ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- The radioactive Van Allen belts posed a serious challenge for space travel. NASA had to figure out a way for astronauts to fly through them without being exposed to deadly doses of radiation.
To learn more about NASA's Van Allen belt calculations, check out these links:
spacemath.gsfc...
www.hq.nasa.go...
Read More:
The 12 Greatest Challenges For Space Exploration
www.wired.com/...
“It’s a huge, dangerous, maybe impossible project. But that’s never stopped humans from bloody-mindedly trying anyway.”
Studying the Van Allen Belts 60 Years After America’s First Spacecraft
www.nasa.gov/f...
“Sixty years ago today, the United States launched its first satellite into space. Dubbed Explorer 1, the spacecraft followed just months after the Soviet Union’s Sputnik 1 and 2 spacecraft commenced the Space Age. Data captured by the Geiger counter aboard Explorer 1 heralded the emergence of space physics and ushered in a new era of technology and communications.”
6 Surprising Facts About the First Manned Space Mission
www.livescienc...
“Reaching unprecedented speeds for manned travel, the spacecraft broke free of the Earth's gravitational pull and entered orbit around the planet, circling once before re-entering the atmosphere and landing back on Soviet soil.”
"Van Allen launched a Raccoon" WHAT.
"A rocket lifted by a balloon." OHHHHHHH
Zedd Arckham LMAO
"poor critter" was the first thing I thought.
Rocket Raccoon
Raccoons love space, haven't you seen Guardians of The Galaxy?
Poor people they imagine they outsmart NASA but are just so dumb. There is the way the radiation belt were discovered. This is one thing, before discovering, you don't know so you have no idea about studying it. Then once you know there are dangerous radiation, you start a program, rats are useless then, balloons going up can help a lot for cheap price, you know where they are n the sky, climbing up in the direction where atmosphere stops... And measuring. Once you have enough measurements, whatever randomly placed you may feel they are, you can easily calculate other points. So that's how they found new way to avoid the big storm for astronauts to survive. But there is a maximum for a balloon to climb up. Then you can complete with a few rocket measurements and calculations (mathematics help you complete the value in places not measured.
This reminds me of the NASA scientist on video admitting we don’t have technology to safely send astronauts through the radiation belts.
Realize, that it wasn't about the danger of the radiation itself to the astronauts, but to the sensitive electronics on the spacecraft.
@@randyschissler5791 I’m not saying we can, or we can’t, we did, or we didn’t… Just thinking about the other video,. From what I remember of the other video, the concern was both the equipment and the astronauts.
@@GhostSal It is both, because if the electronics fail, the spacecraft fails, and thus, the astronauts are marooned in space until death.
According to nasa, they have lost 1969 technology. I believed that 100% haha
It's because they didn't go to the moon.
As usual, the government faked it all, and pocketed the money
I heard that on Apollo 11 Neil Armstrong punched Buzz Aldrin just before entering the Van Allen Belts.
It was a hit below the belt.
Master Therion lol
That deserves a constellation prize.
Master Therion nice :)
Ded
Nope
My mom's belt is more lethal.
MR SLAV your mom wears a moo moo too big for a belt
MR SLAV ya momma is so fat, she plays pool w the planets! 😳
@MR SLAV Well put sir!
ALL SPACE TRAVEL is NIKOLA TESLA's Science & RUSSIANS' Science (from TESLA's translated confiscated works)...
😂
The solution is so simple: just take off from either the north Pole or the South Pole. As you can see from this video, it's clear there's no radiation there. (I hope Nasa hires me soon).
bump, let's get this in front of nasa.
Sorry......you have to be either a great actor or liar.....or BOTH....
someone get this man a prestigious award in science. well fuckin done.
Too funny
I've heard that the rockets would not be able to withstand the cold upon takeoff.
Kay but how come nasa admited they can't get through the belts
So what you are saying , when NASA admit they are absolutely telling the truth⁉️ What did they say it's a magic force field stronger than Superman⁉️
Source?
Those people were promptly fired and now work at Burger King.
@@jorgepeterbarton th-cam.com/video/DpPMoIv1lxI/w-d-xo.html here, I think this video shows something like what he's talking about
Legitimate question. If NASA is saying we can’t or have concerns about getting through the belt, how’d we do it on the first try? Please explain. Thank you.
A little point you missed: The belts don't start right above the atmosphere, there's about 700km before they start. The international space station sits below this so they aren't affected
Please explain. Constructive criticism > criticism >>>> "You're wrong"
Yeah it sits at 666km 😂😂😂
@@ericwoods6286 err why?doh!!
There is a reason for van Allen belts to stop over confident idiots travelling through space.
So, how the raccoon with the baloon went so far to measure a radioactivity?
I don't believe that the Van Allen belts are harmless, they are responsible for creating the Fantastic Four.
colin Paterson I thought that was caused by a solar flare?
In the comics I'm sure that it's the Van Allen belts because I seem to remember that is the first time that I had ever heard of them. Maybe the film changed it?
Yeah, in the comics they got hit by a solar flare...while they were in the van allen belt, which boosted the intense radiation.
Johnny David Sanchez it was cosmic radiation
I dunno about harm. They DID give us Naked Jessica Alba.
The xrays in the van allan belts are not weak radiation. They are so strong its estimated yould need a foot thick bulkhead made of lead to survive a trip through it. As those xrays pass through metal they change to microwaves . Super intense microwaves.
The crew would have popped the astronaughts open like over cooked hotdogs in a microwave or arnold at the end of total recal. Every bit of liquid in them boiled away in seconds and then the easybake ovenship would have ghost rided right into the moon at crazy speed. It didnt though because the capsule flew around earths low orbit and talked to Houston like they where on the moon...not many knew it was fake because even most in mission control thought they were giuding a real mission....they were giuding at most old simulated training radar images on their screens an watching moon footage that was acually filmed weeks before with mostly items from the training simulation s...even the rover....speed up the motion of the videos of moon walks on youtube... Pretty obvious it is a bad fake...to bad
Pathetic that spacebois cannot see how utterly ridiculous the whole moon thing is. We HAD the technology but we don't have it now (per don petit). NASA accidentally taped over the original tapes and on and on. Astonishing how many regular ole people have tied their own importance/identity/ego to something they have nothing whatsoever to do with (NASA) except paying for it, currently to the tune of 60 million dollars A DAY. Overgrown boys, mostly.
