Thanks for this comparison, I wanted the Mudmaster but having an even smaller wrist than you and wanting to use this watch for hiking and cycling I think that I am actually going to get the Mudman. Maybe eventually might get the Mudmaster I dunno. Thanks again!
Great comparison of the two watches, I've just purchased the mudman in rescue orange. I really do like it, basically it's like an updated rangeman with some older pro trek display features. Just wish Casio added a MIP display. I love a negative display but this one can be hard to see in low light situations. Still glad i bought it.
I actually enjoyed your video especially since you are correct I have yet to see someone else do this video I purchased the GW 9500 the other day NM happy with it excluding the negative display because it makes it hard to read in certain environments, but other than that, it’s a great watch. Keep up the good work, and I’m pretty sure you’ll go far!
Thanks for your feedback. Im happy to hear you liked my content 😄🙌. And yes, the GW-9500 is a fantastic watch. I’m curious to see what kind of releases we’ll see in the coming months and years
Good video I just got that watch yesterday somebody stole my GWG 1000 it broke my heart. I miss my GWG 1000 but I’m happy with the MUDMAN. I got the same one you did. It’s very easy to read.
The mudman is like the cheaper version of mudmaster. For mudman, The colour of the watches maybe tempting to some. But get the one with positive display.
great video! keep on going with youtube! Btw what do you think about the negative display on the Mudman? I heard it is rather dark and therefore not as easy to read as this positive one.
Thanks a lot. I appreciate the support 😄👍. The negative displays are imho quite bad. Very hard to read and aside from that it makes the watch look like a smart watch, which is not what I personally want from a G-Shock
Hey nice video man by giving a comparison between the watches though i don't own these G-shocks but i do have the DW5600BB-1DR(it's just a beauty with toughness) I love how G-shocks are so tough and are so technologically advanced the true peak of innovation not like dumb watches(smartwatches) anyways keep up the Good work man❤❤
I got the new Mudman on the way - It looks more like an old-style G-SHOCK - I prefer it. - The GWG-2000 looks better but I personally think is too nice to damage it... Great video!
Great choice 😄👍. And yeah, I also like the new Mudman because it looks like the old-style G-Shocks. My absolute favorite G-Shocks are still the Twin Sensor DW-6700 Skyforce and DW-9100 Riseman. I wish they would bring a re-edition / re-release of these icons.
Good job On you first video, i have the gwg 2000 excellent watch. But the new mudman not so much. Got one of the negative screens worst gshock designs ever went back. I was going to get the positive one but went with the gbd squad h2000 glade i did. best negative screen, visible in any light & low lighting. $50 Cheaper with many more functions. Very lite. You can change the face of the screen with 5 options one being a custom option how you like it to look! I hope this helps others as well in there purchasing?
Thank you very much for your feedback 😄. Yes, the negative displays are really bad and hard to read. A real pitty but im happy with the GW-9500 nonetheless. I guess there will be some more options in the coming months/years in normal display so maybe you can find one then.
To be honest I have barely worn it. I tend to choose a G-Shock when I have the choice and “need” for a bigger spirts watch. But I have kept it in the collection and haven’t sold it
Genau das Video, welches ich gesucht habe. Habe auch die neue Mudmaster GW-9400 mit Positive-Display und finde sie klasse. Von den Varianten mit Negativ-Display kann ich nur abraten… Hatte eine davon und diese war so schlecht ablesbar, dass sie sofort zurück zum Händler ging. Ich liebäugele auch mit der Mudmaster GWG-2000, um meine Casio G-Shock Master-Serie zu vervollständigen. 😊 Mein Handgelenksumfang beträgt 18 CM. Dieses Video konnte mir also helfen bei meiner Entscheidung.
