Neil DeGrasse Tyson - The Origins Podcast with Lawrence Krauss - FULL VIDEO
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- Lawrence joins astrophysicist and science communicator Neil deGrasse Tyson in his office at the Hayden Planetarium in New York City to discuss Neil's background, science communication methods, creating the perfect science sound bite, and much more.
See additional bonus content and AD-FREE episodes at www.patreon.com/originspodcast
iTunes: podcasts.apple...
Website: TheOriginsPodc...
Twitter: / theoriginspod
Instagram: / theoriginspod
Facebook: / theoriginspod
The Origins Podcast features in-depth conversations with some of the most interesting people in the world about the issues that impact all of us in the 21st century. Host, theoretical physicist, lecturer, and author, Lawrence M. Krauss, will be joined by guests from a wide range of fields, including science, the arts, and journalism. The topics discussed on The Origins Podcast reflect the full range of the human experience - exploring science and culture in a way that seeks to entertain, educate, and inspire.
Thank you for your support!
My mother and her best friend conversed this way. Their minds were running so fast and they both know the other so well it sounds like they aren't being respectful in a conversation, but to each other they are connecting just fine.
Krauss actually handled this very well.
Tyson is USED to being a lecturer. I have seen this happen so much in academics. Some PhDs are so used to being the dominating voices in a discussion. Tyson is OBVIOUSLY that, and full of good, illuminating knowledge. But Krauss, who is his equal, let his guest have his say and dominate the stage, as he should. This is actually quite promising for Kruass and his podcast.
Yeah. Yeah. Ye. Uh huh. Yeah. Yes. Wow. Yeah.
You're absolutely right! I love them both but it would be good if Neil let Lawrence talk and not interrupt his sentences. I love them both though.
Aria Law Neil is so passionate and lively I don’t think his brain recognizes inteription.
@@arialaw9456 Neil can't help himself, he interrupts everyone. Just watch a video called "Neil degrasse Tyson being rude and interrupting Joe Rogan", it's pretty funny
to be fair, tyson is the interviewee. he's supposed to dominate the conversation. i can understand an exchange of ideas if they were co-interviewers/interviewees but this is based on Tyson's origin story, should Krauss have an equal amount of input? of course not. he does tend to interrupt people when theyre talking though. overall i always enjoy krauss related interviews. i immediately subscribed to this channel and will be watching as much content as i can.
You’re doing a great job with these series of podcasts professor Krauss Interviewing one of my favorite scientists, keep it comming.
@King EVOII you must be one of the chronicles of judah's fans. I hope you realize what hes preaching is only for one race. When the better solution is about the human species and how to overcome our shortcomings.
They are both clowns for laughter, that's all.
Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.
my 2 favorite science people. I know what I'm doing for the next 102 minutes.
ew
@@DavidWMiller why are you here then?
Watching the video, you cleaned up and going for a round two?
David Miller playing with yourself while watching this?
They're my favorite alive scientist tellers too, with Michio Kaku and Brian Green!
I think that this has got to be one of the best conversations I've heard in years. This is something every science educator (or educator in general), science communicator, and student should watch. I think something like this would have been very illuminating and helpful to me 25 years ago when I was just starting out in college and working at a science museum. This is simply excellent.
I am currently between jobs at the moment and I found this to be inspiring me to look again at the possibility of finding work in a nontraditional educational setting. It has been many years but the only time I ever felt truly fulfilled in a job was working in a science museum.
Really loved this interview guys. 👍👍👍
Hey Lawrence, thank you for creating your podcast! You share interesting insights, and cool ideas, and with this format it allows you to discuss and elaborate on those ideas. These types of discussions give people new perspectives on a huge number of different topics that can effectively change lives, and that's just incredible considering that it is only a conversation between two people.
Krauss has his own podcast? OMG SO COOL, IM INSTANTLY NEW FAN
Enjoyed listening to you guys. I work from home in IT and love listening to science talks while I work.
Wow!! So glad to find this channel today! What a beautiful day! Thanks Prof Krauss
Krauss takes active listening to a whole new level with his “yeh yep uhhuh yehyeh mmhmm sure ohyeh absolutely indeed” 😂😂😂
Max Beamer Dude that’s totally me haha
You are spot on. Watch 56:46 - 57:20 lol
He has several programs running in his brain, simultaneously. One of the biggest TUMORS for Krauss’s brain is ME!😁🤓💡😁😁☝️💪🧠💥💥💥💥🎉🎉🎉😂
He doesn't talk perfect like ME
Koala Nectar
I was alone, in the middle of the night, in my lab.
And, You all were my Teachers.
