and educational video! It was really insightful to learn both the superficial difference (i.e. how the coefficients of the predictors are penalized) and the significant difference in terms of application (i.e. some useless predictors may be excluded through Lasso regression)!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Double BAM! :)

  • @anuradhadas8795
    @anuradhadas8795 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    The difference between BAM??? and BAM!!! is hilarious!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      :)

    • @SaiSrikarDabbukottu
      @SaiSrikarDabbukottu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@statquestCan you please explain how the irrelevant parameters "shrink"? How does Lasso go to zero when Ridge doesn't?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SaiSrikarDabbukottu I show how it all works in this video: th-cam.com/video/Xm2C_gTAl8c/w-d-xo.html

  • @perrygogas
    @perrygogas 5 ปีที่แล้ว +173

    Some video ideas to better explain the following topics:
    1. Monte Carlo experiments
    2. Bootstrapping
    3. Kernel functions in ML
    4. Why ML is black box

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      OK. I'll add those to the to-do list. The more people that ask for them, the more I'll priority they will get.

    • @perrygogas
      @perrygogas 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@statquest That is great! keep up the great work!

    • @gauravms6681
      @gauravms6681 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@statquest yes we need it please do plsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
      plsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

    • @InfinitesimallyInfinite
      @InfinitesimallyInfinite 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Bootstrapping is explained well in Random Forest video.

    • @miguelsaravia8086
      @miguelsaravia8086 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do it for us... thanks good stuff

  • @alexei.domorev
    @alexei.domorev ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Josh - as always your videos are brilliant in their simplicity! Please keep up your good work!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks, will do!

  • @Jenna-iu2lx
    @Jenna-iu2lx ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am so happy to easily understand these methods after only a few minutes (after spending so many hours studying without really understanding what it was about). Thank you so much, your videos are increadibly helpful! 💯☺

    • @statquest
      @statquest  ปีที่แล้ว

      Great to hear!

  • @Jan-oj2gn
    @Jan-oj2gn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This channel is pure gold. This would have saved me hours of internet search... Keep up the good work!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! :)

  • @sanyuktasuman4993
    @sanyuktasuman4993 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Your intro songs reminds me of Pheobe from the TV show "Friends", and the songs are amazing for starting the videos on a good note, cheers!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You should really check out the intro song for this StatQuest: th-cam.com/video/D0efHEJsfHo/w-d-xo.html

  • @luispulgar7515
    @luispulgar7515 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bam! I appreciate the pace of the videos. Thanks for doing this.

  • @atiqkhan7803
    @atiqkhan7803 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is brilliant. Thanks for making it publicly available

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're welcome! :)

  • @takedananda
    @takedananda 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Came here because I didn't understand it at all when my professor lectured about LASSO in my university course... I have a much better understanding now thank you so much!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome!! I'm glad the video was helpful. :)

  • @naomichin5347
    @naomichin5347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am eternally grateful to you. You've helped immensely with my last assessment in uni to finish my bachelors

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Congratulations!!! I'm glad my videos were helpful! BAM! :)

  • @TeXtersWS
    @TeXtersWS 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Explained in a very simple yet very effective way! Thank you for your contribution Sir

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hooray! I'm glad you like my video. :)

  • @JeanOfmArc
    @JeanOfmArc หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    (Possible) Fact: 78% of people who understand statistics and machine learning attribute their comprehension to StatQuest.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  หลายเดือนก่อน

      bam! :)

  • @ayush612
    @ayush612 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yeahhhh!!! I was the first to express Gratitude to Josh for this awesome video!! Thanks Josh for posting this and man! your channel is growing.. last time, 4 months ago it was 12k. You have the better stats ;)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hooray! Yes, the channel is growing and that is very exciting. It makes me want to work harder to make more videos as quickly as I can. :)

    • @akashdesarda5787
      @akashdesarda5787 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@statquest please keep on going... You are our saviour

  • @ryanzhao3502
    @ryanzhao3502 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thx very much. Clear explanation for these similar models. Great video I will conserve forever

  • @alecvan7143
    @alecvan7143 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The beginning songs are always amazing hahaha!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Awesome! :)

  • @kyoosikkim749
    @kyoosikkim749 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The other day, I had homework to write about Lasso and I struggled.. wish I had seen this video a few days earlier.. Thank you as always!

