Sinking a Friendship
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ค. 2024
- The plaintiff used to be great friends with the defendant, and they purchased a boat together. However, the defendant sold the boat at a huge profit and refuses to give the plaintiff his fair share, so he's suing. The defendant insists he bought the plaintiff out of his share of the boat before selling it.
Subscribe to our channel:
/ @peoplescourttv
Case # 32-223
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court - บันเทิง
I can see how the old man can be intimidated by the other guy, the other guy is very greedy greedy greedy greedy
I know a few people who resemble the plaintiff....all have over bearing personalities....it rattles people lol...I get what the defendant is saying. Some of us chose to disassociate...doesn't make them bad people
Just because he’s tall doesn’t mean he can’t be intimidated. Her husband is tall and I don’t think he could bust a grape 😂
Exactly!
😅😅😅 shots FIRED 😂
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
The plaintiffs wife looks like she was being held prisoner
That was exactly the impression that I got, too. She looks defeated and frightened.
The plaintiff says that the defendant is making "zings" at him in court when he did that to the defendant multiple times.
Yes she look scared
haha, she knows she's gonna be in trouble because he didn't get what he wanted from the case
Also,he is much older than the lady with him.She must be with him for the bucks.As he us not appealing at all.
I hate the argument that just because you are a tall person that you aren't under duress. Just because you are big, or tall, doesn't mean you handle conflicts well and can fight. You can feel threatened and worry for your own safety and the safety of your family.
Exactly!
Agreed! Some people, regardless of size, will avoid any potential conflict when they've seen behaviors escalate from that person previously. The plaintiff looks like a hot head, and I don't quite follow how he was awarded any additional monies. 🤔
Well said. I said something similar but not as well as you.
Size does pay a big part in it though.
I absolutely hate the "friend or no friend" thing. The plaintiff destroyed a 20 year friendship for $500
They weren’t really friends to begin with
The friendship was over long before that
DON'T BLAME THE PLAINTIFF OBVIOUSLY HE WAS OWED $$$ SO IT FALLS ON THE DEFENDANT STOP MAKING EXCUSES
Plaintiff acts like a total control freak, what he says goes and you can forget about it,he’s a one way street and that girl looks terrified
This case was like a bad day in the accounting office 😵💫
Maybe I'm just too tired to think clearly right now but the judge's math seems wrong on this one. They both initially invested $750.00. The defendant then paid the plantif a total of $2250.00. Ignoring the repair costs, the defendant has now made a total investment of $3000.00 in the boat (his original $750.00 + $2250.00). He sold it for $3400.00 earning a profit of only $400.00. Either way you look at it, the judgement ended up with the plantif receiving a total of $2826.00 from a $3400.00 sale. That sure doesn't seem like a fair and equal profit to me.
The end result is wrong. The 2250 is the original 750 the defendant gave the plaintiff for the original boat purchase plus another 1500 when the defendant bought the boat outright from the plaintiff. So at this point the defendant is in for 2250 and the plaintiff has 750 profit. Add another 500 sale profit and the plaintiff made 1250 total and the defendant is still 1750 in the hole and no boat.
@@WillGGGi don't understand, and that's ok i'm not ruling on anything😂
Plaintiff needs to stop using words he has no idea how to use. At the end, when talking to moderator. “He proves he’s being libel to me!”
I’d check your own imperfect use of grammar, before coming for others.
😬
@@KAKE-26- you’re actually in the wrong. Its the meaning of words. He uses LIBEL incorrectly. Libel is writen defamatory. Slander is the verbal part. He does not use other words correctly. Next time, SHUT YOUR MOUTH IF YOU PLAN TO BE RUDE JUST FOR HER POINTING OUT HES A COMPLETE IDIOT!
We are not structoring sentences buddy!
the judge messed that ruling up.
The girl with the plaintiff is either mortified to be on tv.....or she's being held against her will. Anyone else notice that?