Vielen Dank für dein Feedback! Freut mich sehr, dass dir das Video weitergeholfen hat. Ich hatte ein Negativ Display auch zur Auswahl und mir hat das auch gar nicht gefallen. Sehr schlechte ablesbarkeit, wie du auch schon geschrieben hast. Ich wollte eigentlich das grüne Modell, aber bin jetzt auch sehr zufrieden. Die GWG-2000 ist wirklich hammer und kann ich nur weiterempfehlen. Die Qualität des Gehäuses und generell die Bauqualität ist noch mal ein Stück besser bzw. mehr premium wie die GW-9500.
Ein sehr hilfreiches Video 🤩 Ich trage schon seit einigen Jahren eigentlich nur die GWG-1000. Da ich als Angler oft draussen bin und als Angler natürlich oft mit Wasser und natürlich Sediment in Berührung komme. Ebenfalls bin ich mit 1.90m und 110kg nicht so gemacht für kleinere Uhren😂😅 Aber die GW-9500 gefällt mir schon recht gut und werde mir die wahrscheinlich auch zulegen
Hello, nice quick comparison. I would also appreciate more detailed comparison with Pro trek prg 340, as they look very similar. Pro trek 340 seems to have the same features except for multiband time sync, and additional protection. And it cost around 250 Eur, new Mudman is 380 Eur which makes it 50% more expensive. So I'm currently considering to buy one of these, not yet sure which one is better deal overall.
Thanks for your feedback and question. I’m happy to make a comparison of the GW-9500 and PRG-340. The functionality is, as you said, pretty much identical only with the multiband. And to be honest, the multiband is a function you can live without. Do you generally like Pro Trek or G-Shocks? What models do you have currently? Then I can give you a better opinion on what to buy. To me the GW-9500 just feels more premium and superior somehow. But in terms of budget the PRG-340 is definitely a very good option.
@@uhrenglueck2587 Hello, thanks for a quick response. I have gshock ga100, gd100 ga140, casio collection ae 1500, and Samsung smartwatch. Now I am considering the more advanced model, but don't have the preference. Also, I like the Pro trek Nanga and Pendleton, but I couldn't find it in the retail here.
I opted to get the GWG-1000 over the GWG-2000, as I felt the original Mudmaster has a much better design and overall protection. I was looking forward to getting the GW-9400 to complement my Mudmaster, but I was completely put off after hearing about countless lug failures. Then I came across this new GW-9500, which basically has everything important the Rangeman has and looks much better built. But I'm torn between getting this new Mudman and the GW-5000U to serve as my solar atomic digital watch, when I want to change things up from wearing the analog Mudmaster.
Thanks for your comment! I had the GWG-1000 also previously and I still like it. I decided to sell it and get the GWG-2000 when it was released. The primary reason being the new material and the slimmer (LOL) case compared to the GWG-1000. Whats quite interesting is that G-Shock hasn’t discontinued the GWG-1000 just yet…
@@uhrenglueck2587 Yeah, the GWG-1000 is still available in some capacity after 8 years of production, which is very impressive. I would have probably gone for the GWG-2000, if its predecessor was discontinued. I do like the new Mudman a lot, but I'm not sure if its worth spending extra to get it, instead of getting the more modest GW-5000U. Didn't think I'd be at a crossroads over digital watches, but here I am. 😅
The GWG2000 looks very nice and classy on your wrist. I prefer the gwg2000 looks much better. Sorry but the 9500 looks like a toy. But obviously it’s what makes you happy that counts.
I personally liked the gwg1000 over the gwg2000 because it doesn't take itself that seriously. The new mudman has that same vibe and I love it. The GWG 2000s are pretty cool, if they are your cup of tea get one. Just try it on before you buy it
Looking to get the same Mudman when it will be available in my country. Just concerned about the shallow face as I feel that it's lacking enough protection ( I could be wrong) and the light button that seems to be at an odd angle.
Thanks for your comment. I believe the dial is saphire crystal, so it should be very resistant to scratches. But I see what you mean about the shallownes of the dial.