You can’t hardly claim it.
What if You want to say that you taught me Astrophysics?
What if I wanna say that I taught Dawkins a little molecular genetics.
And, what if I single leg Kermit?
Loved the podcast. Can't wait for more.
For some reason I thought I'd never see you two on one youtube channel, and there you go... I hope one day both of you will get a "despacito" number of views.
OMG, that soft spoken opening. Lawrence missed his calling as a PBS radio announcer....
It made me do an audio only, to audio/visual double take by pulling my phone outof my pocket to confirm it was him. Doesnt it seem as though he's relaxed a bit in the past couple years?.. maybe hes less anxious in general having grown out his beard thereby masking his pockmarked skin. Just a thought.
It makes me wanna yell at him. I hate it. Just start with the topic please.
@@simplyhuman3982 love the name man. Really sums it up. Find myself saying it allot lately.
@@Bytrl thanks.
Lawrence isn't that soft spoken. Just listen to him outside this podcast, even in this podcast he isn't
Beyond proud to see these compelling, earnest, and deeply novel conversations!!!
I stumbled upon gold ! Now this is what internet is for ...!
Truly
Two of my favorite science people. Wonderful conversation.
Thank you both very much for the podcast, You are both awesome. That being said, great to see Neil still out in the world interrupting and talking over the host hahaha. Keep up the great work, both of you.
😂🤣
I just read all the comments about them interrupting each other all the time and how traumatic it seemed to be some.
And I gotta admit that I barely noticed it..
Does that mean that I do the same thing when I'm engaging in conversations with people?
Anyways.. great conversation guys!
Black B same here. Just seemed like two enthusiastic people having a spirited discussion, I loved it. I wish more people had passion like this.
It seems like you just enjoyed the show. Thats all.
Perhaps it stems from them being interested in what only one if the two have to say
Devils Advocacy Notice .... It can be frustrating to recieve only a partial answer to a question one has no chance of asking in person ....
So you liked listening to two clowns. Amazing.
Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.
The fantastic thing about Mr Degrasse Tyson is you can still see that excited little boy and he gets me excited about things too. Another great interview 🌹🌹🌹
Just remember, just because someone has a lack all lapse of manners at times doesn’t mean that the content of what they’re saying should be dismissed, that’s an emotional reaction, not a logical one. Somebody could be rudely explaining how and why 2+2 equals 4, you may not like them but 2+2 still does equal 4
Conor S you know what ?! I may agree with what your saying but I reserve the right to disagree with how you say it!
The lack of manners is an emotional issue for Neil. He's excited to talk. His eyes say he never sleeps. or maybe he talks in his sleep?
Neil, ever place a recorder next to your bed at night?
I think his mind works too fast his mouth is trying to catch up and say what he's thinking. 🤷🏻
Well , an important message should be properly shared
Both these clowns only have humor, not content.
Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.
Krauss: "...There are little elephants inside quarks!..." Now that is a proper sound-bite! LOL
Great stuff, thank you.
Glad to see you moving on successfully from ASU. I enjoyed everything that was happening there and look forward to what's next. And, hopefully you're still in the 'lab' trying to figure stuff out, and educating. Best of luck.
I'm going into physics next semester at ASU so just now hearing about him leaving is really disappointing. I was looking forward to seeing a lecture from him one day.
@@borodmislovich8239 you tube has many great lectures from him. Check them out, there's hours and hours of physics lectures and religious debate type content. But I see what you mean, a live lecture would be great.
A victim of changing times
What another great podcast with Lawrence Krauss and the remarkable Neil de Grasse Tyson. This is a masterclass.
Dr. Tyson, I have watched you and bought some of your books for years. Time went by way too fast. Outstanding, generous gentlemen, and congratulations for your expanding knowledge with many elements of contributions of sciences, religion, philosophy, histories, art, creative arts, music, and books. With the deepest appreciation and admiration for what you do.
🙏❤️🌏🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵
Literally no one:
Neil D. Tyson: Interrupts
In fairness, NDT is the one being interviewed, so Krauss is yielding to him when he has more to add to his previous thoughts.
Ivanus Prime
Flippin Buddies
My dang Buddies!!!!
Neither is bothered.
Tyson : lots to say
Comments : memes
crush537
I’m ankle picking 👀
He can't interrupt someone that says nothing. This meme is painfully outdated.
I would like him 200% more if he didn’t interrupt and talk over people at every turn. When someone else starts talking he just starts talking louder. Still a great discussion though.
Yep, you're 100 per cent correct. It makes DeGrasse Tyson insufferable at times.