Absolute rubbish.
@Knickertwist Copperby Are you expecting me to take you seriously?
@@GrahamMNewton they are just as dumb as flat earthers
@knickertwistcopperby6066nobody has walked to the moon either.
If the inner belt in protons and the outer belt is electrons with the earth in center to me that resembles the make up of an atom am I correct?
Convenient, eh?
@@MvnStn Not that hard to explain, if the earth has a permanent magnetic field and the geometry of a sphere, the protons have a much higher mass to charge ratio, and given that their motion is only affected by the magnetic field, the electrons would have much higher velocities and therefore travel further outwards. In the atom, the protons are not known to orbit at all, though they occasionally rearrange to lower energy configurations, but you could theorize that the quarks and gluons which comprise protons and neutrons are orbiting one another, though its virtually impossible to prove at this point in time.
Explain this more please
@@thedatavampire7383 earth=proton, outside belt=electrons? I think?
as above, so below
as below, so above
"Let's try blowing a hole in the thing that protects our planet from being wiped out." Thanks for allowing us to vote on that! Oh! WAIT! They didn't.
Seriously, I missed everything he said after that.
Luckily it never happened
@@HatchBackLyfe luckily America failed.. Otherwise this planet would be mars.
Josie Smith they’ve been doing this since world war 2 shooting rockets as high as they can to bust through the dome
Go democracy!!!
@@danielmihai4 the firmament
belts are always lethal...
i learnt that in my childhood... *cries in a corner*
Ikr bro.
He is alone, because he wasn't murdered by a belt, so his brother or sister must've been!
harder dady
Ehh... more like painful.
After all , we are still here to talk about it.
My Dad kept a razor strap handy. Notice. He has been dead since '93' and I still use caps on Dad. I think it worked.
Nobody ever went anywhere past Van Allen belt. Everything else is HOLLYWOOD
That's because you are a low IQ, ignorant and uneducated dimwit.
@@fredbohm4728 better to be ignorant and uneducated that a brain wash or a sheep like you .... got it ?
Facts
@@corneavalentin2799 I mean, your not any better. You're just following your own crowd of moon landing conspiracy that was made up by a couple of uneducated people.
Ok buddy
Interesting, I watched a video where NASA said they wouldn't be able to get through the belts
The truth is slowly come out. Besides "youth" of today aren't paying attention to any of that. They're too busy taking selfies.
No, you didn't. At best, you misunderstood what you heard.
I saw the same video. This is just propaganda.
I read a statement from NASA saying that the Van Allen Probes (which were two spacecrafts) were the first to be built to handle all the radiation. These devices were launched in August 2012. The devices that were launched before 2012 couldn't handle the radiation.. They needed to turn off the power every time they got close to the radiation. We will finally go to the moon with all the information we gathered from the probes. We are very close!
@@PalmdalesAdonis False. Many spacecraft have passed through the Van Allen Belt, including 7 manned missions.
Sorry, this explanation has been redacted decades after the supposedly moon missions by NASA, and only after the Van Allen belt danger became known to large majority of the populace. The actual original Apollo flight plan (which was the same for all Apollo missions) took the craft right through the most dangerous inner belt via a lunar injection.just slightly south of the equatorial plane. This “northern trajectory” hogwash was NOT the flight path taken by the supposed Apollo missions.
Additionally, in all the NASA press release kits of the time, the Van Allen belt danger was never mentioned at all. Nor was there any indication of any radiation danger expressed in the actual Apollo flight/mission control transcripts.
This whole “northern trajectory” mess is a recent redaction by NASA to try to explain away something they were not aware of at the time. And the reason they were not aware, or better not concerned, was that the Apollo crafts never left low earth orbit. So there was never any danger from the Van Allen belts.
"Sorry, this explanation has been redacted decades after the supposedly moon missions by NASA,"
_BULLSHIT._ Show us the statement where NASA "redacts" this explanation.
TimReed22222 go to this video and read the comments under my comment there. I’ve already had this conversation and don’t feel like retyping everything.
th-cam.com/video/lNiscigIgBc/w-d-xo.html
or just go here and watch this. All the pertinent ORIGINAL .Apollo mission logs and press kits are attached.
th-cam.com/video/C0kxid5teUQ/w-d-xo.html
@@Tim22222 I disagree with you here, I have a scanned NASA document referring to flights up to Apollo 15 and dated March 1973 which clearly states that NASA was aware of the dangers of various types of space radiation at the time and all flights were using various types of radiation devices to record exactly what type of exposure was occuring in space. So it is not a matter of changing history to suit the facts. The press kits to which you refer I believe carry an "idealised" version of the flight path.
Does Jim Bridenstine know this?
That is correct . The surprise is that people will cling to a belief at all costs . The concept the ease with which people can be brainwashed with utterly preposterous ideas is a well know weakness of the human psyche.
I literally don't get signal in some parts of my house because of walls & ceiling, but a video feed from 51 years ago can get through every atmospheric layer, through the van allen belt, across the void of space, and reach your comfy TV boxes like it's a baseball match.
It's called a radio telescope. I'll bet you don't have one at your house. Look up Parkes Observatory.
@@randyschissler5791 a radio telescope broadcast live stream moon walking to every TV set in 1969?
@@joshualorden697 Yes, look up Parkes Observatory, and see how big it is. Then, scroll down to the section on the Apollo 11 broadcast.
Did you just compare your WiFi router to NASA equipment?