  • @jasonyimc
    @jasonyimc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So easy to understand. And I like the double BAM!!!

  • @clementbourgade2487
    @clementbourgade2487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NOBODY IS GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE EUROPEAN / AFRICAN SWALLOW REFERENCE ????are you all dummies or something ? It made my day. Plus, video on top, congratulation. BAMM !

  • @ajha100
    @ajha100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really appreciated the inclusion of swallow airspeed as a variable above and beyond the clear-cut explanation. Thanks Josh. ;-)

  • @simsim2159
    @simsim2159 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your videos make it so easy to understand. Thank you!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! :)

  • @kitkitmessi
    @kitkitmessi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Airspeed of swallow lol. These videos are really helping me a ton, very simply explained and entertaining as well!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you like them!

  • @Endocrin-PatientCom
    @Endocrin-PatientCom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Incredible great explanations of regularization methods, thanks a lot.

  • @AnaVitoriaRodriguesLima
    @AnaVitoriaRodriguesLima 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for posting, my new favourite youtube channel absolutely !!!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow, thanks!

  • @hsinchen4403
    @hsinchen4403 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for the video !
    I have watched several your videos and I prefer to watch your video first then see the real math formula. When I did that, the formula became so easier and understandable!
    For instance, I don't even know what does 'norm' is, but after watching your video then it would be very easy to understand!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome! I'm glad the videos are helpful. :)

  • @sophie-ev1mr
    @sophie-ev1mr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for these videos you are a literal godsend. You should do a video on weighted least squares!!

  • @corneliusschramm5791
    @corneliusschramm5791 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude you are an absolute lifesaver! keep it up!!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hooray! I'm glad I could help. :)

  • @RussianSUPERHERO
    @RussianSUPERHERO 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I came for the quality content, fell in love with the songs and bam.

  • @pelumiobasa3104
    @pelumiobasa3104 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is awesome thank you so much for this u explained it so well . I will recommend this video to every one I know who is interested . I also watched your lasso video and it was just as good thank you

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much! :)

  • @mrknarf4438
    @mrknarf4438 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, clear explanation, loved the Swallows reference! Keep it up! :)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Awesome, thank you!

  • @praveerparmar8157
    @praveerparmar8157 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just love the way you say 'BAM?'.....a feeling of hope mixed with optimism, anxiety and doubt 😅

  • @yuzaR-Data-Science
    @yuzaR-Data-Science 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks a lot! Amazing explanation! Please, continue the great work and add more on statistics, probability in general and machine learning in particular. Sinse Data Science suppose to have a great future, I am certain that your channel also will prosper a great deal!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! :)

  • @longkhuong8382
    @longkhuong8382 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hooray!!!! excellent video as always
    Thank you!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hooray, indeed!!!! Glad you like this one! :)

  • @joaocasas4
    @joaocasas4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Me and my friend are studying. When the first BAM came, we fell for laught for about 5min. Then the DOUBLE BAM would cause a catrastofic laughter if we didn't stop it . I want you to be my professor please!

  • @hareshsuppiah9899
    @hareshsuppiah9899 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Statquest is like Marshall Eriksen from HIMYM teaching us stats. BAM? Awesome work Josh.

  • @gregnelson8148
    @gregnelson8148 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have a gift for teaching! Excellent videos!

  • @user-ur2en1zq4f
    @user-ur2en1zq4f ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great people know subtle differences which is not visible to common eyes
    love you sir

  • @rishabhkumar-qs3jb
    @rishabhkumar-qs3jb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video, explanation is fantastic. I like the song along with the concept :)

  • @yilinxie2457
    @yilinxie2457 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks! I finally understand how they shrink parameters!

  • @joshuamcguire4832
    @joshuamcguire4832 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    a man of his word...very clearly explained!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! :)

  • @add6911
    @add6911 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excelent video Josh! Amazing way to explain Statistics Thank you so much! Regards from Querétaro, México

    • @statquest
      @statquest  ปีที่แล้ว

      Muchas gracias! :)

  • @abdullahmoiz8151
    @abdullahmoiz8151 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant explanation
    didnt need to check out any other video

  • @qorbanimaq
    @qorbanimaq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ah! A triple THANKSSSS!!!!. I finally got what they are really doing.