This is one of those times it's just gotta be accepted, or maybe like he did with sound bytes and worked on that part to be more impactful for media, he could learn to adjust interruption. It makes him even more unique though, and it's always relevant.
Yeah he actually said is teacher saw he was a disruptive children.
He should stuck to speeches and lectures, it's apparent he's used to formats where he's the only on talking. Brilliant man, but really doesn't know how to have a dialogue.
thats what wizards do.
What a privilege it is to have both Tyson and Krauss talk for two hours. Great conversation. Thank you Dr. Krauss!
What I like most is that they both are very human, wearing their egos on the their sleeves, not coming across as cool, dry, elevated intellectuals.
@@AlanWinterboyegos on their sleeps😮....just wondering if the ego does take a nap😊
@@AlanWinterboy "sleeps"?
@@arlen1630 Damned voice text robot. Off to correct, lol Thx
@@TomHuston43 Damned voice text robot. Off to correct, lol Thx
Tyson is both an easy guy to interview because you don’t even have to ask him questions (sometimes he won’t even let you ask them) and a very difficult guy to have a reciprocal conversation with. Not dogging him or anything, Chomsky was similar...and I respect them both.
He is self winding😂
With these 2 talking I'm surprised this discussion didn't go till the heat death of the universe
Ted LeMoine Yes! Or about this dangerously military style dent proof, scratch proof, bulletproof armored vehicle for Mars, called the Tesla truck. Apparently it’s going to be scaring families and children on the roads…
coz they say nothing
freeze death... the universe is accelerating in its expansion. No heat in that Ted.
lol.
@@Sammasambuddha : Agreed. lol We humans have a body temperature at just 98.0 degF - really low side of the average of the Temperature of our Universe. No heat - No Warmth - hopefully we still maintain consciousness somehow.
Neil is gonna interrupt until expansion pulls everything to his cosmological horizon and he’s alone :/ still loved it. You have to be very vested into the topic and you can “hear past” they interrupting style of his “interviews”
Really well done audio and video in these podcasts. Excellent job.
I love the competitiveness between these two.
Mr Tyson's relating how he became interested in astronomy and what support he got (and didn't get) is for me the most interesting and useful talk he has given. There was a time when working men's lending libraries or public libraries kept a stock of books that would help any young man get on in any chosen profession. If there is no exposure to possibilities there can be no planting of seeds of ambition or hope. Today's teachers seem unable to direct or encourage self motivated students only to bore them.
The teacher that gave him the ad for classes at the Hayden Planetarium knew he loved astronomy.
How many people in the world have heard Tyson say "most of what I know is a subset of what you know" ?
NDT is a clown along with Krauss.
Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.
@@2fast2block Your a dumbass
@@2fast2block Okey. We already saw you. Now we can get back the important stuff.
@@dres4039 you saw what I wrote and totally ignore it because you can't deal with it as you pretend to only accept important things. You stu-pid lying clown, go act as if you're so dignified to other dingbats that believe you.
@@2fast2block Oh so you must have evidence for this supernatural creator. Care to share it with us?
I love these two with their incomparable intellectual energy and output. The third leg of the intellectual tripod, in my opinion, is professor Richard Dawkins.
ya great for closed minded materialist with a sprinkle of arrogance
I love two scientists having discussion about ambition, live a better life, than a celebrity getting interviewed about their personal life
A great discussion and thanks for putting smile 😊 on my face this morning.
26:42 "sorry to scream at you - I love it when you scream!" Haha this is great, great chemistry
Not chemistry. This is physics!
I’ll see myself out
24:54 NDT, "Oh, my God."
Talk about irony.
Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.
dude i love Neil but he ALWAYS interrupts , i would be annoyed
Why cause u loke to hear yourself tall.. being annoyed by Neil is super nuts
Yes.. 2 minutes in and it's nearly unbearable.
Dude, this was a battle of who went where and who did what!
because this is about Neil talking.
Take the words "yeah, yeah, yeah" out of Lawrence's vocabulary or edit them out of this video and it becomes much less annoying.
That time Lawrence had to moderate a brawl between Tyson and Greene xD
These two have such a great dynamic.. They both know that Lawrence is more versed in the field, but that Neil is far more poetic about discovery. Always a mild competitive tension.
I watched this debate, conversation, discussion interview or dialogue between you guys and you have a great chemistry! Some moments seem you are near shouting and beginning to fight and then you agree and make up and it's all fine! You take us out on a roller-coaster and this ride is amazing! Thank you both for "existing" and for being two of my favorite Podcaster, public speakers and men of science! Although my English language is very bad I hope you understand the meaning of this message! You are awesome men, amazing people, fantastic human beings and extraordinary in all senses! Congratulations for confusing and fill my brain with your wisdom expertise and all the sound bites and comments with random comments and ideas! GREETINGS FROM PORTUGAL 🇵🇹
Anyone else watching this with red eyes and a nice joint?