This is one of the dumbest correlations I have ever seen. This is what's wrong with you idiots. You don't understand something and now everything is based off that misunderstanding. There's no logic to your statements. Instead of being stupid why not do some research? Try to learn those things you don't understand. Space Isn't fake, the earth isn't flat. The fact that the people that believe this quote people from hundreds of years ago who used to burn women at the stake because they thought they were witches.
Just take RadAway pfffttt
The Van Allen belts are a protective magnetic field. What about the radiation (primarily from the sun) that is constantly bombarding these belts. So you pass the belts then you are left exposed to the gamma rays and radiation of deep space. The spacecraft cannot protect you from these particles as its made of aluminum and carbon fiber. How do the astronauts dodge these particles? The matrix or something? This 1 fact does not add up.
@@basedneeble7350 they took more rads from deep space than they took from the radiation belts. They passed through the belts quickly... the point is that the suns radiation would not kill you instantly - it takes time, but without our magnetosphere you'd start to see symptoms within a few weeks. Solar flares increase the amount of radiation a whole lot so this is your main problem.
The ISS is mostly shielded by the belts because it's in low Earth orbit - anyone outside of the belts is at risk of solar flare activity.
You are also wrong that aluminium and carbon fiber don't absorb radiation - they do. Your body is made of stuff, so is aluminium and carbon fiber. Just because it's not as dense as lead doesn't mean aluminium doesn't reduce radiation.. what do you think sunscreen is? UV is radiation - ultraviolet radiation, and all it takes is a little bit of sunscreen to block it...
Are you seriously going to go down the conspiracy route with this one?
Wendell Payne you should be on some sort of science or space message board/forum. You are way too smart to just be posting this in the TH-cam comment section. Very interesting stuff.
Wendell Payne or better yet you should make a TH-cam video. Use pictures and words and just narrate it. I’d watch.
In 1969 we sent three men 250,00 miles from earth, landed them on a moon then got them to take off from that moon and land back on earth. Fast forward 50 years, in which time we have made VAST technological advances and the farthest we can send a man is 250 miles into low earth orbit - does that make sense to anyone?
The reason we can't go is not technological, it's political: No one wants to spend the money.
Using currently available technology if you personally could have come up with about 40 billion dollars 6 or 7 years ago you could be standing on the moon right now. The fact that you are not up there right now - does that make sense to you?
@@joevignolor4u949 they just sent 30 billion to the Ukraine! 18 + 12
@@joevignolor4u949 dude the fact that none of the billionaires have gone should tell you something
@@dracoboomin6511 It tells you nothing. It would be crazy expensive and what's the return on investment for them? The lack of brain power from the denier community is baffling.
I'm still suffering eruptions from the van halen belting I got in the 80s......
If we would have to spend days in the belts for them to become lethal, how are they protecting anything?
Rays
Who is "they" and what is "anything"?
@@SubvertTheStateWho is what that's the question.
The suns radiation is reduced before it gets to us by the magnetic field
🎶Nuke all the problems away🎶
Thanks for confirming that we never went to the moon!
Grow up, you science hating imbecile!
This right here, Comedy Central!
Wonder what brand aluminum foil they used?
Reynolds’s wrap
You know the theory where bacteria came from space on meteorites, well would the bacteria survive the belts of radiation ?
Yes. Ever heard of the Tardigrade?
Blast EDM Because....they lie. All the time. They tell one lie to cover another lie when they contradict themselves and on top of that they sometimes forget what lies they told just as all liars do.
Bacteria are more resilient to radiation extreme temperature than humans
No they wouldn't and that theory is false.
@@angebrowne1730Imagine highly educated people taking monetary advantage of others. That never happened.
I miss the good old days of science, when atomic bombs could be set off at the edge of space just to see what would happen.
It's even better when you realize that it involved not just a single crackpot who thought it up, but a whole lot of other people who agreed it was a good idea.
Yeah they're called Lefties.
Then they accidentally EMP'd the whole island of Hawaii causing a major black out. hehe
Back when it was fine & dandy to add led, a serious neurotoxin & heavy mental, to gasoline which was then spread through out everywhere were cars were driven for 75 years ending in '96... seriously lowering human IQ along the path. Look it up. Don't blindly trust what is accepted as safe.
cleveque....yeah, it could be worse...like injecting millions of people with some crackpot, untested, dangerous "vaccine"...".just to see what would happen."
That's how climate change began, Project Starfish.
No human has ever flown thru VAB. Not a chance.
aka the firmament.
Wouldn’t there be more radiation outside these belts in the first place which was incidentally trapped by these belts. Just curious
the belts are made of particles trapped by the magnetic fields. if the particles don't have enough energy to pass through the field but is not too weak to be deflected into outer space, it will pass through a few barriers, but won't have enough energy to completely penetrate or leave the magnetic field it just passed through, so it stays trapped in there.
Can you tell us the story about Tim Allen's tool belt next? I'm very intrigued, can I sign up for your newsletter??
YOU ARE TOOOO HILARIOUS!!! Thank U For Making My Day!
The belts, this is what the Flat earth thinks is their mythical dome.
I found your video very interesting but I'm confused on one subject if I go fast through a radiation field I am not affected by radiation
Think of it like being out in a snow storm. If you only stay out for a minute, you have a little bit of snow on your jacket when you come in. If you stay out an hour...MUCH MORE! Radiation comes at the human body like snow flakes (flesh penetrating snow flakes). The longer you're exposed to the radiation snow flakes the more damaging they are to your body.
the radiation takes time to sink into the body through the skin. an analogy would be it takes time for you to get sunburnt from the sun. so if you walk very slowly out in the sun from one spot of shade to the next, you will get burnt, rather then if you sprinted and stayed out of the sun mostly.
@@fruitsnacks155you dont have to be in the sun to get burnt. You can get burnt on a cloudy day. Bad illustration.
Nobody flies through that 😂😂😂 still believing the lie?
Found the flat earther
Even after the above clarification? Ofcourse astronauts made their way through it
@Adam how do they make it to space n to the other planets? Or is it all fake ? Air space crafts pass through the VAB to get to their destinations out of earth. Should we deny that as well ?