Judge didn’t care.
I wonder if that’s how the defendant was feeling?
Mail order bride
Correct Philipana overseas bride, i have one to..
@@matthewmorales94 how do I get one?
The plaintiff is petty…just petty. He is a sad little man. I
Per the agreement…plaintiff got too much IMHO
This case is stupid! Plaintiff shouldn't get anything
Certain things you should never do with a friend and buying a large purchase is one of those things.
The plaintiff gives off money hungry.. sorry to say.
Exactly
She neglected to take in the fact that the Defendant had an initial invbestment of 1000 dollars. He should of gotten 75.00
The defendant specifically said the plaintiff denies that that happened and that he had no proof on his end. What did you expect the judge to do? 🤷
OMG Judge!! 3400/2 = 1700 each. But defendant already paid 1500 to plaintiff, so judgement should be 200. There. Fixed it. The accounting of input costs are all equal (repairs, purchase) so the math is easy here. Or .... 3400 - 2000 = 1400 profit or 700 each. Profit _ input costs = 700 + 1000 = 1700 each. P already paid 1500=> 1700-1500= 200 judgement! There fixed it again. Yes, I'm a CPA
I'm not an accountant but definitely knew the judge's math is wrong.
Yeah, her math was all the way wrong. The plaintiff even admitted when he filed suit that he received an additional 750 on top of the 1500, so he received way more profit than he was owed, and I fully believe the defendant spent more money to fix parts up, so the defendant ended up in the negative.
Yep
It is not a pure mathematical issue. The law impacts the factors.
Yeah, no. It wasn't a down payment. The agreement was to SPLIT the profit.
If I pay $2250 for something and sell it for $3400, my profit is $1150, and half that is $575.
Should have had him sign a receipt that said this supercedes all previous agreements. Simple and done.
The word is spelled "supersedes." Strange but true.
What a long boring case, the plaintiff is petty
I just don't trust the Plaintiff. He comes off of a money grabbing liar
ANNNNDDDD who is using the wrong words as well! ’hes libel to me’ 😣🤨😳🤯 so the plaintiff is saying that the defendant is writing all over him with lies?!?! He’s stupid.
I think the judge got this one wrong
She looks scared to death!!!
She is …prob in many ways
The winner doesn't think he's a terrible person , but everybody else does
The plaintiff gives "I'll fight you" vibes. He's girlfriend looks frightened too. I can totally understand the defendants "duress".
Both of these guys are special.
defendant knew the dude he was selling it to was going to immediately turn around and sell it again for more and he would make money again. they worked it out beforehand for sure.
The defendant said: "I've seen him by his own actions, I seen his character, and I no longer wanted him around my son." The defendant not wanting the plantiff around his six year old son tells me he discovered something new about the plantiff that he no longer trusted him. Perhaps the way he treats his wife, who knows. They both were being careful what they said about each other.
At the end, the plaintiff said the defendant was saying/doing things at work to get him fired. That's not very careful to me. That's malicious and defaming.
The plaintiff is using words he doesn’t understand
I get irrationally irratable when listening to certain plantiffs and defendants. These guys both sound so whiny and privileged at the same time it hurts
What is up with lady with plaintiff? Blink if you need help!
"Proof is what I go on, dude!" Every judge needs a shirt that says that 😆
Well that boat sailed😂
That was longest exit interview I’ve ever seen, good grief. 😩And to those saying the girl looked distressed; she might not even speak English that well and just really doesn’t want to be there on national TV.
Both old men are a mess after all these years. Took advantage of each other over a boat.
They ended their friendship over $576.00!
It doesn't seem like the kind of friendship that is worth maintaining based on this.
They more ended it over the plaintiff being dangerous to the defendant’s child.
If the plantiff was paid and 'bought out', he is owed nothing more! Zero.
I’ve never seen Doug at a loss for words 🤣🤣🤣. Normally he’s good with wrapping up little tantrums.