  • @pratiknabriya5506
    @pratiknabriya5506 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A StatQuest a day, keeps Stat fear away!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love it! :)

  • @TheBaam100
    @TheBaam100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much for making these videos! Had to hold a presentation about LASSO in university.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I hope the presentation went well! :)

    • @TheBaam100
      @TheBaam100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@statquest Thx. It did :)

  • @codewithsid2063
    @codewithsid2063 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep it up man. Awesome content.

  • @Azureandfabricmastery
    @Azureandfabricmastery 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Josh, Thanks for clear explanation on regularization techniques. very exciting. God bless for efforts.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @UncleLoren
    @UncleLoren 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both the Ridge and Lasso videos made me want to cry. (Know you aren't alone if anyone else feels the same.) Also noteworthy: Ridge Regression avoids problems introduced by having more observations than predictor variables, or when multicollinearity is an issue. This example avoids either condition. Triple Bam. (Obviously, I am taking the definition too literally. It's a relative statement, re: the vars to observations ratio. )...Nevertheless, there's no end to my confusion. I was approaching "understanding", using the ISLR book....but you can actually get two different perspectives on the same topic, and then be worse off due to variance in how the concepts are presented. That said, you're still awesome, StatsQuest, and you are invited to play guitar at my funeral when I end things from trying to learn ML.

    • @UncleLoren
      @UncleLoren 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      (gonna check the StatsExchange link down below that you provided. Thank you, sir!!!)

  • @flyingdutchmanSimon
    @flyingdutchmanSimon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seriously the best videos ever!!

  • @ainiaini4426
    @ainiaini4426 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hahaha.. That moment you said BAM??? I laughed out loud 🤣🤣🤣

  • @DonnyDonowitz22
    @DonnyDonowitz22 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best explanation ever.

  • @kd1415
    @kd1415 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    love the work, i remember reading books about linear regresion, when they spent like 5 pages for these 2 topics but i still have no clue what they really do =))

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it was helpful!

    • @kd1415
      @kd1415 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Love the fact that you reply to every single comment here in YT haha

  • @johnholbrook1447
    @johnholbrook1447 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic videos - very well explained!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! :)

  • @mahajanpower
    @mahajanpower 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Josh! I am a big fan of your videos and it is clearly the best way to learn machine learning. I would like to ask you if you will be uploading videos relating to deep learning and NLP as well. If so, that will be awesome. BAM!!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right now I'm finishing up Support Vector Machines (one more video), then I'll do a series of videos on XGBoost and after that I'll do neural networks and deep learning.

    • @mahajanpower
      @mahajanpower 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      StatQuest with Josh Starmer Thanks Josh for the updates. I’ll send you request at Linkedin.

  • @chadmadding
    @chadmadding 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always amazing videos.

  • @lucianotarsia9985
    @lucianotarsia9985 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! The topic is really well explained

  • @hanadiam8910
    @hanadiam8910 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Million BAM for this channel 🎉🎉🎉

  • @tiborcamargo5732
    @tiborcamargo5732 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That Monty Python reference though... good video btw :)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha! I'm glad you like the video. ;)

  • @lihuang919
    @lihuang919 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! I finally understand!

  • @whispers191
    @whispers191 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you once again Josh!

  • @leandadearaujo5559
    @leandadearaujo5559 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome your explanation just simplifies everything
    request to make videos on rest of the algorithms as well
    thank you

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm working on them :)

  • @apekshaagrawal6696
    @apekshaagrawal6696 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the Video. They make difficult concepts seem really easy..

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! :)

    • @apekshaagrawal6696
      @apekshaagrawal6696 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@statquest Can u make a similar video for LSTM?

  • @rezaroshanpour971
    @rezaroshanpour971 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great....please continue to learn other models...thank you so much.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks!