@@MrStirstir thanks! Much appreciated. And yes, you’re correct about that feature. I should make some notes next time 😄 before starting to ramble. But I just wanted to get a first video out there. I actually use the sun set/rise quite often when I’m wearing a g-shock or pro trek
They are basically the same watch due to the two having the same functions. They just have slightly different styles and designs overall. The new Mudman is based on the PRO-TREK PRW3400-1. Don't get me wrong I am a G-Shock collector and have been seriously collecting these watches now for 11 years. I have the GWG1000-1A3 Mudmaster and I have the old GW9300CM-1 Scorpion Mudman. I just wish G-Shock come out with a new and original design to the Mudman. All they have done is combined an existing design and gave it a new model series number. A little disappointed to say the least.
Mudmaster wird meine Uhr irgendwann werden. Ich liebe eben noch die "alten" Zeiger! Haben Sie suoer gemacht, das Video. Ihr Englisch ist auch echt klasse! Well done! 👍👍
The Mudmaster looks like a luxury watch ❤
Got the same combo. 9500 is my everyday beater and 2000 is a weekend watch. I like both.
I prefer the mudmaster gwg2000 than the new mudman..But both are awesome watches!!! Greetings from Brazil!!!
Thanks for this comparison, I wanted the Mudmaster but having an even smaller wrist than you and wanting to use this watch for hiking and cycling I think that I am actually going to get the Mudman. Maybe eventually might get the Mudmaster I dunno. Thanks again!
Nice comparison, this week i received the Mudman TLC Edition. Beautiful watch
Good choice!
Great comparison of the two watches, I've just purchased the mudman in rescue orange. I really do like it, basically it's like an updated rangeman with some older pro trek display features. Just wish Casio added a MIP display. I love a negative display but this one can be hard to see in low light situations. Still glad i bought it.
Enjoy it
I actually enjoyed your video especially since you are correct I have yet to see someone else do this video I purchased the GW 9500 the other day NM happy with it excluding the negative display because it makes it hard to read in certain environments, but other than that, it’s a great watch. Keep up the good work, and I’m pretty sure you’ll go far!
Thanks for your feedback. Im happy to hear you liked my content 😄🙌. And yes, the GW-9500 is a fantastic watch. I’m curious to see what kind of releases we’ll see in the coming months and years
Thanks for reviewing both watches..i think i will get both models for my collection
Good choice!👍
Well done, a bit more detail & comparison between the watches is always a good thing.
Good video I just got that watch yesterday somebody stole my GWG 1000 it broke my heart. I miss my GWG 1000 but I’m happy with the MUDMAN. I got the same one you did. It’s very easy to read.
Sorry to hear that. Hope you enjoy the new Mudman
The mudman is like the cheaper version of mudmaster. For mudman, The colour of the watches maybe tempting to some. But get the one with positive display.
Thanks for the comparison!
Thanks for watching!
great video! keep on going with youtube! Btw what do you think about the negative display on the Mudman? I heard it is rather dark and therefore not as easy to read as this positive one.
Thanks a lot. I appreciate the support 😄👍. The negative displays are imho quite bad. Very hard to read and aside from that it makes the watch look like a smart watch, which is not what I personally want from a G-Shock
nice video! I just ordered the mudman. one of more impulsive purchases lately
Hope you enjoy it!
Hey nice video man by giving a comparison between the watches though i don't own these G-shocks
but i do have the DW5600BB-1DR(it's just a beauty with toughness) I love how G-shocks are so tough and are so technologically advanced the true peak of innovation
not like dumb watches(smartwatches)
anyways keep up the Good work man❤❤
I got the new Mudman on the way - It looks more like an old-style G-SHOCK - I prefer it.
- The GWG-2000 looks better but I personally think is too nice to damage it... Great video!
Great choice 😄👍. And yeah, I also like the new Mudman because it looks like the old-style G-Shocks. My absolute favorite G-Shocks are still the Twin Sensor DW-6700 Skyforce and DW-9100 Riseman. I wish they would bring a re-edition / re-release of these icons.
The compass of what model is bad?
Thanks for the video in comparison
My pleasure!