You can only fly through it in 1969 and with 1969 equipment. 😂 earth is round. People always try to dismiss the moon landing hoax as flat earth believers. That's their only defense
@@johnf817The video literally explains with math how they fly through it.
They don't fly through the Van Halen Belts, they *JUMP* over them!
Sebastian Elytron Just go high enough so you can go over it, or go under. Duuhhh
Yeah, go ahead and jump....JUMP!!
TBH Im more interested in the Van Halen belts than the Van Allen belts
The picture is just a cross section. The belt goes all the way around.
Guys, The OP was referring to the song JUMP, by the music group Van Halen...
Chuck Norris doesn´t take radiation damage from Van Allen Belts. Van Allen Belts take radiation damage from Chuck Norris.
Yeppers.
Chuck Norris doesn't get radiation, radiation gets Chuck Norris. 😝
Should have launched him to clear out the radiation. 👍
There use to be a video which I believe was Buzz Aldrin talking about the van allen belts. He stated that when the ship started approaching the van allen belts, all the instruments aboard started going haywire. He could see like lights all over the spaceship so they had to pull back. So years later when they supposably when to the moon... nothing had been upgraded to the ship or to their suits.
I remember
And yet you used the word "supposably"
I I saw that. I remember him saying we can't get through them.
Question, how can you pull back a ship in orbit?
A basic understanding of space travel show that your story is bs.
Ascent Abort Mode? lol
Its a good job we have all these space experts / flat earthers telling us we cannot travel through the van allen belts and we have not been to the moon, tune in next week and they will show us how to make a tinfoil hat.
@@Good-Enuff-Garage you dont deserve to see it.
@@wolfbbq6076 In 2016 NASA said they were going back to the moon in 2020, Mmmmmmm still waiting .
@@troth6251 Artemis missions will have humans returning to the Moon's surface by 2024. NASA had been aiming for a launch date in late 2020 for Artemis 1. However, Administrator Jim Bridenstine suggested in December 2019 that the launch might not take place until 2021.
They aren't that deadly. At most 10 rads/ h. You can absorb up to 50 rads with no side effects and xompletely recover.
Hmm, i'm still tryin to figure out how did NASA figure out how to go through 100% mass of deep space radiation.
Considering that there was severe difficulties passing thru the Van Allen Belts contain only a few percent, under 10%, of the total radiation.
title : how did astronauts pass van allen belts.
video : they just did. because nasa said so.
great job dudes, very informative video. /s
van allen radiation belt can stop solar winds but barely affects human flesh even if u stay in that radiation belt for 50 minutes. only nasa could come up something like this.
The only thing that Van Allen belts have ever stopped is the functioning of your brain waves that's so far cannot go on as I don't see them trying to even start back up you could do this all the big flavor you know there's a lot of tall Bridges around with no water under them
As opposed to:
Q. How would astronauts be unable to pass the van allen belts?
A. They just were, because hoax believers say so.
??
Van Allen Radiation does NOT stop 'solar winds'. The radiation itself is the result of solar subatomic particles becoming trapped within the Earth's magnetic field. No magnetic field is going to stop a spacecraft.
Watching Bart Sibrel on JRE, had to look up some reference material
Wouldn’t the protons and the electrons attract each other and combine together?
Yeah and have a little tiny Positron after honeymoon...
the comments here...some of them are sad. Just plain sad. Are we in America that poor in the area of "science" in grade school? I see things like rockets dont work in space because "when you put a candle under a cup it goes out" to people using words like "shill" just to sound cool and feel important somehow. Finding truth is science but its sad seeing how much energy is being put into the most ridiculous conspiracy theories. If even a fraction of that energy and talent were spent on real things, we would have a much easier time advancing the human race. We need to keep our minds open to every possibility and that goes for both sides of the conspiracy theory fence. We need to stop being so polarizing from both sides. Question everything from both sides.
We must question everything!!
I've often debated conspiracy theorists who believe the moon landings were a hoax. They generally fall into one of two categories. Some are bible literalists that believe the bible's description of an impenetrable "firmament" that exists about 50 to 80 miles above the surface of a flat earth. These people claim that all space flight is impossible because nothing can penetrate the firmament and enter God's realm above it.
The second category is what I call "paranoid government haters". These people believe that the government always lies about everything and that it can never do anything right. This basic, monolithic belief structure causes them to be unable to accept that the US Government, which they hate with a passion, could ever accomplish such an amazing feat as landing people on the moon.
@@blue123439 Having a healthy degree of logical skepticism and questioning things we are told is fine as long it doesn't digress into pathological paranoia.
Most of us do, but when you keep seeing the little differences that can't or won't be answered , well skepticism is alive and well.
Why dont you explain to people about what type of radiation it is.
It's weird how that NASA guy several years ago, promoting a mission to Mars, admitted we still have not figured out how to get people safely thru those belts. Just watched the video again. It's a NASA video on the Orion spacecraft. I can't believe they haven't taken it down. It kinda makes Apollo 8-17 seem more like Capricorn 1.
Exactly, but the sheeple will accept any explanation that doesn't mess with the reality they choose to believe, or that the government feeds them.
No one ever said that! Believe what you like but don't lie.
@@johnrambo9104 trust the $cience
George Mallory --NASA has said no such thing. Furthermore, Dr. Van Allen himself was part of the US space program and its Apollo moon missions, and he'd have disagreed with you. What is your standing to claim that you know more about the belts than the person who discovered them?
@@cardinalRG Agreed, NASA lies through it's black ops teeth. Funny how all the original telemetry data of the very first Moon Shot just up and disappeared, of the most historic event in space history. There's lots of OOPS like that at NASA. NASA is a complete fraud.
“Seep through” you would need a six foot lead walls to go through the belts.
Who would have thought Aluminum foil and duct tape could stop that much radiation. Please don't believe their lies.
Scientists: We fired a nuke at the radiation to see what it would do.
Bosses: And?