  • @TheHerbert4321
    @TheHerbert4321 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your style of explaining! You leave enough time for anyone to take in all information while talking. Sometimes it feels like you are trying to teach little kids, but it actually just works. I often watch other teaching videos and can't remember most of it afterwards, but I can remember almost everything that you are saying after the first time watching. Amazing job!
    I have one question though. You were saying that the regression model in the beginning had low bias and high variance. Does it not have high bias? As far as I know bias represents the expected generalization (or test) error, if we were to fit a very large training set. If we fit that simple model to a lot of data, the generalization error would be rather high, because it could not capture the true patterns in the data.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad you like the videos! In ML, there are specific meanings for bias and variance that are a little bit different from what you are using and I explain in this StatQuest: th-cam.com/video/EuBBz3bI-aA/w-d-xo.html

  • @RenoyZachariah
    @RenoyZachariah 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing explanation. Loved the Monty Python reference :D

  • @arthurus8374
    @arthurus8374 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so incredible, so well explained

  • @simrankalra4029
    @simrankalra4029 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thankyou Sir ! Great Help.

  • @emmanueluche3262
    @emmanueluche3262 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! so easy to understand this! Thanks very much!

  • @khanhtruong3254
    @khanhtruong3254 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi. Your videos are so helpful. I really appreciate you spend time doing them.
    I have one question related to this video: Is the result of Lasso Regression sensitive to the unit of variables?
    For example in the model: size of mice = B0 + B1*weight + B2*High Fat Diet + B3*Sign + B4*AirSpeed + epsilon
    Suppose the original unit of weight in the data is gram. If we divide the weight by 1,000 to get unit in kilogram, is the Lasso Regression different?
    As I understand, the least square estimated B1-kilogram should be 1,000 times higher than the B1-gram. Therefore, B1-kilogram is more likely to be vanished in Lasso, isn't?

  • @zebralemon
    @zebralemon ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I enjoy the content and your jam so much! '~Stat Quest~~'

  • @stefanomauceri
    @stefanomauceri 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I prefer the intro where is firmly claimed that StatQuest is bad to the bone. And yes I think this is fundamental.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s one of my favorite intros too! :)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      But I think my all time favorite is the one for LDA.

    • @stefanomauceri
      @stefanomauceri 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes I agree! Together these two could be the StatQuest manifesto summarising what people think about stats!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      So true!

  • @PythonArms
    @PythonArms 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Harvard should hire you. Your videos never fail me!
    Thank you for such great content!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you very much!!!

  • @akronmom9037
    @akronmom9037 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for uploading this video. Can you upload a video explaining the difference between Lasso and Group Lasso? Thanks again.

  • @cloud-tutorials
    @cloud-tutorials 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One more use case of Ridge/Lasso regression is 1) When data points are less 2) High Multicollinearity between variables

  • @ninakumagai22
    @ninakumagai22 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My favourite youtuber!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! :)

  • @davidmantilla1899
    @davidmantilla1899 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best youtube channel

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! :)

  • @KrizTahimic
    @KrizTahimic 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing! Thank you so much for this!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks!

  • @adwindtf
    @adwindtf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    love your videos.... extremely helpful and cristal clear explained.... but your songs..... let's say you have a very promising career as a statistician... no question

  • @MrArunavadatta
    @MrArunavadatta 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wonderfully explained

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! :)

  • @abelgeorge4953
    @abelgeorge4953 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for clarifying that the Swallow can be African or European

    • @statquest
      @statquest  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bam! :)

  • @gdivadnosdivad6185
    @gdivadnosdivad6185 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You are the best! I understand it now!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks!

  • @faustopf-.
    @faustopf-. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Magnificent video

  • @KansasFashion
    @KansasFashion 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this song bro!

  • @johnalvinm
    @johnalvinm ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was gold!

  • @pomegranate8593
    @pomegranate8593 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    me: wathcing these videos in full panic
    video: plays calming music
    me: :)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bam! Good luck! :)

  • @raymilan2301
    @raymilan2301 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot for the explanation !!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are welcome!

  • @gmshadowtraders
    @gmshadowtraders 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is dope fam!

  • @arpitqw1
    @arpitqw1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    why can't ridge reduce weight/parameter to 0 like lasso?

  • @annd6920
    @annd6920 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Josh, could you please make video(s) on Correspondence Analysis, Chi-Square distance and Multiple contingency table?
    Learning from your videos are much efficient than several books combined :) !

    • @statquest
      @statquest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm working on those, but the bad news is that they will not be ready for a long time.... :(