Sounds like EGO, ED and COKE 👩🏿⚖️
My Dad told me a long time ago that you don’t have friends when it comes to money. Things like this don’t work out well too often.
The plaintiff has a desperation in his eyes. He was willing to lose a friendship to snake a little more money out of a deal.
Just because a man is taller doesn't mean he is a fighter .. The shorter guy looks like a tough guy with a temper !!! Sadly this was a bad idea as it ruined a friendship !!
This is one of the reasons why I would never buy anything with anyone
Once he bought him out that was a done deal..
This is crazy.
Does the plaintiffs lady know this is a court and inappropriate wardrobe?
They should have sold the boat(to someone they didn't know)and split the profit, done deal. That way, there are no hard feelings, that one made more money than the other. Common sense. This whole deal seems more complicated than it needed to be. The Defendant claiming "duress" and fear for his family make me think HE DID pull something shady. They were supposed to be friends for goodness sake.
Judge is earning her pay today. 🙄
This was a very civilized case. They seem like decent, honest men.
This case was so confusing I think neither should get a dime. 🤷♀️🤦♀️
Lmao the plaintiff 100% lied when she asked if he trusted Aaron’s word because he knew he would get less money. What a sleaze
All this math just baffles me. Ugh.
What about it baffles you?
@@vorpal22 hahahahaha
Can’t believe this petty case of two grown men for $500
I agree. My time is worth more than $500. I would have just cut my losses and never enter into an agreement with that guy again. That’s all
Snake move ?? Man cut his losses and got double investment with no room for liabikity foh
The math is wrong!!! What happened to the defendant's original $1000 put in the boat. That should have been subtracted before calculating the profit
I know everyone thinks the girl looks scared but I thought Doug looked a little intimidated by the real tall guy.
Maybe it’s me, but the plaintiff’s attitude seems a little off when answering questions or even describing the circumstances.
Maybe he’s nervous?
Classic dumb brain syndrome.
I don't think the plaintiff is very bright 😮
Folks wear anything in this court. Judge Judy would not allow it at all
What's wrong with what they're wearing? They both look fine to me.
@@vorpal22the club wear the lady with the plaintiff is wearing
@@Sugarplum33 Ah. Ha - hard to notice her except at the beginning and then again until right at the end. I can see why someone would call that outfit inappropriate for court.
Just because someone is taller than someone, does not mean a smaller statured person can not be intimidating and threatening!! Cone on Judge that attitude is ridiculous!
You made yourself look bad by being MONEY HUNGRY PERIOD !
All that over $500
Judge M, the size of the man has nothing to do with his ability to defend himself unless he is trained in self-defense. In addition, size has not boundaries if weapons are involved not to mention threats to one's family. That argument doesn't hold water. The defendant could definitely feel duress. The plaintiff is 100% intimidating - his stance, his facial expression.
I’m confused. If they paid $1500 for it. And sold it for $3400 in my brain the most the plaintiff could get would be $200
That's the shirt she decided to wear to court?!
Such repetitive testimony! And shame on the judge for her statement that, due to his height, the defendant shouldn't have been intimidated by the plaintiff (not that I believe that he was).
People can - and do - hurt others who are bigger. Or a smaller person could have a crackpotted personality, and be the type to burn another person's home if they're angry.
I wish I worked with
them! 😂😂😂
The boat guy totally third saled it to avoid paying lol
The plaintiff looks like Ray Liotta (a little bit).
Rays whiney little brother
@@S.K.Smith-Green 😆
How the hell did the plaintiff get $576?!
The math is not mathing!!!!!
3400/2=1700
He was paid 1500
At most he would get $200!
How the hell did she come up with her numbers! That’s insane!
Plantiff’s wife looks scared SOS…?
Whÿ would plaintiff get $2825, out of $3400 sale....and he gets $575!!!!!