Scientists: Turns out firing radiation explosions at radiation adds to the radiation.
Bosses: That didn't occur to you?
Scientists: WELL NOW WE KNOW.
LMAO!!!
SCIENCE
2:10 if one belt is protons and the other is electrons, shouldn't they be travelling in opposite directions? Small detail, maybe, but if you're going to be a mainstream science channel with 4.2 millions subs, you should probably be able to get that right.
Don’t opposites attract?
@@The-Skinn DEFLECT
"A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However ... Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage ... I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable.
"The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is nonsense."
- Dr. James Van Allen
They have never been through it.
Yes, they have. Six times.
You made a mistake the apolo 11 space craft flew at 24,200 mph not kph. Big difference.
Hi. I get that the spacecraft could get through the Van Allen Belt. But how did they get back through it from the moon?
In the same spacecraft.
@@Tim22222 moon landing was a box bud.
It was not just the dose of radiation that was the threat, the belts interference with instruments and electrical appliances on board any space craft would spell doom. Also the thickness of protection needed to safety pass through would be too heavy as well as the only known shield against radiation is lead.
No, different kinds of material protect against different kind of radiation.
That would mean the moonlanding was fake
xxYOURBIJOUxx....I hear aluminum foil works pretty well.
@@sluggo5260 It must, because that's what that p.o.s. they want us to believe went to the moon looks like it was made of.
@@x7video 😉 NASA and Hollyweird are like🤞, okay? 🎥🎬
That’s a funny bit of fiction here. The Apollo astronauts didn’t even know what the van allen belts were lol
Ummmmm......whose James Van Allen? And what did Explorer 1 do? I guess maybe Apollo must have missed that mission, right?
Great video!!!! But seriously, what song is in the background?!?! Where have i heard it before? Was it from another popular youtube vid? At 1:08
Stranger things
Just duck and cover whenever you go through it and you should be alright.
Let's send some politicians through the belts first...see what happens
Pure curiosity on my part, but what would happen if we somehow removed all of the stray Protons and Electrons trapped in those magnetic fields? I honestly have no clue if that would affect the protection those magnetic fields provide.
(Yes, I know this was mentioned in the video, but the subject of "what would happen if we did that" didn't come up)
Idk for sure, but Ik the suns ray's pack a lot of energy, obviously. The protons and electrons probably wouldn't do much to it at all
don't think that's very practical. it makes sense that the tangible part of this "shield" is what deflects harmful rays and other phenomenon - not purely the magnetic field, but what it holds in place. so taking that away would probably expose us to those effects otherwise not felt. in my mind, the magnetic field came first and particles are picked up along earth's journey through space, so removing them would not eliminate the entire magnetic force (depending on which way you do it, of course) (don't use bombs pls). - well that's my interpretation (based on nothing, as usual) xD
If it wasn't mentioned in the video it was for a good reason. THEN you would have KNOWN for sure this guy was nuts. Besides, why mess with what God created!
Us “Humans “ love to do “what would “
@@betterheaven6081 DEPENDS ON THE FIELD IN YOUR NUMBSKULL
Van allen belt forms a double layer due to charge separation as the inner van allen belt is positively charged while the outer van allen belt is negatively charged, its like a battery.
and the lava core is like a magnet... sometimes it triple :)
So now its conform the never went to the moon, lol lying bastards
Or like nearly everything in the universe, affected by electromagnetism.
How did they overcome the temperature of the Van Allen Belt?
Disinfo. No life can go through without a magneto-gravitic shielding (toroidal). The source of this info (pleyadians) also said the graphic that NASA uses without van allen belts in the poles is a lie and the van allen belt radiation HAS MORE DENSITY ON THE EARTH POLES (similar to a magnet where the magnetic lines have more density also in the poles). Now, there is a secret space program and those ships (triangular in shape) have the correct shielding, but the apollo movies don't show any tech real and they are just disinfo, just to place a ship in orbit and then come down again, and the whole "moon landing" done in some base in Australia is my guess, pine gap base probably was the place, a very small stage for Apollo 11 and bigger to several hundred meters the other missions. Neil Armstrong was already saying things a little in ambiguos so they killed him as he was to do some medical operation. The rest see and don't talk or they have same. There was one astronaut that talked about ufos and such, that is permitted because is like "oh we were on the moon and saw UFOs there" that makes people forget that WE DIDN'T WERE ON THE MOON, so such "talk" is just disinfo also and permitted because makes the lie solid on the mind of people, that will start to talk about the kind of ufos on the moon and not doubting anymore it.
So what I gather here, we never went to the moon! Or am I missing something??
In other words, you're either mentally disabled or didn't watch the whole video.
Did you not watch the whole thing
So where is the space station? Outside the range?
Just under the belts.
Then why NASA have to reassess the radiation of van Allen belt by unmanned Orion capsule? A NASA engineer Kelly Smith talked about this Orion spacecraft of NASA. He said, the objective of sending Orion capsule through van Allen belt; is assessment of all changes in parameters while crossing van Allen belt; so that astronauts can be sent on board in Orion capsule on subsequent space mission. If NASA scientists already knew how to send astronauts in shielded spacecraft through van Allen belt without radiation hazards in 1969.... then why they have to rediscover the same facts regarding radiation hazards on human by sending unmanned Orion capsule?
And I've read many comments here; where people believe that deficit of money, lack of profit and future plan of NASA for Mars expedition are the reasons that NASA abandoned Apollo mission to moon and never went to moon again after Apollo missions...... Do you guys have any idea that how much money and strategic profit USA made from Apollo missions? You believe; whatever you hear from lying media!!!! The USA federal reserve increased mostly from the year 1969 onward.... if you analyse the USA federal bugdet. The technology they built for lunar modules; gave USA space dominion over Russia and resulted in ideas of resources & development of numerous new tech in field of astronomy and in many other scientific aspects. And USA made huge profits in subsequent years following successful Apollo missions.