...cuz I sure am 😂
haha me too
didn't expect to find this comment
same here 😂
Well not this on this specific one, but on every other StarTalk video. Sure.
It makes me understand EVERYTHING...but when the high is gone...pufff...I m back to my regular non mathematical brain
I'm watching a comedy.
Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.
Two of the best brains in science of modern time.
Both with huge egos ( :) ), bickering everytime they can but both have huge respect and awe for eachother.
Thanks Lawrence for another great episode! I had a lot of laughs on this one! Dont get me wrong, but Neil, a wonderful person, shure have lots of energy! :)
P.S. I give Lawrence an A+ on his 'quarks' soundbite.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is amazing because he understands the troubles of learning when you don't have good teachers or educated parents. He tries to actually explain himself, his ideas, and how he came to think that way. I think it's a rare skill.
His point about soundbites really drove that home. It's something I have been using for a while when in conversation with friends or family that aren't well versed on some topics, but wasn't actually aware of it.
They should have a podcast where they just argue. That would be more entertaining than startalk. Love how Lawrence challenges Neil like a genuine friend.
Now I’m up to date on quarks. Hahahaha Love this interview. So refreshing.
Now I can't forget what a Quark is. Please, do that again, together, and on purpose. Make it a TV show, a regular scheduled podcast, or something. Everybody needs that. Everybody'll love that. Happy new year both.
"I love it when you scream" - Lawrence Krauss
Well am loving this guy Lawrence krauss i have watched lots of talks before in public audiences before include with Neil. But i have watched his podcast with J B Peterson and he has intrigued me alot., He his wise, rational, curious and very honest with his approach to learning. A real scientist. You have just added a sub
The "You run for President" argument would be more impactful if everyone had an equal chance to run.
Yeah! I wanted to comment on this. God he's so ignorant of reality.
Do you mean equal chance or equal privilege?
Umm.... Any natural born citizen can run. Question is, are you great enough to grow a following and raise campaign funds from people?
Mister Amesa inheriting millions of dollars and having a father who is a former president does not make one great
Whether you like him or not he’s the only President with an MBA (Harvard) so he’s not as dumb as a lot of people think
You both are extremely valuable 🌞
I'm just glad you didn't decide to put half of this podcast behind a paywall *cough* Sam Harris *cough*
Thank you, I enjoyed it a lot.
Everyone gotta pay the bills somehow
Ive heard Sam harris mention that if you email him and tell him you cant afford, hell give you it for free.
dont be mean to Sam Harris. he said he gives you a free subscription if you're too pour
Just found this, im so happy.
9:00 starts a good advice to parents.
love you both. great content
Lawrence is a super star in soooo many aspects
thats why he was friends with epstein. great guy
After watching every single video of Krauss on TH-cam, I gave up.searching for a couple of years. To see him doing his own podcast with all new material. 😍 Ty !!!! Dr. Krauss
I checked out Neil's book for those in a hurry and it was good. Touches on a lot of subjects in astro physics that people want to know about. But if you have seen 100's of science videos on youtube it's just not enough. Hope he puts on another book that is more in depth.
Hey the black science man is back! Something about Neils voice and the knowledge he speaks makes for such a relaxing way to fall asleep
I'm glad for Lawrence's patience.
Wonderful and amazingly intelligent minds, but i really struggle with Tyson's dominant way of discussion.
but but but we are watching this podcast to learn more about Tyson so... its just the way he is
Well Neil Degrasse - after poking fun at the 3 UFO videos - what is your comment now that US Navy has confirmed the 3 UFO videos are Authentic and do capture an Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, according to the US Navy . And now the US Army has signed a CRADA deal to study UFO metal samples supplied by TTSA according to all media reports = where are your debunking comments now Neil Degrasse
@@spookyninja4098 He would repeat that simply because they are unidentified does not mean they are extraterrestrial. Carl Sagan also said Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
@Ken Havens - Obviously Neil has not bothered to see the " Extraordinary " evidence for himself. Please tell me which Earth nation can build and fly a device that can defy the laws of Physics and out perform all US Navy aircraft and technology ??? th-cam.com/video/PRgoisHRmUE/w-d-xo.html
@@spookyninja4098 what did he have to debunk or laugh about initially? it seemd pretty hard to debunk. and metal samples?