@@uhrenglueck2587
I have no choice but to buy both
Good job On you first video, i have the gwg 2000 excellent watch. But the new mudman not so much. Got one of the negative screens worst gshock designs ever went back. I was going to get the positive one but went with the gbd squad h2000 glade i did. best negative screen, visible in any light & low lighting. $50 Cheaper with many more functions. Very lite. You can change the face of the screen with 5 options one being a custom option how you like it to look! I hope this helps others as well in there purchasing?
Thank you very much for your feedback 😄. Yes, the negative displays are really bad and hard to read. A real pitty but im happy with the GW-9500 nonetheless. I guess there will be some more options in the coming months/years in normal display so maybe you can find one then.
The Protrek has been on my wishlist for a while, after a few months how do you feel it compares?
To be honest I have barely worn it. I tend to choose a G-Shock when I have the choice and “need” for a bigger spirts watch. But I have kept it in the collection and haven’t sold it
Genau das Video, welches ich gesucht habe. Habe auch die neue Mudmaster GW-9400 mit Positive-Display und finde sie klasse. Von den Varianten mit Negativ-Display kann ich nur abraten… Hatte eine davon und diese war so schlecht ablesbar, dass sie sofort zurück zum Händler ging. Ich liebäugele auch mit der Mudmaster GWG-2000, um meine Casio G-Shock Master-Serie zu vervollständigen. 😊 Mein Handgelenksumfang beträgt 18 CM. Dieses Video konnte mir also helfen bei meiner Entscheidung.
Vielen Dank für dein Feedback! Freut mich sehr, dass dir das Video weitergeholfen hat. Ich hatte ein Negativ Display auch zur Auswahl und mir hat das auch gar nicht gefallen. Sehr schlechte ablesbarkeit, wie du auch schon geschrieben hast. Ich wollte eigentlich das grüne Modell, aber bin jetzt auch sehr zufrieden. Die GWG-2000 ist wirklich hammer und kann ich nur weiterempfehlen. Die Qualität des Gehäuses und generell die Bauqualität ist noch mal ein Stück besser bzw. mehr premium wie die GW-9500.
Well done review, subscribed.
Much appreciated! Thanks for subscribing!
Ein sehr hilfreiches Video 🤩 Ich trage schon seit einigen Jahren eigentlich nur die GWG-1000. Da ich als Angler oft draussen bin und als Angler natürlich oft mit Wasser und natürlich Sediment in Berührung komme. Ebenfalls bin ich mit 1.90m und 110kg nicht so gemacht für kleinere Uhren😂😅 Aber die GW-9500 gefällt mir schon recht gut und werde mir die wahrscheinlich auch zulegen
Vielen Dank für das Feedback. Freut mich zu hören 😊. Die Mudman ist eine sehr gute Ergänzung zur GWG-1000
Good video enjoy your new watch
Thanks 👍
Good job, keep the videos coming. We all crawl before we walk.
Thanks for your feedback 👍
Excelente vid congrats
GWG 2000 of course.
Technically I agree, but I generally prefer the all digital g-shocks as that’s where it all started in the 80s
Hello, nice quick comparison.
I would also appreciate more detailed comparison with Pro trek prg 340, as they look very similar.
Pro trek 340 seems to have the same features except for multiband time sync, and additional protection.
And it cost around 250 Eur, new Mudman is 380 Eur which makes it 50% more expensive.
So I'm currently considering to buy one of these, not yet sure which one is better deal overall.
Thanks for your feedback and question. I’m happy to make a comparison of the GW-9500 and PRG-340. The functionality is, as you said, pretty much identical only with the multiband. And to be honest, the multiband is a function you can live without. Do you generally like Pro Trek or G-Shocks? What models do you have currently? Then I can give you a better opinion on what to buy. To me the GW-9500 just feels more premium and superior somehow. But in terms of budget the PRG-340 is definitely a very good option.
@@uhrenglueck2587
Hello, thanks for a quick response.