And one more important thing; the narrator told in this video that if astronauts passes through van Allen belt even without protection they would not receive lethal dose of radiation and if astronauts spend days in van Allen belt; then they can be affected with hazards of radiation of van Allen belt. For your information; the radiation of inner belt of van Allen belt is about 2500 rem (25 sV). The nuclear explosion in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 produced radiation about 600 rem (6 sV) that wiped out entire lives within blast radius and caused melting of every standing structures on ground.
"Then why NASA have to reassess the radiation of van Allen belt by unmanned Orion capsule?"
Because Orion is a new ship! New ships must be tested. They weren't "reassessing" the belts, they were testing the new ship's shielding.
Apollo used old fashion electronics from the 1960's that used discrete transistors and low density logic gates. This type of large scale electronics is not susceptible to radiation damage. In contrast, Orion uses modern high density microprocessors and digital memory. This type of electronics is much more susceptible to radiation damage. As such Orion needs a lot of testing and an advanced design to make sure the electronics will work reliably in the space environment out beyond earth orbit.
TimReed has a stupid reply for you. They sent up Orion to test the make-up of the Van Allen belts. There's an interesting Nature Magazine article on the called "NASA's Van Allen Probes Spot an Impenetrable Barrier in Space". I think the millinnials just don't have the mental capacity to understand science.
@@Tim22222 That is one of the stupidest reply's I've ever seen. You can't be that gullible.
@@AmericanPatriot-1776 ?
So straighten me out. What WAS the Orion test flight doing out there?
how did they know lethal dosage of radiation to humans i 300rads under an hour? dont massacre me just asking?
animal experimentation like many other things that are tested on animals.
i am lyric Exposure to 300 rad for ten seconds is fatal.
How freaking stupid are we? Detonating a megaton nuke in space in our outer atmosphere.
forget the magnetosphere , what about the ionosphere , which is even more unstable & dangerous . theres no way they shredded threw it goin 20,000 kph . they would have been fried like eggs on a griddle
I think more and more people are doubting we went to the moon. For a human to be exposed to THAT kind of radiation would die from the poisoning within an hour of exposure. Once past the VAB's you would be exposed to EVEN MORE of the gamma rays as well as the suns radiation. Once the last astronaut has passed away then the truth will come out. These guys profited with this lie and they kept their secret to the grave.
@AmericanPatriot 1776
'For a human to be exposed to THAT kind of radiation would die from the poisoning within an hour of exposure.' Isn't that covered by the content of this video?'Once past the VAB's you would be exposed to EVEN MORE of the gamma rays as well as the suns radiation.' I don't even recall gamma rays being the main problem with the Van Allen belts. But where is your evidence that the radiation beyond the Van Allen belts is greater than within it? Why would the Van Allen belts have even been a thing if it was?
@@TearTheRoof0ff The temperature of the Belts is about 3000 degrees. The apollo's were only covered with layers and layers and layers of aluminum and other stuff. The only problem is aluminum MELTS at 620 degrees. it's easier to lie and get paid WELL for it. That way you can fool eveyone and go into seclusion like Armstrong did. AS far as Aldrin, well he's a who&^ for the money.
@@AmericanPatriot-1776 'The temperature of the Belts is about 3000 degrees' lolwut? Also, what are the heat transfer characteristics involved? Or, for that matter, how does heat transfer work? Why can I put my arm in a heated oven set to 200 degrees C and not get burned?
It's fun that you think 'temperature is X, melting point is Y' is going to be some kind of gotcha that sends the whole operation up in smoke and scientists into a headless frenzy.
@@AmericanPatriot-1776 Apollo 11 wasn't adequately protected .if you think a thin layer of aluminium is sufficient then I would challenge NASA to use the same technology today .I don't think so !!!
sorry i have seen NASA saying we have never been through it. How does combustion work in the vacuum of space
Where? I've never seen or heard anyone from NASA ever say that! (I know the videos you're referring to and they are wrong!)
"How does combustion work in the vacuum of space"
They bring the oxygen with them.
True, you don't have flight you have thrust. There is no flight in space, you're floating not flying. There is no friction in space.
It depends on the fuel spacecraft store oxygen in liquefied forms to combust in space
Ok .. then how did we get through it the first few times ??? You know WHEN WE WENT TO THE MOON!?!??
By going through the least dangerous parts as quickly as possible. Didn't you even watch the video?
@@GuardianSoulkeeper but that's not the response from the astronauts when questioned.. NASA MEANS DECEPTION IN HEBREW ... WAKE UP!!!
NASA means to lift in Hebrew. It's a wise idea to fact check before spouting what you read on the Internet.
@@GuardianSoulkeeper mmmmm nope... Keep talking.... While doing so explain how come the Challenger crew is alive (according to videos AND The SS Administration) and then explain how water is always level... Yet we are on a ball that's 70% water? Or how about , given the supposed rate of curvature how does a periscope see? Or a lighthouse work or better yet how the navy uses lasers to target missiles HUNDREDS of miles away???! Or how come after FIFTY YEARS OF BULL FROM NASA WE STILL DONT HAVE A SINGLE PHOTO OF THIS "PLANET"
@@jasonwessel2346 _"explain how come the Challenger crew is alive "_
They're not.
_"explain how water is always level"_
It's not.
_"Or how about , given the supposed rate of curvature how does a periscope see?"_
By being above the curvature.
_"Or a lighthouse work"_
As above.
_"how the navy uses lasers to target missiles HUNDREDS of miles away?"_
Target painting?
_"Or how come after FIFTY YEARS OF BULL FROM NASA WE STILL DONT HAVE A SINGLE PHOTO OF THIS "PLANET""_
We have literally thousands: epic.gsfc.nasa.gov
Not just NASA, either: electro.ntsomz.ru/en/
himawari8.nict.go.jp/
I get the distinct impression you're just mindlessly repeating what someone on the Internet told you without actually fact checking their claims.
Lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo they can't
Rockoon omg
Make no mistake. No one has ever been through the Van Allen belts. No one.
No one, except a few dozen people.