You guys are a riot. I like the vamping and free ranging flow all over the universe. If I may make a humble suggestion: instead of just "The Origins Podcast" (Sounds a tad too serious) add ":Fun Things you can do with your brain" which is what this is to me, and I so appreciate it.
The interrupting is tremendously obnoxious.
Lawrence, I love your books. Still hoping for a sequel to the physics of star trek.
neeerdvaaaanaaaa!
A most informative and enjoyable conversation.
Its really annoying how the guy keeps saying yeah before he finishes a sentence
One of the better science interviews I've seen, maybe because it was more of a discussion than an interview..
Neil, STOP INTERRUPTING AND TALKING OVER PEOPLE!! Use manners my man.
Screw your damn manners
Krauss and Tyson my favorites, I would love to see Michio Kaku with you guys to complete the trilogy.
Loved this. More!
Great stuff!! Thank you :)
I watched a number of presentations on The Candle in the Wind Science network where I was quite disappointed to hear several scientist denigrating Philosophy as "no longer relevant to science (although it was the birth of Science). Philosphia - The Love of Wisdom, can never become "irrelevant"! Glad to hear Lawrence does not think the same.
"I love it when you scream at me" hahaha I've always loved the dynamic between these two
I am a big fan of both, Neil and Lawrence. That being said, one can't help but notice that there is a lot of praising and ego stroking here (which I totally understand: in the end of the day we're all thinking where the next meal is coming and how to make the job we like more secure)... I loved the interview/dialog. 🖖
Two of the greatest interrupters of all time, going head to head. Krauss interrupts and then stammers around for a minute.
Wow, Neil is so energetic, and I love how he dominates Lawrence's constant attempts to start talking about himself. Somehow this balances out in a very balanced dialog in the end.
Hey Neil Detroit has a statue of ROBO COP
It is very interesting to watch this two men have a conversation. I noticed the interruptions and overtalk. But the man is just too smart and has a lot to say. Besides this is a Podcast, which many others have achieved success because of the 'unstructured' natural conversation format. Keep it up you two. Thanks for putting this out.
How wonderful. I've bought books on the back of these podcasts. The Andy Knoll book about the history of our planet is superb.
Fascinating listening to this conversation
Good to see you back Lawrence, and thank you for replying to me on Facebook.
Lawrence is an amazing host. He knows he is above the average brillant but he doesn´t keep pushing it to the audience.
Great program! Neil, when you asked Krauss about Joyce Kilmer's poem Trees, you said "..what's her most famous poem?" But, Joyce Kilmer was a man.
The beard looks great Lawrence! Awesome episode!
1:18:11 "sorry to scream at you again, you making me scream at you all the time - I know and I love it, I know you mean well" hahaha
loved this show great job
These discussions are amazing. They're informative and interesting. Please consider getting Steven Weinberg as a guest. I'd enjoy hearing your conversation very much.
It has that fly on the wall appeal
Came to hear about science.
Went away knowing more about art.
This was good.
On the robot vs. human going to space, I think the reason why we get more excited is that we can imagine ourselves in the place of the astronauts. Whereas it is hard to imagine ourselves in the place of robots. There is a reason why the robots go first because you don't explore uncharted territory with people, you can't have them thinking something bad could happen to them.
So, in a way, I think it is the complete opposite of what Dr. Krauss is arguing. But I can see the appeal of his argument. We are very lucky to get to hear these conversations. Thanks to you both for educating.
I've wanted to ask Neil a few questions for years, but he's never answered me. Oddly enough, Lawrence promptly answered a question for me a few years ago which I had messaged him
Sound bite battles... this is a good idea.
Two of my favourite giants in the world science. Delightful.
Thank you for the podcast. Just one thing. Mr. Krauss, please do not interrupt your guests so much. I understand you want to input your view into the guest's answer, but we really want to listen to the guests' answers uninterruptedly. Otherwise this is great!
In 50 years something as simple as this conversation on video will be something cool to see for that generation.
As more listen to these two clowns and somehow think they're smart.
Neil deDumbass Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his crap at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to dumbasses, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumbass Tyson.
Dr. Tyson is really a thoughtful person. Great guest helped by how well you know him. He is so interesting when he is being serious. He looks at things in ways others might not.
You my favorite science\cosmology people!!!
1:18:49 Don McLean’s song is titled “Vincent”, not “Starry, Starry Night”.
very interesting comment ad answer interaction. i have a question though. with so many books. How do you publish a science related book
One of the best ways to start the journey into science is music. Music makes you study sound. Sound makes you study vibration. And vibration is what we are. We jiggle, atoms jiggle, MRI's resonate.