I watched 2 seconds and came here and seriously no comments about the plaintiff forehead? Fr? Ok
Plaintiff is rather simple isn’t he.
Once again money ruined a long term relationship and for such a small amount too...
It is obvious the "old man" is a complete liar. He could have just split the profit. People they work with all were a part of this whole thing. The boat was sold at the profit of 6500.00.
Yeah, he for sure sold it at 6500, like the plaintiff believes. That's why the defendant was ok with the verdict and never got angry at the plaintiff winning so much.
He claims the plaintiff received 1500+750, and then won over 500 in judgement, so the plaintiff made over 2800 out of a 3400. That means the defendant only received 600 from the sell, which doesn't even cover his initial investment of 750 (let alone his 450 repair cost and other 250 repair cost). He didn't get angry or even point that out, so he for sure sold it at 6500, like the plaintiff believes.
Lose a friendship for $500
Someone please explain this to me, bc the calculations are off to me. They spent 1000 each to buy and fix the boat. He sold it for 3400, so the profit is 1400. But he gave the man 1500+750 (2250)... so out of the 3400, the plaintiff got 2250 while the defendant got 1150. The plaintiff received 1250 in profit (2250 minus his 1000 investment), while the defendant received only 150 in profit (1150 minus1000 investment)... But I also believe he did pay the additional 450 to fix it, so he basically paid in 1450, while only receiving 1150 (meaning he's in the negative 300, before the judgement)... Or did I miss something completely?
Either way, the defendants lack of anger and reaction at the end makes me believe he did in fact sell the boat for way more profit than he admitted. I bet he already had a buyer when he made the deal for 1500+750 in the contract, and knew he would make a large profit. If he lost profit or ended up in the negative, then he would have been quick to point it out, which he didn't.
He's lying on Aaron to get as much as he can. Wow.
Does she not realize she is in court? That get up that she has on is for night clubs. She looks ridiculous.
I didn't even know she was there till the end! Trophy wife for sure
@@TopherGrant I thought it was his daughter, but now I'm not sure.
@@TopherGrantThey are truck drivers. They don’t have trophy wives
She's kinda standing away from him when he didn't get awarded so much. She's not happy.
@mickm6309 she never looked up. Not sure if she was nervous or scared of him
This plaintiff...swear to god karma is going to get him so bad
I do it often. 😂 great response to Doug.
Plaintiff looks and sounds a bit like Michael from GTAV
Sorry Judge, your math on this is terrible! He sold the boat for 3400 AFTER he bought out the other guy. That would be all his profit and his right to profit.
Heyyyyy I’m right on time !!!! ❤
Lost their dignity for $540.00.
How tall are you?
6'5
😂😂😂😂😂
I’m kinda confused on this verdict. How is the plaintiff entitled to even $1 if he admits he allowed the defendant to buy him out? Oan that lady with him definitely looked like something was bothering her. Then again I watch too much crime tv so maybe I’m paranoid😂
Plaintiff: Boehoe i want money😢
Plaintiff was def a greedy/not good “friend.”
Both these guys need some Midol for their crankiness
Bet he has a temper 😅
I agree
Yes hot head
Dude on point
Baby-face had to get in the last, "INTERESTING" like anyone gives af
Wait..6yr old son.... He's old enough to have grandsons
Did the defendent even make any money on the sale? Doesn't sound like it.
Size means nothing. I don't think the defendant was afraid of the plaintiff, but the judge should know size doesn't matter.
The defendant was lucky to get away from this leech!
A twenty year friendship in the trash over a few dollars. Sad.
Odd agreement in that written document that any FUTURE profits will be split. That's what the document said. Who knows if the defendant pulled a fast one. But the plaintiff didn't have proof for court.
Why didn't Judge call Chris?
Girl, blink if you need help 😮😮
The plaintiff is nasty!!! I would get you in trouble too. You are very petty sir.
The plaintiff reminds me of a little kid who looks at cups side by side and complains because one has a hair more. Booo