So you’re telling me humans travelling at 25000kph survived? Come on, do you know the g force that would be involved in speeds like that? They’d die from that alone, never mind the radiation. Moon landing didn’t happen smh
Another uneducated science illiterate suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect
They didn't go from zero to 25,000 MPH all of a sudden. It took them about 12 minutes to gradually accelerate up to earth orbital velocity of 17,500 MPH and then later on another 6 minutes to gradually go from 17,500 MPH up to 25,000 MPH, which is the earth's escape velocity. The most they ever pulled was about 3 G's during the initial part of their ride into orbit. G forces are determined by the amount of change to your velocity and then the time required to make the change, not your ending velocity.
G force isn't calculated from velocity but is calculated from acceleration
Very interesting!
what's more interesting is that there's another video that shows a NASA scientist saying they've yet to figure out how to cross the van allen belts because of the extremely high radiation
@@DANNY40379 link to video?
mindlesstube. I would like to see too.
Nice reference flat earth
Jum saesiaw...........FOR YOU............YOU'RE WELCOME...................
th-cam.com/video/TKGCJ1N-WfQ/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/4O5dPsu66Kw/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/zxmeb1_qciQ/w-d-xo.html
nasa says they cannot go past low earth orbit due to these belts, even though they went through them in 69, before they were discovered.
*_WRONG._* NASA says they can't go beyond low-earth orbit _because we don't currently have any rockets that can take humans that high._
It has nothing to do with radiation.
@@Tim22222 no the belts are a cover story for the fact that even their strongest":nuke" bounces off the crystaline dome, hence nothing leasves the earth!
The belts were discovered by scientist van Allen in1958 10 years before the Apollo missions to the moon Apollo 4 and 6 were test flights and gathered information about the radiation levels finding it to be safe .
Very Interesting, I knew a much of the things related to the earths magnetic field n all but, something like this is totally unexpected.
(Can we have a video on the recent discoveries of Cassini regarding jets sprays in Enceladus, and other interesting discoveries regarding titan, before it dies )
11.4 rads 300 rads per hour is lethal
Yeah and astronaut are only exposed to 16 rads not 300
@@davemaffucci5620 sorry... I was taking notes to share on another video.. and my memory isn't great🤷
@Dave Maffucci that's the limit for lethal exposure not what they experienced
The video title : "How astronauts fly through the Van Allen belts"
Reality: "NASA admits they don't have the technology to fly through the Van Allen belts."
you landing deniers never come with links to the information you claim to be true. never. all talk all the time.
Wow, why was Apollo 14 exposed to so much more radiation than the others?
Presumably: A) Miscalculated trajectory, did not pass through the belt at it's thinest point, thereby absorbing more rads. B) Slower trajectory, spent more time in the belt than other launches, absorbing more rads for longer period of time.
The Van Allen Belts are effected by solar activity which can cause the outer belt to change size and shape and even create a third belt. th-cam.com/video/1tZs02kxTdg/w-d-xo.html
They had the longest moon mission. 2 weeks.
All of you are forgetting something. Apollo 14’s major exposure came from being outside of the van Allen belt. Almost all of the Apollo astronauts received their doses outside of the van Allen belt. Apollo 14 caught the tail end of a solar storm which is why their exposure is much higher. They almost didn’t fly the mission because of the solar event.
The true danger of any missions in deeper space is the gamma radiation and I ther solar particles. The van Allen belt are the least of our concerns.
@@davidbowerman6433 It also means accepting these dangers as inevitable costs of exploring space.
What is radioactive resistant material you passed by that really quickly
Lead.
If inner and outer belts are opposite charges, why isn't there intra belt repulsion and inter belt attraction?
Anzetal Because....they lie. All the time. They tell one lie to cover another lie when they contradict themselves and on top of that they sometimes forget what lies they told just as all liars do.
The force of the Earth's magnetic field is equal to the repulsive and attractive force
The belts are caused by Earth's magnetic field
@@angebrowne1730 if you think space is not present or science lies then why come here
@@palanisamysaravanan1656 he is just stupid if you dont know math then dont ask stupid questions
How was any radio communication at all possible through this radiation belt and why wasn't the cameras on the moon not affected by it?
The frequencies used in the Unified S-Band Communications System are not particularly affected by the particle radiation in the Van Allen Belts. The Moon is not in the VAB's. Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth it actually is within the belts!
@@snakeeyes3733 Inner VAB up to about 12,000km. Outer VAB up to about 60,000km. Distance Earth to moon 384,400km. Take care.
*Radiation Belt*
*Apollo 13 : Hold my moonshine.😜🤸*
Stranger things
Mario Sr. I wondered how long I would have to scroll to find it
what about 0:52 tho? is it from some remix?
@@NappingWanderer ye very much true
nice cartoon lol
I really need an explanation if anyone could help, they said it is full of radiation and they propose to nuke it so that it would do what?
We need video "what are defending us better our magnetic shield or our atmosphere?"
I've heard that magnetic field is providing little protection and 90% our protection comes from our thick atmosphere. In that article they are saying that van Allen belt is even accelerating particles. They become high energy after entering into van Allen belt.
It is pushing my knowledge to a limit)
I don't know is this true fact or not.
I've seen it in a russian news.
I concern about Mars. If magnetic field is providing weak help but our atmosphere is a main defender I think it is possible to terraform Mars to perfectly habitable planet.
Because I think it is real to build atmosphere over years but magnetic field building is kind of possible but overwhelmingly hard.
the magnetic field protect us from charged particles. if not for the magnetic field those particles would strip away our atmosphere by colliding and giving enough energy to the atoms in our atmosphere to escape earth's orbit. but everything that is not affected by the magnetic field, or is low interacting, will enter the atmosphere until its absorbed by something, usually a air molecule.
Danilo Oliveira
Thank you for the answer.
What do you think about Mars than? I think Marsians will have to live underground for several hundred years. I don't how they will awoid radiation unless they go underground under thick rock.
Family Dog
It's arguable that Martians will never have an atmosphere.