I have gshock ga100, gd100 ga140, casio collection ae 1500, and Samsung smartwatch.
Now I am considering the more advanced model, but don't have the preference.
Also, I like the Pro trek Nanga and Pendleton, but I couldn't find it in the retail here.
I opted to get the GWG-1000 over the GWG-2000, as I felt the original Mudmaster has a much better design and overall protection.
I was looking forward to getting the GW-9400 to complement my Mudmaster, but I was completely put off after hearing about countless lug failures.
Then I came across this new GW-9500, which basically has everything important the Rangeman has and looks much better built.
But I'm torn between getting this new Mudman and the GW-5000U to serve as my solar atomic digital watch, when I want to change things up from wearing the analog Mudmaster.
Thanks for your comment! I had the GWG-1000 also previously and I still like it. I decided to sell it and get the GWG-2000 when it was released. The primary reason being the new material and the slimmer (LOL) case compared to the GWG-1000. Whats quite interesting is that G-Shock hasn’t discontinued the GWG-1000 just yet…
@@uhrenglueck2587 Yeah, the GWG-1000 is still available in some capacity after 8 years of production, which is very impressive.
I would have probably gone for the GWG-2000, if its predecessor was discontinued.
I do like the new Mudman a lot, but I'm not sure if its worth spending extra to get it, instead of getting the more modest GW-5000U.
Didn't think I'd be at a crossroads over digital watches, but here I am. 😅
Gshock watches are all super.
The GWG2000 looks very nice and classy on your wrist. I prefer the gwg2000 looks much better. Sorry but the 9500 looks like a toy. But obviously it’s what makes you happy that counts.
I personally liked the gwg1000 over the gwg2000 because it doesn't take itself that seriously. The new mudman has that same vibe and I love it.
The GWG 2000s are pretty cool, if they are your cup of tea get one. Just try it on before you buy it
Looking to get the same Mudman when it will be available in my country. Just concerned about the shallow face as I feel that it's lacking enough protection ( I could be wrong) and the light button that seems to be at an odd angle.
Thanks for your comment. I believe the dial is saphire crystal, so it should be very resistant to scratches. But I see what you mean about the shallownes of the dial.
@uhrenglueck2587 Hopefully they come out with bullbars for this model just like what I have on my Rangeman, thanks for your response.
Great review. I own both the gwg 2000 doesn’t have the sun rise/sunset feature, which might be a necessity if you are outdoors a lot
@@MrStirstir thanks! Much appreciated. And yes, you’re correct about that feature. I should make some notes next time 😄 before starting to ramble. But I just wanted to get a first video out there. I actually use the sun set/rise quite often when I’m wearing a g-shock or pro trek
@@uhrenglueck2587 you gave a great review regardless!
How often do you change straps?
For G-Shocks never
Mudmaster for me.
I like my gwg 1000 the best out of all of them. Mudman is cool though
It’s a great choice! Did you ever put the GWG-2000 on the wrist yet?
@@uhrenglueck2587 No however, I've seen them and they're extremely nice too.
Amazing video, am planning to get the New Mudman soon here in India
Great 👍
They are basically the same watch due to the two having the same functions. They just have slightly different styles and designs overall. The new Mudman is based on the PRO-TREK PRW3400-1. Don't get me wrong I am a G-Shock collector and have been seriously collecting these watches now for 11 years. I have the GWG1000-1A3 Mudmaster and I have the old GW9300CM-1 Scorpion Mudman. I just wish G-Shock come out with a new and original design to the Mudman. All they have done is combined an existing design and gave it a new model series number. A little disappointed to say the least.
id go with the mudman
Mudmaster wird meine Uhr irgendwann werden. Ich liebe eben noch die "alten" Zeiger! Haben Sie suoer gemacht, das Video. Ihr Englisch ist auch echt klasse! Well done! 👍👍
Vielen lieben Dank 😄🙏. Vielleicht mache ich bald ein Video von ein paar “alten” G-Shock mit damals noch Twin-Sensor