Mars is small and geologically dead.
So, geologically dead means no magnetic shield.
No shield means no atmosphere.
Then the problem is compounded by Mars' small size, low gravity means not much holding the atmosphere onto the planet.
+Family Dog
Unless you love living underground, with a risk of rapid decompression quickly causing asphyxiate and blood boiling, and enjoy the possible negative health effects of micro-gravity, Mars is not a place you would want to live at.
Venus is much better, leaks take a long time to diffuse giving you time to repair, and as long as you don't fall off the blimp, you should be very safe from the inhospitable area below.
Although the magnetosphere does accelerate particles, it keeps them in orbit following the magnetic flux lines so far less radiation hits the atmosphere than otherwise.
How do you manage to post a video daily? Don't you ever run out of topics?
you can never run out of science, my friend
Software Man Well said man. But it's really difficult to find new topics and make vids every single day. Though I appreciate it a lot. I learn a lot from them.
Plus if i remember right seeker is pbs. Pbs is a pretty big organization, pulling off a 3 to 7 min video daily doesn't sound hard for them.
chemp231 mm I didn't know they are a really big organization.
in universe many things unexplored even on Earth, also the discovery of new things could possibly change the law for example like quantum mechanics, even if the team is super lazy of finding new science info, they can simply make a "what if" video and end it with "what do you think?"
Let's do it again 59 years later
I am an old lady now, and I watched the first fake moon landing on TV with my father when I was a child. Rather than explain how he and other adults I knew went from being excited at the idea man might land there to being angry that it was clearly fake, I will simply advise you to look up videos on the fake moon landing. I was too young to pick out things for myself, but I was told it was to do with shadows and other things. I've watched videos myself since and can understand the mistakes they made in filming that gave it away then.
Space agencies are business corporations. At the least they seek to make a profit. However, I believe they are among the companies used for the laundering of the massive amount of wealth that the 'elite' thieve and defraud. You mustn't say that to teachers or those in authority though as just saying it would get you in trouble, get you listed as a potential subversive, and would down your grades. It is often best to pretend to go along with and believe their lies but to quietly know the truth for yourself so that you are not fooled in the private space of your own mind.
Also best to not discuss it with classmates who might either make fun and tell the teacher, or who might also believe it and argue with the teacher and say your name as back up "Jo believes it as well as me".
Your family and friends not in your school or college would be fine, even if they go on thinking the landing was real. Just don't bother getting into big arguments because at the end of the day, what we know and believe about what powerful people do changes nothing, and they aren't worth having ill feelings with others over. Just watch the videos and know the truth so you are quietly wise as to how devious the powerful are (so you know to not trust them and to be careful of them).
You are the victim of anti-space exploration propaganda, which you are simply regurgitating.
How many times I see the video I don't get doubts because there is explanation for every teeny tiny bit of anomaly
If you are old enough to remember Walt Disney talking about this Sunday night on the Disney hour. He was saying this was our biggest obstacle going to the Moon would be the Van Allen radiation belt that's the way Earth the astronauts capsule would have to be three foot thick lad shilling and it would never get all the launch pad. Now this is almost 50 something years ago I was 9 years old now I act like it's just everyday thing and when I got older 20 years ago I remember this now they are saying something completely different human flesh going to the Moon one way would be like putting an astronaut in a microwave for 45 minutes on high I honestly believe I hope I'm wrong but we did not go to the Moon if even a little bit what I think is true is true you're so much on government we live in the greatest country in the world but if you know history a little bit every country civilization ever got to the Pinnacle of domination of the world imploded on itself because the government did whatever it wanted to do and the people stood by and let it happen and listen to your lungs this is covid-19 research we put there they have an agenda necessarily for your best interests
Wtf?? They cant go through.. They even say theu have to learn how to do it xD why ppl like you fake info.?
Of course they can ho through it. They did so 18 times in the Apollo program. Look it up.
No one has said "they have to learn how to do it", only that they are going to do it in a different spacecraft design and they needed to test it before they put people aboard (just as they did with Apollo in the 1960s). It's the same as developing a new aircraft: they know how to make them fly safely but a new design is still always tested before it is allowed to carry passengers
To those denying the moon landing, ya, the little things you found, the smart scientist were too stupid to consider and you're all more brilliant then them.
@@qinaan Umm--that was weak.
2 things are possible.
We made it to the Moon when no one else could.
A big fat lie.
@@daytripperhd Anything is possible if you believe. A lot of stuff is horse shit if you don't.
to those who belive in moon landing ...you are literally too stupid to be insulted
Correction: You stated that the Apollo spacecraft reached a speed of about 25,000 kilometers per hour when leaving earth. It was actually about 25,000 miles per hour, or 7 miles per second (11 kilometers per second).
What's the speed limit on the interstate in your state? 65? Mph.we don't do kilometers in usa
7 miles per second??? Damn.... Could anyone imagine what hitting even a tiny pebble at that speed would do to the rocket? That's hard to believe, unless they knew damn sure they had a clear path, but at 7 miles per second seems like a gamble.
Play Van Halen when passing through Van Allen.
1:21 stranger things theme song hm🤔
The US NEVER went to the moon. They would have died shortly after going through the Van Allen Belt.
Stop *LYING.*
Start *PROVING,* or shut up!
Typical, *CLUELESS* theotard!
@@CNCmachiningisfun Study up on the Van Allen RADIATION Belt.
The Van Allen Belt is huge. There is no way humans could have enough protection to prevent harm. They would be dead in a day.
@A random hamster How do you know this? Do you work for NASA?
Where did this research you site come from, if the van allan belt is so deadly why was the government worried about it? Doesnt add up
They just "hopped" over the belt? Amazing!
Truelly amazing!
Yeah, an amazing story of bullshit, alright! LOL
🤔I'd like to know, why haven't humans gone beyond these belts since the Apollo missions? Things that make you go, hmmmm
If you'd like to foot the bill after budget cuts I'm sure nasa would definitely get on board